This woman will be the first to join the Army's elite 75th Ranger Regiment

Should women serve in the army? Why and why not?

armytimes.com/articles/this-woman-will-be-the-first-to-join-the-armys-elite-75th-ranger-regiment

Other urls found in this thread:

defencecareers.mil.nz/army/joining-up/fitness-requirements
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3521538/Army-fitness-tests-written-make-sure-female-soldiers-qualify-line-duty.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_Battalion
youtube.com/watch?v=q-NG1AnljKE
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You'll have your answer in nine months.

If they can complete the same requirements, yes. Even more so for special forces which is about bonding with insurgents to create an asymmetrical force in your favor. A woman's innate abilities would do well there with the added level of skill required to become a special forces member.

You're an idiot.

fpbp

I'm also a vet whose served with women (some of whom were in special operations, not forces, with me) that were head and shoulders above some faggot on the internet, so suck my dick.

Nope.
But who the fuck honestly gives a shit at this point? Our military deserves to suffer, they brought this on themselves.

Did they have any negative effects on group cohesion though? That's the main reason I wouldn't want women in the military even if they met the requirements

>Should women serve in the army? Why and why not?
No, only when defending your country from foreign invaders as a last resort
It's not even because they are weaker and cry when under pressure, even a crippled man in a wheelchair can kill somebody with a rifle.

You don't send women into wars for the same reason you don't send resource gatherers out to fight on RTS games. Not only they are weaker/slower than regular soldiers, but they also are needed to produce more soldiers.
If you start killing the enemy's women, you are killing the unborn enemy soldiers that might be a problem in the next 2 decades. Plus, if you capture the enemy women you can WOLOLO them into producing more soldiers to YOU, which is even worse for the enemy.

Even a 14 year old boy can outperform a woman in combat, but we don't send them either because the reason why you are fighting the war is to protect your women and children not some kike's interests
A country that sends it's own women to die is a country without a future

Stolen valor

>special operations, not forces, with me
sure m8

>If they can complete the same requirements, yes

They fucking can't though. Literally every attempt to put women in combat arms has required them to lower the standards.

No different than any other person. SOCOM/AFSOC, weeds people out pretty quickly. In Big Blue/Big Green the same ratio of dicks and cunts, exist. There are more males in the military so you notice the dicks who completely fuck up unit morale more, however.

US Marine here. Out Company Gunny pretty much summed it up when he once said, "I have met many women in my career that were amazing leaders and amazing Marines, however, in hand to hand combat, I would kill every one of them.

Case closed. War is about killing, not your feelings.

Alright sounds fine to me then. I trust someone who's actually experienced it than someone trying to extrapolate based on their perception of women.
's Argument is decent though, but this would only matter if you had a real big war where you had to draft a good chunk of your population.

See The whole question of "if they can meet the requirements" sounds reasonable and makes sense until you find out that none of them fucking can. All of this shit is political and isn't about finding the best people for the job.

women do fine when faced when combat. it is everything that leads up to combat that destroys and erodes their body and makes them less suited for a combat-oriented role.

No. Simple fact is that man can do everything better in army. Maby field cafeteria maiden or field-brothel moral booster max.
Inb4 some Semite posts IDF pig disgustings.

Nah, brah.

There were like 8-10 girls in my company, 6 of them broke down crying every now and then in basic training.

It was pretty awkward.

you post as if the woman in your picture is joining the rangers. For anyone who thought that: this is just some random bimbo. The article does not show a pic of the woman or even give her name

>10/10 roastie will service our elitest troops's every whim

God bless America

> do they have negative effects on unit cohesion?
Know how I know you never served? You use faggot ass middle management talk like that. Shut the fuck up, you have no right to speak.

>Should women serve in the army? Why and why not?

No. Because they're women.

Nobody thinks that. fuck off.

And what about the stronger women who drove tanks in wwii and fought off whole battalion by themselves. Not all women are weak. And why would a solider if trained break formation to save someone. I doubt anyone from this era would save a women.

There's already CST females grinding shit out on the daily.
This shouldn't be a surprise. Good lock getting them through PJ/CCT pipeline tho.

