Whats his end game

whats his end game

Other urls found in this thread:

huffingtonpost.com/entry/grover-norquist-cruel-taxes_us_595b04fbe4b05c37bb7fde6f?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
archive.is/CeE6z
tampabay.com/news/business/economicdevelopment/study-obama-tax-hikes-on-rich-didnt-hurt-economy-or-rich/2301353
fortune.com/2017/06/27/seattle-minimum-wage-study-results-impact-15-dollar-uw/
fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GINIALLRH
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore_and_information_technology
fool.com/retirement/2017/02/11/a-95-year-history-of-maximum-capital-gains-tax-rat.aspx
pbs.org/newshour/bb/part-2-billionaire-warren-buffett-says-gop-health-reform-bills-relief-rich/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Delicious

Same as virtually any wealthy business elite globalist, make more money and accumulate more capital via:
> Open borders
> Free unrestricted migration
> Accessible tax havens
> Universal Free Trade
> Breakdown of nationalism and things that traditionally impede materialistic international business interests
etc.

destroy all the jobs while right wingers suck his billionaire globalist cock

Take over california after the US government fails due to vibrancy. Renamed Amazon State Service.

he needs a tax break

He needs Obama back in office so he can keep making money.

Hopefully Bannon doesn't get kiked out of power and we can see if he can actually have some influence and raise taxes on the wealthiest by a large margin.

Obama raised his taxes. You fight for his tax cuts. It's your entire ideology. You worship him. You obey him. His agenda is your agenda. You fight for the billionaire globalist elites. Hell, you even elected one.

If you buy it, you buy it from him.

Yeah let's see the GOP Congress vote for a tax increase on the rich when their entire ideology for the last 40 years has been cutting taxes on the rich.

Trump is there to cut taxes on himself, not raise them. Wtf did u think he was doing all this for?

Conservative Activist: Raising Taxes On The Wealthy Is ‘A Cruel Thing To Do’
huffingtonpost.com/entry/grover-norquist-cruel-taxes_us_595b04fbe4b05c37bb7fde6f?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

inb4 norbot

To ensure peaceful coexistance between mutants and humans

Please archive it
archive.is/CeE6z

Did the wealth of billionaires increase or decrease under Obama? See that huge jump under Clinton?

The death of Superman.

Raising their taxes a few points doesn't ruin them or the economy. LOL That's the fucking point. That's been the Democratic argument for 40 fucking years while you GOP shills have been screaming for tax cuts for the rich.

You're making my argument for me.

Socialism via Capitalism

So Democrat policies enrich billionaires more than the poor, yet we're the party of billionaires?

Sadly probably true. It's too bad Americans and conservatives/Republicans have been brainwashed by propaganda so much and we could never see a populist party rise in to power which would tax the wealthy more.

"It is striking to note that the best growth years for the bottom 99 percent since 1990 have taken place in the mid to late 1990s and since 2013, shortly after increases in top tax rates," Saez wrote.

tampabay.com/news/business/economicdevelopment/study-obama-tax-hikes-on-rich-didnt-hurt-economy-or-rich/2301353

Build the 4th temple to end the world and have Satan replace G-d forever as long as it means more foreskins and dead goyim.

Same as any Jew.

During that time billionaires increased their wealth at a much faster rate. Democrats are good for income inequality.

The economy does better under Democrats so yeah everyone does well. Now you're bragging that when you GOP shills crash the economy, everyone gets hurt?

Are you now saying that you're throwing away 40 years of GOP ideology and you're FOR higher taxes on the rich? No of course not, you will dodge that question because you're a GOP shill. You are ALWAYS for tax cuts for the rich. That's your ideology. You can't deny it. That's what you fight for.

I don't really see Bezos as someone that cares about money or luxuries. He legitimately wants to transform the world to his view.

You know what I love? You get btfo by me so hard that you can't argue from the right anymore. You have to larp as a Bernie fan who cares about income inequality. I assume Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are your 2 favorite senators?

