Censorship is wrong in my personal opinion, even if done so by a private company on their platform

Censorship is wrong in my personal opinion, even if done so by a private company on their platform.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erection#/media/File:Erect_penis_shaved.JPG
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

That's a bénis

flag the video

>wahhhh I'm offended pls ban it

SJWs like you are the fucking worst

fpbp

its performance art

Jesus. I wish we could bring back some of the greats to have them bitch out these modern 'artists'. Imagine a resurrected divinci throwing out these fucks as Jesus did with the merchants.

...

As long as it's age restricted I don't really care.

Its jewtube
You answered your own question

rapeable af

no i think its just an excuse for her to roll around naked in egg yolk in front of a bunch of people so she can masturbate to the thought later

Yeah, but that doesn't mean we have to prevent it from happening... y'know...

>degeneracy on a platform accessed by kids is over reacting

fuck of you fucking jew, kike war now.

what about child porn?
shouldn't that be censored?

Of course child porn should be censored. It's an involuntary action that exploits a child. Performance art is not the same as child porn.

Same reason they push for modernistic architecture. To stop nationalism & pride & promote degeneracy. Modernism is a branch of Marxism.

To promote reveling in degeneracy & take society & culture away from glory & pride.

So if I wrap my feet behind my head and beat off into my mouth, title it "normie struggles" and upload it to youtube as art should it be there for everyone to see?

Well, the only way they could get onto your video is if they clicked on it in the first place, so I don't see why not.

so uh...sauce on the vid in the background?

what are you some kind of faggot?!

looks like a male and female to me but then again i've been here for years and my perception might be skewed

Sure, if they add a NSFW tag or content filter so that people know it's explicit.

But they won't, because advertisers won't give them money if they allow content that isn't family-friendly.

If you don't like it, don't use their private service that you don't even have to pay a penny for.

I think you'll find that this sort of """art""" is relatively rare, because it is still not seen as acceptable by society at large. Youtube is a business, they want views and ad revenue. If a significant portion of their content is driving away customers, they are going to cut that shit out.

Youtube doesn't care directly about viewers. They care about ad revenue, and advertising companies won't buy ad space on a platform they believe isn't suitable for their target audience.

Ever notice how you don't see ads for household products on porn sites?

Yes and anyone who thinks otherwise is a busybody SJW

>ITT sensitive SJW's get their feefee's hurt by a bepis in a jewtube vid

you must know some pretty buff women then user,

> penis not in the credits
That's racist, *ding!*

Certainly, but ad revenue is a result of viewers. They drive away their viewer base, their ad revenue disappears. The two are inextricably linked.

how do we get asians and mexicans to start voting for the LP

also what is your opinion of austin peterson's run for the MO senate seat, do you think he will beat mccaskill

>Ever notice how you don't see ads for household products on porn sites?

It's partly because people that are currently wanking don't really care about anything besides porn and sex while doing so.

You don't, as cultural groups they are not inclined to libertarianism. You can attract the odd one, but targeting the whole group is dumb. Also, democracy is dumb, so there's that as well.

>austin peterson
He's a statist cuck, but still better than the alternative, I suppose. Nothing substantial will change whether he gets in or not. Achieving libertarianism is not about changing the government. That's the easy part. It's about changing the public's perception of the government. Can't do that just by swapping out a politician here and there.

If they did not censor porn, youtube would become porhub levels of pure degeneracy, kike

fucking leftists bringing trash and disgust and calling it "art". Gets me depressed to see what is considered nowadays as "art"

I loved playing in messes as a kid too but its gets boring after you turn 5

i think group targeting would be beneficial, no? that is what the democrats have done and they currently dominate those two groups in voting, regularly winning 70-75%. i think we could win, capitalism has gained popularity in asian nations, i feel a lot of them enjoy the system but vote for democrats as they are an established party

i know libertarians are generally against grouping people, but i just feel that culturally it may be necessary to at least get them on board, and then further teach individualism once we got them.

as for peterson i agree with you, but i believe he would be much better than any other alternative at this time. i feel gary johnson was a massive failure this year, we should have got at least 5%

hey, butthurt faggots
check out wikipedia sometime:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erection#/media/File:Erect_penis_shaved.JPG

Hey I recognise that porno

>nudity=degeneracy
Wash yourself with the clothes then.

Fine by me, I don't give a shit if they want to drive away all of their business partners.
You have to remember that the free market is powered by demand as well as supply, and although there is PLENTY of porn on the internet, not everyone wants to see it.