Defeating the "political LGBT"

HOW do we go about this pol?

LGBT has been immensely politicized and used to damage countries, by normalizing mental illness, bad health practices, and degeneracy which corrodes family values.

I've found the biggest argument is the "I cannot control myself" argument, where faggots and dykes say theres nothing they can do to stop their feelings, which means there's nothing they can do to stop their behavior : And this is only halfway true, sure its impossible to stop impulsive thoughts, but we can control if we act on them, or if we actively DWELL on these thoughts. And these in turn shape future behavior

Anyway pol, how do we go about dealing with this? This INFESTS the west and Europe, and colleges, and I wonder how we can organize a way to resist this : after all nobody can see truth if they are first blinded by mental illness, and LGBT people (and supporters) are political pawns of the left, first and foremost. Half of the people who hate trump so much are somewhere on the LGBT spectrum and legit think they will be genocided for it, and thus us this to demonize the right. (I don't support genociding them, I think this can be cured)

So pol, lets brainstorm how we can stop this politicized faggotry

Few goals to keep in mind

1: Get people to realize homosexual acts are a CHOICE to engage in, unless you are raped

2: Get people to realize you can resist feelings : that its ok to do so, and resisting them CAN make them diminish over time (I've had the odd homosexual thoughts, but its entirely different to act on them)

3: Get people to realize accepting ones body is far more beneficial than being trans, and mutilating ones body / losing ones friends and family

4: Gender roles have benefits in complimenting the physical and psychological differences between men and women.

Importance of these things is scaling downward, with the first ones being important for getting someone away from degeneracy, while the last one is good for preserving a good society.

Other urls found in this thread:

prc.utexas.edu/nfss/documents/NFSS-study-design.pdf
prc.utexas.edu/nfss/documents/NFSS-codebook.pdf
m.youtube.com/watch?v=DBSIs2bHi5g
advindicate.com/articles/3022
youtube.com/watch?v=DiqtFAKQHlk
youtube.com/watch?v=-4heEpQh9Zw
youtube.com/watch?v=6ICTsqE4Fjs
pandys.org/articles/lesbiandomesticviolence.html
emedicine.medscape.com/article/924996-overview
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

line all the faggots up and shoot them, lol you guys act like this is a fucking game of chess

oh no, LGBT people scare me, please make the scary gays go away because it triggers my feelings and violates my widdle snowfwake safe space

aw, you precious little bitch. (bless his heart, i think he has a case of mental retardation.

>I've had the odd homosexual thoughts
fag
i am beyond triggered, how dare you

Problem is brother, Faggots are an ideology, and we cannot really do this if our sons and daughters are being converted into faggotry at the same time : we would be at war forever

We MUST Fight the ideals of the LGBT and combat the idea that people "cannot control themselves" if we want to lower faggot activity in the long term

I'm not against shooting the WORST perpetrators, but this honestly would need to wait until social attitudes are different before it would be a viable option

we must FIRST start with a culture war

Actually buddy, there's indeed things that gay people cause as problems outside "my fee fees".

I guess I would ask YOU, how do you justify your behavior?

And can you defend your point without sarcasm / jokes?

PLEASE NOT, this is indeed a big tactic of faggots too, resorting to mockery, attacks, or jokes : this is because theres no logical argument for it, everything supporting it is an appeal to emotion, authority, or some other fallacy based argument.

I can understand you thinking that, as is shaped by the culture, but this is PART of why the LGBT is so successful

NOT ONLY is it the mainstream LGBT which supports it, but anybody who rejects the idea one can control themselves and their actions

This only ends up CREATING more practicing faggots, as those who struggle with suppressed feelings can find no place to speak about it EXCEPT with LGBT, which then encourages such behavior

This is covered under points 1 and 2 : and these are essential to deal with the problems with faggotry

Remember, all of us have has urges to murder others, but few of us are murderers : so keep this in mind with faggots too, same rule applies.

Pic related : THIS is the problem which is destroying society, not a half second homosexual thought that most people dismiss, similar to people dismissing the urge to steal or kill.

The problem is when people are told they CANNOT stop it, and then lose hope, and fall into the LGBT trap

please respond to the statistics in the graph in the OP.

