What does Sup Forums honestly think about homosexuality?

I'm gay and I know that makes me a deviant, but I'm not a degenerate. I keep my sexuality to myself as I consider it a private thing. I don't go to LGTBQ rallies or advocate homosexuality to other people. I feel like I could even enter into and maintain a strong and fruitful heterosexual union/marriage, despite how difficult it would be for me because of my deviancy, and do my part for society. If for some reason I can't, if family life is not my destiny, I feel like there's still a positive contribution I can make to the world (and that in many ways, it's my duty to discover what that is and fulfil it).

Then I look out at the world and see these bitchdykes and faggots and I want to kill myself for being associated with them.

As long as you keep it private and don't show it to the world, then go for it. People could not care less, there are far worse problems. What you do in private is your thing after all.

Keep it as a private vice.

Don't politicise it.

Don't make it your identity. Your not a member of the LGBT community, you're just someone who happens to have same-sex attraction.

Marry another gay man and have surrogate kids. You can still carry on your genes withou being trapped with a woman. Dont listen to pol telling you you should be unhappy for their benefit. Thats crazytalk!

Just reading this gave me a semi. I'm not wearing any pants. 7 inches uncut here let's get gay.

Milo was right, the world was better when hays stayed in the closet

Have a wife, have some kids, raise them right and have gay sex on the weekends and on business trips

Why do straights have a monopoly on public affection? Get fucked.

>just fornicate

Weird i never see bible pushers trying to make fornication illegal only gay sex and marriage.

No, I don't give a fuck if you're "private about it." If you as a male do not find the image I posted attractive, but rather prefer gross hairy balls of another man, you are a complete degenerate. You are sub-human. Get off Sup Forums NOW!

>I'm gay
>I keep my sexuality to myself
Pick one

>Why do straights have a monopoly on public affection?
Because the sight of two faggots kissing makes any normal person puke.

Hell, even lesbians don't want to see gay dudes kissing.

We don't

Public straight orgies and flaming homosexuality are just as frowned upon as public gay orgies
You faggots can kiss and hold hands like every other normal person no one cares

Mental illness from long term soft trauma from you mum.

Nigger include an imgur next time. I want full coverage, no peely backsies, and preferably a semi

i truly do not give a fuck

OP do you consider your being gay a sexual choice or genetic predisposition?

Seeing that people argue LGBT+ as either a "born gay" or choice to be gay issue I feel the same no matter what.

If you fall into the people are "born gay" category my answer is that your LGBT+ nature is more that of a mental illness than a character trait. I will treat you no different than someone who has any other mental illness. Even if the current state of political correctness demands that you be considered no different than anyone else it will not change that you are afflicted with an illness in my mind.

If you fall into the gay by choice category I find it hard to separate the LGBT+ from say those who are pedophiles or zoophilies. You are disturbed and it is best if you did not exist.

There is no good thing about LGBT+ and the best a homosexual or anyone else in the LGBT+ can hope for is that the masses never become fully aware of what lies below the AIDS infested surface. The pervert army of the LGBT+ deserves nothing less than total removal from society.

>be OP
>try shamelessly to get (You)'s in brit/pol/
>realize they don't care about gay's
>shits the bed knowing everything his been told is a lie
>shamefully creates a thread to gather (You)'s to at least draw in the Jew-on-a-stick amerifat (You)'s.

Go piss in your mouth on X factor or something attention whore.

Man your picture selection game is weak

forgot to mention I'm a lesbian

also I don't know about two men raising a child, but i know for absolutely certainty that (except perhaps in very special cases) that women are far too emotionally unstable to raise a child together as a parental couple. If I was to have a child, I would want to raise it with a man.

I often feel like a platonic loving relationship with a man in a family setting would ultimately make me 'happier' in the long run than a romantic, sexually-satisfying passionate one with a woman. I guess it's down to me to make a choice, whatever I think is more noble.

I don't care where someone sticks their dick on their own time. That said, I live in NYC, and I cannot deny the fact that open and widespread acceptance of homosexuality is an abscess on society. Many of them have no identity outside of their sexuality, and when mainstream homosexuality is no longer transgressive enough to provoke the desired reaction from the public, they have to seek more and more deviant expressions of it in order to satisfy their need for attention and validation.