I assume you favor Hillary's tax hikes on the rich?

You will keep dodging because you know I destroy you.

Defeat Superman

You're advocating for higher taxes on the rich. Care to discuss Trump's tax plan? No of course not. You're a GOP shill larping as a Bernie fan because you get fucking annihilated by me.

$123.47 stock price

Being forever in Elons shadow and staying a manlet for the rest of his long life.

>totally not jewish
>totally doesn't focus on money to get it done

Killing superman

you got btfo hard. yet again. why do u even try to fuck with me you dirty gop shill?

btw at least try to post a more accurate, less skewed chart.

you're done shill

you're done

I fucking annihilate you every time. Don't you ever forget it.

...

You sound like a total twat.

...

>The best growth years were at the height of a massive economic boom that remade the global economy and during an economic expansion after a financial crisis.

Really gets the ole noggin' a joggin'. What's next, water is wet?

>1 post by this id

Republicans crash the economy. Democrats thrive the economy. Lol that's my argument dumbass.

A world of slaves under his Jewish rule. Sadly he's won at this point.

You've got to be autistic to fall for that chart.

You've got to be a right wing retard to fall for trickle down for 40 years

Obama Leaf out

Ironic that that biggest blip at the end there happened just after Bush Sr. broke his pledge of "read my lips, no new taxes" and killed his political career and inspired Bush Jr to never make the same mistake. I guess tax hikes == more inequality? What no way!
Really makes me think.

criminally underrated

fixing his eyeballs

GOP shills arguing for more tax cuts for the rich

you can't make this shit up

you poor broke ass retards truly are cucked beyond repair you know that right

His endgoal is to get a seat on Bilderburg

K

>The net worth of the world's billionaires increased from less than $1 trillion in 2000 to over $7 trillion in 2015
I'm sure they all made that money from hard work and it's not all from destorying the middle class and definitely not riding an economic bubble.

...

I didn't know liberals on pol existed. I hope you aren't one of the insane ones that support social justice

Watch this. I assume you support a $15/hour min wage for American WORKERS in order to reduce income inequality?

After all, Seattle's unemployment rate is 2.8% and employment is booming.

Now watch as the corporate shills can't help themselves.

inb4 debunked corporate shill fake news study

The Seattle Minimum Wage Study Is Utter B.S.
fortune.com/2017/06/27/seattle-minimum-wage-study-results-impact-15-dollar-uw/

Amazon Prime watching you in every household

I guess you can't refute my claim.
Damn you got BTFO man.

k

Sup Forums are the fat acceptance movement SJWs now

You're arguing for tax cuts for billionaires. There are no bigger cucks on this planet than shills like you.

Bezos became part of an elite group of tech barrons whos only goal is to make crazy money by replacing human workers with code.

Once they achieve AI, or semi-AI enough to write code without humans making it, everyone will realize how none of the tech boom was worth it.

End goal is a world where communism is a must because there won't be any jobs between wealthy baron and homeless person.

g2g i'll catch u shills later

Suicide, I hope.

I was hoping for an interesting thread. Instead I got you, a fucking leaf leftist, sperging out and shitting up the thread.

Canada can't die soon enough.

...

fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GINIALLRH
Bush Jr actually did the best job at preventing inequality of all the Presidents.
Average GINI increase per year and total GINI increase over term
Reagan: 0.003125, 0.025
Bush Sr: 0.00575, 0.023
Clinton: 0.0015, 0.012
Bush Jr: 0.00025, 0.002
Obama: 0.0018333, 0.011

>Bush Jr actually did the best job at preventing inequality of all the Presidents.

AHAHHAAHHAHAAHAH HOLY SHIT

Right wing retards are now arguing that it's good that Republicans crash the economy because it reduces income inequality. Holy shit u retards have fucking lost it.

gg

I thought you had to go per Before you tell me you're back already, why not say something about the banks?

catch u later

u failed hard

It's now official. It's now confirmed. What I've been saying for years. Republicans actually crash the economy on purpose. Every fucking time.