The Regnerus study was a deliberate, erroneus manipulation of data funded by Christian organizations to make gay people look bad on court with the hopes of denying us adoption and marriage rights. That debunking is only a google search away. The study failed to achieve its aims and the Christian anti-gay movement is further in the fringe than ever. It is weak and impotent and we have won many more battles than you apart from some minor losses in deep states regarding Christians using their religion as a shield from anti-discrimination laws. We have won the war but you can keep fighting these battles in the face of ever-increasing support and tolerance of gays and our rights not to be discriminated against in places of public accommodation, hiring, housing, marriage, and adoption but you will continue to lose 95% of the time because we are defending our own self interest and you are defending your ability to rule over others and one has a much higher burden of proof that faith and scripture alone has failed to meet, time and time again. I suggest moving to Iran for a more favorable outcome against us.

It never ceases to amaze me that men sticking their dicks into each others anuses ,and dressing up like women,is considered "normal" these days.


We all know they're degenerates. We all know they're pedos. Pic related : "8 year old drag queen" being groomed by antifa. Theres also a video of a young boy twerking at a gay pride parade .

Don't let them frame the argument in their view of love.

Keep them talking about Human Physiology and the results of their deviant lifestyles.

I can make homosexuals cringe with proof that anal and oral results in terrible things to the body. No matter how much lube and enemas are used, the rectum will tear (mostly microtears with some fissures). And there is always fecal particles in the rectal cavity; when the tears show up from penile thrusting, fecal matter enters the bloodstream. If semen gets in there, the chemical makeup shuts down some of the immunity functions of that part of the body. So, you end up with feces and semen in your bloodstream for several hours; infecting the body and suppressing the immune system.

There's numerous things at work also, especially cancers, psychological effects, emotional issues, long-term health and safety problems - the list is endless.

Who is this LGB-QT?

>debunk
Which is why you totally cited your source for why its inaccurate, huh faggot?

>tolerance
sorry but faggots are far less tolerant than you act like they are : faggots will try to get you lynched if you disparage their movement.

>defending your ability to rule over others
I'm different than others : I don't care if you have the right to do something, but I should have the right to call you a faggot and call you out for destructive behavior : just like people have the right to drink, and I can call a drunk an alcoholic.

Again, the biggest thing is we MUST normalize the thought that you can resist / control your feelings. This is absolutely essential to reducing this, otherwise anyone who has so much as an urge to be with men in the slightest will turn into a faggot because "well, I can't help it".
I have an idea guys : Lets try trending hashish tag "sexualresponsibility" with posts which indicate having homosexual thoughts, but resisting them for health reasons : Stuff like admitting certain urges but wanting to avoid aids, or keep family strong, ect

I figure if we get a bit of momentum behind this, and tweet this are the right people , we could get momentum going in favor of having less degeneracy, and more responsibility.

So to ANYONE with a twitter, try tweeting a few of these out : Be it usage or porn, homosexuality, or simply not being a whore : try to make it varied with your posts.

...

Blah im on my phone but a good summation of the academic response to regnerus can be found in a wash post article in the volokh conspiracy series.

I dont care what names you call me as long ad your actions are the same as others and you dont own a business open to the public, an apartment building or another venue where u wish to bully gays.

>88 out of 248 of the respondents that were counted as "Parents are of the same sex" responded that their parents were never in a same sex relationship while they were living with them though they had same sex relationships while they were growing up, ie their parents divorced and they ended up with the straight parent but they were still counted as having parents of the same sex

Source
>prc.utexas.edu/nfss/documents/NFSS-study-design.pdf
>a. Parents are of the same sex
219 active and 29 withdrawn panelists, from Page 3
>prc.utexas.edu/nfss/documents/NFSS-codebook.pdf
>S8 Did you ever live with your mother while she was in a romantic relationship with another woman?
40 said no, from Page 4
>S9 Did you ever live with your father while he was in a romantic relationship with another man?
48 said no, from Page 4
Yes, that is the official study results

Disgusting. Gas all fags now.