Go back to kissing the ground vets walk on burger.

>They fucking can't though. Literally every attempt to put women in combat arms has required them to lower the standards.

Is there any official evidence about lowering the standards for women? I'm sure plenty of anecdotal evidence exists, but that's always shrugged off as unreliable. Feel free to share a story or two if you have personal experiences about it.

The Finnish army has some sort of PT tests that where they grade you according to push-ups, pull-ups, cooper and the like. They used to be the same for women and men, but at some point they changed it so that women get points more easily. Not sure if it that has that much significance, since it was just the basic PT test for everybody.

Apart from lower physical strength and stamina women also break down more easily. Heard a lot of stories from NCO and officer school where a lot of women simply quit, because their body is breaking down more easily and they don't have the time to heal up. Also heard how the other conscripts had to sometimes carry the gear of the women and sometimes even the women themselves.

Yeah, put 'em in. More blood on the PC crowd's hands.

Females have worse pain tolerence.
Females heal wounds slower.
Females have 60-40% less upper body strength.
Females have 30-25% less lower body strength.
Females convert less food into muscle and more into fat.
Females have less lung volume.

There are a top % that can reach the average of the male soldier, but due to biological differences it is greatly reduced. More soldiers for the grinder is nice, but this has nothing to do with that because:

Just take a look at NZ and AUS army.
Physical standards are lower across the board.
Even for NZ's special "club" as they call it.

This will get people killed.
defencecareers.mil.nz/army/joining-up/fitness-requirements
Feel free to take a look.
If it wasn't about political correctness and diversity then the standards wouldn't be lowered.

No they are completely useless. I have served as a conscript for 1,5 years in Greek army and met literally more than a hundred. Basically they are useless and in universities, if you subtract the made up fields like social gender studies etc.

> (OP)
>If they can complete the same requirements, yes. Even more so for special forces which is about bonding with insurgents to create an asymmetrical force in your favor. A woman's innate abilities would do well there with the added level of skill required to become a special forces member.
Come fight for ZOG, I'll succ ur dick

Yaaaay
Women get to cause the deaths of their fellow soldiers with their incompetence in the UK as well soon!
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3521538/Army-fitness-tests-written-make-sure-female-soldiers-qualify-line-duty.html
I love diversity.

She can throw her boobs at them. Ban assault tits
>women
>oh em gee he has like a 42 inch cock
>4.5" asian
Here have a grenade

Practically no women were tankers in WWII. Heavy equipment is a bitch to work on. Taking off a tanks undercarriage in the field is a difficult task even for a crew of 5 men.
There were women snipers and things like Night Witches though.

Sure. Our fighting men deserve some slampig to reduce their stress. I am for free fuck toy women for our soldiers.
Thanks, for volunteering, sluts!

>t. reddit bullshit artist

You are afraid of strong women

>And what about the stronger women who drove tanks in wwii and fought off whole battalion by themselves
How about this strong woman that can hold off battalions be back home raising strong children with her superior genes instead?
You have a hammer, a screwdriver, a wrench and a 10/10 porcelain knife. You need to use one of them to kill somebody.
The knife is great at it's job, but it is the only tool you have to cut meat. Why would you risk breaking your precious knife and ability to cut perfect stakes when you can just use the hammer?
Women can have children, men cannot. Women are precious and should be protected, men are expendable.

> And why would a solider if trained break formation to save someone. I doubt anyone from this era would save a women.
If you had to choose one: having your 10/10 handsome brother be kidnapped by niggers or your 10/10 sister with big tits, which one would you choose?
If a gang of thugs came up and slapped your male friend in the face, you might just let them get away with it, but if they slap your female friend on the ass, you HAVE to at least try to defend her her, or you can't call yourself a man
How can a soldier call himself a man if he doesn't break formation when he knows the girl who he has a bit of a crush on is about to get captured and raped to death by shitskins?
A male soldier MAY be tortured when captured, he may even die. A female soldier WILL get raped, might die or on the worse case scenario can be sold as a sexslave.
If you doubt anybody would refuse to save a woman, especially a soldier who puts his life on the line everyday, it means you are a gigantic cuck

...

