Feb 22, 2015 -- Podesta's "make an example of leaker" email was sent July 10, 2016 -- Seth Rich murdered July 22, 2016 -- Wikileaks published the leaked emails
What leak is Podesta referring to? Obviously he can't be refering to the DNC leak since this email is part of said leak, so what other leak did he want to punish someone for?
Damn guess nobody is following this story anymore? Did it get completely disproven or something?
Bentley Nguyen
no new evidence.. dc police covering up facts
Noah Clark
bump.. I've asked the same question before and haven't yet seen any suggestions.
Juan Long
DNC leak was way before this summer. Look up Amy Dacey, (CEO of DNC) in wikileaks.
Joseph Cox
bump
Elijah Bennett
"Make an example"... Take it in the full context. He wasn't taking about whacking anyone. I don't doubt that he would, but he wasn't talking about it here
Daniel Martin
unless wikileaks had the leaked emails all the way back in february but simply didn't release them right away, and podesta found out about it, then spent the next few months planning how to kill Seth.
Jacob Ramirez
Right, but the question remains what leak what was he referring to?
Nicholas Hill
1/2
Joseph Williams
>Make an example of him >Some idiot henchman takes it too literally
Not impossible
Isaiah Cruz
2/2
Matthew Young
>"Make an example"... Take it in the full context. He wasn't taking about whacking anyone
Exactly what was he talking about? What punishment did he and the DNC have the right to give out?
On Feb 21, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Joel Benenson wrote: > > But this is by far the most damaging story and most damaging type of > story we can have. > > > > The press will love writing these. I did when I was a reporter. > > > > I think we need a paradigm shift in how this world operates we have to > convince HRC and probably WJC that her meeting with 200 people doesn’t > help her. Hiring corporate wizards has never been a successful strategy in > campaigns. And anyone whose name is in the paper 48 hours after they meet > with her needs to be cut off completely from her campaign. . > > > > Almost everyone on this team that has been assembled has been busting > their tail to make this work and to work against this kind of stuff and > it’s going to get demoralizing in a hurry. > > > > I’m open to all and any alternatives on how to truly solve this but I > really feel that when she is back from CA we have to solve this. > > > > Thanks, > > Joel > > > > > > > washingtonpost.com/politics/the-making-of-hillary-50-marketing-wizards-help-reimagine-clinton-brand/2015/02/21/bfb01120-b919-11e4-aa05-1ce812b3fdd2_story.html
> published by WikiLeaks on July 22, 2016. This collection included 19,252 emails and 8,034 attachments from the DNC, the governing body of the United States' Democratic Party.[1] The leak includes emails from seven key DNC staff members, and date from January 2015 to May 2016
What leak are you talking about?
Eli Rodriguez
Also lol at "this is the worst kind of story" ... If only they knew what was in store
Cameron Myers
THANK YOU, finally someone with an answer. So that line establishes very little in relation to Seth Rich, otherwise than a hard stance on leakers
William Hill
>Firing staffers
How is that setting an example? He said leaks like this are 'illegal.' Of course he would fire them.
Why wouldn't someone be fired after leaking sensitive information? Do you think someone selling trade secrets for a huge company wouldn't be fired for selling secrets?
Are you actually Podesta?
Lincoln Hall
Correct, but It does establish motive. They were clearly fed up with "anonymous sources" in the press and felt they were the reason Hillary was doing bad in internal polls.
Nathan Price
ok thx. pretty boring.
Charles Russell
You think you're hot shit, dontcha?
Xavier Gonzalez
See the screenshot from this post
Robert Reed
the Skippy thing was debunked too. We should shed quickly the memes that are not valid/relevant. Pizzagate is real af but there's a lot of junk being piled on.