How do you actually feel about monarchy?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mfHrMnl1uLo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

I would only support a monarchy if I was the monarch.

Meritocracy > Aristocracy

If America was a monarchy Hillary Clinton would be Queen right now

Better than democracy. At least monarchs have more of a reason to preserve society for the next generation than a rotating door of childless politicians does.
Still is bad though

Only for barbarians and cucks. We need a full athenian democracy with public offices selected by lottery.

The ultimate redpill

This. All officials should serve short terms as well to prevent the inevitable corruption

who was the last childless president?

Best system.

This. Let the population decide their ruler is retarded, since the majority of the population is retarded.

I would support a monarch if their not some german imbred.
Or if their king bob

I really miss it.

>monarch
>elite ruling class
>somehow NOT controlled by the global elite

A living fossil with a crab mentality.

Just like Judaism, banking, niggers, and China.

That's a cool coat of arms

The one with the crown is Hillary, right?

I do not believe in a social contract, will of the people, egalitarianism, etc. etc. Most Enlightenment political philosophy is garbage, except those parts pertaining to free-market economics.

I would rather be left in peace under a monarch than be represented in a system that rips me off.

Proven to work and objectively best system.

ITT: 12 year old boys who take Warhammer seriously.

that is an excellent flag

They start out alright, but once they become leisured aristocracy, they degenerate quite rapidly.

I want to live under it

>kekistan flag
>insulting others for being childish

O I am laffin

This is true for every system. And monarchy seems to last the longest.

If someone posted Pepe with a crown, I bet he'd change his mind right quick.

Why would they need to be?

>that flag
>supporting monarchy in any way shape or form

Wew, lad.

>He doesn't know about triple H

No monarchy has ever had taxes so high as our "free" democracies.

It's a huge cultural boost and as long as they lack any real power and stay away from everything political I don't have a problem with it. Also thumbs up for everything the Swedish royal family does.

Arguably the best system
>king is linked by blood and by wealth to his country so what is bad for it is ultimately bad for him
>you can't corrupt him with money or career promises like all the puppets we have today
>quintessentially a conservative force
>quintessentially nationalist
>quintessentially patriarchal (unless you are some brit faggot but who cares about them ?)
>he doesn't raise to power by being a slimy professionnal liar
>was taught how to rule and not how to win a public contest

Best proof is how Franced turned to shit since we don't have a ruler while we were the most powerful country in Europe from the fall of Rome until the Revolution.

>an absolutely abhorrent post
>kekistani faggot

>the joys of representation

I want a Monarchy, but unfortunately we don't have any royal blood to support so the only way for one for one to spring up is either via gutter crown or a situation like the end of the Roman Republic.

In hungary it's about 50% if you don't have 3 kids.

Obama's kids couldn't have been biologically his considering he married a tranny.

Unironically the best system ever conceived.
There's a reason the Jews first made sure to eradicate European monarchies before pushing their current shit.

Monarchies preserve stability and traditional values, because that's how they keep themselves alive. They ensure that the leaders do what is best for their country, because the king himself directly benefits from it and most of the king's wealth will forever be bound in his country due to land not being moveable.
It'd basically fix all the problems with modern politics in an instant.

;_;

Fuck Masons...

(((they))) start making decisions for us

>falling for the outdated renaissance fair meme

Monarchs only deserve death.

>preserve stability and traditional values
Have you seen the current king of Thailand and his former wife? Entire countries have been destroyed by bad monarchs. It's playing Russian roulette.

Yeah with a revolver with 3000 chambers and one bullet

better than playing poker with marked cards.

>thinks they both have an opinion
>non-geolocation flags

Nigga, you can't be a Mason without being a monarchist.

You're thinking of a plutocracy. A monarch wouldn't need anything like that.

Why?