And that's not even considering the damage to morale this will do, I mean, It's not like, ever in history, Women in the military, have like, destroyed troop morale, like ever. Right?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_Battalion
oh
Women deserve spaces free of men! But Men deserve no spaces, everything, where they can be alone with their bros, will be infested by females in the name of equality..

Women are a joke dude for anything beyond housekeeping, sex puppetry and baby birthing.

is she going to provide "stress and tenseness relief" for the rest of the squad or what?

That's not the mission of the Ranger Regiment.

Women do have their place, and that's in intel and working undercover (SF dude and woman acting like gf and bf and taking lots of pictures).

Women should not have a role in actual fighting, though. Especially with Direct Action-oriented units like the 75th Ranger Regiment. Those guys have to carry a ridiculous amount of equipment and ammo.

There are more male fuck-ups than female fuck-ups, but the latter causes a disproportionate amount of trouble for the unit as a whole. Lance Corporal Schmuckatelie gets a DUI, gets Nj 'd, busted down and put on restriction. Lance Corporal Schmuckette gets a DUI, accuses 3 dudes of rape, loses shit before a CMR, and somehow gets a meritorious promotion and/or moved to a new unit(if she wants).

You're quite worked up about this. You in the tiny bird military?

He's right you know

>how is our 24/7 news cycle going to cover a raped captured, raped, mutilated woman?

well I guess germany and sweden are female combat ready, then

>Hurr durr, I'm a vet. I worked as a chef. I-I got PTSD when a pot boiled over. HURR DURR Women can do anything a man can do!

Part of me wishes.
Although part of me does not.
But it's not up to me, I have medical conditions so unless those go away I can't join.
Don't even get government fucking gibs for my condition, but Maori nig nogs get gibs for fucking nothing all the time.
All I do is make knives out of wood and grumble on Sup Forums at this point. Fucking kill me.

Any trained soldier could kill this woman in 10 seconds.

There are tons of women nowadays there's some 7 billion people in the world why do you want to have more kids in a already overpopulated world.
I mean you probably think trans men on hormones shouldn't be in the army either.
Prove to me one soldier that died because they broke ranks to save a woman or do her job for her.
>protip you can't

Especially once she fractures her pelvis after rucking all over creation wearing 150lbs of "high speed" bullshit.

She's an officer though and because officers are fucking useless having her in a ranger regiment will be fine. The rest of the people around her are going to be relatively squared away so if they have to drag a shit sandwich around for a bit nobody will care.

No.

If a female wants to be elite military, let her.

But do not change or lower requirements. If she can't perform exactly the same as men physically and mentally, she has no business being military.

>Although the women performed well in combat and suffered few casualties their example was not enough to inspire the mass of war-weary soldiers to continue fighting.

Wikipedia never fails to make me laugh

Oh man, I'm like the American version of you. Except I can't make wood knives.

Best wishes NZ-bro.

>7 billion people in the world why do you want to have more kids in a already overpopulated world.
In 3rd world shitholes, not in Europe or America.
>I mean you probably think trans men on hormones shouldn't be in the army either.
They shouldn't, they have as much business serving as does someone with diabetes.

>born too late to fight barbarians
>born too early to fight ayylmaos
>born just in time to wage wholesale war in a time of such delusion that they shoehorn women onto the front lines

At this point I say bring on WWIII boys, gonna fuck me plenty of dying aryan girls as their guts hang out and they scream for daddy.

>Biologically imposible to have as much strength as men
>Men instinctvely try to protect women at all cost
>If they get ever captured they will be raped to death, you are giving free women to sex starved muslims, great idea

Theres no shortage of jarheads for the front lines, whats the point.

You are a *literal* welfare whore; if you rubbed two of your five neurons together, you'd realize that the US military doesn't protect us from legitimate threats, only Israeli interests.

Love the rubber look, just not inside the titties.

if she passed the exact same tests and training as the guys i dont see a problem unless she fucks up in the field, if she passed because of reduced expectations for women (amount of weight able to carry and all that shit) and got in for PC and propaganda points then there is an issue. time will tell and i hope it is the former rather than the latter.