This post has aids

Thanks. The study was bullsht funded by an opus dei front group to try to influence the courts. The whole thing was a catholic collusion because if they cant oppress gays than what power does that show god as having. Christian conservative opposition to gays is very weak now and has little influence. Recent surveys show gay marriage support as higher than ever. Germany just adopted it and Australia will likely follow next within a year or two at most. Focus on achievable dreams like border control. Most of us just want love and a family. Im sure you have cherrypicked counter examples but outside of pol nobody thinks one or two articles from the internet of gays turning out to be pedos or kids doing drag or twerking are somehow evidentiary enough to mandate criminalizing homosexuality or taking away our civil rights.

>Again, the biggest thing is we MUST normalize the thought that you can resist / control your feelings.
This is interesting because we all know the left is based on emotions, the "feels", and identity politics . It's being pushed very hard in film/ on tv for a reason. .I doubt it'll be changing anytime soon .


As for changing it? I don't think we can. Honestly I think the best case scenario is having our own ethno state .We can mop up the degenerates/media/politicians/ banks.

they passed their damaged genes to their children, even though they didn't exhibit the behaviors. very sad

Theres a difference between bullying and asking someone to act responsible

Also, question :do you mean "gays" by people with homosexual urges, or people who act on them?

I've NEVER bullied anyone who was in the closet.

BUT, I've seen countless people with homosexual urges in the closet bullied pretty bad by faggots or faggot supporters.

Doesn't matter who paid for it, matters if its accurate faggot.

Go suck on a tailpipe

>acting like being gay is normal
Hhahahhahahahah... no. You're a degenerate.

Can't say it can't happen unless you try mate.

I understand how you feel, but mainstream media is being rejected these days : lets capitalize it, push the hashtag "sexualresponsiblity"

Homosexuality is not genetic, its caused by Pavlovian learning which links homosexual acts with sexual pleasure via ones experiences in life. It can be counteracted, but it MUST start with a person trying to be in control

And while I'm taking apart the OP
>Broken households
The study methodology actually doesn't count gay or bisexual father or lesbian or bisexual mother respondents in the single parent group so they aren't dragging down shit. The study carves off those groups from all samples before carving off single parents therefore single parents that were in same sex relationships at any point are counted as LGBT but not counted as single parents.

The study has been autopsied and only actually included children of 2 lesbian couples out of all the LGBT samples. The remaining 246 were labeled as being raised by LGBT parents while either being the children of single parents, being the children of parents who had LGBT affairs, or being the children of heterosexual couples that divorced only for one parent to come out as LGBT, the last group of also includes instances where the child NEVER LIVED WITH THE LGBT PARENT IN AN LGBT RELATIONSHIP which as previously mentioned accounts for over 1/3rd of the children in the gay or bisexual father or lesbian or bisexual mother respondents.

>The sample is faulty
Well, it is. It labels people as having parents of the same sex when they didn't.

>It uses statistics from old studies
It doesn't, you were right. It does however use respondents whose parents were known to be active as LGBTs during a time period when doing so was illegal in many states. But what are the odds society's view of their parent could impact a child's development? You have to keep in mind the study was from 2012 and used respondents aged 18-39. LGBT activities were only legalized in over a dozen states in 2003.

>matters if its accurate faggot.
>built in design error of over 35%

Fags are 19x more likely to die in a car accident than heterosexuals

Denying someone housing or employment solely for their immutable sexuality is bullying. It is illegal in nearly two dozen states for a reason.

The study manipulated data to fit a conclusion they already had in mind. Academics have already repeated analysis of the study excluding erroneous and misleading data and found difference between gays and straights were negligible. Regardless, most judges are intelligent and saw through this religious farce with an agenda as not real science but an attempt to control and deny other people rights. Regnerus has had little positive influence on the courts it was designed to curry favor with.

>being gay is a choice

Having sex is a choice, what you find arousing is not.

>literally worse than single parenting
jesus fucking christ

>believing bullshit you saw on the internet
>especially bullshit that literally tells you it is a lie if you read further

>Some gay people are degenerates so all of them are bad.

By that logic being straight is bad too since there are straight degenerates.

I like cock in my ass


I literally have lost the ability to get turned on by straight porn


What the fuck do you want me to do about it? I wish I was straight so that my parents wouldn't be disappointed but what do I do? Stay closeted to them and they'll forever think I'm just alone?


Of course you think it's just a choice because you wouldn't understand.


Transgenderism is fucking retarded though

fuck off queer

Read the study design and codebook documents, ass-hat.

