Are most religious rules/proclamations like banning/stigmatizing gay marriage stupid and arbitrary...

Are most religious rules/proclamations like banning/stigmatizing gay marriage stupid and arbitrary, or is there some legitimate societal reason(ing) behind them based in organic social evolution?

Other urls found in this thread:

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/06/26/same-sex-marriage/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Monkey see, monkey do.

Feminists are destroying western culture more than gays do. The woman in your pic deserves to be raped.

Faggots are degenerate and shouldn't be normalized. OP is also a faggot nigger

Post more of this semen demon

>is there some legitimate societal reason(ing) behind them based in organic social evolution?
you have to ask?

ok pre op.

Have at this.

Arbitrary. The only people who obsess over gay marriage are either faggots themselves or heavily repressed.

Ok
What exactly is wrong/harmful about gays marrying? Also a question to , what's socially harmful about normalization or acceptance?

...

bump

...

was this written by a 12 year old? it's not even a good strawman

gays dont even want to get married. none of my gay friends have gotten married. they all kill themselves

swear to god if i met this slut bitch bitch in real life id knock her the fuck out

Only gay women and weakkkkker gay men want to be married. The ones with daddy issues.

>op's pic
The table's lines are clearly bent.
Bad shop

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/06/26/same-sex-marriage/

Surveys conducted by Gallup over the past year find that about one-in-ten LGBT Americans (10.2%) are married to a same-sex partner, up from the months before the high court decision (7.9%). As a result, a majority (61%) of same-sex cohabiting couples are now married, up from 38% before the ruling.

the power bottoms?

Hey, Somalia... Are you getting edgy again?

>implying religion has anything to do with society
you retards will never learn.

must be all the old ones who want tax benefits

...

>what's socially harmful about normalization or acceptance of mental illness?

Why exactly do you think that homosexuality is a mental illness?

Bost moar teddies OP. also, source name/ IG on bitch

Interesting, but I think pic is still slave of a wrongful distinction between nature and culture.
Beware this is not the nature/nurture thing, according to which certain aspects are ingrained whereas other ones are learned.
Nature/nurture is fine as a distinction.

The real problem of pic are statements such as:
>errors are not biologically sound
Now, it is apparent that these are not errors at all. I mean, they become errors in our eyes after we see them fail... But in nature's perspective these are just attempts at diversity, according to which a population tries all alleys just in case something goes wrong with the usual scripted shit.

>mental illness is any behaviour that is not strictly biologically necessary
Now that's bullshit. I would say mental illness is maladaptive behaviour...
Behaviour is wonderful because it is the king of adaptation.
Is homosexuality wrong? Maybe not. Maybe it is still "adaptive" in a weird sense. Not adaptive for the individual, but surely adaptive for the species.

>world is overpopulated
>suddenly, behaviours emerge that reduce the likeness of conflicts within an overpopulated species
>the biggest source of conflict is that between males. Women have competition too, but it is usually males who engage in long term violence (war)
>suddenly, behaviours emerge that are less likely to make people dangerous: autism, mancaves, homosexuality, etc.

Maybe homosexuality is not okay for one's own genes... But sure as hell the homosexuality of some members of the group may be for the best of the group's own fitness.

Just kidding. Found her, but her IG is private

retard. She just has massive tits. Every one in a while one roastie gets extremely lucky in the genetic lottery and ends up with massive tits with a small waist

Openness out homosexuality ruins meaningful male relations. The more visible fags are, the more conscious you have to be about not to show affection or physical contact with your male friends out of fear of being mistaken for a fag.

>Am i standing to close to him? They might think im gay.

>Ill wait until he's done in the shower. They might think im gay.

>N-no homo bro.

And of course, when men cant have meaningful relations, women who organize can achieve their goals much easier.

>some legitimate societal reason(ing) behind them based in organic social evolution

The human race has two sexs
the most fulfilling life is a life where these two sexes mate for life and breed
homo can't do that
homo is unsatisfied
homo then tries to have as much pretend breed as possible
after having a sex partner for almost every day of the calendar year, the void he has been trying to fill is the size of his engorged homo butt
he now has one of three options:
>kill homo self
>keep have homo sex 2 increase void(size)
>die of homo STD

homo think that gaining social acceptance will help, it will not, only conversion or
abstinence will help the homo.

Brief, the author of the pic confuses individual fitness with group fitness.

He says
>biologically 'okay' activities are only those who ensure the advancement of the species
>then forgets to point out what matters are gene pools and not single individuals per se
>a gene pool might expresses populations with some seemengly maladaptive individuals in the individual sense of the story, but whose existence is adaptive for the entire group

There is no right or wrong in this, unless you want to make a huge mistake and say
>my idea of nature should be the law of men
But that's bullshit and you are actually projecting. You have no idea what nature is up to when it results in populations with such and such individuals.
Here, of course, I say things like "nature is up to", but it's only a useful fiction because clearly nature does not express itself intentionally in the same way people express themselves intentionally.

If you have no fucking idea of biology, you shouldn't go around and say things like:
>All behaviours in which an individual doesn't pass his genes to the next generation are inherently wrong
Wrong for whom? Maybe for him, but not for the entire population.

And, anyway, homo keep popping out... But not just a result of nurture. No matter what kind of society you put up, at some stage you'll have men running each other's dicks together.

Now, that would be extremely maladaptive if the population counted a very limited number of males... But what the hell? There are 7 billions of us.
Yes = us. Because even if there are different races, we can still have interbreeding between them

Just imagine how unattractive this kike would be with out those milkers. She could've fed all of Auschwitz with those things.

Sup Forums is full of degenerates. I'm not even a Christian but the pro-morality Christians have a point. They need to exist so society can stay decent. Even though western society isn't decent, and is notoriously degenerate. Only 18 year old effeminate LARPers or older autistic isolated man-children think that everything is fine and we just need to post memes and praise le based Trump and everything will be fine.

She DOES have massive tits in RL... But, concerning pic related, either the camera focus is skewed or somebody shopped something because the lines of the table in op's pic are suspiciously bent.

there is no reason other than eww and muh jesus this question is a moot point

Your dick gets hard when a guy rubs it? What are you, gay?