Examples:
>Man walking around in a fishnet shirt and a leash, short leather shorts, leash held by boyfriend. This was in a grocery store

>Shirt that says "GOT POPPERS?"

>Shirt covered in outlines of dicks and asterisks

They run around in groups of 6-7 in clothes that would have been seen as gaudy at pride parades not 10 years ago, screaming laughing and attracting attention from equally unlikeable women who find them non-threatening, a fashionable social accessory.

I don't really want to dislike gays, but I don't feel like I'm being given much of a choice.

I'm 25 years old and still in the closet. I can't even think of coming out to my family, its like the scariest thing in the world to me

>What does Sup Forums honestly think about homosexuality?
I never had a problem with homosexuality until they told me that being a white cisgendered heterosexual male means I have a problem with homosexuality just by existing.
You picked a fight faggots, yas got one.

I don't think anyone actually gets upset about gays. Everyone hates faggots, though. The only thing Incan think of is an absolute socialist society that would burn gays for not reproducing and adding back into the social genetic pool from wenst they came, like Africa does (African actually explained it as just that, the same style of thinking a national socialist would have, Inwas quite impressed)

The down side is that gays have been use as a 5th column by globalists/destroyers of nations, to enact deconstruction and erode social/moral absolutes, which society needs to function healthily, lest we be blown in the wind like rootless grass.

Homosexuality is a mental illness. We should recognize this as a society.

However, it is completely normal for most people to have some sort of mental illness. Just please keep it to yourself. You can be as mentally ill as you want within your own home. Once you start bothering others with your mental illness, it is only fair for them to react negatively to your inappropriate public behavior.

I agree with faggot OP. I am also a faggot and hate these liberal faggots that I am grouped in with.

if I stuck my cock in you it wouldn't matter right?

I don't know

I had my first gay thoughts at 6. I kept myself in the closet until I was 25 and the first time I had gay sex it was a powerful experience, so much relief, so much understanding, so much pure joy. my sexual preference is a reality to me I can't deny. I didn't choose it.

but I could choose to not practice homosexuality, despite my thoughts. so does this ultimately make it a choice?

It's not a gay couple hugging or holding hands, it's faggots. Think Folsome Street Fair, blatant unmanliness, feminine men and so on.

Honestly, if the femmes hadn't won out in the early 20th century, homosexuality would probably be not considered much at all, with all Manly "bears" being men together, but no, there has to be lost men from the pool of ablebodied young men, not being able to serve militarily or lift objects over 50 pounds, making coffee for a living. That's why people are actually against gays, it's because of the femmes among you and no other reason.

I don't know if it's Jewish lies or not, but I read that Wilde banged Walt Whitman. Fucking paddies. Keep your dicks away from our national treasures. No matter how charming they might be.

Disgusting. Allow silent liberty and intimacy, forbid political uprising of any kind with jail time. Do not allow it to become a subversive cultural influence on society life.

It's fine as long as you keep your shit to yourself.

I never gave a fuck about it until I saw large parades of indecent perverts wandering down the streets, screaming at the rest of us for being normal.

Now I fucking hate you degenerate scum.

it's a mental illness and a bad influence for children
if it gets in such a collective level it starts affecting a civilization, then any punishing is essential

Heterosexuals BOW to the homos.

Reminder that the queer is a breed unto his own, a veritable aristocrat in a world of vermin; charged with ineffable responsibility, the taskmaster of civilisation.

>the Greeks generally
>Alexander the Great
>Hadrian
>Nero
>King Edward II
>King James I
>Shakespeare
>Leonardo Da Vinci
>Michelangelo
>Frederick the Great
>Lord Kitchener
>Tchaikovsky
>T.E. Lawrence
>Oscar Wilde
>Rimbaud
>Marcel Proust
>Thomas Mann
>Alan Turing
>Yukio Mishima

Do not submit to the slave morality of your fallen brothers or to the chains of your heterosexual lowers. Those who would choose lowly victimhood deserve to be left behind in the dust. Ignore the decrepit politics of an inferior world and claim your rightful birthright. The Uranian man should become King.

