Collusion and where to go from here

We have to shift gears. Fight battles we can win.
There is now plainly evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. That is no longer up for debate. The left got their evidence that they have been clawing for.

What we can do however is look at what it amounted to. Apparently nothing? That's what both sides of the meeting say in retrospect. There will be investigations, but we can't allow the dems to make up proof of exchanged evidence where there is none. Where are the dems planning to take this?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/oAy5n
archive.fo/oAy5n
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I suggest ignoring threads like these.

Donald Jr is an idiot that was trying to help his father and fell for the dumbest most obvious trick in the book.

>That is no longer up for debate.

Enjoy your nickel, traitor.

The ((media+democrats)) wanted to milk out all of they could with this nothing burger because they are losing the Russian narrative
Jr releasing all if it at once said fuck that and led to the cuck journalist lose his shit
Now they have nothing again

BIGGEST LEAK IN 4CHIN HISTORY
archive.is/oAy5n
archive.fo/oAy5n
→ →
ROTHSCHILD LEAKS

>they are losing the Russian narrative
Not anymore. The overwhelming majority of people consider this at the very least acceptance of collusion.

This is a Shareblue shill thread paid for by the Democratic party.

Trump did nothing wrong, prove that Russia even exists faggot, I'll wait... how much did you get paid for this divide and concord bullshit? Fucking shill scum
REEEEE

Reminder that Russia did in fact interfere with the election and that's what will be remembered in the history books and taught as "fact"

>The overwhelming majority of people consider this at the very least acceptance of collusion
on Plebbit.

The rest of the country doesn't give a liquid shit about this.

>Russian bitch's client is under investigation by Preet Bharara
>Russian BItch meets with Trump Jr promising damaging info on clinton
>Trump is elected
>Trump fires Preet Bharara

looks suspicious as fuck.

...

>Collusion
>didn't collude

k

story is already over if you haven't noticed

A. That doesn't imply "collusion" because that term involves illegality.

B. That doesn't imply that anyone gives a solitary peanut-chocked turd about it, only that they aware of extranational influence.

Stop watching TV.

They also view this as a really weak arguement
Wanting dirt on a politian ain't new
People know majority of elections involve outside governments fucking with the election to get the president they want
This seemed like this was all they had left
They had this info during the election and would've pushed this shit hard if they thought it was actually good enough to fuck with Trump
They figured it wasn't much and would be countered by China trying to set up a meeting with Clinton and the sale of uranium to the Russians
Now we here and it's still nothing

the sweet smell of sage.

>Where are the dems planning to take this?

same as Dems, brics trade war over fuel with Russia and brics, geez wonder what the deal is the secretary of state is some oil guy and now the price of oil is going to go up gee whiz

>plenty of evidence that a non-crime has been committed

It's the number one story in American news right now.
This just shows how out of touch you are.
Spoiler alert: the president has a 38% approval rating. Lower than Obama ever did.

Shariablue herb thread, you know what to do

Who cares? You stupid fucks are just selling fear and irrationality. Trump is beyond this low iq garbage

>It's the number one story in American news right now.
And? That amounts to absolutely nothing. Beanie Babies were the number one news story for months 15 years ago.
>Spoiler alert: the president has a 38% approval rating. Lower than Obama ever did.
>he still relies on polls for his affirmation of "the truth"

Fuck off with your shill thread about your nothing burger meeting faggot.

Reminder that there is no evidence whatsoever that Russia were responsible for hacking the DNC servers and that the DNC refuses to let the FBI analyse said servers in an attempt to discover who supposedly did.

Following (((((polls)))))

>no counter evidence
As I suspected

>Reminder that there is no evidence whatsoever that Russia were responsible for hacking the DNC servers and that the DNC refuses to let the FBI analyse said servers in an attempt to discover who supposedly did.
The CIA and FBI disagree. It is widely regarded as fact.

This even his dad was smarter and didn't attend the meeting.

>we
you mean you, faggot?

sage

It doesn't matter what the people think.
What matters is what anybody who hast to investigate or prosecute thinks.
No body else's opinion matters.

Retarded or ShariaBlue. Either way, KYS.

>still no evidence

>still no evidence
There's plenty of evidence. They came to that conclusion based on evidence.
It's literally the narrative of the 2016 election.

>it doesn't matter what the people think in a democracy
Oh you.

>no evidence
Wat?

What evidence do they have?

>It's a meaningless distraction from the harsh reality that the Democrats lost and that loss was their own fault for running a detestable piece of shit like Hillary.

It was your own fault. Had you avoided the corruption endemic in the Democrat party and run the guy the other Dems actually wanted, we would have President Sanders instead of Trump.

We're not a democracy, thank God and Thomas Jefferson.

Show us the evidence which proves it

bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections
>In Illinois, investigators found evidence that cyber intruders tried to delete or alter voter data.The hackers accessed software designed to be used by poll workers on Election Day, and in at least one state accessed a campaign finance database.Details of the wave of attacks, in the summer and fall of 2016, were provided by three people with direct knowledge of the U.S. investigation into the matter.In all, the Russian hackers hit systems in a total of 39 states, one of them said.

Whether that's true or not is irrelevant, because it will be what history remembers.

>1 post by this ID
Sage this garbage.

That says nothing about the DNC tho

> Malicious Russian IPs hitting servers

This is absolutely nothing. Got any more junk?

Donald Trump says that Donald Trump Jr. is innocent and he is the President he can just pardon him anyway the President can do anything he can decide guilt or innocents who lives and who dies that is his job.

If this story held water in a legal sense it would have been floated long ago. This was supposed to be a card the former WH didn't want to play bc it is such a transparent farce. 1-hearing opposition research is not a crime. 2- it isnt illegal to provide opposition research. It could have been a russian district attorney and it wouldnt be illegal. 3- the email between goldstone and trump was between private citizens not govt. That means likely a fisa warrant would have been issued to collect this surveillance. The reason for the warrant is irrelevant. 4- the "3 magic people" who saw these emails before DJT Jr dump were govt and likely WH appointees and high level IC. 5- info so politically sensitive would have been memorialized and labelling these 3 shouldnt be difficult. 6- i'd bet their initials are SR, JC and JB. 7- this unmasking and leaking of such politically sensitive info is likely a felony.

This is the truth.

There was no criminal activity so nothing to pardon...

His only mistake was not using a surrogate to hold the meeting then report back, which all politions use.

History will judge him on what he does, not on the corny fabricated scandal the media conjured because they've been proven time and again to be, if not intellectually dishonest, outright liars.

I guarantee that if Trump gets the Obama care repeal through we won't even know Russia exists, and he will be judged on the economic recovery rather than the silly scandals.

yeah but what else is happening, they're getting ready to put Wray in as head of the FBI

I'm betting democrats aren't complaining about Wray,

probably means you don't want him if democrats aren't complaining

complain about Wray, allow the government to hit the debt ceiling asap

Bump

>its okay if i only try to commit a crime against you, as long as i don't succeed

>A meeting
>A lawyer
>collusion

>concord

Did you post in the Black Mummy thread?

Conquered /= concord.

Interesting. One poll seems to ask if the Russians tried to influence the election (obviously they did, they'd be fools not to, we try to influence their politics as well.)

This is compared to an earlier poll asking if they "tipped the sales," or succeeded in influencing the outcome.

> the president has a 38% approval rating. Lower than Obama ever did.

Not to bicker, but Obama dipped into the 30% range in December of '08.

Autism, the post

I cant believe all these newfags and idiots still reply to this crap, especially without saging. Type "sage" in the options field if you cant help but reply you retards.