We have to shift gears. Fight battles we can win. There is now plainly evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. That is no longer up for debate. The left got their evidence that they have been clawing for.
What we can do however is look at what it amounted to. Apparently nothing? That's what both sides of the meeting say in retrospect. There will be investigations, but we can't allow the dems to make up proof of exchanged evidence where there is none. Where are the dems planning to take this?
Donald Jr is an idiot that was trying to help his father and fell for the dumbest most obvious trick in the book.
Nathaniel Richardson
>That is no longer up for debate.
Enjoy your nickel, traitor.
Jayden Price
The ((media+democrats)) wanted to milk out all of they could with this nothing burger because they are losing the Russian narrative Jr releasing all if it at once said fuck that and led to the cuck journalist lose his shit Now they have nothing again
>they are losing the Russian narrative Not anymore. The overwhelming majority of people consider this at the very least acceptance of collusion.
Isaiah Sullivan
This is a Shareblue shill thread paid for by the Democratic party.
Kevin Reyes
Trump did nothing wrong, prove that Russia even exists faggot, I'll wait... how much did you get paid for this divide and concord bullshit? Fucking shill scum REEEEE
Isaac Ross
Reminder that Russia did in fact interfere with the election and that's what will be remembered in the history books and taught as "fact"
Connor Edwards
>The overwhelming majority of people consider this at the very least acceptance of collusion on Plebbit.
The rest of the country doesn't give a liquid shit about this.
Leo Morales
>Russian bitch's client is under investigation by Preet Bharara >Russian BItch meets with Trump Jr promising damaging info on clinton >Trump is elected >Trump fires Preet Bharara
looks suspicious as fuck.
Daniel Kelly
...
Kevin Collins
>Collusion >didn't collude
k
story is already over if you haven't noticed
Zachary Foster
A. That doesn't imply "collusion" because that term involves illegality.
B. That doesn't imply that anyone gives a solitary peanut-chocked turd about it, only that they aware of extranational influence.
Stop watching TV.
Colton Perry
They also view this as a really weak arguement Wanting dirt on a politian ain't new People know majority of elections involve outside governments fucking with the election to get the president they want This seemed like this was all they had left They had this info during the election and would've pushed this shit hard if they thought it was actually good enough to fuck with Trump They figured it wasn't much and would be countered by China trying to set up a meeting with Clinton and the sale of uranium to the Russians Now we here and it's still nothing
Ethan King
the sweet smell of sage.
Luis Morgan
>Where are the dems planning to take this?
same as Dems, brics trade war over fuel with Russia and brics, geez wonder what the deal is the secretary of state is some oil guy and now the price of oil is going to go up gee whiz
Jonathan Parker
>plenty of evidence that a non-crime has been committed
Michael Gomez
It's the number one story in American news right now. This just shows how out of touch you are. Spoiler alert: the president has a 38% approval rating. Lower than Obama ever did.
Brayden Gomez
Shariablue herb thread, you know what to do
Jaxson Roberts
Who cares? You stupid fucks are just selling fear and irrationality. Trump is beyond this low iq garbage
Samuel Anderson
>It's the number one story in American news right now. And? That amounts to absolutely nothing. Beanie Babies were the number one news story for months 15 years ago. >Spoiler alert: the president has a 38% approval rating. Lower than Obama ever did. >he still relies on polls for his affirmation of "the truth"
Austin Stewart
Fuck off with your shill thread about your nothing burger meeting faggot.
Samuel Lewis
Reminder that there is no evidence whatsoever that Russia were responsible for hacking the DNC servers and that the DNC refuses to let the FBI analyse said servers in an attempt to discover who supposedly did.
Joseph Murphy
Following (((((polls)))))
Ian Sullivan
>no counter evidence As I suspected
Luke Miller
>Reminder that there is no evidence whatsoever that Russia were responsible for hacking the DNC servers and that the DNC refuses to let the FBI analyse said servers in an attempt to discover who supposedly did. The CIA and FBI disagree. It is widely regarded as fact.
Aaron Phillips
This even his dad was smarter and didn't attend the meeting.
Logan Russell
>we you mean you, faggot?
sage
Connor Stewart
It doesn't matter what the people think. What matters is what anybody who hast to investigate or prosecute thinks. No body else's opinion matters.
