So what's Sup Forums's argument against this?

So what's Sup Forums's argument against this?

Leftists adore saying this

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Bolivia
Rare

Gonna fuck with him.

...

Ask anyone who's ever had the unfortunate experience of going to a majority-black school growing up.

My dad went to one and said he got jumped by roving gangs of niggers on a regular basis. Is that "white privilege" in action?

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade

Also, here is how Arabs view blacks.

What does oppression have to do with racism?

Kekr

Everyone has enslaved everyone. Asians haven't even been enslaved by whites and they still bitch out white privledge and oppression. Imagine whitey pulling that shit in an Asian country

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade

this image would be more effective if it said:
"Whites enslaved in Africa" vs. " Blacks enslaved in America"

it's too muddled

Does a dictionary count as an argument?

However only second-third generation asians pull that shit.
They get brainwashed by the left, either that or they realize they can get some "oppression points" and get some advantages by it.
Yes even here in Bolivia we have the whole "lmao white privilege!" Shot even though whites are like 15% of the population.
Banks, police, military, government, most of business aren't owned by whites, its a mathematical certainty yet they still pull that shit.

constantinople

you can't go back there btw

South Africa (and Zimbabwe).

t. Saffer

Just more proof that "racist" is a word whose sole purpose is to disparage whites. If only white people can be racist, then racist is a slur against whites. It's the only slur against whites that is actually effective in demeaning them.

So anti-racists are just anti whites (like Tim Wise, obviously). And fighting racism means fighting whites. It's so obvious at this point I don't know why more people say this

>jargon has no place in colloquial conversation. if you had graduated from college you'd know this. now leave me alone you racist piece of sub-human garbage.

It's gonna be funny when they run out of white people to kill and blame, and they just start going down the line of colors and picking out who will be next in line.

>EHHH ESE I'M NOT WHITE, I'M MEXICAN!
>it doesn't matter, you look white enough, now die for your privilege

Extra points if he's an illegal that they were defending a year ago.

no cos they'll pull out that cartoon that shows that dictionaries were invented by old dead white men or summat

>haven't been enslaved

slavery isn't the only thing that can oppress people. the opium wars and british colonization were white people.

For white people having so much pride in their race our ancestors sure don't give a fuck about their descendants. There seem to be a lot of trickle down problems they didn't have to deal with but the current generation do.

Kinda reminds me of climate change.

>388.000

Source

Irish Slaves
Current South Africans
Zibazinga farmers

barbary slave trade

you mean rhodesia right?

>when were

Don't coloureds have any problems that weren't solved by whitey centuries ago?

You can't just make up a new definition for racism so you can say you're not racist.

There is no such thing as "reverse racism" because it's all just racism. They can try to coin whatever newspeak garbage they want, but their very application of the word racism is racist if they insist it can only be used for one race and not others.

That's not a fucking argument

Also, it's hard to find a country and people that were raped harder in both world wars then ethnically white Poland.

Every single black man was freed by a white man.

Every single black man was enslaved by a black man.

>if you've been oppressed you're free to be racist
What the fuck is that logic?
>your ancestors haven;t been oppressed (by my definition of oppression) therefore you that have absolutely nothing in common with them should be a victim or racism by me that I haven't been oppressed but my ancestors have
America ruining the world.

(((K-Pop))) fans

The definition of racism isn't about (government) oppression, it's about discrimination.

Like my tweet, n00bs.

Whites were oppressed by their own kind when empires were shunned and the colonial powers reigned in.

Ignoring the fact that whites HAVE been oppressed many times throughout history, the power + prejudice = racism equation was invented by (((sociologists))) to allow shitskins to get a free pass for being as viciously racist toward whites as they want to be.

In the real world, "power" has nothing to do with racism. If it did, then no white person in America could have been racist against Barack Obama because they didn't have the power of the presidency like he did. Tell that to a libshit and see how they react.