Thank You Based Poseidon

GINI coefficient usually rises, only slightly though, during a recession. It remains mostly unchanged.
Just look at the FRED data.
Plus I'm not even right wing or Republican m8, why are you calling me that?
It's okay though, keep ignoring reality you can live in Narnia longer if you want

What the fuck, when did this happen?

You're bragging about the Bush GOP economy. You're actually bragging about the worst Republican Recession since the Great Republican Depression.

It is sad how badly you have btfo yourself.

Look I know you're larping. You're fighting for tax cuts for the rich and pretending to care about income inequality but your entire ideology is having workers earn as little as possible.

I have 1 question for you which you will dodge. This entire decline in income inequality. From 1935 to 1970. What was the top tax rate?

GG. Case closed. You lose.

Good luck based Poseidon!

Ironically also, more jobs is likely to cause more inequality unless you can increase the demand for jobs (and thus raise wages).
When politicans create jobs, they usually do so at a cost of wages (as Keynesian economics relies on so called "sticky wages") thus more jobs may actually create more inequality.
A labor tax (aka the Income tax) is actually one of the worst things for labor. Most wealthy people don't make their money from labor, they make it from capital. It's like you haven't even read Marx m8.
Labor taxes, which is what income taxes are, only hurt the labor class. You need capital taxes in order to tax the rich.
Even CEO salaries are fucking nothing. People at the top make their money in the equity in the company, or equity in real estate, etc.
By increasing taxes on labor, companies will look to substitute labor with capital, putting downward pressure on wages.
>posting data from French blogger
Can you post similar data from a legitimate source for data pre 1967?

As usual, socialists deny personal freedom and personal responsibility. The system did not make them billionaires, so your argument is not valid.

Al Gore invented the internet and Bill Clinton was the CEO of Microsoft, gotcha! The 90s tech boom was a result of investments in the military industrial complex being commercialized. ARPANET was started in 1969 and advanced for decades until being commercialized as the internet and the Dot Com Boom. Clinton was lucky that it happened on his watch.

You have to be a special type of stupid to think that raising taxes actually makes economic growth stronger. If there's a booming economy, then raising taxes will increase government revenue, but raising taxes takes money directly out of circulation and decreases economic activity. Even Obama temporarily cut taxes to spur economic growth.

>implying that raising taxes will allow you to raise spending to infinite
>implying that the government hasn't already increased tax revenues without passing new taxes anyways by hiding taxes
>implying that you can say 'case closed' and act like you've won when the federal government hasn't had a 0% growth rate for over 30 years
>implying raising taxes fixes policies which don't work like in california and illinois while texas is booming economy attracting people the world over
>implying raising taxes in new york probably the most liberal city on earth actually did anything to benefit it's citizens and didn't end up in the hands of tax thiefs, pensioners, and welfare recipients
>implying raising taxes means you get more revenue
>implying this would work on state level, which is impossible
>implying california didn't reject singlepayer healthcare because they knew they couldn't pay it
Your goals just shift opportunity from the middle class to the corrupt and lazy. Rich people pay the taxes, yes, but they pay less percentage when taxes are raised because of how revenue works. However, middle class people are hurt the most because corporations/rich entities can easily pass the costs onto them when they are forced to raise prices.
Do you expect them to just diminish their profit margin to zero? The government and competition already have them on the ropes in most industries, they can barely stay above water even when they're the best in the business.

>whats his end game

Obvious control the global supply chain for toilet paper and then have you monitored 24/7 by microdrones and sold as the truman show

Right wing retards have somehow convinced themselves that Based Bill Clinton is the first and only president to have technological innovation during his presidency. This is hilarious to me. You people are so fucking stupid.

