For one thing, we can cross-reference the actual authors from the Wikileaks dump. 1.doc is in the "verified" Wikileaks release as the attachment which can be downloaded from here which has the original author of "Lauren Dillon." So, wait, who is Warren Flood et al? Each of these documents had a creation date of June 15, and were modified by "Фeликc Эдмyндoвич" a few minutes later.
In Office 2007 format specification, there is a certain stylesheet template which dictates overall formatting for the document. In three of the documents by Warren Flood, we find the identical metadata.
The above line appears across all three of Warren Flood's documents. styrsid11758497 is an unique identifier that is session-associative. The fact that it does not appear in the other documents indicates it's associated with Warren Flood and not Фeликc Эдмyндoвич.
Why is this important? Well, the \langfe1049 portion is a setting saying that Russian language should be used as the default language for the document.
Had Фeликc Эдмyндoвич been setting the "watermark," it would be the same across all documents. But instead, distinct watermarks were created for each document creator, suggesting inconsistent application or three different creators applying their own watermark. In other words, document creators set the document properties to use Russian language and created three distinct so-called 'watermarks' in doing so, not 'Фeликc Эдмyндoвич.'
Also, cross-reference to Wikileaks shows that Warren Flood did not author any of the documents. And given that the timestamps are all on June 15th, this is the sequence of events:
A worker using a computer registered to Warren Flood opens a DNC document, copies it, and pastes it as a new document to his computer. A worker using a computer registered to Warren Flood sets the theme language to Russian in some way (this process is different for all authors). A worker using a computer registered to Warren Flood modifies the document's author to Фeликc Эдмyндoвич. The modified document is then uploaded to the Guccifer website and publicly published a short time thereafter.
Aaron Price
Who is Warren Flood? Warren Flood is a high-ranking technology official for Democratic operatives, having worked for Obama for America, DNC, and Joe Biden. It's a unique name.
His name does not appear in any of the Wikileaks emails, meaning that he appears to be a third party as far as the DNC email leaks are concerned.
Other than his (professional Internet) profile, he is a virtual social media ghost, never having made any Tweets nor any evidence of real social media activity.
The pertinent point is that: the metadata forensic proof is irrefutable that Warren Flood, or someone who used a copy of Word registered to Warren Flood, shoehorned in obvious "Russian" fingerprints all over the documents.
UPDATE (5/27): The owner of g-2.space suggests it was not Warren Flood who personally did poisoning of document with Russian metadata, but a far more sinister agent of DNC using Word applications registered to him, possibly for the express purpose of creating rationale for unmasking: g-2.space/jb/
Guccifer 2.0 is none other than a botched DNC creation to create a false flag for Russia.
Daniel Hall
Impact of Guccifer 2.0 being a DNC creation The "Russian influenced the US election" campaign all started from the DNC leak.
Allegations of Russian influence was built on a completely fabricated foundation of lies.
In hindsight, we now know that Obama administration unmasking of US campaign officials on the pretext of "Russian interference" started in June 2016, same date as when Guccifer 2.0 began. The implications that the unmasking all was predicated on a DNC psy-ops is staggering.
Who cares why the DNC did it? Because it proves that "Russian interference" started as a total DNC fabrication that persists to today. The whole Russian campaign started before Trump made his infamous joke about Russians getting Hillary’s emails.
Illegal unmasking of Trump campaign officials over Russian interference began June 2016. Was this predicated on Russian interference with the DNC hacks? If so, this means that the leaks not only implicate DNC and plague President Trump himself, but also implicates Obama administration officials and all the involved intelligence agencies.
Why did DNC leak their own documents? It’s right in Guccifer 2.0’s blog. Pertinent quote: "The main part of the papers, thousands of files and mails, I gave to Wikileaks. They will publish them soon." The DNC knew they were having their documents leaked to Wikileaks, and wanted to make sure a Russian hacker took credit for the leaks.
How did the DNC know Wikileaks was going to release the DNC emails? Great question. It’s hard to imagine them knowing without assistance from intelligence agencies – and indeed unmasking of campaign officials started in June 2016.