I hope our super volcano erupts and wipes this shitty mini-continent off the face of the Earth.

Fuck, just read that article again, section I was referencing has been removed, fucking Jews, it's got a lot more "wymynz was perfect soldiers" than it used to.
Eh, was a section on how male soldiers hated the female ones for not letting them retreat that I was referring to.

I would definitely like to spend the night in her foxhole, if you know what I mean.

no woman is stronger than the 12 children she can bear

> OY VEY WORLD IS OVER POPULATED
> GOTTA HAVE LESS CHILDREN TO STOP GLOBAL WARMING
> WE MUST IMPORT MORE REFUGEES
Found the shill

Trannies shouldn't be allowed either because it makes you look weak by association
Which army do you think ISIS fears most? The russians with their squat vodka drinking lunatics or modern day america's, full of women and pansies with artificial vaginas?

I did. I thought it was a good idea to have a prostitute along so we don't need to outsource that shit.

Bring back comfort women.

Women are shit at everything they do. The very idea of a female soldier is laughable. I bet you have a pegging fetish.

Woman are inferior in combat. It is just the nature of gender. Woman play supportive roles.

Her foxhole is booby trapped, so be careful not to cut yourself user.

That's where you're wrong kiddo, I beat the greeks on a game of age of empires by spamming workers at them.

Wow that is disgusting.

lmao

>Elite Female Ranger raped and killed in battle. Feminists shocked: Where were the men?

gay!

Name one thing women have involved themselves in that has not been ruined or made worse by their involvement.

Besides porn/sex related tasks

Raping her, duh.

No. No. No. You dont understand this unit. Terrible idea. She will been relegated to a desk. Period. If she ends up on a mission she'll guard the vehicles with a few privates. Guaranteed.

>SOCOM/AFSOC
>AFSOC
>special operations, not forces
lmao, you were supply for TACPs and PJs? Get the fuck out of here.

>guard the vehicles with a few privates
A few privates' privates?

Squid here. Women are insufferable on ships and get special treatment. 300 guys cooped up on a boat will do anything to get close to a woman. Plus they're miserable to work with. All Navy women end up disgusting as well. i have no idea what would inspire a woman to join the military.

Itll be a fucking train wreck but kept in-house.

If a woman wants to be a soldier, she should have her face scarred, tits removed and cooch surgically sealed to remove all value in the sex trade.

mandatory

...

With the growing prominence and importance of technology in warfare I don't see why not. The more willing soldiers for the draft the better.

discord gg/WbDVqFr

This unit does not need women. There is no net benefit. If there was it would have happened years ago. Terrible idea.

>sandmonkey in charge of common sense
increased technology = increased weight the average grunt has to carry

women are so weak that their hips literally break under the pressure of marching with standard infantry packs

...

>that pouch set up
>that weapon handling
Well you can tell she never carries anything heavy shoots or crawls.

>Should women serve in the army? Why and why not?

Yes. It's HER TURN.

#Feministsforthefrontlines

#draftwomen

#whyshouldboysgetallthefun

Jokes aside my National Socialist brothers:

I think that everyone should be trained to fight in our societies. There is no dishonour in a woman knowing how to defend herself and even you when the time is right.
It's simply a matter of fact that young healthy men will naturally make up the strongest and most elite sections of most of our armed forces.
We should not take the piss out of nature and insist on statistical cosmetics.

For unit composition, real psychological dynamics should be considered carefully.
This should be obvious.

Any and all communist whinings will be ignored.

I don't have to be an expert to see that women are too stupid to get over the most simple obstacles, let alone fight in tense situations.

Here is a video about women in the Bundeswehr.

youtube.com/watch?v=q-NG1AnljKE

Powerful footage on multiple levels.

As long as a woman can complete the same requirements men have, then it's fine. The fact that they can't and that they have special lower standards for women just shows how the left wants to make our armed forces weaker.

>white knighting on an anonymous image board

>I'm also a vet

ITT: Stolen Valor

Being a fobbit weather man does not count. Nor does being secret squirrel.

finally a woman i'd rape and kill that would totally be worth the challenge.