Jaxson Russell
Retarded or ShariaBlue. Either way, KYS.
Adam Thompson
>still no evidence
Levi Cooper
>still no evidence There's plenty of evidence. They came to that conclusion based on evidence. It's literally the narrative of the 2016 election.
Thomas Davis
>it doesn't matter what the people think in a democracy Oh you.
>no evidence Wat?
Kevin Reed
What evidence do they have?
Jason Sanders
>It's a meaningless distraction from the harsh reality that the Democrats lost and that loss was their own fault for running a detestable piece of shit like Hillary.
It was your own fault. Had you avoided the corruption endemic in the Democrat party and run the guy the other Dems actually wanted, we would have President Sanders instead of Trump.
Bentley Peterson
We're not a democracy, thank God and Thomas Jefferson.
Leo Cruz
Show us the evidence which proves it
Christopher Long
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections >In Illinois, investigators found evidence that cyber intruders tried to delete or alter voter data.The hackers accessed software designed to be used by poll workers on Election Day, and in at least one state accessed a campaign finance database.Details of the wave of attacks, in the summer and fall of 2016, were provided by three people with direct knowledge of the U.S. investigation into the matter.In all, the Russian hackers hit systems in a total of 39 states, one of them said.
Jace Cruz
Whether that's true or not is irrelevant, because it will be what history remembers.
Aiden Butler
>1 post by this ID Sage this garbage.
David Williams
That says nothing about the DNC tho
Tyler Harris
> Malicious Russian IPs hitting servers
This is absolutely nothing. Got any more junk?
Gavin Moore
Donald Trump says that Donald Trump Jr. is innocent and he is the President he can just pardon him anyway the President can do anything he can decide guilt or innocents who lives and who dies that is his job.
William King
If this story held water in a legal sense it would have been floated long ago. This was supposed to be a card the former WH didn't want to play bc it is such a transparent farce. 1-hearing opposition research is not a crime. 2- it isnt illegal to provide opposition research. It could have been a russian district attorney and it wouldnt be illegal. 3- the email between goldstone and trump was between private citizens not govt. That means likely a fisa warrant would have been issued to collect this surveillance. The reason for the warrant is irrelevant. 4- the "3 magic people" who saw these emails before DJT Jr dump were govt and likely WH appointees and high level IC. 5- info so politically sensitive would have been memorialized and labelling these 3 shouldnt be difficult. 6- i'd bet their initials are SR, JC and JB. 7- this unmasking and leaking of such politically sensitive info is likely a felony.
This is the truth.
Justin Morgan
There was no criminal activity so nothing to pardon...
His only mistake was not using a surrogate to hold the meeting then report back, which all politions use.
David Parker
History will judge him on what he does, not on the corny fabricated scandal the media conjured because they've been proven time and again to be, if not intellectually dishonest, outright liars.
I guarantee that if Trump gets the Obama care repeal through we won't even know Russia exists, and he will be judged on the economic recovery rather than the silly scandals.
Nolan Parker
yeah but what else is happening, they're getting ready to put Wray in as head of the FBI
I'm betting democrats aren't complaining about Wray,
probably means you don't want him if democrats aren't complaining
complain about Wray, allow the government to hit the debt ceiling asap
Levi Taylor
Bump
Nicholas Gutierrez
>its okay if i only try to commit a crime against you, as long as i don't succeed
Andrew Campbell
>A meeting >A lawyer >collusion
Jayden Flores
>concord
Did you post in the Black Mummy thread?
Conquered /= concord.
Eli Thomas
Interesting. One poll seems to ask if the Russians tried to influence the election (obviously they did, they'd be fools not to, we try to influence their politics as well.)
This is compared to an earlier poll asking if they "tipped the sales," or succeeded in influencing the outcome.
Carson Scott
> the president has a 38% approval rating. Lower than Obama ever did.
Not to bicker, but Obama dipped into the 30% range in December of '08.
Nathan Brown
Autism, the post
Sebastian Long
I cant believe all these newfags and idiots still reply to this crap, especially without saging. Type "sage" in the options field if you cant help but reply you retards.