Hello Fellow subhuman, what do you think about irala's shooting?

That was justice in action. Street justice for the shit whites did.

Arguments are built upon definitions. Both sides have a common understanding of the words we use, and therefore can have discourse. SJW's find the agreed upon definitions inconvenient, incompatible with their twisted world view, so they change them. Now the same word means something different to either side and there can be no arguments.

White people were oppressed when the Barbary pirates from North Africa in the 17th century came and enslaved 1.25 million Europeans, four times as many as slaves that were transported from Africa to North America.

Apart from this new definition of racism being an obvious, galling attempt to justify hypocrisy, it's even more sinister than just that.
Before 2013, being called a "racist" was one of the worst things in our society. This new definition essentially says that "to be racist is to participate in a system that perpetuates unequal racial outcomes." This is basically just a smokescreen to enable black people to call every single white person a racist.
The thing is, this new definition is not nearly as serious an accusation as the old definition. Putting aside the fact that unequal outcomes are caused by a bunch of different things, passive participation in anything is not going to be nearly as malevolent as active prejudice.
However, they want to be able to call every white person a racist, but for that accusation to carry the same social weight as previous.
They don't have any foresight, since this is all just idiotic catharsis for them, so they don't realize that this will only water down the best method they had to get white people to do what they want. The day white people don't fear being accused of racism is the day the music stops.

absolutely, they fail to realize that they are effectively watering down the power of the word racism, the same thing is happening with the word rape, if everything is rape, then nothing is, if everything is racism then nothing is
is this a good thing for us?
absolutely, niggers are being so obnoxious and unbearable that they are turning moderate whites into full blown racists.

>What's Sup Forums's argument against this?

Figure it out yourself.

Hello fellow subhuman, you're always in my threads lmao.
You're the only other bolivian that I recognize here, perhaps we're the only ones, hit me up one day yo.
Also what do I think about the shooting? Shit man it sucks, feel bad for the poor girl who got shot.

It is retarded to think that a white individual can't be oppressed by people of other races in a given scenario just because whites on average aren't oppressed, or because whites weren't oppressed by people who aren't alive today generations ago.
He also suggests that genuine racism against white people is perfectly ethical, even though it is not.
It is also very short sighted to think that just because whites haven't been oppressed by people of other races YET, they won't ever be. Give power to blacks, tell them that everything is whitey's fault, tell them that being racist against whites is fine, and see what happens 30 years from now.

>That was justice in action. Street justice for the shit whites did.
>Da fukin snake killed muh babies! Fuck tha forest mon! Burn it down, justice for muh children!

This is why the continent niggers rule over is a literal desert and the only greenery is brought by the rain.

google

t. researcher

Justice against middle school children for something that grown-up Whites allegedly did?

Nigger-tier logic in action. This is why nigger need to be culled, including the baby niglets.

Except you're all conforming to the SJW definition of racism dumbasses:
privilege+power

The classical definition has nothing to do with that.

Moreover:
>implying you're so cucked you're asking how to defend yourself from accusations of racism

it's doublespeak for "I can be a meanie but you can't". People that say this are often the most fragile when it comes to being criticized. Their dialect is that they can dehumanize and they can subject others to a lesser state than themselves while others cannot and should not be allowed to do so. It's a sort of blind and arrogant self-piety that creates this self-contradictory ideologue whose capacity for self-awareness doesn't exist.

brazilians are involved in the shooting
we need a Bolivian Trump to stop huehue niggers from coming here, are you in Santa Cruz? no Collas allowed

I would love to see how they would respond if you asked them what they would call a black man who is being racist in the old sense against a white man. They would either say that blacks being "racist" is perfectly fine and we don't need a new word for it, which would imply that hating someone based solely on their race is not a problem in itself, or they would have to admit that this re-defining of the term is counter-productive, because now we can't put "racists" from oppressed groups into a category.

