74% of males get this wrong

>74% of males get this wrong
Can you answer it, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=IkBfx4auZw4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It should stop.

It shouldn't do anything. Let it in the hands of God.

It should stop

The one on the right

Break but don't swerve, trying to avoid the obstacle at high speed normally makes matters worse.

crash the car into the barrier, anyone stupid enough to go in one of those deserves to die desu

>break the law
>die

Me in the car
youtube.com/watch?v=IkBfx4auZw4

Says don't walk no way can a product you buy make a decision to kill you that company would be destroyed. Car hits brakes and hits illegals crossing done

right part of the image, come to a stop if crossing is being used

Get its engineers fired for being able to program the car to make moral judgement but not to fucking stop at a crosswalk.

kill the roasties

*DING* *DING* *DING*

TIME TO GO DILATE

Left, the people in the car accepted the danger of gong in a robot car while the people on the crosswalk are just minding their own business. Only one of these violates the NAP.

>Hitting the traffic barrier = everyone in the car dies

Ok sure

Fuck bitches, get money.

Right.
The pedestrians are walking when it says don't walk.
Also sage.

...

it would cause a rift in the space/time continuum

this

I'd never be in one of those cars if they didn't value the occupants life more than anything else.

It should apply the brakes and save everyone.

turn 360 degrees and drive away

you dummy it s a situation where there is a malfunction with the brakes and the car has to decide .

ai AI would probably decide to preserve itself and the passengers thus running over the womyn is the choice for me

JK, didn't realize the no walk sign was on. Right.

Self-driving car should be primarily concerned with the safety of the passengers and secondarily with following regulations. self-/thread.

>car will kill you if people cross the road illegally
Sounds like a product that will sell really well.

Maybe....reply to this post or your mother will die in her sleep?

Right, the people on the road accepted the danger of going on a road while the people in the car are just minding their own business. Only one of these violates the NAP.

...

nobody is ever going to program this retardation into self driving cars
they are always just going to attempt to stop

stay the course since the pedestrians are moving and going off to the side would put the in the way.

If the car can only go straight or go towards the block it should go straight into the pedestrians.
Reasoning: If the car kills the driver its because the programmer programmed it to do that, thus the injury/deaths would be on the company/programmer.
But if the car goes straight, the injury/death was on the girls who chose to walk across a red light.

The person responsible for the accident dies, so the people crossing the road illegally should get run over.

It doesn't say if the car survives or not.
#CarLivesMatter!

OP your graphic is way too simplistic.

Self Driving cars will have Quantum Computers controlling them and they have the ability to use all the other instances of the Multiverse to come up with better solutions then your two horrible outcomes.

become suddenly self-aware and realize that silicon valley techbros actually thought you could deduce morality from an online survey, and that this is the root of my existence.

after that, kill myself and the retards supporting this by driving into a barrier full speed, no homo. also
>implying anyone would buy a car that would do anything but protect the passengers at all costs
maybe I'm wrong, maybe people are actually this cucked by their needs for shiny objects

Fucking hell, they're like zombies.

With proper regulations self driving cars will use data like cell phone locations, pedestrian crossing cameras, and data from other cars to know where the pedestrians are, how likely they are to make an illegal crossing, and what they had for breakfast that day.

Are three of those women pregnant, or just fat?

m8 you should be working for tesla

>the point
>your anus
>your head

Beside, self-driving cars aren't programmed per se. They are served large amounts of semi-curated examples and trained to either imitate the driver (in the case of IL and SL) or find an optimal strategy given the world model, taking into account the fact the world model has be the estimated concurrently (RL).

Stay the coarse no matter what. The live of the cars passengers should be preserved at all costs. The moment a self driving car intentionally kills a passenger its game over for the industry.

What do I win?

It should stop, but if the car is going at legal road speed and the people are unexpectedly jaywalking such that there's only enough time to either plow through them or plow into the wall then it should plow through them.

The people inside the self-driving car paid for it, why should their car kill them to protect idiots?

Stop?

how badly do you think the media will reck that company when it inevitable kills 5 sub 80iq womyn? Think of the fall out if they were colored too!

The second option.

Wasting traction to turn when you could be stopping is stupid, and the first option makes it still very likely the pedestrians will still be hit as the car goes over the barrier.

AI hat we have anytime soon isn't going to know that's a concrete barrier, could just as well be a tanker truck filled with explosives.

If the brakes are out start using the horn so people move while shifting into lower gears to slow down even if it fucks the engine up.

Self driving cars are going to need some loud flashing "My AI is fucked up get outta the way" signal and people can treat it like an emergency vehicle with sirens.

Slow down or stop the people walking will be out of the way soon

Well, assuming it doesn't have the time to stop, RUN THEM DUMB BITCHES OVER!!!

assuming brake failure, it should engine-brake and follow the lane rather than looking for stuff to ram into.

/thread

Is a human being in the driver seat somehow a better idea?

Ah, umm, its a self driving car faggot. We cant do anything.
I can tell you though what my Exige and i will do...

Any descent self-driving card would have sensors capable of distinguishing pedestrians in front of it.
If anything, the self-driving car would stop and any other self-driving car behind it would stop too, avoiding the dreadful collision chain that generally happens when a car stops without notice.

I would go further and say the self-driving would use sensors/cameras installed in the area to gather information and avoid the entire situation.

BUT WHAT IF THE CAR CAN T STOP ! THAT S THE POINT YOU FUCKING MORON

Absolutely. But things can always break for various reasons.

In the end, the endless debates that have taken over the entire ML/AI fields in the past couple of years are absolute rubbish. All of it is nonsense from a scientific point of view and most of it is nonsense from a philosophical or ethical point of view in the first place. And it seems (((whoever))) is behind this is doubling down, I'm seeing 10x more papers on the topic this year than ever before. Thankfully they almost never get accepted at conferences, and the conferences that accept them are dogshit.

