You libertarians are even worse than liberals

you libertarians are even worse than liberals

Other urls found in this thread:

lp.org/the-libertarian-party/
alternet.org/visions/true-history-libertarianism-america-phony-ideology-promote-corporate-agenda
archive.is/1mcoc
youtube.com/watch?v=vLqHv0xgOlc
youtube.com/watch?v=DB9oUqIcX-c
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

"libertarians" are just republicans who arent ready to admit to their parents theyre republicans

Libertarians aren't even remotely republicans dumbass. They have way more in common with liberals.

Libertarianism is the next political meme trend once everyone gets sick and tired of Trumps shtick.

Conservatism is just as fundamentally backwards as liberalism

FUCK YOU NIGGER. YOU KNOW NOTHING

Jokes on you, I'm a monarchist

libertarianism died in 2016 senpai

>Imagine actually believing that fascism would lead to a better nation in the long run
>Imagine believing that the Germany that's self destructing itself with perverse leftism today, isn't an exact reaction fascism.

If you're talking about nationalism - that's a bit different, more acceptable. But fascism is quite clearly a regressive ideology that will hinder humanities progress towards perfection.

Then again, that's just my opinion.

>this is what ancap ayn randian fucks actually want to happen
seriously, worse than liberals

GUYS GUYS FREE-MARKET CAPITALISM IS DUMB, PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE DUMB, I WISH HITLER WAS MY DAD

But fascism rose in direct opposition to marxism

I'm talking about nationalism vs consumerism. Libertarians are consumerist whores that think everything ought to be a commodity to be bought and sold. They'd sell their own fucking parents into slavery if they could.

(You) >:^D

there are very few examples of any of the standard typologies on Sup Forums.... teenagers and idiots dont know what they are or what they are talking about so mostly they are lame caricatures of such

Consider that the entire "culture" of the place is based on endlessly repeating the same jokes over and over again.... not a bright bunch.

Granted I'm sure there are exceptions.

the entire political spectrum has shifted left in recent history. The modern republican is the classical libertarian you pleb and modern libertarianism is liberalism 20 years ago

Libertarians are liberals
Why do you think they always shit on natsocs and generally are obnoxious pseudo-intellectuals?

Wrong. libertarianism proved itself capable as a party of shitposting

Ive been a trump supporter since June 5th 2015. And getting him into power was fun and all, but its boring now.

Sup Forums is going to be libertarian board by July 2019

This is the kind of dumb ass shit libertarians believe, folks.
Like, you can't even make this up. This is it right here.

'
shutup retard

Libertarianism is corporate PR you dumb nigger and they're all proto-liberal degenerates. Liberalism is liberalism.

Libertarianism and classical liberalism are basically the same thing.

And yet they have leftist-fascism lite in Germany now.
I guess you could argue that, then we'd have to come up with a mix between free market libertarianism and nationalism - something that I'd sort of agree with.

But I believe fascism is as bad as progessivism, and inevitably will either lead to an opposite reaction that achieves nothing, or just flat out stagnate humanity' s evolution.

Yes and im the stupid one bc this stupid piece of fucking shit moron cant see how american politics work. just bc a party is named libertarian doesnt mean theyre the most libertarian by the books. looks like i stirred up the "dude weed" voters

I agree. Fascism is not needed. I have nothing against capitalism mind you, but when it impinges on our national identity and brings discord to the people, threatening our solidarity by reducing everything to a market value instead of a moral value, then we have a problem.

What the fuck are you even saying?

both are jewish are cucked and inferior ideologies

lp.org/the-libertarian-party/

Educate yourself you fucking moron. The Libertarian Party has way more in common with democrats and the liberal agenda than republicans or conservatives.

Enjoy, dumbasses.
>alternet.org/visions/true-history-libertarianism-america-phony-ideology-promote-corporate-agenda

Yeah that's a good point you have about rabid consumerism reducing everything to market value.