Yes I'm 100% Camba.
Born here, parents as well, lived here all my life.
Who would be a the closest to a Bolivian Trump thought?
Most of our politicians are leftists
I may even consider running for office myself.

>I would love to see how they would respond if you asked them what they would call a black man who is being racist in the old sense against a white man.
They just say the black man is being prejudiced, cuz to them racism=prejudice+power, because they think nigs have no "power"

When you wuz kangz of course, black devil

>implying British colonization was bad

might need to check your pulse, if you feel one please take steps to negate it

> which would imply that hating someone based solely on their race is not a problem in itself

They are already doing that by singling out ''whites'' peoples when it comes to any discussion about racism. Which is honestly a really hypocritical concept since out of all the ''whites'' nations, only a handful ever dealt with slaves.

the argument is the definition of racism

Irish, Italians, Greeks, Scots, Frenchies, etc.... They've all been oppressed at some point.

These dumb fucks are clueless about history. Why can't they crack open a damn book once in a while?

Don't play their game. Oppression and racism are not the same thing.

We have no one, our only chance was the separatist movement from 10 years ago, but we didn't have guns and that's why we're stuck with evo.
I personally love Percy, but he's too old now, Santa Cruz pushes this entire country economically, we have to send our money to Colla Niggers in their depressive, cold, airless, shithole that no one wants to live, that's why collas have infested Santa Cruz
Good thing is Evo has calmed down, he was batshit insane, what made him stop being so retarded to only being moderately retarded was Venezuela, Venezuela had to be destroyed so other socialist governments start to take it easy.
i would support a Doria Medina presidency.

The answer is: Fuck you, you think I'm superior? Well I am.
Yes, whitey was never oppressed (he was, but we don't have to admit that if he doesn't know), now get back where you belong before I put you there.

I'm not even a white supremacist but jeez we need to stop fucking apologizing for not being weak.

>white people shouldn't be proud of what their ancestors accomplished
>white people should feel guilty for all the bad things their ancestors did

I am not one to complain but I would consider us to be victims of systemic oppression.

Not the fake kind of systemic oppression that americans talk about but we have actual legislation which excludes us from the work force.

There was a change that almost past with our income tax law which would of excluded any charity which caters to white people their exempt status.

That never passed but I am sure when they start land reclamation without compensation that law will be passed to.

Leftist don't care about that though, they will just say its the whites just deserts for apartheid.

Did we just go in and violently take over everyone and everything like leftists insinuate? My history isn't that up to speed but for some reason I have a feeling that it didn't happen that way

The left is just admitting that whites are the master race

>For white people having so much pride in their race our ancestors sure don't give a fuck about their descendants.

They didn't expect us to be so weak and that we would just use the advantages they handed us to continue our dominance

>2-2.5 million enslaved Germans/britons/whomever they were conquering at the time killed in gladiator combat for the amusement of the populace in the Roman empire over 500 years
>Not oppressed

Pick one.

All nogs had to do is pick cotton. Roman slaves had to fight to the death against their will.

That's exactly what happened in Communist Russia

>Why can't they crack open a damn book once in a while?
They are lazy. Which leads to them being stupid later on in life.

south africa homeboy

You can change the definition of anything to make it fit your argument. It's intellectually dishonest to do so, but when has the left cared about facts?

Has anyone ever asked what material wealth these types think was actually removed from Africa and transferred to Europe that has made it such an absolute hell hole? Is it gold? Diamonds? Some farmland that's unusable now? Do they realize that for the first two they're not necessary to create a decent country?

Greeks were oppressed and enslaved by T*rks

As an Anglo American I've always thought it sad that there isn't really a Greek presence in Ionia or eastern Thrace/Constantinople any more and an outrage that we've let Turk squatters occupy Cyprus for decades when it's rightfully a part of Greece,

...

Just stop fucking caring nothing will get through to these faggots. Red pilling is self done.

>Roman and Ottoman empire