Cipher Challenge

Hey Sup Forums
Can you do me a favour and try to decrypt this cipher I made?

Firstly, I assure you that it actually does mean something.

Secondly, I created this cipher as the base of some encryption software I'm working on.

Thirdly, you have one hint to ask me for. The first serious question (that doesn't give away what it says) will be the only one answered unless I deem others necessary. THE KEY WORD CAN BE ASKED FOR.

If enough people reply to this saying they give up, I will reveal the message, however the process will NOT be revealed. If you can figure out the message, I will reveal the process.

Just a game for you guys, but a serious test of the security for my cipher. I chose to test it out on here because this place seems to have some pretty serious minds.


Cipher is as follows:

YBANXEXNYBELCGELNEHUNFMZLJBPOEGPWUBCTWJ

Other urls found in this thread:

security.stackexchange.com/questions/68377/how-is-a-cypher-algorithm-verified
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

just use gpg stop being a larping faggot sort your shit son

How does this involve hating niggers and jews? I'm confused.

is it begome ordodox? i think its begome ordodox.

ps gave up during instructions.

Shouldn't this be on Sup Forums

cool cipher ahmed

nice caesar cipher you burger

Yban = I
Xexnybel = OP
Cgelnehunfm = is
Zlj = a
Bpoegpw = huge
Ubctwj = fag

fag

Wow is the key word to do with 3?

I'm attempting to start a business, so that why I'm making encryption software. Not LARPing, testing out the encryption integrity.

I just posted it there, thank you.

Not a Caesar cipher.
A mug more advanced variant that's also poly-alphanumeric.

ffs then you're brainded
you don't peer review encryption in a filipino cp board

You could ask what the keyword is.

A lot of great minds on here. Sup Forums has figured out a ton of shit that people wouldn't think they could. I figured this would be a good place to test it other than on actual cryptographers.

I might have a crack at it when I get some time, but basically, if it's possible to crack with such a short text, it's useless, isn't it?
A decent cipher algorithm has to be able to stand up to people attacking it with like ten gig of text to work with.

Give the key

What is the key word

Keyword: DOMINION

Keyword: DOMINION

Be sure to drink your Ovaltine ;

OK wat is key word.

I'm testing the base cipher before I go all out. If the integrity is weak with the base, then the full blown algorithm will be just as volatile.

Keyword: DOMINION

Nice reference btw

if OP thinks his shitty cypher he came up with after 10 minutes into a cryptography youtube lesson can be broken in a board with a userbase so dumb they unironically do believe in the most moronic conspiracy theories providing only a shitty string and not even a fucking server to make requests so you cannot really test for any kind of leakage then I must call all of you delusional LARPers

Not a LARPer, this isn't a shitty cipher, cipher*, I don't believe in conspiracy theories, I believe what can be proven, this is a test of the integrity of my base cipher not a test of the users of this board.

anyway if you want a serious answer go to stackexchange not Sup Forums which is reddit-tier "yeah science bitch" garbage

Lets bust open the Voynich Manuscript. Its Neat.

Oh, okay. Thanks!
I've never been on stackexchange, so I wouldn't of known. Thank you!

Stuff like that could be something Sup Forums could crack.

and if you have any intention of coming down to earth
security.stackexchange.com/questions/68377/how-is-a-cypher-algorithm-verified

Askin' the real questions.

now go ahead and post some communist memes faggot lmao we're all waiting

>there's only one dude from spain posting
kys and stop hiding your real flag third world scum

Why not try Sup Forums OP?

I did. I posted it there, one response 15 minutes ago. Nothing since.

im here with you too np m8

Holy shit digits confirm solved
/thread

Maybe also cripplechan and lainchan.

Has precognative or remote viewing de-crypto ever been tried ?

>pol tries to decipher Voynich Manuscript
>uses only those methods that will return "it was jews" as a result

Very true