India

[Sebastian Peterson]

How can poos explain south being more developed than them, while claiming they are niggers?

[Christian Nguyen]

bumo for interest

[Brayden Adams]

Northerners are mixed with Aryans whilst South are more pure Dravidians. The Aryan mindset plagues the north to make the populace seek individuality and hedonism whereas in the south they seek collective betterment of their peoples similar to the British mindset.

[Aiden Jones]

I thougth tamil Nadu was the only on mostly pure Dravidian andrha nad karnataka have been kind of mixed with Aryans while Kerala is even less Dravidian because of a shit ton of Muslim and christian immigrants from the middle east?

[Cooper Gomez]

Portuguese, Kerala is special specifically for that.

Otherwise, there's about 6 ethnicities in India, that's like making Spain, France and Italy the same country because "all Germanic meds." They range in appearance and intelligence, the latter being a good indication of human development.

Also, see that region just south of Delhi? That's full of Punjabs, they're fine and most similar imo to Persians. They're not poor because they're poor because it's inland and far from any historic trade routes.

Likewise, Bengali people (the ethnicity in India's pan handle) maybe aren't the smartest, but they become rich too because Bangladesh is built on one of the silk road sources.

Lastly, best Indian girls are Gujarati.

[Angel Cox]

The biggest shit hole seems to be the area between Maharashtra and Delhi

[Isaiah Gonzalez]

Kerala gets remmitances from Kerala's Indians working in the Gulf Arab States told by Indians in Sup Forums by 50th time.

Goa is a tourist resort and some industries, natural resources. low % Muslim subhumans and it's only 1,5 gorillion Indians
All Indian states have different population densities, etc..

[Logan Turner]

>port cities are more developed in general
Wow really gets those neurons firin. Moron.

[Sebastian Diaz]

Inland places are nearly, almost usually poorer than the coastal areas and that's almost only and exclusively because of trade. Those northern areas had good trade, as did Bangladesh and as did the south (through sea faring Europeans).

India was almost like the Britain making a mini-EU in the middle of Asia. The place is decentralised enough that one area is completely different from another, not just different ethnicities (again, 6/7 depending if Telugu and Tamil are different or if Maharashtra is considered an ethnicity or if it's just Kannada).

I'm not saying India shouldn't exist, but you should understand it doesn't really exist. There is no such thing as an Indian person, they're literally anything else.

And silk road sources.

It's not just coastal areas.

[Ian Phillips]

How the fuck is that supposed to develop Kerala if they are all overseas and last time checked Kerala has a pretty huge population for a tiny state at around 34 million which is more than all the Sikhs in India and their population overseas is less than 4 million