Gay people are traitors to their fathers, ancestors and the entire human race. Simply put, they're 100% defective humans.

I'd love for these people to have to go back in time to meet their ancestors and explain to them that their legacy will end in some dude's anus or even more degenerately - in a barren inside-out mutilated tranny penis.

These people are [almost] all 100% capable of reproduction and they choose to suck dick and get fucked / fuck another man in the anus. They deserve to be the end of their lineage.

I'm just glad to see things are taking a turn. These people aren't going to end up in camps or gas chambers but at least enough people are starting to wake up to the fact this shit shouldn't be celebrated. Fuck no, you should be ashamed, oppressed and occasionally beaten to death for fucking other dudes in the ass. If I was doing the same faggot shit I'd fully expect it.

I guess faggotwise the biggest reason to not be a fag is to pass on their genes. If you do not reproduce you will literally be the first creature to do so in your specific line going back all the way to the first cell dividing on earth. I doubt any of these fags care about that since they're mostly liberals anyway and just want humans extinct.

> (I've had the odd homosexual thoughts, but its entirely different to act on them)

OP is quite literally a faggot.

>What's a brother/sister?

Also sperm banks are a thing

True,there's no harm in pushing back. Online atleast.If you promote these id was n public you will be harassed by the gay mafia.


My best friend was booted out of PTA and told she couldn't come back to school fubctions because she could possibly "make LGTBQIIIII+ kids uncomfortable" . Her crime ? Saying marriage should be between a man and a woman.

Welcome to hell.

did you ever have that ability?

Good on that school! Wasnt that way when I was in school. Even the bigots here just serve to demonstratr life is only getting better and better for gay people.

Yes, when I was a horny teenager

Funny enough, the first porn that I ever watched was gay porn, because I just learned of clearing history so I just typed "penis.com" in the search bar


Maybe that has something to do with me being homosexual


the first sexual thoughts I ever had were about men

Clarity what you are even talking about...

>illegal
Legality =/= morality, and illegality =/= immorality.

>fit a conclusion they already had in mind
So are most studies, the heck is your point?

And you ever consider other poeple re-enacting the study later are fudging it to hide results? LGBT has an immensely huge lobby / political power, and many leaders are criminal rapists / child molesters...so I do not trust them.

Technically true, but you can shape what aroused you.

my ex for instance was on crutches, and so now I have a little thing for girls who are injured. I could make this otherwise if I fit my experiences to make injured girls seem bad, and thus, less sexy

Accepting makes something more likely to be arousing, while rejecting / hating it makes it less likely.

And beyond that, its STILL a choice to take a dick up the ass unless raped : its no different than if a man finds rape erotic, but morally opposes it / rejects such feelings.

Lower rates of degeneracy : you need to examine what common factors are involved in degeneracy, homosexuality, porn, drugs, ect...all factors involved

Straights who wait till marriage for sex, use no porn, drugs, and uphold christian values are virtually unaffected by degeneracy compared to a drug using porn addicted faggot.

My advice to you brother, is abstain : the mind can reset itself over time, and I've been through this myself : being into really nasty porn, going without for a month, and being into much more vanilla stuff

if you give your mind time to reset, things will find their "center" again, but you need to abstain first.

Less of a faggot than people who jerk off to traps =)

You can say I'm a faggot, but I'm not the one sucking dick.

Amen brother, this is why I'm saying to push the hashtag people. Sexualresponsibility. Get it trending, and make people realize they can indeed make choices

okay thanks, I'll try


Should I try to start watching lesbian porn? To try to only associate sexiness with women?

Besides the aids, the rape, the molestation, the homelessness, the drug addiction, the suicide, the cutting, the alcoholism, the mental illness, the family rejection, the anal health problems, the infections, the abuse, the lack of life planning, lack of responsibility, ect....

.....Besidies all those right?

But you cannot really blame those on others those are pretty direct symptoms for being a PRACTICING homosexual (IE, a faggot)

Life has NEVER been bad for men in the closet, and if it has, its because faggots like YOU harass them

You DO NOT want accountability for your actions, your basically a "dindu nuffin" except with buttsex.

See, you people don't give a rats about the quality of life of closet homosexuals : you just want more people for your faggot club.

>Clarity what you are even talking about...

