Are breasts inherently sexual or have they been made sexual by society?

Are breasts inherently sexual or have they been made sexual by society?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=oP-Sscz_I48
youtube.com/watch?v=XHR0tsnuUhE
youtu.be/xcrxNBlqrbM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

don't care. day of the rake, when?

...

More attractive boobs, like hips, means higher fertility.
Higher fertility means more arousing and more arousing means more sexual.

So yes inherently sexual.

day of rake on that pic give me them tiddies

Inherently. Only a dumbfuck would tell you otherwise.

...

>Are breasts inherently sexual
no
youtube.com/watch?v=oP-Sscz_I48

They're a secondary sexual organ.

I don't give a shit if women want to breastfeed when they need to but god damn try to plan ahead so you don't need to.

You tell me.

theyre inherently sexual. there is no practical reason for women to not be flat chested just like men. human females are the only primates that have permanently enlarged breasts solely for attracting a mate.

made for feeding babies. but they can feed me too, doesnt really matter to me

I dare you to name a body part that someone doesn't find sexual

Really accelerates the atoms

Humans are the only species of mammals that has swollen mammary glands at all times. Obviously human like titties so its a sexual thing.

In a lot of tribes tits dont seem to be sexualized.

Every single part of that black woman's body.

>Noah's ark tier background
>Meme tier preaching complete with comical details about the world being 6017 years old
What world am I living in

Only one gender has them.
They're as sexual as penises and vaginas.

>Female secondary SEX characteristics
>SEX

Yes, you retard. Don't let the feminists and Jew pornmakers desensitize you from the natural and mystical beauty of the breast.

True, how do we explain there being numerous tribes where breasts are not sexualised?

if you've ever sucked on a titty you'd realize they are a sexual organ.
The nipples in particular are very erogenous.

if you are a virgin, here is a sex tip: suck on the titties during foreplay

Are the erogenous zones?

so nothing is sexual, because those parts can also be found on very unattractive people, if in a different shape or colour?

Let her breasts fill you at all times with delight; be intoxicated always in her love.

Proverbs 5:19

lurk more faggot

youtube.com/watch?v=XHR0tsnuUhE

Many body zones can be erogenous without being inherently sexual, i.e.: ears and neck

I agree they are sexual, but I'm not sure them being an erogenous zone is the reason why

but that'd be quite awkward, wouldn't it? being with a girl and then suddenly sucking on her nipples like a baby...

Fucking japs with their stupid fucking censored porn. Boggles my fucking mind! What is even the point? It doesnt make any fucking sense goddamit. And why the fuck do people watch it when it is censored? It ruins everything. Anybody know any good non-censored streaming sites for jap porn?

Nice political thread OP.

ears may give a rush to some, but nipples give a rush with 100% effectiveness and a more intense rush.
Only the vagina itself gives a bigger sexual rush. Which is why the breasts are the SECONDARY sex organ.

are you saying that necks are not sexual?

Yes and yes

id like to suck on the titties during fore, during and postplay if possible

it always goes over well, dont worry.
Just don't do it like a baby. Do it like a man conquering.

A mixture of sucking and using your tongue works best. When you are bored with it lightly grab her nipples with your teeth and stretch it a little bit (not too much) then let go.

Thank me later, Hanz.

the female body is a fishing lure for males dumbass

When I lived with a baptist family who had a newborn, the mother brought a small blanket with her in her purse, and if she needed to feed her young she'd drape it across her chest covering her tit and the infant.
I have no idea why this isn't universal behavior, breast-feeding isn't shameful but you don't want me looking at your tit so cover it up when you feed your spawn in public.

They are inherently sexual. Even girls like boobies. Nipple stimulation provides sexual pleasure, in men and women.

wtf i love Jesus now

Boobs exist so men will look at them and think of butts and then sex.

Beautiful invention I must say. I'm more of an ass-man myself though.

I like to lightly twist the nipple between my index finger and thumb, it's almost like I'm rubbing it not twisting. This shit drives girls wild.

I loved boobs from the time i was just a little kid. Its inherent for men to love boobs. There is just something about them. Glorious.

...

yes

They are sexualized. Do you think the african bushmen don't have loads of sex? They just don't have any shame, have you seen a penis gourd before?

Here is an video you might find interesting

youtu.be/xcrxNBlqrbM

God made breasts so men would have a place to slap women when they're bad. It hurts a LOT more than a slap to the face, believe me.

Boobs are sexual.

I see you're trying to sound smart here nigger.

You're not though.

I imagine it's almost as bad as a kick to the balls, though not quite.

It's dumb nigger monkeys that live in the hottest areas of the world. Of course, they'd be as exposed as possible.

not an argument

the hell does fertility have to do with anything

Men become aroused at the sight of breasts. No, it's not just a meme.

>This is the kind of thing women spend their time discussing

STEM really is missing out.

Wow this video really helped me out, thanks!

I used to be around a family like this, and the woman with the baby just got the fuck out of the room and fed her baby in private without asking anybody else to do anything.

Imagine that.