This is, of course, highly illegal, and would mean that the Russian disinformation campaign wasn’t just a DNC operation, it was also created from collusion with the Obama administration using highly illegal means including violations of the Fourth Amendment.
Christopher Watson
Since Guccifer 2.0 was a botched operation, that might make the continued existence of the real leaker who might draw scrutiny that much more precarious…
What about Crowdstrike report? The metadata I described above can be independently verified by a non-technical person with access to any text editor like vim (which is available on Mac OS terminal command line). It does not require special forsenic analysis to identify. There are only two explanations: staggering incompetence, or DNC collusion.
I cannot say if Crowdstrike is competent, but I can say that their co-founder and CTO, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow with the Atlantic Council, a think tank whose policies could be termed as anti-protectionist.
Aiden Diaz
Who leaked the DNC emails to Wikileaks? In short, all circumstantial evidence points to Seth Rich.
Seth Rich was killed on July 10, after the Guccifer drops and before the Wikileaks release. Wikileaks offered a 20,000 reward for information on Seth Rich’s death.
Craig Murray, a British national connected with Wikileaks, claims a disgusted Democrat insider was the leaker and he personally flew overseas to meet one of those connected.
Was Seth Rich murdered by the DNC? We are getting in speculative territory here. The circumstances of his death are suspicious – there had never been a homicide prior or after in his area. The assailants did not steal any of his valuables. Furthermore, Seth was on the phone with his girlfriend at the time of his death and is allegedly to have ended the conversation with "I have to go," which is an unusually calm thing to say at a gunpoint robbery.
Conspiracy theorists assume Seth Rich was murdered by the DNC to "set an example." Personally, I think that as long as Seth Rich existed, he could have spoken up as the leaker at any moment and drawn scrutiny to Guccifer 2.0 being a DNC operation. To our knowledge, the unmasking of Trump and related officials started in June 2016 using the DNC hacks as a pretext. Seth Rich’s continued existence could have lead to the fall of the White House and intelligence agencies.
Is that motive enough for a political hit? You tell me.
Landon Gray
But what if the child consents?
Xavier Jones
You sick fuck.
Nicholas Rogers
Hillary's server had spyware installed on it.
"With each new WikiLeaks dump, the rabbit hole in the feud between Chelsea Clinton and Doug Band seems to grow a little deeper. The most recent disclosures included a November 11, 2011 email from Chelsea to John Podesta, Cheryl Mills and the Clinton Foundation lawyers at Simpson Thacher in which Chelsea clearly lists out her issues with Clinton aides Doug Band, Justin Cooper and someone referred to only as "Hannah," which is presumably Hannah Deletto, Director of Membership at the Clinton Foundation. Among other things, the email alleges that Justin Cooper installed spyware on Bill Clinton's computer in order to monitor his email traffic, that both Justin Cooper and Hannah Deletto stole "significant sums of money" from the Clintons and that Doug Band / Teneo "hustled business at CGI."
Mr. Justin G. Cooper served as a Senior Advisor to Teneo Holdings and Decision Sciences Corporation until December 22, 2016. Mr. Cooper served as Senior Advisor to President William J. Clinton
This is a much more concise version of op's novel. Still, thank you op for posting interesting and relevant knowledge.
Christopher Morgan
...
Justin Carter
Bump
Mason Smith
...
Alexander Hill
Nice. Thanks user.
Consider how compromised the Republicans and FBI elements must be that they won't dare to dig. How much pedophilia can possibly be occurring? Is it a prerequisite these days in politics, GS, and NGO? I know media it has always been, but seriously? What a demonic nation we have become.
Luke Garcia
>The DNC was not hacked. I will prove it this data came out back in April. I'm happy someone is spreading it again.
Isaac Johnson
...
Jack Wood
We need to do a better job of disseminating it. We would do well to post it in full multiple times a day in multiple platforms.
Benjamin Cook
...
Kayden Hall
Excellent.
Caleb Barnes
Far, far more often, please.
Nathaniel Wilson
...