Hear hear. Present thine flaccid masculinity for maximum enlargement

It's not an accomplishment and there is no pride in being the end of your bloodline. It should not be praised nor promoted. Sex is for making babies and all sex that is for pleasure is deviant. Sex in holes meant for pooping are extra deviant for hygenic reasons. This post is 100% true.

...

Nero, Wilde, Turing (autist was his actual race)

The rest you just pulled out of your ass, like so many other things.

Greek/Samurai Manly love is not the same as a homosexual sexual orientation

Ok paula deen

I don't care
It's not degeneracy on an individual scale that bothers me.
It's the larger picture, of what is socially normalized. LGBTQJIDF is trendy and you gain social status from supporting it. It's the fact that western european society is the most pro-LGBT, and our postmodern views of sexuality and race are affecting our birth rates, are disarming us in the face of competing groups who don't care.

The pornification of society and constant bombardment of sexual imagery, even if heterosexual, is disturbing.

I am so tired of you fucking faggots.

I don't care if you're a "good" faggot.

I don't care if you browse this board.

I don't care if we have anything in common.

You are not good for me.

You are not good for my family.

Stay away from me.

Stop trying to convince me to a give a shit about you.

You are repulsive to me.

You are a genetic dead end.

It might not be your fault, but it is your fault that you're in my face right now trying to be subversive.

Go away.

Reeeee

Stop asking you faggot. Those who are willing to let it slide will never say so, but they will leave you alone if you leave and let be. You will never ever get any sympathy from me.

That's retarded unless you think being a faggot is a choice. If it is by nature, then nature is very clearly not wanting you to breed at the most basic level. Isn't it cruel to have kids then?

>manly love
There are different social manifestations of homosexual behaviour, with possibly different origins and characteristics, yes. But whether these cannot and do not exist today and that all homosexuals are fundamentally different from those in the past seems a little far fetched.

Also the rest aren't pulled out of my ass you fuck - the only ones who I'm pulling a bit are Lawrence and Da Vinci. The rest are verifiable homos.

Very impotent. Bow to me, LARPer.

>the Greeks
This varied a lot more than people think. The Athenians at times had the death penalty for known homosexuals entering the Assembly of the polis.

Usually it was either pederasty or soldier-lovers on campaign. They had absolutely no conception of the "loving monogomous married same-sex couples" that are promoted today. Marriage was always heterosexual.

>Thomas Mann
Liked little boys. Great role model.

*spoiler alert*
This list contains the names of several historical figures, a few of whom were recorded as gay in historical records. Most figures on this list have been posthumously declared gay by modern historians in their interpretations of relatively very few hints among the historical records that they may have actually been bisexual.

Like clockwork, fags cry.

Cry all you want.

Sup Forums will never accept you.

I will never accept you.

My family will never accept you.

You don't have to care.

Stay the fuck away from me.

You are like niggers to me.

You can add King David to your list

Funny I'm a gay man and I want a woman that will have good maternial skills with my child.

I also have a penis that can get you pregnanet. So does my boyfriend.

Think we can work something out between the 4 of us?

We make vaginas cheaper for you. The fuck are you waiting for? Why should i be competing with you for them? Go two scoops em up negroid

Even if I see straights making out in public, my first thought is "Get a room."

>anthropomorphising nature
Smh

Yeah I didnt mean to imply it was a universal property of ancient Greeks, or a universally accepted/instituted behaviour. Homosexuality plays a big part, both positive and negative in the writings of Plato for instance, but I wouldn't call Plato homosexual.

