Why is Western Europe/North America/Australia/etc. so successful compared to the rest of the world?

Why is Western Europe/North America/Australia/etc. so successful compared to the rest of the world?

It's like these places exist in a bubble of prosperity which the rest of the world cannot match.

Other urls found in this thread:

strategic-culture.org/news/2015/12/09/soros-and-his-cia-friends-targeted-ussr-russia-1987.html
cloverport.kyschools.us/userfiles/3/Classes/308/Jared Diamond - Guns Germs and Steel.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Times_Group
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tadeusz_Kościuszko
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Kosciuszko
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Kovats
aaas.org/report/role-soros-foundation-disseminating-scientific-information-former-soviet-union
youtube.com/watch?v=rP9IW5a_tbM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Colonialism

Whites.

Explain Eastern Europe then.

Capitalism and high intelligence levels as well as the requirement of competition between European countries allowing them to quickly outpace China and other potential competitiors.
Explain how we were the only ones able to colonize?

It's shit because of communism.

Soviet union / slavs in general.

Steel

Not a very good place for seafaring and subsequent naval trade routes is the biggest reason, I think. Also whites of W. Europe aren't the same as whites of E. Europe.

Communism.

what do all of those countries have in common

Europe + USA: The best soils in the World, long history of peaceful democratic development

Australia: Natural resources

>Japan

How do you explain them having lower wealth levels than W. Europe before communism was invented, then? Apart from Czech Republic.

>Western Europe/North America/Australia/etc.

why are you ignoring the fact that the arabs colonized all over asia and africa?

why are you ignoring the ottoman empire and the mongol empire?

sorry forgot to call you a weeb nigger

>etc

check the map retard

...

>poortugal

Because we're White.

>eastern europe
>white
pavel pls

A lot of these countries have artificial wealth that only manages to survive through wars and only for short amounts of time.
I'd take back the old Soviet times of slow rise, rather than this shitfest that capitalists have.

>not mentioning taiwan and the other red places on the map
white countries are the ones you specifically named and they're also the only ones that have been prosperous for hundreds of years retard

>E
>T
>C
>.

They were effectively slaves under Germans or Russians for several centuries.

From 'The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Europe: Volume 2, 1870 to the Present'
Notice latvia and estonia were above finland and just below norway in 1938. So, communism.

>white countries are the ones you specifically named and they're also the only ones that have been prosperous for hundreds of years retard
dumb nigger. how do you expect people to actually inform you about the "etc." countries for which there is no pattern as there is for the white countries, which you specifically named. are you just a shitskin?

Fine, then we go back further. How come the Dacians weren't as prosperous as the Britannians, Franks, Saxons and Romans?

lol UK that is decadence

You were once the richest and the most powerful nation in the world. Now look at you

Yes, also notice how the first 9 countries are Western European and you mark it as special that the first Eastern European country (which had considerable Germanic influences) come in 10th?

I don't want to be a divide and conquer shill. Like I said here I think the primary reason for Eastern Europe to have always been behind Western Europe is simply geographical. Naval acces is incredibly important and it isn't a surprise then that the first Eastern European country on that list is Latvia.

They are allies to the jew.

Low average IQ and shit-tier culture.

To USA it's simple, they steal from the entire world.

Invade little countries to steal their oil and so on. That way it's easy.

Nothing lasts forever.

but it's sad nevertheless

It could have lasted until today if it wasn't for your left-wing parties and America

Communism
ex-KGB agents still run our country and the R*ssians in our country managed to elect communists to the EU parliament

Yea, obviously they weren't going to be as successful as Western Europe, I'm not refuting that. I just posted it to show they would possibly be on similar terms to Finland, Italy and Spain.

Those countries are marked over 100k usd in the op and Eastern Europe could have possibly had that if not due to communism. Though obviously not as successful and probably not all the countries.

Evgenij go back to Russia

Anglos are the most powerful race in the world.

Fuck off back to US, you NATO deployed nigger.

The most bullshit book ever and the most laughed at among the area's reasearchers

How many book did you wrote? Let me see your research on the subject ...

Slavs aren't White.

Ad hominem?

Do some research before posting bullshit here

Because you were more ruthless and greedy in the past and now you lecture others on how to be tolerant little cucks.

