Is white genocide really that bad when you consider the alternatives?
Is white genocide really that bad when you consider the alternatives?
what the fuck is this retarded thing
the favourite method of genocide from each respective ideology
Nazi Germany wasn't right wing
They were massively authoritarian tho
>Libertarian right
>helicopter rides
what?
Pinochet was a Facist, he is up in the blue corner
If the various breeds of white-tailed deer that evolved in the different areas of the Appalachian mountains were mixed together in a single area; in a few generations only one "mixed breed" of white-tailed deer would exist.
Likewise, flooding ALL & ONLY White countries with non-Whites and force-assimilating them will blend Whites people out of existence, AKA White Genocide.
You say you are anti-racists, but what you are is anti-White!
Anti-racist is just a codeword for anti-White!
But I'm libertian left and I prefer the gas chamber
MUH GAS CHAMBER Y U TAKE IT AWAY FROM ME
libertarians are the ones that advocate helicopter rides these days
What alternatives? Shitskin genocide?
That would be so much better.
>the favourite method of genocide from each respective ideology
yes and the left thinks this is a right only thing. they are wrong. we need to break this fucking meme.
Noone is saying they weren't authoritarian, but why are they represented on the right of
economic spectrum fucking burger.
>Everything I don't like is fascism
I even can't tell if you're butthurt ancap of leftist retard
What do you mean these days? we never advocated that at all...
Stop using political compass.
Because they supported private property
why? isidewith is more accurate but...
what?
That is what Pinochet was
He was far right, and a strong nationalist
14 words
>Trump as authoriarian as Stalin
>Jill Stein the next coming of Gandhi
>Hillary to the right of Trump economically
It's fucking inaccurate is what it is.
We got pretty active with the muskets back in 1776, my nigga.
LIBERTY OR DEATH
agree stalin is way more authoritarian than trump, it's very inaccurate but it doesn't mean that test is completely shit, :\
>(relatively) free market
>Fascism
You can't have both by definition. Call Pinochet an authoritarian right wing dictator all you want but he definitely was not a fascist. Stop throwing it like a buzzword.
newest fag
...
We never advocated COMPULSORY helicopter rides.
But if someone violates the NAP, then.....
in 1776 it was war, but throwing someone from helicopter because of his political views is way different, we advocate freedom of speech and we are against any kinds of censorship, so i don't think libertarians are fans of helicopter rides in a literal way...
>Ancap square
>Helicopter Rides
who makes these?
ftfy
No one is denying that fact. However, the Nazis were still socialists.
>mass starvation
but user that's authoritorian left
Bingo
should be aids desu
Authoritarian left starves because of oppression
Libertarian left starves because Starbucks goes out of business
Highly flawed because is takes the subversive position that the Nazis are far-right when they are socialists. Helicopter rides were Pinochet, the true representation of Authoritarian Far right politics (Also proves that Authoritarian Far-Right works as a return to democracy.)
They were right winged to an extent, but too a very huge extent. They were economic centrists for the time.
Oh God, I could fap to purple.
Nazis supported private property therefore they are on the right.
>Nazism
>Right wing
>Libertarian left starves because Starbucks goes out of business
What the hell does that even mean
As I've said 10 fucking times already, supporting private property means you are on the right side economically
Thank you greatest ally, been looking for this pic for centuries.
We wouldn't need to if people stopped treading on the fucking snake
lol
While preaching völkisch equality or "social justice for germans", forcibly shutting down any and all private welfare means to have people dependant on the state, Nationalising large portions of industry, which means seizing all that private property.
Nazis were for private property under two conditions. You were German and they didn't want it.
As opposed to places like the SU, where any and all private property was seized.
WOKE
damn
Not saying Nazis were far left. They were left though and centrist at most.
They spawned from Marxism, but disagreed with the globalist view Marx spouted. Hence the "National designation". They took the same name and platform as the Austrian and Czech National Socialist parties, which were always considered left wing.
The push for Nazis to be considered right wing was by Marxists themselves after the backlash the Nazis received at the end of WW2, fearing hat they'd go down with the ship and all forms of socialism would receive sweeping condemnation they started the propaganda campaign.
yes, yes it is
Commies violate the NAP by simply existing. Executing them has nothing to do with ignoring free speech or denying them the right of thinking for themselves, it is merely self defense.
>Commies violate the NAP by simply existing
>worker ownership violates the NAP
i think you might be dead in the brain
Centrist in economics. Socially very far right.
This has been debunked so many times. The actual socialists got purged in the night of the long knives. Hitler had a different definition of socialism and private property,buisness and class difference and natrual hiracy was pushed
Hitler was never about getting rid of all the classes of Germany it was about uniting them all under and for Germany whenever you were rich or not
Gas chambers best chambers and you'll be the first to try them on re-opening day.
Nah