I believe in a diversity of opinions

>I believe in a diversity of opinions
>I want to throw Marxists out of helicopters.

Why are physical removal types (on both sides) so incoherent?

Marxists out right restrict diversity of option, therefore it helps diversity of opinion to remove them because they are an obstacle.

You can't tolerate the intolerant.

marxism is a self destructive ideology. it's destroys you, and has a negative effect on people around you, and hypocritically it doesn't allow for diversity of opinion. it should be treated as a mental disease. maybe helicopters is a wrong approach, but it's an understandable approach.

Youre describing two different types of people genius.

>I believe in a diversity of opinions
But I don't.

I don't care for Le helicopter man, he was an Amerikike shill and is popular with nu/pol/. Labor camps are better

Yeah destroy the economy and arm socialists for a civil war is pretty diverse right

The fact is political opinions are opinions about the use of force, when and who force should be applied to. Who should live and who should die. When war should be waged. There is no such thing as a peaceful difference in political opinion.

I do think the power of the argument, the word, should be upheld since it's a effective way of working through things. But these conclusions we arrive to are still violent.

You can be a communist, just not in my country.

By all means have your opinions.

Share them with me, however, and there will be consequences if I disagree.

>I believe in a diversity of opinions
No. No we do not.

Marxists are subhuman
Their opinions are as the opinions of slugs

There's a limit. The limit is "are you trying to create a system by which saying what I think is banned".

The right-wing was doing this in the USA with McCarthyism and they were rightly chastised for it for years. Now the left shuts down open dialogue, so it's their turn.

It's called a joke, you know we're humans too right? Unlike the kikes.

If you're throwing people out of helicopters - you've gone past "the limit" and should be stopped yourself.

*passed

And no, the helicopter thing is clearly a joke considering none of us own helicopters. Meanwhile, everyone owns fists so saying punch a X in the face cannot be a joke and is serious and is a call for violence.

This is why it's obvious we're the good guys.

Differing opinions are fine. But if the Marxists are inciting violence and promoting the overthrow of society, that shouldn't be protected speech.

>implying it is open minded
>to be fiscally irresponsible
>with other peoples money

Culling the mentally ill is a perfectly natural thing to do.

No, past was correct.

You've passed the line.

You walked past a shop.

for

This

This is literally incitement to violence and crime, it should be illegal and it's hollow Alinsky shit that they're trying to censor emotionally painful language.

>you called me a nigger and should go to prison
>I'm out right telling people to kill or disadvantage whites wherever possible and I should be protected
This is hypocrisy and it's deliberate, they think if they try to censor us first then we can't censor Marxism and other hatred promoting speech.

Didn't you make a thread trying to slander Friedman for associating with Pinochet yesterday? Anywho, Pinochet was the head of a military junta and successfully implemented fascism as a measure to prevent further degeneration of his country and to repair the damage that was already. Diversity of opinions had nothing to do with that. He was (correctly) convinced by the Chicago Boys that neoliberal principles were the best way to heal Chile's economy. These principles are not directly linked to a 'diversity of opinions', but that seems to be the end result as Chilean people had their government peacefully returned to them along with a thriving economy. Pinochet is evidence that fascism works. Where is the evidence that communism works?

Free speech is a double edged sword. There's no such thing as "free speech" without expecting some kind of consequence as a result of using it.

>I believe in diversity of opinions
that's where you fucked up. Pinochet would never believe in something as gay as "diversity of opinions"

They just really hate each other. There's nothing more to it.

I disagree. Line them up and shoot them all. Its better to cleanse ourselves of them

...

People who advocate for the destruction of free speech should be thrown out of helicopters.

>be me
>believe in property rights
>see that leftists want to abolish private property
It's because they're violating our rights; how is that "incoherent"?

liberty thread?

go back to the CATO institute you deluded lolbertarian

>implying libertarians would advocate for taxes
Nice try

Those helicopters run on taxes. The irony

Marxism, isn't an opinion, it's a mental retardation

I have never seen make a sensible post.

The tea party was funded by the Koch Brothers. Libertarians are just useful idiots of the koch bros.

I don't believe in diversity of opinions. I believe in my opinion.

The opinions of Marxists do not matter as Marxists/Communists are not human.

>>ALLnumbers
>special pleading
>special pleading
>special pleading
>special pleading

I would just like to say that I'm afraid of heights. Like shaky pedestrian bridges are a big problem for me. While it's really nice for everyone to offer, I'd rather stay on the ground.

Opinin that some certain people have to die because of there opinions is still an opinion.
Be tolerant.

memes

>you cant tolerate the intolerant

That is literally something an antifa thug would say

We have different intents. Their's is to pretend silencing their opponents is about protecting the emotions of their pet demographics, ours is to prevent incitement to damage, crime and aggression.

From our point of view, they're the unnecessary aggressors who did shit like equalise white male children by marking them differently, you can't pretend to be egalitarian if you're feeling hateful resentments towards children.

From their point of view, they're preventing a possible (not even confirmed) threat that socially accepting Nazis would cause.

We are about damages.
They are about emotions.
Our consequences are a loss of opportunities and freedom.
Their consequences are a hurt ego and bad feelings.

Any false equivalence here is truly Alinsky as fuck, you disgusting wretched troll.

I unironically think communists and democrats dont deserve free speech

I'm a Marxist, and an egalitarian, and that's the reason I can't support the Frankfort School's cultural marxism and AntiFa. It is completely antithetical to egalitarianism. I feel like if they actually sat down and thought about the implications of their LARPing, if a good chunk of them were communist, they'd recognize that they were chopping their own political standing and protection of free speech down at the root.

I know you and don't like you, I'm sick of you responding to my posts and being all like, nuh huh that's not Marxism! Shut the fuck up all Marxism in some way is either a plagiarism of Hegel and Plato or intellectually justified hateful resentment.

You are more concerned with fucking the bourgeoisie than improving poor conditions. This is the running theme of Marxism, at this point of realisation it's a farce and clearly never about equality.

Welp. Sorry for trying to agree with you? I'll leave you be, then.

Just find a different word, I'll be your friend if you call it mutualism or something, which is a better description of left libertarianism/left wing anarchy than Marxist anything. Marxism is too dangerous for you too keep it.