(((Libertarianism)))
(((Libertarianism)))
bump
...
>libertarians offer support only to other libertarians and progressives
>progressives
Wrong.
en.wikipedia.org
>the LP is more culturally liberal than Democrats
You poison yourselves.
>This includes favoring minimally regulated markets, a less powerful federal government, strong civil liberties (including LGBT rights), (the party supports same-sex marriage), the liberalization of drug laws, separation of church and state, open immigration, non-interventionism and neutrality in diplomatic relations, free trade and free movement to all foreign countries, and a more representative republic.[48] The party's position on abortion is that government should stay out of the matter and leave it to the individual, but recognizes that some libertarians' opinions on this issue are different.[49] Ron Paul, one of the former Presidential nominees of the Libertarian Party, is strictly pro-life, but believes that that is an issue that should be left to the states and not enforced federally. Meanwhile, Gary Johnson, the party's 2012 and 2016 presidential candidate, is pro-choice.
>They don't care about morals
Wrong. Not wanting the state to impose morality =/= not caring about morals, dipshit
>They don't care about community
I don't know where the hell you guys get this shit from. Communities are very compatible with libertarianism, and we're not all individualists. Do you honestly believe that within a libertarian society people would just dissociate themselves from everyone else?
>They don't care about art
How does not wanting the state to dictate what music can or cannot be listened to not caring about art? Fuck off with your bullshit
>strong civil liberties (including LGBT rights)
We don't support any rights beyond your right to life, liberty, and property. You can thank the state for bullshit anti-discrimination laws and so forth
None of these people are true libertarians. There should be no laws regarding LGBT rights and drugs. Meaning that if the majority of people do not approve of your activities and feel it is harming society, you better be able to defend yourself because you're on your own.
>its not that we dont care about morals its that we disagree with legislating morality.
Actually when you push libertarians hard enough, you'll see that they do. Even the CATO institute released this recently:
twitter.com
>It is not enough to be passively "not racist" — libertarians must be actively anti-racism.
And Gary Johnson supported the whole "gay cakes" drama. Their morals usually just happen to be one of selfishness and greed, or aligned with leftists. Ayn (((Rand))) even said any system based on altruist morality are "socialism".
>ts that we care about our own community
No, that's what NatSoc does. Libertarians think the concept of "community" is "collectivist" and needs to be destroyed, and should be replaced by pure individualism and nothing else. Caring about your race, culture, nation is "collectivist" and should be discouraged, this is what a lot of libertarians think.
>culture is self creating. every society has and will create culture because humans crave it.
Nope, culture doesn't come out of thin air. It needs the right conditions, minds, people and values behind it to flourish.
cbsnews.com
>Culture etched on our DNA more than previously known, research suggests
>natsoc is the same "i know whats good for you" bullshit that keeps failing over and over again
Except libertarianism is exactly like that, except instead of letting people who actually care about their culture, race, community, etc. do it, you're letting megacorps, banks, and the mass media (that are all owned by the same people and never have your well-being in mind) do it
Libertarians are completely bluepilled about the JQ or race question, and they think letting huge powerful entities that often have more power than the state and will take any opportunity to curtail your freedom (see: TPP) do whatever they want is somehow "freedom"