1776 vs 1488

Which one is better 1776 or 1488?

Other urls found in this thread:

timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/Swastika-is-pre-Aryan-dates-back-11000-years/articleshow/53090079.cms
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

both mean the same thing.

1776 is literally 14 without the 88.

That is stupid, if that was true America would have stayed a colony because Britain is... was white.

>if that was true America.
>would have stayed a colony because Britain
That is stupid

the answer to 1984 is 1775
the answer to 1453 is 1488
the answer to 2+2 is 4

This beaner gets it.
That's why he's still in Mexico.

>Britain is... was white
still more white than you

Idiot, Hitler hated freemasons, secret societies, and Jews whereas USA was founded by freemasons funded by a Jew (Haym Solomon).

SO cute and fluffy little birb omg

tell me more great great great great grandpa

someone explain to me 1488.

Horse shit, my great grandfather was german, and nearly the rest of my ancestors were either nordic, Irish or a few italians.

1776 leads to 2017.

1488!

Google it newfag.

1776. Only autistic stormfags care about the other.

>lolbertarian
>calling anyone else autistic
TOP KEK

1389

14 is cool, 88 is gay

That is creepy

This guy gets.

Both America and Israel are enemies of the White race.

1 7 7 6
7
7
6

1776 will be nothing compared to 1488.

>That is creepy

I'm not a National Socialist, but I think it is beautiful.

The solution to 1488 is 1867.

>we must defend our skin color even if it means turning the world upside down a killing millions

Come on now it's near cultish, its the same thing as north korea does.

We must claim that race is only skin deep even though that's utterly retarded and no sane human would ever claim that, meanwhile our nations are overrun with people who are racist against us and mean us serious harm, wouldn't want to be called a racist

>t. BASED non white civic nationalist

I'm sure you'd prefer them twerking or some mindless behavior propagated by Jewish media.

It's probably a Jew.

1488 leads to north korea

Kim Jong Un is a freemason.

Natsoc is a cult. It's related to the occult and all sorts if /x/ garbage. google the black sun and swastika. They go back to india.

1488

>the black sun and swastika. They go back to india.
the black sun and swastika are indo european symbols they have nothing to do with india

> they have nothing to do with india

1776
freedom is the greatest gift this country was given. collectivists, totalitarians, and other fags of that nature can go back to europe if they have a problem with that.

I'm not white and I see nothing great about being white. Fuck off stormcuck

how do you know the extent to which a person's ethnicity or race affects their intelligence when you're unable to control for a person's upbringing when testing iq

> they have nothing to do with india
the swastika was first used in europe , it is not a indian symbol

1776 for me, but hey this thread is a D&C thread, sage.

Lolbertarian & Nadsock BFFs. Anyone who says different is a shill or just plain cucked.

>it is not a Indian symbol
The swastika was an Indian symbol first.

timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/Swastika-is-pre-Aryan-dates-back-11000-years/articleshow/53090079.cms

...

1453

, they just claim that the ukranian swastika is not as old as it is belived to be, but they offer no proof other than (((source says )))

>India
Oldest Swastika is from Ukraine and Black Sun is from Germany.

He's right found throughout Europe, Persia, and India but also in non European places too.

>Times of India
>Claims it originated from India

>
>Kike larping as white nationalist in order to demonize conservatives.
KYS motherfucker.

>Kike larping as white nationalist in order to demonize conservatives.
What Are Conservatives Trying to Conserve?

wasn't directed at you
Didn't see highlighted text

1389

>Kike
Not likely at all
>White nationalist
While I do like white people and currently white people are some of the best cultures on earth, that doesn't mean I want to remove any colored people from my nation or won't give someone a chance based on the color of their skin, I think anyone of any race can be a good and honest person, I've already met enough people of multiple ethnicities to be proven so, and nor do I think all white people are superior, I have celebrities and youtubers/viners to thank for that.

I'll agree with 1488s that black, asian, latino native and mostly middle eastern cultures and sub cultures are messed up, latino and asian not so much, they can be pretty cool and really conservative, maybe even more conservative and religiously devout than the majority of whites, but to say we should remove or even kill all of them for a bad cultural trends that could easily be fixed is silly in my eyes and destroys the freedoms that this great nation was founded upon.

The Conservatives that I am referring to are trying to conserve, or rather reinstate, constitutional government based on the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law.
You know, due process and all equal rights for all regardless of skin color.

Then why did you start another goddamned race baiting thread?

>Race baiting
How so?

so they are trying to reinstate a constitution that was created for completely different people than the ones that live in usa now ? and you think this is gonna work?+ it is based on the wrong idea that all men are created equal

>still more white than- *gets hit by truck*
fixed

It was never intended to assure equality of outcome.
That's just Marxist bullshit that retarded hippies have bought into.
The Constitution is intended to ensure equal treatment under the law. Nothing at all about everybody being equal in all ways.

So first off, illegals need to be deported. All of them.
Next, anybody that can't step up and abide by the simple laws put forth by civil society, has no place in said society. They can either be deported or imprisoned when they break the law.

If it turns out that there are "communities" that can't abide by the terms of civilization, then fine.Segregate them. But make it because of law, not because of race.

This has the benefit of allowing the best individuals of all races to rise and succeed and keeps the shitty ones in check.

1488

2020, 1940, 1860, 1780

1488. Libertarianism as a modern movement has never cared about white identity.

>Which one is better 1776 or 1488?
1776.

both answers to 1984

>totalitarian government is an answer to totalitarian government
??????????????

1984 was written about Nazi germany and Stalin's communist dictatorship, 1488ers would love to live under Nazi germany.