Think about it. Indonesia, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Lebanon, Malaysia, Singapore, Saudi Arabia... All those countries are Muslim majority. Combined, they make up 650 million Muslims. Yet, when was the last time you heard of a terrorist from one of those countries? There are none.
Terrorists come from war thorn regions, like Iraq, Syria and Libya. And it targets the agressors of such countries, like West Europeans and America.
Before America destroyed those countries, there were also almost no terrorists from them. Before, terrorists came from al-Qaeda and Taliban, which is based in Afghanistan after the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan.
Also, countries that do not get involved in wars are not targeted. For example, Japan has always been a pacifist country since WW2, so it's no surprise it was never the target of terrorism.
Do you think it is just a coincidence that only war thorn countries produce terrorism? Is it really a surprise that when you attack a nation, people from that nation retaliate?
The problem is that you put your shithole sandy countries on top of our oil. Otherwise, we'd just wall you off and let you go back to riding camels around and Allah Ackbaring each other's heads off.
They're simply behaving as they have since the very beginning.
Mason Scott
Japan doesn't have terrorist attacks because they don't let you cunts in.
Jace Collins
Deus Vult from all sides your time on is coming to An end.
Kayden Roberts
Mohammed was a pedophile Retard.
Evan Gutierrez
Not one intelligent reply. The extent of Sup Forums's intelligence. Fools.
Robert Lee
...
Liam Reed
Fuck, I'm an atheist and I'd like to Deus Vult those goatfucking motherfuckers.
Oliver Rivera
Explain the difference between this: And what you are suggesting. Are you really on the "good" side?
Grayson Nguyen
Mudshits stole Christian lands, they deserve all the fear and misery we can give them
Julian Gray
It's a well-understood fact known to anyone who's put even a little bit of thought into things. Islam has about as much to do with modern terrorism as anarchist philosophy has to do with 1890's bomb-throwers. Both are used as excuses for actions. CONVENIENT excuses, because both ideologies ARE rooted in conquest/revolution respectively, but excuses nonetheless.
Wyatt Torres
I'm not religious and Muslims are creepy morons. Most are so fanatic and brainwashed - maybe it comes with all the inbreeding.
Ian Rodriguez
Last time you people tried to come up here to make rapebabies, you ended up downing and never dared to come again.
Angel Miller
I'm suggesting that we tend to be a lot more civilized to each other than Muslims, who practice honor killings, stonings, blow each other up, and have kids with their 1st cousins all the time. I'm also suggesting that oil means that there will be interactions between the rest of the world and the Muslim world, and the differences are bound to lead to conflict. I would also add that the West does not yet understand that there are only two viable strategies with the MENA: 1) Steer clear of it, or 2) Level the entire fucking region.
You are as civilized as the environment around you.
What makes you think when the chips are down, you won't be uncivilized like them?
If you think might is right(and i agree), very well.
But after subjecting them to this might, do not expect them to be civil.
Owen Barnes
Just check for any slavic history of dealing with ottoman empire, this is just Slovenians and Croats.
Anthony Myers
...
Lincoln King
>What makes you think when the chips are down, you won't be uncivilized like them?
I know I would be uncivilized if I were thrown into a situation where everybody around me was uncivilized because I don't want to die. But, in day to day life, we tend to not apply the harshest aspects of Sharia law here. Even if it isn't oil bound to the US, if a significant portion of the world's oil supply stops flowing all of a sudden, the US is fucked in a people starving in the streets kind of way. Go back to my comment about two ways to deal with the MENA to put that into context. There used to be a third way, and that was ensuring that strong man dictators ran a tight ship who at least weren't violently hostile towards us, but we've already burned that bridge with Gaddafi, Saddam, Assad and the Shah of Iran.
Jayden Ward
>You are as civilized as the environment around you.
what if this was the case, there would never be any civilization at all
Leo Flores
>we tend to not apply the harshest aspects of Sharia law here Assuming there is stability in the region, do Sharia Law really concern you? Though i agree it is a somewhat lower-level culture. > Even if it isn't oil bound to the US, if a significant portion of the world's oil supply stops flowing all of a sudden, the US is fucked in a people starving in the streets kind of way. cnbc.com/2016/07/05/us-oil-reserves-surpass-those-of-saudi-arabia-and-russia.html You think? > Gaddafi, Saddam, Assad and the Shah of Iran I think those leaders share a common point...like intervention.
Environment was/is such that it allowed/allows civilization to flourish(to this extend, at least), no?