They're a clear sign of fertility, of course they've always been sexualized.

the hell does fertility have to do with anything

From an evolutionary perspective, breasts are a mutation that is supposed to sexually attract men. You see, the size of breasts has no impact on the mother's ability to breastfeed a child. Our ancestors still walking on all fours always had the ASS on eye-level: the primary way to attract possible mates was in perfect sight. This changed when we started walking on two legs which led to females growing breasts so the cleavage could simulate an ass.

What did you think attraction was for in the first place?

...

>the hell does fertility have to do with anything
how stupid can u get

>leaf

This, it's pretty painful. Especially if you have a big cup size

Boobs

Nature teaches us from birth you need to suck on them for survival. When you grow older, sucking on a boob pleasure you and her. So no, nature made it this way not society.

I N F E C T E D

there is no correlation between hip size or breast size and how " likely " a woman becomes pregnant since its extremely easy for a female to get pregnant regardless of circumstance

secondly there is also no correlation between hip size and breast size and how likely the baby survives birth

so again what does " fertility " have to do with anything

>what does fertility have to do with sex
You've watched far, far, FAR too much porn.

there's also no correlation between abhorrent posts and leafs, yet here we are

thanking you now.
will try, as soon as I'm about to lose my virginity.
probably won't happen tho

Baby making? Boobs? They go hand in hand.

>be cave-user
>see woman breastfeeding her young
>see big tits
>think "big=more"
>"my young will be well-fed"
>initiate cave-rape
I'm not sure what you're finding issue with here

Permanently engorged breasts serve literally no other function than to be sexual.

A woman's boobs, hip-to-waist ratio and general healthiness are all signs of fertility for men and lead to arousal.

Same thing with women, just with strong chins and muscular bodies. They are signs of fertility for them and lead to consequent arousal.

After all, the point of sex wasn't to feel good. It was to create offspring that could survive until the next generation, and biology responded accordingly. Look at this women. What makes her "hot"? It sure as hell ain't her personality.

A whole nigger

>since its extremely easy for a female to get pregnant regardless of circumstance

Not if they're 400 pounds you retard. There's a reason why a vast majority of people find fatties disgusting.

you just described literal pseudo science by admitting it has no real scientific basis, only a theoretic benefit based on primitive dumb human logic " big=more "

I answered your question: Permanently enlarged breasts in female serve no other function. You don't see that in most other mammals.

>secondly there is also no correlation between hip size and breast size and how likely the baby survives birth
Larger hips definitely help a woman pass a child easier through a natural birth. In the era of C-sections it's admittedly less important.
Also some women will have their pelvic bone grow wider during pregnancy. Especially if she is carrying multiples.

Stop trying to use big words he already proved hips and boob size are related to higher fertility

Well they make my pee-pee hard when I look at them, so you tell me.

Again the definition of fertility is being over looked.
None of these aspects mean fertility. At best, fat waists or other parts simply means the woman can survive without food for longer and thus is more " fertile ". So basically this comes down to fat. Not fertility. Just fat to survive the winter.

>primitive dumb human logic Like our primitive ancestors, the ones we're discussing here tonight?

Do they develop during puberty? Yes? Then sex organ.

...

except physical waist size is not represented by how large a waiste is since a waiste can be large due to fat and a slightly thicker woman can have the same waist as a skinny woman.

Which is why I said pelvic bone

>initiate cave-rape

(shameless double bump)

Are you drunker than I am? Because if so I am impressed.

Leftists are incapable of thinking on multiple levels or understanding anything beyond a relativist point of view. YES, they are inherently sexual. Breasts are organs of sexual arousal and are also a female erogenous zone, and these stupid bitches know this whenever they claim they just ~want to be free~ and walk around topless like a man. I wouldn't say they are equivalent or analogous to a man's cock but they are absolutely not, under any circumstances, equivalent to a man's chest, either.

I think that's a double question/answer there. If you were born and raised with women with their tits exposed at all times, you would definitely not look at them the same way as we do now. Having said that, even under those circumstances, you are still going to grab & squeeze those tits when fucking, you're going to put your dick between them and fuck them, and you are going to bust your load specifically on them. And here's the reason why... they are a feature that makes women what they are. No man has breasts. Even the obese men don't have functioning mammary glands, and only the men pumping foreign substances in their bodies would exhibit anything like that. So because they are a feature of only the female sex, they would always be seen as a sexual feature.

The leaf pauses to organize his next shitpost

Inherently, other mammals don't have beasts like humans, even other primates.
They evolved as we started walking upright and our focus on each other shifted to the front of the body, the shape evokes that of butts with the evolutionary intent to elicit sexual desire and attract mates.

What's the difference? You can't tell pelvic bone size by " waist " size. When is a large waist not simply fat? Especially when concealed by clothing it would be impossible to determine. So maybe wayyyyy back in " cave days " men would be able to accurately determine whether womans waiste was actually larger or just fatter, and thus determine pelvic bone being larger, thus she " could survive giving birth better maybe " and thus this can be called " fertility "

Foreplay is literally faggotry.

This is the last (you) you will get from me.
Spend it wisely

user. You assume cavemen were inherently logical and knew all the things you know.

>adipose tissue designed to protect the baby
>large hips to carry the child
>ample adipose/excess fat on body to supply nutrients to infant (fetus) in times of hardship

not sure what you're talking about cuckbro

>implying leafs are more logical than cavemen