Archive please
archive.is/1mcoc

>And yet they have leftist-fascism lite in Germany now.
Because the west destroyed and demonized fascism since it's inception to even this day as inherently evil, but has allowed marxism to roam free in academia.
youtube.com/watch?v=vLqHv0xgOlc

>we'd have to come up with a mix between free market libertarianism and nationalism
It's called national-socialism

youtube.com/watch?v=DB9oUqIcX-c

>Nobody should have rights

at least we understand economics u fvkking normie

>corporations should define and enforce rights

Yeah, but you don't understand morality you fucking shill.

inferior people don't deserve the same rights as superior people

I never claimed that.
And what happens when your people are considered inferior?

in a libertarian state only the corporations would make the rules
it's its logical conclusion

>it's its logical conclusion
In what way? Libertarianism=/=Anarcho-Capitalism

>And what happens when your people are considered inferior?
the powerful will rule the weak, white nationalist Europe will always be strong enough to claim superiority over niggers, spics, mudslimes,...

...... libertarians ARE liberals.

>white nationalist Europe will always be strong enough to claim superiority over niggers, spics, mudslimes,...
Currently working wonderfully

actually a christian libertarian has the highest morality one could acheive: derived from god no states in sight

nah

a hoppian dictatorship is the logical conclusion of libertarianism and that is just anarcho-capitalism

All authority is from God.
Obey the princes.
- the New Testament.

in a STATE the STATE make the rules in a libertarian society would be a basic social consensus about how to interact with other people

Do you even understand the principals of your own ideology?

Libertarians believe that the only laws that should exist and be enforced are those that prevent fraud, protect private property, and enforce contractual obligations. That's it. That means the only "rights" people have are to live under the authority of money and those who possess it.

Ironically, Libertarians are probably the most fascist people in the history of civilization.

have you heard the term, limited liability?
who made that rule?

>truth is found when a group of people come together to agree on what is truth
>reminiscent of protestantism
>tfw you realize classical liberalism is merely a descendant of theological liberalism; aka protestantism

>imagine being such a subservient faggot that you can't even grasp the idea of not having a boot on your face at all times

>Imagine handing even more of your rights and willingly submit to being controlled in every aspect of life

Sure smells like socialism in here.

Because European politics is dominated by weak and inferior ideologies (often controlled by jews). Liberalism, socialism, christian democrats, greens,... all are reluctant to place Europe on the 1st place. Nobody wants to sink the refugee boats because "muh human rights". Nobody wants to deport muslims because "they're European aswell, every human is equal and deserves to have the same rights as native Europeans". We're trapped in one giant cuck-spiral and we're sinking farther and farther in the swamp of decadence and degeneracy.

...

No, in a libertarian society it would be a corporate consensus, because corporations would own all the money, and the only laws that would exist in a libertarian money are forms of protectionism.

you literally cant even read or comprehend what i said u degenerate fucking moronic piece of shit

In an unregulated market, what is there to prevent a monopoly that swallows up all markets?

What is there to prevent us from becoming the United States of Amazon?

Libertarianism is just a minimalist state.
>Defence
>Border protection
>Police
>Basic security (fire departments and shit)
>Infrastructure
A libertarian state is simply a state that ignores heavy influence, control, or manipulation of private companies as well as highly limited or no social programs. Of course you could consider yourself libertarian and oppose roads or border protection or police or support public education, its a sliding scale.

Yeah, because your grammar is shit. It's expected from the low IQ and poorly educated. Keep up the passive aggressive replies, though. It fuels me.

>Le you are the real fascists meme

Christianity in a libertarian society would merely be a commodity to be bought and sold. It's importance would be equal to its market value and that's it. If people became deceived and lost sight of what matters, they would stop wanting to participate in it and it would fade away simply because it wasn't trending on twitter and being shilled by big businesses.

Shit, that's already where things are headed, and you just want them to end up there even faster.

Sounds like a good argument to get rid of government subsidies.

If the Europeans are superior they should naturally be able to deal with lesser peoples and not need the state to directly intervene to oppose those peoples.