>lvl. 62 dick poking mage

That as the other dude pointed out over a third of survey participants included in the raised by same sex category didnt actually live with a same sex parent growing up. The study measures outcomes of single parent vs married two parent families and of course gay or straight single parents do worse. We wont have actual data in large enough numbers of how kids raised by gay married parents vs straight married parents did until 2030 at the earliest.

Life has always been horrible being stuck in the closet. Plenty of evidence shows gays allowed to marry and be open about their sexuality are happier and healthier.

If you CAN end up getting aroused to it, that might work : I'm honestly not against porn if it makes possitive changes : But one cautionary thing, DO NOT self project yourself as the girl : This will lead to TRANS thoughts, and you DO NOT want those

Instead try and appreciate the female form : the softness, the curves, ect....

Focus on them, and imagine what you could do, prodding with your fingers, exploring, feeling, groping them, ect.

And do not let guilt be a factor : one huge thing is that gay men commonly feel bad about being aggressive / have mommy issues, so sex with women feels immoral : reject those ideas, for now, till you can get comfortable feeling an attraction to women.

Are you trying to say having a lesbian mother, if you live with your straight father would not effect you?

Because you know, who cares if that effects children, we need more rights for people who make their own decisions to not suffer consequences!

>1 third
what about the other 2 thirds?
And again, just because you don't live with them doesn't mean it effect you : I didn't live with my lesbian mother, but she was still in my life dude.

Citation dude.

Also happier does not mean its good : someone smoking meth all day would be happier than someone sober, doesn't mean its good to smoke meth all day

Also, I bet you aren't including shit like abuse / disease rates when you say that

top fucking kek

The 88 respondents aren't aren't gay single parents.

They were divorced straight single or remarried parents that were counted as gay couples.

The remaining 160 samples were also polluted with
>single LGBT parent households (because the "single parent households" were only excluded from the group that remained after the LGBT parent households were excluded into their own groups)
>households where a heterosexual couple remained married and raised the children, but one member of the couple was having an LGBT extramarital affair
>and households where a heterosexual couple divorced and the LGBT parent only received partial custody
to a degree that studies of this study have shown that only 2 of the 248 same sex parent households were actually stable 2 parent households

The study was deeply flawed by design.

you niggers ignore my asking for statistics on no family(orphanage) every single time. theres no excuse for that.

Even with that, would the damage of proximity to LGBT stuff not be a factor? I think it is.

LGBTQ = Let God Burn Them Quickly

Burn fags on the stake to get them ready for the fires of Hell.

proof of God killing fags: m.youtube.com/watch?v=DBSIs2bHi5g

Can’t stop having sex with strangers even when in a relationship: advindicate.com/articles/3022

youtube.com/watch?v=DiqtFAKQHlk
youtube.com/watch?v=-4heEpQh9Zw
youtube.com/watch?v=6ICTsqE4Fjs

Roses are red
Violets are blue
God hates fags
And so should you

Romans 1
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

>(I don't support genociding them, I think this can be cured)
this is cute as fuck, how do we stop this thing?
you answered your own question. invent a cure and it will sort itself out. but there is none, you only worship the psuedoscience rabble of your peers with your zap factories and prayer groups. Lets be brutally honest, if you wanted to get lgbt people off the left you would accept them but encourage them to act normal in all ways not related to being gay or a faggot. You wont do it because you are our enemies pure and simple, compromise is not an option for you, you must control, kill, and eradicate. You feed the very movements you hate with that black and white thinking.

>Defeating the "political LGBT"

AIDS

Specifically encouraging the new gay fashion for bugchasing and 'gift' giving HIV so faggots can belong to the inner circle of fagness. Traps in particular should be made know they are not proper traps until they have the hiv bug fairydust in them so they can try and give it to drugged up straight guys cos they hate them.

Yes these are all real things and why faggots must not be tolerated. You were warned.

Do you even read? All your criticism is addressed in the picture.

I can't find stats on that, feel free to share.

pandys.org/articles/lesbiandomesticviolence.html

Stats on lesbians being more violent.

Also, to any homosexuals reading who feel hopeless, remember our feelings tend to sway with what we experience / chose. If you feed the "homosexual dog" in your mind, it will grow stronger. If you want to gain control, you must starve the dog : no porn, no sex, no fantasizing about it. These all keep it normal, and keep the neural pathways wide open.