Jayden Adams
Robert Mueller, who as U.S. Attorney headed the Noriega (a related Iran-Contra inquiry) and the BCCI investigations, found no evidence pointing to illegal behavior by George H.W. Bush. His subsequent investigation into Enron found no wrong doing by Enron. Mueller would later be called up to head the WTC Investigation
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz & Imran Awan: Largest Spy Scandal In US History Outlined An absolutely astonishing Federal Security Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today is warning that the entire United States government (if not the whole nation) is in danger of collapse should President Donald Trump approve a Department of Justice (DOJ) memorandum calling for the immediate arrest for treason of nearly all of the Democratic Parties (DNC) top officials—including former President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary, and not less than two dozen Democratic members of the US House of Representatives, all of whom are involved in what can only be described as the largest spy scandal in American history—and that this nations mainstream media has not allowed their citizens to know about. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.] impiousdigest.com/largest-spy-scandal-in-american-history-outlined/
Alexander Foster
Thank you. This has cleared up the final piece of the puzzle for me. Although it's largely speculative. I have been through the whole ride on the side of WikiLeaks and the Seth Rich investigation. Here are my conclusions:
WikiLeaks is controlled op.
Julian Assange's past is a clue here. And his deliberate attempt at appearing to go missing stirred the investigation into pizzagate and other psy ops forward.
Pizzagate is real and it's not real. It was manipulated in order to push further political division. Trafficking and satanic abuse is very real. However, the pizzagate narrative was entirely in their control.
Seth Rich. Alive or never existed. He was portrayed to look like a patriot. He was a Bernie supporter which was meant to get Bernie supporters together with Trump supporters to help out more traction into the Russia story.
Trump is in on it. The election was a collaboration. Hillary was on the same side as Trump, and Trump was always meant to have won the election.
And Russia? One of our greatest allies. The Russia hacker narrative is to keep the bad Russia WWE storyline going.
Oliver Howard
>Hillary same side as Trump
No.
>Pizzagate is real and not real
Yes.
>Seth Rich
Real and dead.
>Russia our ally
Yes. Sort of. To the American people. But mortal enemy (Orthodox Russia, that is) to the Beast System of Revelation.
>Wikileaks a controlled op
Yes and no.
Nathan Hill
>Thank you. This has cleared up the final piece of the puzzle for me. Although it's largely speculative. I have been through the whole ride on the side of WikiLeaks and the Seth Rich investigation. Here are my conclusions: > >WikiLeaks is controlled op. > >Julian Assange's past is a clue here. And his deliberate attempt at appearing to go missing stirred the investigation into pizzagate and other psy ops forward. > >Pizzagate is real and it's not real. It was manipulated in order to push further political division. Trafficking and satanic abuse is very real. However, the pizzagate narrative was entirely in their control. > >Seth Rich. Alive or never existed. He was portrayed to look like a patriot. He was a Bernie supporter which was meant to get Bernie supporters together with Trump supporters to help out more traction into the Russia story. > >Trump is in on it. The election was a collaboration. Hillary was on the same side as Trump, and Trump was always meant to have won the election. > >And Russia? One of our greatest allies. The Russia hacker narrative is to keep the bad Russia WWE storyline going.
Dam it you figured it all out, now you will have to die.
>opens shark tank
Isaac Jones
Bump
Chase Reyes
...
Isaiah Fisher
>Hillary same side as Trump The clue to Trump is in his tower. The freemasonic imagery is all over it. He's a follower of Apollo. Sun worship. Heliocentric sun worship is what rules the earth to this day. Clan MacLeod, connected to the Stuarts. Sorry but Trump was always one of them.
>Seth Rich real and dead No proof. Photoshopped imagery. His connection to Israel.
Kayden Watson
Go see a doctor
Ethan Hughes
>But mortal enemy (Orthodox Russia, that is) to the Beast System of Revelation
History isn't very clear. But, from what I understand of it, the events of Revelation have already passed. The stage was already set and unset in the 15th century. Orthodoxy won out and the trials have already been made. The star patterns described are for that period. Not the September 23 happening we make the mistake of assuming. All we have are the residuals of a prophecy that has already passed. Whomever remained was defeated with the fall of Constantinople. Perhaps we have 500 years left to complete the 1000 for Jesus' return.