They were conquered by the Romans, who had a vast empire by that stage. I don't understand how you can compare them to them.

As for Britons, Franks and Saxons. Dacians were at a comparable level of wealth to them, prior to the Frankish empire of course, which piggybacked on the declining Roman empire. The Dacians couldn't do the same and build a large kingdom of their own because of their proximity to Byzantium, which didn't collapse until well into the middle ages.

They utilize the lowest tactics possible to keep every other country down.

Global warming, for example, is an invention of USA to keep third world countrie sfrom developing.

And that is not a secret or a conspiracy, but an open strategy that many USA think-thanks openly admits to.

Pic related.

>ex-KGB agents still run our country
Yeah, that's why our whole political elite and the local MSM constantly shits out the dumbest stories to blame everything on Russia or whatever local party has russians in it.
Educate yourself, you underage twat.

That book is laughably bad and is written by a man who thinks farming is the worst thing to ever happen to humanity

check out Jared Diamond's book "Guns, Germs and Steel" for a possible explanation. Also, there's a documentary about the question.

>Ad hominem
Isn't that what your entire post was?

>Colonialism
>Whites
NOT so fast you fingol and burger, me and my neighbour have something to say about that map

Stop shilling that garbage
Has to be b8

Nope, I'm saying that many researchers(mainly anthropologists) on the subject have already stated that this book is not a valid explanation for why those countries developed better than the others, I don't even know why would someone take this book as valid empirical data

>being this retarded
Ivan pls

>local MSM
that's because it's owned by the Swedes

>political elite
You mean the ex-KGB agents that got rich during the mass privatization after the fall of the Soviet Union? Most of the important Latvian politicians I can think of are KGB agents that got rich through corruption

>Ad hominem

I don't really think you understand what that means

Plus, you didn't show me your research refuting that book

Because we had guns, germs, and steel. Duh.

>farming is the worst thing to ever happen to humanity

Now I'm sure you never read the book

free market economies that are subsidized and encouraged by the government

kys libshit

So now you want me to babysit you throughout all of what is available, because if I don't you're correct? Wake up to reality

>>being this retarded
That seems to be the case with you, Bill.

>that's because it's owned by the Swedes
LNT and LTV1 are owned by Swedes?

>You mean the ex-KGB agents that got rich during the mass privatization after the fall of the Soviet Union?
Majority of those who've privatized and sold property here, as well as most of the industry, were the ones who started the shitfest that were "independence" movements, which were started by Soros and CIA.
strategic-culture.org/news/2015/12/09/soros-and-his-cia-friends-targeted-ussr-russia-1987.html

>Most of the important Latvian politicians I can think of are KGB agents that got rich through corruption
Such as?

The book doesn't provide citations and isn't respected by anthropologists, what do you not understand.

>So now you want me to babysit you throughout all of what is available, because if I don't you're correct? Wake up to reality

Not really, since you clearly don't have the qualification to babysit me. I'm just exposing how your criticism is fallacious.

Saying some researches don't like the book for "reasons" is not in any shape or form an argument.

They're all owned by the Rothschild's
They're pretty much all the same empire

His shilling is so obvious that he even refuses to argument, it's like discussing why his bible is fairytail, there's no way to argument with people like that

H O N O R A R Y
O
N
O
R
A
R
Y

I wonder how Portugese people feel, looking at that map.

>The book doesn't provide citations
WTF are you talking about? Just look for yourself ffs:

cloverport.kyschools.us/userfiles/3/Classes/308/Jared Diamond - Guns Germs and Steel.pdf

>isn't respected by anthropologists

So fucking what? Since when papers need to be "respected"? They need to be countered against facts and reason not "disliked" like a facebook post. If anthropologists don't like the conclusions... well cry me a river or right yourself a study exposing it's flaws.

That is true. Same here. Czech economic has risen because of political stability. They made a lustration after the communist brakedown. Those countries who didn't, still have problems now.

Communism.

Eastern Europe used to be very successful, though of course they fell behind during colonial years due to the lack of sea access with which they could build navies and complete in The New World. As a result, they lost out on a lot of land, riches, resources and trade.

Ottomans, ethnic tensions, Soviets.

The Polish/Slavic (Ivanka, Melania) bunch over there are improving your demographics. Without them, the US would already be a minority White country.