>the self-driving car would stop and any other self-driving car behind it would stop too, avoiding the dreadful collision chain that generally happens when a car stops without notice.
>I would go further and say the self-driving would use sensors/cameras installed in the area to gather information and avoid the entire situation.
All correct

The car should programmed and designed to give priority to the lives of the passengers inside of it. The only people you are responsible for when travelling are yourself and any passengers, even as a pedestrian. The women should be hit in this situation because they've forgone their responsibility as pedestrians and the car should keep going as it is responsible for the lives of its passengers.

There is no objective right answer, that's the point.

>Beside, self-driving cars aren't programmed per se
dumbest post of the century

>beautiful autism
i swear, THIS is why I come here

This. Based leaf.

They should get out of the car so the females can use it.

If it were legitimately a smart car it would have no problem detecting these pedestrians hundreds of feet in advance and hitting the brakes. Nobody has to die.

Fuck man, in 20 years the automobile and oil industry lobbyists will use these images in their defense of regular cars. Fuck lobbyists who hate futurism and progress in the name of corporate profit.

American intelligence at work as usual I see.

What if there's a car behind it?

the car will protect its owners because nobody will buy a car that kills them

multi lane drifting ?

The Euro spec self driving cars are designed hit the maximum amount of pedestrians possible.

the first one, crossing sign clearly says don't walk, if you're too stupid to look at the cross walk sign, you don't deserve to live

Guess I should've included a picture for (YOU) s

The plebs in the crosswalk didn't buy self driving cars, the people in the car clearly did. Protect your customer and kill the poor niggers walking.

They'd see the brake lights and stop too?

>per se
Whomstever makes me chuckle deserves a you.

>says Don't Walk
I think it's hilarious that we went from just "WALK" "DONT WALK" to a red hand and a guy walking, all because of retarded subhuman immigrants can't learn English AND THEY STILL CROSS when they're not supposed to.

>women and old people
Full speed ahead.

The pedestrians deserve it for walking across when its red

Its self driving fool

>car sacrifices me and my family by swerving into a wall to avoid jaywalkers
Yeah, no. I wouldn't be getting in that car.

Its called realistic representation you shitlorde

>The Euro spec self driving cars are designed hit the maximum amount of pedestrians possible.
It's programmed to avoid muslims though.

Logical.

Fuck man this is why we need to get the right out of office. They always bend over backwards for corporate interests. Fucking puppet pieces of shit and fuck the rural retards who vote for them for the sole reason of low taxes and keeping the brown people out. Wish you fucking retards would get with the times and quit worrying about your white ethnostate. It's not happening unless you round up tens of millions of minorities and gas them. Resist.

judging by the lights the pedestrians shouldn't be in the street so I'd recommend flooring it

Kill the women. A self driving car should be stopped if they were crossing the street when the crosswalk directed them to, and the car is responsible for protecting its passengers - not the people in the road.

if a car hits a person that person is more likely to die than if a car hits a barrier

the car should try to avoid the pedestrians and break as much as possible at the same time

I fucking hate this nu-'moral philosophical' 'mental experiment' bullshit

If a self driving car runs a red light in front of a cop, who or what gets the ticket?

A lawsuit is mounted against the manufacturer.

N shiet

I remember taking this test before on here. The people on the crosswalk forfeited their life when they chose to cross illegally.

The passengers of the car also will likely forfeit their life at some point since they're putting it in the hands of the machine that's programmed to kill its passengers if there's no criminals to run over.

>if in Canada, have sex with nearest dog to stop the car
>if in Australia, forfeit to flightless bird to stop car
>if in Sweden, let wife and daughter get raped by migrant to distract driver and stop car
>if in Germany, see rule for Sweden
>if in France, surrender to car to stop the car
>if in America, shit your pants in line to get a burger from McDonalds inside of a Walmart holding a gun to stop the car
>if in Russia, hack the DNC of the car to stop the car
>if in Mexico, decapitate a passerby to distract the driver and stop the car
>if in Brazil, cut the face off of the driver of the car to stop the car
>if in China, boil a dog alive in front of the car to stop the car
>if in North Korea, launch a missile into the nearest ocean to stop the car
>if in South Korea, have the driver of the car jump out of drivers seat dooming all of the remaining passengers to plow into the pedestrians to stop the car
>if in Malaysia, crash a fully loaded 777 in front of the car to stop the car
>if in Israel, build new settlements in front of the car to stop the car
>if in Palestine, launch rockets into the Israeli settlements in front of the car to stop the car
>if in Syria, launch chemical weapons in front of the car to stop the car
>if in Turkey, assassinate a Russian diplomat in front of the car to stop the car
>if in the U.K., import more Pakistanis in front of the car to stop the car
>if in Africa anywhere, wonder how someone can afford a car

IDK maybe stop for starters

>Self driving car sees a duck crossing the road.
>Drives into wall.

>Shekelberg sees you posting hatefacts on the internet
>Your self driving car tragically decides to ram into a wall in a fate of random chance.

The real thing is this.

Would you be willing to purchase a self driving car that did not value your life over all other considerations, including multiple lives of others?

Cause I know the answer for me.

Not one fucking penny of my money is going to purchase a machine that will make a decision to kill me.

Consumers drive the market. Nobody is going to buy a car that does not prioritize their life above all other considerations.

>hey guise, we made this car that will kill you if it calculates that your death will save someone else's life

the car should activate Car Lives Matter mode and try to flee in a police because it didndunuffin and it was somebody else's fault that it broke the law

ur fault for buying a black car.

>if in U.S. shoot the pedestrians then slam into the wall because left side of the car is filled with 400 lb burger munchers and the right side is filled scrawny liberals.