Lol right wing retards with their most retarded meme ever. Muh dot com. Who programmed all u retards with this meme?

The Based Bill Clinton economy created 23 million jobs. How many are you claiming were lost in the first 6 months of 2001 because of muh dot com?

Bush had much faster computers, internet and "dot coms". He still crashed the economy.

As always you will dodge the question.

Also... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore_and_information_technology

Wages go up under Democrats and crash under Republicans. Republicans oppose higher wages for Americans at all times. Remember. Your entire cuck ideology is that workers should work for as little as possible so that your billionaire globalist overlords can have it all.

Also, it's hilarious to me how you right wing retards miss something so fucking fundamental about the labour market. Honestly none of you retards know this. When unemployed get jobs and the unemployment rate goes down (not a conspiracy), and the labor market tightens up, wages rise. Wow! ECON101

As predicted you dodged the question.

Last post. I'll catch u shills later ok.

I have 1 question for you which you will dodge. This entire decline in income inequality. (You)

From 1935 to 1970. What was the top tax rate?

...

catch u tards later

Obama leaf fag detected!

b sure 2 come back again

Never trust Republicans with money.

Enjoy capitalism to its fullest.

"Seasonally adjusted"

I.e. untruthful graph.

Please provide real info, and not something that explicitly states that it is untrue.

Currently unemployment is down, but there was quite a long time they reported 5% unemployment when EVERYONE pointed out that it was much higher. I don't trust these "jobs numbers" from the feds.

to grow hair

moonbase

Lol you right wing retards are fucking hilarious.

Jobs reports have been seasonally adjusted since the 1940s you absolute fucking morons. Otherwise you would have wild swings from month to month. Holy shit u retards fucking know nothing.

You embarrass yourselves with your stupidity. Unemployment wasn't fake just because you got triggered by a black president.

Quick retard! What does U4 measure? Tell me.

that's last post i promise lol

these retards keep drawing me back

That data is very questionable.
Census data for economic inequality stops at 1967.
Hence the data pre 1967 is likely fabricated by French blogger Berruyer and American journalist Henwood. Do you have a better source of data m8? Data from bloggers is not real data. So any pre 1967 data should be cut out completely unless you can corroborate the data.
Yes top tax rates were higher, however that isn't of itself conclusive, as you have to look at the effective rate, and capital gains rate (which was also higher, but not higher than 35%)
fool.com/retirement/2017/02/11/a-95-year-history-of-maximum-capital-gains-tax-rat.aspx
There is also basically no correlation with Presidential party and capital gains tax rate. Even Reagan cut capital gains taxes only to raise it back, while Clinton cut the rates and Bush cut them further.

Ironically also, capital gains rates were actually HIGHER UNDER REAGAN, than under New Deal Democrats.

So you're advocating for higher taxes on the rich and higher wages for workers to combat income inequality?

No of course not. You're a shill who is larping. You advocate for lower taxes on the rich and lower wages for workers.

And it's not just that 1 chart.

All charts show the same pattern when top tax rates were 70 and 90%.

But you don't want to talk about that because you're a shill who fights for the billionaire globalist elites.

sorry goy, Jeff Bezos isn't Jewish... neither is Bill Gates or Warren Buffet or the Walmart family...or the Koch brothers...nor Phil Knight

Based Bill Clinton raised taxes on the rich and the economy soared You're literally arguing in favor of the Republicans because they crash the economy.

We're done here.

this

funny how u dodged this you don't want higher wages and lower unemployment for workers.

Obama Leaf out

Part 2 — Billionaire Warren Buffett says GOP health reform bills are relief for the rich
pbs.org/newshour/bb/part-2-billionaire-warren-buffett-says-gop-health-reform-bills-relief-rich/

nice autism

>Jeff Bezos isn't Jewish

>Care to discuss Trump's tax plan?
You do realize that tax plans in the USA don't effect you right? I'd like to debate you on minding your own country's business.