Did he do the right thing?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/8UskCJgO6pM
archive.is/oAy5n
archive.fo/oAy5n
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

kinda

Yes of course and so did Dylann Roof
Bringing these two up is the best way to out the pussyfooted race traitors on Sup Forums

no

He killed the people he was so interested in protecting. No, he didn't do the right thing.

yes

But he killed the future communist leadership in Norway.

Without him, Norway would probably be like Sweden right now

No, what he did was wrong. He should have got into politics and lead a party and campaign peacefully rather than attempting but failing to start revolution lading to imprisonment.
>Will he get out in 2032?

that. or what he did, same result.

Yes. Everyone that says that he killed innocent children is sucking jewish dick. Traitors deserve death no matter the age.

youtu.be/8UskCJgO6pM

Would it though? If I recall correctly, most of them were only around the age of 18.
>Norway would probably be like Sweden right now
It takes many, many years to break a people down to the point that Sweden has done to it's people. desu all he did was create more sympathy for leftism, as they had an opportunity to play the victim

>shoot up a bunch of 12yos and their parents
i guess you could make the argument that brevik was ridding the future of mudslime filth. so i really have no qualms.

>kill some old niggers praying in a church because you're too pussy to kill real niggers without fearing being shot back
roof was a pussy, plain and simple. he even admitted it in his manifesto he didn't want to kill actual, real niggers that cause problems because "they might shoot back :^(" that faggot did more harm than good.

BIGGEST LEAK IN 4CHIN HISTORY
archive.is/oAy5n
archive.fo/oAy5n


ROTHSCHILD LEAKS

>all he did was create more sympathy for leftism
But I really don't think this is true

Does ISIS's brutal tactics create more sympathy for their victims? Or do they actually work? Obviously they work. People admire, respect, and fear strength

Sometimes winning is winning, not losing

what he did was a pin drop in comparison to what those kid's commie parents, and all their commie butt buddies have done to your children and everyone's children. It doesn't even compare to the destruction and suffering wrought by the people he targeted. Their policies led to an over decade long sex slavery ring involving young white girls that went unchallenged, and that kind of shit is going on all over Europe as we speak. This is what they want.

No mercy for these fucking evil motherfuckers.

yes he killed the future generation of commies without his norway would have become germany 2.0

christian niggers are still niggers, shitskin children are still shitskins, are boys did nothing wrong desu

>roof was a pussy, plain and simple. he even admitted it in his manifesto he didn't want to kill actual, real niggers that cause problems because "they might shoot back :^(" that faggot did more harm than good.
See every time I bring up Dylann Roof I get some derivation of that response. I'm not sure if it is a meme or shill tactic or both. Either way what he did was better than killing hood niggers. If you shot some worthless ghetto jungle bunny no one would give a shit, hell he probably could've killed a whole bunch before anyone would notice. Now targeting a historical black church, that sends a statement. What he did was certainly terrorism and part of why terrorism works is that it provokes a reaction. He got a reaction alright. The whole alt-right movement taking off is arguable a response to the whole "summer of liberalism" that took place partly thanks to Dylann Roof's actions.

DEY WUZ PRAYIN N SHEIT

DEY WUZ INNOCENT CHILDRENS

There was a thread the other day where a large chunk of people here confessed that they were diehard Liberals before being redpilled.

Killing these people rid them of any chance of changing like some of you have.

When they died, did the shitskins laugh more than Breivik supporters? If so, he did the wrong thing.

>Does ISIS's brutal tactics create more sympathy for their victims?
No, because the media and the certain groups running it do not care for them. They do, however, care for all these idealistic leftist children.
I'm sure many of us were once leftist, the only ones that need to be killed are the ones indoctrinating them.

Confirmed for not knowing shit about Norwegian politics, history or economy. So let me school you motherfuckers who keep praising this turd.

1. Of all his victims, only ONE was considered a rising star in the party. Most of his victims would have a) switched sides, b) become apolitical or c) become unimportant members of local city councils where they don't make decisions regarding immigration.

2. Labour is not communist, and historically, they have been communism's greatest enemy in Norway. They are a center-left party that absolutely hates communism. During the cold war, Labour was in charge most of the time, and they relentlessly harassed anyone believed to be in league with Russia or communists. Anyone who were even friends with people who were suspected communists were kept under surveillance. The brains behind this Norwegian brand of McCarthyism was a Labour politician, and they kept those policies up for decades.

3. With the exception of Oslo East (which is improving through gentrification btw), Norway is doing fine. We don't have any crisis. Every fucking politician now uses the mantra "we don't want Swedish conditions in Norway!". Even far-left socialists recognize that there needs to be limits. Oh, and we have right-wing populists in government right now. They control the Justice department and immigration.

4. All the three (this autumn there might be four) major parties in Norway, including Labour, are pretty strict on immigration. In our representative democracy, these parties will be the main muscle of any government constellation, meaning it doesn't matter all that much who is in charge.

I'm a right-winger who would never, ever vote Labour, but anyone calling this sack of shit a hero has absolutely no clue and zero perspective.

this

Step aside plebs. These two had the right idea. And we're the best. They were "God Like".
>inb4 only 13 kills

The library, which was the biggest part of the Massacre, had over 60 kids. They had enough ammunition to permanently ban hammer all of them but for some reason chose not to. They could have destroy the kids hiding in the classrooms too.

Those communist traitors got exactly what they deserved. How many women have been raped in Europe because the liberals have flooded Europe with low life scum? Look at all the terrorist attacks by these animals that have been flooded into Europe. He is a hero.

We're trying to discuss a politically-motivated massacre, not pointless bloodshed caused by two underachieving chucklefucks.

>Now targeting a historical black church, that sends a statement.


He could've made just as big of a statement, if not bigger, by blowing open the skulls of feral niggers that cause most of the problems today. He could've killed a nog that might have raped or killed a white woman in the future. He would've been doing the entire country a favor by ridding at least one those and you know that. But some decrepit nogs praying in some old church? very misguided.

As it happens, we have only suffered one terrorist attack. Some would say two.

Either way, the perp wasn't a Muslim in any of those cases.

Also, Norwegian Labour are strict on immigration.

>under achieving
They were considered "gifted" students. That were highly advanced for their age in information technology. And in a sense, it was a in some small way political. They wanted to scare the world. especially America into fear and complete worry. They inspired numerous copy cats.

Like these attention whores like Mr Cocunt Head who's girlfriend cucked by black man and decicied to destroy a church.

Yup, executing traitors is God's work.

Because it was about causing senseless suffering, not actually about killing blacks. Roof was a typical psycho mass murderer, stop riding his cock because he posted here. He didn't kill feral nogs because he's a beta and didn't have the balls to shoot people who would shoot back.

I think they'd have shot you without hesitation and you may still be saluting them as heroes while you lay there dying.

We'll.....you're not wrong.....unless I was friends with them in school.

I disagree. He would have been covered far less in the media had he killed hood rats. Liberals might think that it had "raysis" motivations but it wouldn't give them enough ammo to lash out like they did.

Have you ever loved someone? Imagine them being randomly killed without discrimination and then you promptly sucking the dick of the shooter because he was your friend. Christ, what does it take to be as fucked in the head as you?

no he was a retarded faggot

It has been efficient. No politician dares to advocate for immigration now in Norway ever since he killed the children of leftist politicians

Back off shit powder. My love for them is unconditional.

What about me?

Norway doesn't appear to be Sweden 2.0 so... maybe?