Spoken like a true communist jew worm

holy fuck that show and movie was entertaining

yeah and under king george the police, fire service, schools, infrastructure and military basically didn't exist (or were somewhat hostile in the case of the military)

Monarchs only have one goal in mind, the preservation of their country and her people. Meanwhile Democracies have one goal in mind, keep getting re-elected by listening to every whim of the "people".

Kings are like the leaders of companies who built it from the ground up, meanwhile democracies are the 3 month CEO looking for a sweet, short term return. Even if it means the end of his company. As long as he gets his bonus, he doesn't care.

>why?
Why serve some fucking king? Why should they live in luxury on your taxes why people starve in the streets and thousands go with out a home? You are ether a noble pig or the ultimate cuck if you are a monarchist. If you truly love your people and your culture, you would be a socialist.

In the case of american schools not existing is a positive thing.

>doubting the jews ability to weasel their way into being puppetmasters of every western nation
lol

"Politicans live in luxury while people are starving", you just described socialism you subhuman ape

...the stamp tax you asshat. Literally a tax on anything you wanted to display in your house.
Can't fire a Monarch as easily as a politician

>Nigga, you can't be a Mason without being a monarchist.

They changed their stance somewhere in between. They were responsible for a lot of anti-monarchist revolutions, but after seeing what democracy brought they went "oops".

Because people could take care of their own shit without needing to hand over autonomy to a bunch of overpaid bureaucrats and rent-seekers. All of the 'services' the state provides are garbage.

A monarchy tends to plan thing in a long run, a democracy in the short.
I think Hoppe was right about that.

based

Vajeera Long Corn. Probably a great guy.

I pay far more on EVERYTHING I buy because of sales and excise taxes than I would pay on a measly stamp.

And firing the politician doesn't mean shit if it's revolving door of incestuous rent-seekers.

>50% taxation is based
I could get the point behind lower taxes for parents and even lower ones when your children graduate, but that is too much in peacetime.

Monarchism/Imperialism is/are a mental illness requiring psychiatric treatment, drugs, and isolation from society until recovery is complete and confirmed. Or else kill the motherfuckers.

>muh democracy

No it' not
thank you

I think you are a retarded faggot, actually.

nigger afraid of no welfare

It's not really that bad, people used to democracies feel like they're a regressive end of the world, but it's obviously nothing like that.
However, being an actual monarchist at this point and thinking much will come of it is the pinnacle of LARPing.

>Thailand
Thailand is an asian shithole full of prostitutes what will you show us next ? Bokassa ? Don't compare european nobility to third worlders.

>Entire countries have been destroyed by bad monarchs. It's playing Russian roulette.
And all countries are systematically destroyed by republicanism and parliementary regimes.
Also bad kings rarely happen and when it does there is either abdication or someone else is picked by the royal family to help him rule (like a Richelieu).

>Kings are like the leaders of companies who built it from the ground up, meanwhile democracies are the 3 month CEO looking for a sweet, short term return. Even if it means the end of his company. As long as he gets his bonus, he doesn't care.

Good analogy, the main problem of democracy is that there is not accountability, politicians fuck shit up and they never have to assume their choices.

Typical commie jealousy (which is the core of your ideology) and lies, socialism is internationalist and cheer for the erasure of people culture and identity to make them ants.
Also egalitarianism is a stupid meme.

You're assuming that since those revolutionary day taxes there would be no more? You should be comparing Britan's shit situation to yours unless you wanted to conveniently pretend that time isn't a factor? I don't want cable so i don't buy it. It's a subscription. In Britain there's a tv tax. You don't pay it you can't use your tv.

Greed is in both places but instead of whining why not go gather signatures and knock on doors and work to change things?

it's the same shit all over again, if you chose wrong then you are screwed

real democracy should have law power to control gov decisions

If the collapse realy comes it's possible that a monarchy will emerge from the ashes.

im in for absolute monarchy

>being underage and post about political systems

imagine that there's no good system which will allow you to control those morons or stop them from causing global conflicts

The state governments started collecting more taxes and building up debt as soon as or even before they gained independence. A substantial part of the reason why the Federal government was created was to enforce taxation for the collection of war debt and to put down tax resistance, e.g. the military action taken against the Whisky Rebellion.