Pederasty never died, really. I found this passage in Houellebecq's atomised pretty insightful:
>as he masticated his cereal with added vitamins, he thought about the faustian nature of sexual pursuit, its vampirism. for example, thought bruno, people are wrong to talk about homosexuals. he had never – or very rarely – met a homosexual; on the other hand, he knew a great many pederasts. some pederasts – thankfully, very few – prefer little boys; they wind up in prison for a long stretch and no one ever talks about them again. most pederasts, however, are attracted to youths of between 15 and 25. anyone older than that is, to them, simply an old, dried-up arsehole. watch two old queens together, bruno liked to say, watch them closely: they may be fond of one another; they may be affectionate, but do they really want each other? no. as soon as some tight 15-25-year-old arse walks past, they will tear each other apart like panthers; they will rip each other to pieces just for that tight little arse; that is what bruno thought.

>in this, as in many things, so-called homosexuals had led the way for society as a whole, thought bruno. take him, for example – he was 42 years old. did he want women his own age? absolutely not. on the other hand, for young pussy wrapped in a mini-skirt he was prepared to go to the ends of the earth.

Here's you a (you), shill.

Nobody but the truly divine are completely un-degenerate, and traditional societies had niches for freaks and deviants. If you truly have anything positive or constructive to contribute to society, then most people will look past a little deviancy.

However, deriving social identity from sexuality is degenerate. Not merely the gay pride/ folsom street fair types, but also heterosexuals who obsess over trying to prove they're 'NOT GAY' by acting like a nigger- picking on the defenseless and shitting out kids you don't take care of.

Out of sight, out of mind. As long as you're not being a goddamn faggot about it I don't care if you put your dick inside another man in the privacy of your own home.

>Then I look out at the world and see these bitchdykes and faggots and I want to kill myself for being associated with them.
What is it about them you don't like?

I'd be ok with my wife fucking a woman. Especially if she shared.

i wish you americans would do the same

It's a fetish that shouldn't be normalized.

This is generally the correct answer.

Trying to police sexual deviancy out of existence is both impossible, taxing on resources and (yes) cruel.

But if you look at every successful civilization, it has as it's bedrock the monogomous heterosexual family.

See for the Greeks

(partial exception for polygamy, but even in Islamic societies where it's allowed, it's rare outside the upper classes. Polygamy is if anything worse than homosexuality because it deprives a large number of men from have wives - leading to resentment).

Rather, niches and subcultures should be allowed to exist for eccentric individuals so long as they don't politicize their vices or try to spread them.

>tl;dr gays are the end of their bloodline

Frankly I want my country to go full isolationist and tell the rest of the world to get fucked for a few years. We got enough internal shit that needs sorting before we fuck about on the world stage any time soon.

Homosexuality is pretty gay tbqh famalam

Meh. Centurion was half a fag

>I'm gay
>doesn't post boipucci

based nig

>I'm gay and I know that makes me a deviant, but I'm not a degenerate.
Are we going to split hairs here?

this shit again larping coonery.... just make white babies ... if your none white don't.... no one gives a fuck about faggots ... off topic bs that divide the cause of all us not died from dunecoon and chimp attacks

they're disgusting. why publicise what you do in bed like that, whether you're straight gay bi or whatever? they're attention seeking, they're embarrassing, they make homosexuality into a joke rather than a serious issue that humankind has had for thousands of years.

no

this is a none issue. I can still have children. all I have to is incubate some seed. my vagina and uterus works fine, just like the sperm of your average healthy gay man. you dont have to love someone to breed with them (though it's obviously preferable, but we're talking about bloodlines not families) or be sexually attracted to someone to successfully put p in v

Man you got a whole lot of repressed things going on there for you.

reminds me of this post from a long time ago
I would not be surprised if the breakdown in sexual relations, which is, in practice, a soft form of polygamy- the chad harem/robot dichotomy described by r9k users- contributes to this social malaise, of eccentric sexual subcultures being politicized and normalized, to the detriment of the larger social organism. People have a deep spiritual need to find a 'niche', which they will pursue at all costs

Good answer.
Like I said before, I wasn't looking to fight gays until they brought the fight to me.
Man like, seriously, look at history, DO NOT fuck w/ white males, when we get pissed as a population, devastation happens. We don't have bitter conflicts that go on for thousands of years, we fuck shit up quickly and bring conflicts to swift bloody resolutions, scorched fuckin earth.
But anyways to each their own I say.