Beyond that the real issue with fascism is nationalism and due to admixture between populations and the concept of greater nations this inevitably leads to conflict. Case and point Serbians and Russians have generally supported pan-Slavism since they are the largest populations of south and east slavs respectively. Smaller slavic populations generally opposed pan-slavism since pan-slavism silenced the voices of those ethnic minorities. Another example of course is the concept of greater Germany where Germans idealized a state that ruled over large parts of Poland and Bohemia where Germans were a significant minority but still a minority to the Slavs, this of course leads to a conflict of interests between the Slavs and Germans.

exactly
and the rules of society would be dominated by the media who has funding from other corporations like today but without the compassion

not a libertarian government that's for sure

I don't read shit from people who's followers cant explain their ideology precisely and concisely
I get all my info on anarcho-capitalism from you retards

Some, yes. Not all of them. Federalism needs to go. But state and local subsidies are often feasible because they are under the control of the local population. There's more freedom in doing things at the state level, and also, there's enough wealthy states in America that you have options. It's a compromise with libertarians, you see. Like I said, I'm not against capitalism, but we do need some regulations. This is why conservatives are not against mandated healthcare. Republicans are not trying to throw healthcare away, they just want to reform it to make it work the way it should instead of the way Obama set it up.

Most anti libertarians also think the u.s. is or was ever supposed to be a democracy..... Which only enforces just how fucking retarded they actually are. Corporations can only take control of areas where the population is too god damned soft to defend their own liberties.....debate me faggots.

>and the rules of society would be dominated by the media who has funding from other corporations like today but without the compassion
Except the media has no direct reason to influence the state because unlike today them and their supported corporations do not receive corporate welfare from the state.

What are you talking about? The media lobbied harder than any other special interest group during the 2016 elections. Do your fucking homework and look up Super PACs and who was donating the most money.

the governments of Europe are against her people
there is not much they can do without being detained

Libertarianism doesn't need to mean a completely unregulated market. That's just a fevered dream of idiots and tycoons.

You can have a libertarian government where there is enough regulation to make sure no corporation can grow so large that it swallows up everything. In fact it would increase competition because heavy regulation just makes it harder to start a new company.

Libertarianism isn't the same as the ancap memes, those are just memes. A real libertarian simply wants the individual to be in power and not the government, regulation is a tool that can be used to keep the individual in power or to keep the government in power. The difference is in how that tool is used.

We already have monopolies and the government supports them all. That's why we're having this stupid net neutrality push because people are afraid of the ISP monopolies in the US. So they're asking for big daddy government to save them when big daddy government protects the monopolies in the first place.

what is the ideal form of government for libertarians?

you just explained why the state must not have power

minarchist

bitcoin
the only way to govern something while still having byzantine fault tolerance, is to use a blockchain

It depends which libertarian you ask. That's why there's never been a strong libertarian movement since the colonies rebelled. No two libertarians will have the same opinion of what is ideal.

If you ask me, economically it would mean strong ownership rights, easy to start up a new business without needing to spend half your money on permissions that mean nothing or are redundant, it would not protect stupid consumers who buy shit without actually researching (but false marketing and fraud would still be illegal and harshly punished).

Legally it would mean everyone has the same rights so long they don't fuck with others rights. You want to practice whatever mad religion you want? Go ahead, don't ask others to accommodate those beliefs though. Someone hurt your feelings because they called you a nigger, go ahead and be offended and even hurt their feelings back, but don't ask for someone's voice to be silenced. Someone beat you for being a minority? Well that person is thoroughly fucked because they overstepped.

Punishment should be harsh in most cases. If you have so much freedom, it's only fair that those who squander their freedom or undermines the freedom of others should be taught the true value of being free.

how minarchist are you talking?
the articles of confederation were a complete failure

>They have way more in common with liberals.
Are you actually retarded? The modern usage of the word liberal is basically a synonym for leftist. Seeing as the left wants to abolish private property, and libertarians want to restore property rights, I seriously doubt that you have an IQ over 70.

Right-wing libertarianism is more common than left-wing libertarianism (which is practically non-existent).

Cry more

Mmm yes daddy, please give me more of your boot! I trust that the government will always do what is best for me! I'm daddy's little sissy!