>parents divorced when I was 4.
>from age 4-12 Mom had a "partner"
>stepped in when my mom was depressed and lost. provided emotional support and convinced mom they were real feelings.
>grew up with two moms never thought there was a problem
>"Partner" was the butch. Strict. Drilled me. Never had freedom. Couldn't be a kid. I was always jumpy and afraid to speak.
>tested into school districts gifted program for high IQ
>finally thought she'd ease up (she had tender moments here and there)
>once i began thinking for myself, she got angrier... meaner... I couldn't be controlled. 11 years old in high school level courses.
>she got meaner to us. fighting with my mother and me constantly.
>started hitting me when I got fed up with bullshit.
>reached out for help - no one believed me
>one day at 12, told her to fuck herself and went at her.
>>thrown across a room into a table

My mother immediately kicked her out, never saw her again, and to this day, denies she was ever gay being married to my wonderful, supportive stepfather.

Gays play fucking games, and one preyed on my mother's moments of weakness from not having a supportive family in her time of need.

Fuck the entire LGBT community and the fuck parades they force down our throats.

>Are you trying to say having a lesbian mother, if you live with your straight father would not effect you?
Are you trying to say that a mother simply being a lesbian would negatively impact the child even in situations where the parents divorced only slightly after the child was born and the child only learned of the mother's sexuality in adulthood?

The answer to that question is not yes or no. It's sometimes. More to the point, the study is used as evidence against the effectiveness of LGBT childrearing. If the lesbian wasn't raising the god damn child you have no fucking business using the child ending up fucked up as evidence against lesbians being able to raise children.

A dishonest person would point out that a bunch of kids removed from their LGBT parents ended up fucked up, so the problem is disallowing LGBT parents from raising their children.

Realistically though the study is just a fucking mess with no conclusions to be drawn because of how badly sorted the family archetypes were.

>Are you trying to say that a mother simply being a lesbian would negatively impact the child even in situations where the parents divorced only slightly after the child was born and the child only learned of the mother's sexuality in adulthood?
Not the case in the study, you obviously didn't even read the image

so you think it is. glad you mentioned that, we can all go home everyone, this person thinks its true so he must have gotten it right.

LGBT
they tied an anchor to themselves when they added the "T"
Transgender issues will face increasing amounts of resistance as its apparent its an ideology that's infiltrating science (biology is not able to just let this one go and maintain itself as a serious field of study) and harming children

Body mutilation in transgender operation, transgender suicide rates, and inclination towards degenerate behavior all stack up against the "T".

When the "T" sinks, the LGB will sink with it- somewhat.

>what about the other 2 thirds?
What about them? If someone came to you with a study about survival rates from peanut allergy reactions, but 1/3rd of the samples were actually gunshot victims that had no peanut allergies whatsoever, would you give that study the time of day?

Acceptable error in a normal study is 5%. This study has a 35% absolute methodological error rate before accounting for other factors, of which there are many.

>feel free to share
why would I share stats I dont have? your entire arguement is flawed. I didnt even know the study was shit and was assuming it was at least half accurate, but the point is if children who are orphaned have worse statistics than gay people, and you straight breeding fags wont adopt them, you are denying them better standards of living just because gay parents aren't perfect. instead of comparing it just to straight people, you need to compare to something called a fucking control group, something the people invovled with didn't give a shit about because the family research council is among the quack jobs that want to destroy evolution in science classrooms and otherwise turn america into a christian theocracy.

Real talk. get some numbers on the rammifications of being an orphan, compare it to the gays, if the gays come out on top, there is no excuse for keeping gay adoption illegal.

enjoy your gift from your gift giver. You'll be special then. All rotting slowly and signed up for doom while you spread death. hiv. all yours

>Denying someone housing or employment solely for their immutable sexuality is bullying. It is illegal in nearly two dozen states for a reason.
Fuck off socialist fag

>All your criticism is addressed in the picture.
Actually none of it was
See

>(biology is not able to just let this one go and maintain itself as a serious field of study)
just because you where asleep in biology along with all the crackpot leftie pronoun people doesn't mean gender isn't a spectrum. every single feature of a living being is a spectrum, sex and gender aren't exceptions you twat monger

Based on the statistics alone, that third that wasn't actually raised by homosexuals is actually improving the average of homosexuals, because straight single parents have a far better score.