>LNT & TV3
owned by en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Times_Group
>LTV
owned by the Latvian government
>all other important Latvian media
owned by Russian companies

>strategic-culture.org/news/2015/12/09/soros-and-his-cia-friends-targeted-ussr-russia-1987.html
What a trustworthy source

>Such as?
Sadly, we don't get to know for sure, because the government is keeping the names of all influential former KGB agents in Latvia secret and always votes no to release it. However some of Latvia's influential companies are run by known KGB agents (such as Latvijas Gaze). Also, ex-communists such as Alfrēds Rubiks were elected to the Saeima.

This.
Less white, constantly raped by Moors, Turks and Mongols. The central parts of Europe prospered, the border regions suffered.
Do you have any proof of the Dacians being less prosperous than Celts or Germans?

>this delusional slavic supremacy
Slavs are not, and have never been even close to the population you are implying, stupid ass. Can't believe you dumb fucking slav niggers would actually try to take any credit for America's glory.

Well then just fuck you burger faggot. Good luck with your nuggets. Slavs are smart enough not to ruin the demographics of their countries, and also don't breed transmonsters, SJWs and other degeneracies.

Niggers, not nuggets. Even iPhones are PC controlling spelling, can't believe this shit.

tbqh eastern europe was worse at civilising itself and had given western nice headstart. Additionally eastern europe seems to be autistic kids playground with lots of shit going on there and limiting everybody's prospects for growth (Just look at how many countries there are younger than 100-200 years).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tadeusz_Kościuszko
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Kosciuszko
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Kovats

10 million Poles in the US, that counts for something. Chicago would be full of nogs were it not for the Poles. Their north side would be overrun kek

idk
(also post-communism,ironically)
it never ends

>Why is Western Europe/North America/Australia/etc. so successful compared to the rest of the world?

IQ matters, folks!

>owned by en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Times_Group
No wonder, I guess. We don't even have any real banks of our own left.

>owned by the Latvian government
Well, if you've followed the local news on TV, then you'd know that both are on the same level of making bullshit info.

>What a trustworthy source
aaas.org/report/role-soros-foundation-disseminating-scientific-information-former-soviet-union
There are many types of sources for this, the best one was an interview with him where he said it himself, but I honestly can't find which one it was.

>Sadly, we don't get to know for sure
So you've got nothing and are just making hot air out of nothing.

>However some of Latvia's influential companies are run by known KGB agents (such as Latvijas Gaze).
Are you telling me that Kalvītis is a KGB agent? I'd want a source on that.

>Also, ex-communists such as Alfrēds Rubiks were elected to the Saeima.
Yeah and such ex communists like Lembergs, who actually keep Ventspils a nice place to live at, in comparison to the same old Rīga.

communism
I believe Poland pre ww2 was the most wealthy country in Europe (mostly cause jews though)

>1
Ukraine is worse than Africa

It's not race, it is the product of Western culture which started with the Great Shism in Catholic Europe.
Orthodox Europe is something completely different. Communism also made the edges of Catholic/Protestant Europe shitty (best example: east vs west Germany).

45years of communism will be followed by 45years of reforms to fix corruption

the green and yellow countries had a 45year head start

the baltic states, poland, hungary, slovakia, slovenia and czechia are all growing 3% to 5% every year

also you need to look up gdp per chapita in south america and the usa before communism... you will be shoked

Interesting! Thanks

Because we've had a massive string of successes:

-inheriting the culture of the Greeks and Romans
-protestant Christianity which is unironically extremely productive and practical
-a degree of racial supremacy
-whites in general being high empathy, the best soldiers and the best at organizing societies gives us a lot of advantages
-being able to utilize the resources of the new world was a huge boon to our accumulation of wealth (though no we don't owe the natives or niggers anything, they weren't doing anything with that shit anyway)
-being first to industrialize gave us a century head start on everyone else
-never falling prey to a horrid Ideology like Communism or Islam (thank you Christians)
-never conquered by outsiders
-GOAT philosophers who literally invented science and education as we know it today

>you can't criticize a shitty, burnt McDonalds burger unless you're a master chef

Found the interview with Soros. youtube.com/watch?v=rP9IW5a_tbM
Though it's not the specific one I was talking about, but just another one where Soros speaks about how he was in the middle of disintegrating USSR.