And I don't believe for a second that knocking on doors is going to make politicians give up their taxes, debt, and corrupt monetary system. The iron law of oligarchy makes it clear that elites will not give up their gains because they can always distract the majority.

•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)

So what I'm getting from Hoppes libertarianism is that it's basically taking a puzzle and positioning and orienting all the pieces exactly the same way a fascist/traditionalist would, but stopping short of actually connecting the pieces together.

Anarcho-monarchism united in Catholic theocracy is the endgame redpill and the highest form of society.

It almost always only works for one or two generations and then some faggot comes into power and fucks everything up.

I object less to the political system itself than the mysticism that often comes with it. It should still come with a constitution and other officials, though, gotta have some Caligula insurance.

Constitutional republicanism is number one. The US needs to reduce its democratic elements, your rights as an individual should not be decided by a mob.

He seems pretty degenerate tbqh.

The Siamese whipped your country pretty good in the 19th century. And they keep their mudslime population in its place while mudslimes are taking over France.

There are many examples for it lasting 1000+ years. Democracy had a good run if it lasts 200

I don't like the idea of someone just gaining supreme power over me just because they came out of the right person's pussy from the right person's dick.

I can't imagine my country without it.

>anarchism
>monarchism
>catholicism

That's retarded

Closest thing we'll ever get to a benevolent dictator.

However there needs to be a way to ensure the leader we get isn't a piece of shit.

I want to see a monarch take back powers from parliament in my life time. I guess that makes Charles a candidate.
youtube.com/watch?v=mfHrMnl1uLo

I support a benevolent monarchy as history shows it's one of the best governing systems that yields one of the best social and cultural results.

However it's once that benevolent monarchy turns into a tyrannical or malevolent dictatorship that it poses a problem.

Benevolent monarchy > all other forms of government until it transforms to malevolent.

Sure, but just because they held things together doesn't mean it was "good" or that even half the people were happy.

How about a monarch that can be voted out of office when he fucks up?
Like when 50% say he is shit he will get out of office and another family gets voted to become the next monarchy?

>Real monarchy
An outdated concept from before the emergence of nationalism. People were traded like a cattle between the monarchs and had no real identity.

>Pseudo-monarchy like the one in the UK
A bunch of dumb celebrities that are eating public money and sometimes they generate some tourism income. Basically useles.

It doesn't work like that. Britain technically has that, and has since the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution where it was finalized under the Rex v Rex trials which established the Crown is an institution, not a monarch.

But it isn't as simple as a "vote" - I mean a monarchy in theory is selected by God, and in practice, is born and raised for that role. You can't teach it. So who do you replace him with when the monarch goes? A guy off the street?

If it was a genuine king of kings
Someone with absolute compassion for his own
I wouldn't mind

You're 80% genetics, and a lot of you have
absolutely no idea the power of genetics

Nah, that leads to too much politics and backroom dealings since it would allow people to install puppet leaders like they do now.

Nazism or Fascism > Degenerate nobles.

There is no pseudo monarchy in the UK. The Queen retains the power to dissolve all governments she's head of state of, most recently in Australia in 1975 when her Governor General fired the Prime Minister in response to a government shutdown. She signs Royal Assent on anything that becomes law, and every single soldier swears allegiance to her before parliament.

Does that sound like a pseudo monarchy dishwasher?

>Being this butthurt when somone is insulting your favourite celebrity

I unflinchingly support it since it's the only real and effective way of uniting ethno-nationalism with the state.

>>anarchism
No centralised system of controlling your money, only local sindicates/clans/families/guilds/fraternities.

>>monarchism
All the above operate within one country, under monarch as the head of state and guarantee of their freedoms.

>>catholicism
Monarch is appointed by God and guards the faith in order to maintain social order.

>being this out of arguments you resort to greentexting