It's akin to saying that you have:
Group A (pure) with a 70% score
Group B (1/3 pure and 2/3 rancid) with a 35% score
Chances are the problem is the 2/3 rancid

I dont indulge in hook up culture, so I dont have to worry about aids thanks. And in all other cases I very much enjoy being alive, and muslims aren't knocking on the door of the country I live in.

Step one has to be regaining control of the schools to stop that faggotry from being taught to impressionable children.

The next step after that is to get into elected offices and start cutting off their benefits for any reason you can think up, mire their benefits in bureaucratic red tape, and use CPS to hound them.

Concurrent with that either control or discredit the media so that reports of this happening don't get out.

The communist tactics work, let's use them.

hiv hiv

bugchasing and your gift. all wrapped up.

XX
XY
biological differences are insurmountable

leave the spectrum to wavelengths of light

Aids helps, but only so much if people think they cannot help but be faggot whores

This is why you need to prevent the feelings

Also, homosexuals are more predatory, with a taste for converting heterosexuals : this needs to be stopped too.

Dear lord, sorry you had to go through that brother. I had something similar, I hated when my mother and her lover called me "their" child : I lashed out and said the other woman had nothing to do with me, and wasn't my mother or father.

Glad you eventually got a good family setup

Course, don't be hateful : that only fuels faggots who use this as an excuse to claim martyrdom. Instead, push the hashtag, and the idea that its a CHOICE.

Yes. Children NEED a mother and father figure, to tell them how men work, how women work, and how women work together

2 women means theres no way for a boy to learn from them how men and women work, which can lead to a kid being homosexual or trans very easily, because there's no positive interactions with men and women for the boy to go off of : intact its likely the kid will only see hate for men, which will effect the boy.

As for a girl, she will not have examples of what good men are, and how they should treat her, so theres a good chance she will become a massive whore searching for her "daddy figure"

>kids removed from LGBT end up fucked up
Do you think maybe having them there fucks them up too? Sure, the treatment sucks, but you guys refuse prevention. Its like complaining setting a bone is painful and shouldn't be done, but not examining how much worse it would be having a broken bone.

repeating a meme only crazy shitheads are involved with doesn't mean I'm among them.

Google happier married gay. You can do it. If 1/3 of your results have to be thrown out than the existing study conclusions are not apt.

I just read your post, and everything you mentioned was already addressed in the pic.

>I dont indulge in hook up culture
thats the thing. you don't have to. just whoever you catch it from has to. Nothing speaks of the utter degeneracy of lgbt more than giftgiving.

>durr what are mutations on DNA
Great the right is so fucking stupid they don't even understand what an X and Y is made of, let alone how simple mutations can completely fuck how they interact with a body, and nevermind that the mother's imperfect womb and her own genes are another vector.

god damn this is basic shit.
emedicine.medscape.com/article/924996-overview

>you obviously didn't even read the image
I read the study, dipshit. The image gets some shit just factually wrong about the study methodology itself. For instance, as previously addressed, the study starts with a pool of all respondents, carves off one LGBT parent into one group a piece, then carves off single parent households from the remainder that includes single parent and intact bio families, thus leaving in all LGBT single parents in the LGBT groups, so the LGBT get drug down by single parents, but not vice versa, despite what the OP's pic claims.
>Kids raised by homosexual and bisexual parents.
They weren't 35% of the time despite what the study would have you believe. Stopped reading there.

BUT BUT i LOOOOVE YOU user SO i GAVE YOU the gift SO WE CAN BE TOGETHER

Enjoy your aids from some demented faggit

>dating a cheater
lol okay.
you're more likely to get aids than me, from banging your coalburner

>I can't think of anything so i'll just ignore the dissenting evidence.
yeah okay, glad you made it clear you only care about the evidence in so much as it helps you. you never gave a shit at all. you grabbed anything that looked like it would help against something you decided was your enemy from the very beginning

That 35% where the homosexual parent wasn't the main parent (still probably was on weekends) actually improved the average of the homosexual category

Explained here:
"It's akin to saying that you have:
Group A (pure) with a 70% score
Group B (1/3 pure and 2/3 rancid) with a 35% score
Chances are the problem is the 2/3 rancid"

So if anything, homosexuals are even worse than the study claims

Anyone can be a fag user, you can't genocide it.

repeating something doesn't make it true. this is science not armchair psychology

Let them be.

Never interrupt an enemy while they're making a mistake.

It's basic mathematics, the "fault" that you found with the study logically helps the homosexual score, it doesn't hurt it.

The study conclusively proves that homosexual parents are terrible.

not just that, but being a faggot is part of being trans, Ie its a mutation, so even if you could genocide all the gays, you couldn;t genocide all the gay recessive traits, which will inevitably result in more gays, especially when they must socially breed to preserve the white race.

you can't use the study itself to say that the homosexual scores lower, and then say that because they score lower, the stuff we added doesn't count. you need two studies. This is how science works nigger. improve or get the fuck out of the way.

>gunshot wounds

Irrelivant, a better comparison would be if 1/3rd was infact only TRACE amounts of allergies, like M&M's being produced in a place working with peanuts, giving someone with a peanut allergy problems. Maybe that just shows the allergy is VERY severe.

Again, the only way you can think the way you do is if you think things only effect a child if they LIVE with it : so a little girl being anally raped has no effect unless she LIVES with the rapist. Is that your logic?

>I don't have stats
Then why the fuck are you on about orphans? You complain I don't show stats, but don't show them either, your worse than myself : you are a hyporcrit, complaining for something not being there when you dont try to provide it.

Your argument is also fallacious : you argue if being with gay parents is LESS damaging than being an orphan, that gay parents ARENT damaging : this is entirely ignoring the higher damage rates

We are looking for what is IDEAL, and LGBT parents are NOT ideal..

Also, by your logic, if beating up gays prevents gay murder, then beating up gays is ok.

OP here, I admit genders a spectrum, but this doesn't mean you cannot MOVE YOURSELF AROUND on the spectrum, and it doesn't mean certain areas in the spectrum are healthier.

Why should we promote men being on the female end of the spectrum, or women on the male side?

Is there ANY benefits to outweigh the costs?

They are MASSIVELY disproportionately involved with aids

most people with aids are gay, and gays are less than 5% of the country....let that sink in

hermaphrodites are extremely rare, and an anomaly.

Also, you need proof on an individual basis per person that someone INDEED has a genetic difference or chromosome problem, but you fags would hate a study of this, as it would show most trans do not have chromasone issues.

Being a fag is a choice : nobody is forced to take it up the ass unless its rape.

These threads are why I always carry a gun. I do some pretty degenerate shit with consenting adults behind closed doors. I don't talk about it with random-ass people, I don't bother with Pride parades, and I pay my fucking taxes.

Fuck with me the way you people are LARPing, however, and I will put you in the ground.

It's pretty damn obvious that homosexuals score lower...

These all sound like great ideas. I will let the 1950s know.

>because straight single parents have a far better score.
See
The study doesn't compare stable LGBT two parent homes with stable heterosexual two parent homes, but pretends to do so.

When 99.2% of a dataset is pollution, no shit the study is fucked. The only thing polluting the intact bio pool are heterosexual affairs not resulting in divorce.

Oh, and 51.8% of the "single parent households" actually had parents that remarried while they were growing up. The single parent household respondents are only those that EVER lived with ONLY ONE BIOLOGICAL PARENT due to death, divorce, military service, separation, or any other reason between the ages of 0 and 18. A remaining 8.6% lived with their parent's lover while their parent wasn't married to them.

Your mommy died in a car wreck the day before your 18th birthday? Single parent household. Daddy off fighting in Desert Storm? Single parent household. Mommy died in childbirth and daddy remarried before your first birthday? Single parent household.

I can't stress this enough. THE STUDY IS BULLSHIT.

Russia, China and the whole Muslim world is anti-LGBT
Barely above 50% of the Western world is pro-LGBT and rapidly changing

You are delusional if you think the year means anything

>mutation
citation needed that ALL fags and trans are mutations

Thanks for clearing this up.

OP here. I don't support the idea of lynching, but I think you should indeed be held accountable, and should be aware of the damage you could be doing to yourself and others

Consent doesn't necessarily make things right, people could "consent" to being cannibalized, being pimped out for meth, ect : this doesn't mean this is right.