According to Seth MacFarlane on the DVD commentary...

>According to Seth MacFarlane on the DVD commentary, the Bush and Gore scene originally was going to predict that Gore would win the election, because as MacFarlane put it, “We never thought that Bush could actually fucking win.”
When will they fucking learn?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_United_States_presidential_election_recount_in_Florida#Post-election_studies
youtube.com/watch?v=0-Lvv1f5Qu4
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore
nytimes.com/2000/12/10/politics/supreme-courtacutes-decision-to-halt-the-florida-recount.html
archive.is/YIYBZ
archive.is/PZE2N
youtube.com/watch?v=TNEZsruEBqE
youtube.com/watch?v=COebForDa8s
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Budget_Reconciliation_Act_of_1993
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

We learned that you right wing retards won't stop electing retards like you until you completely crash the country.

...

...

...

>the country
>flag

A leaf

>family guy
>>>/reddit/
cringe

>was 5 during the '00 election
>don't remember a thing about it

I understand it was absurdly close, yes?

Every presidential election is.

Except Trump's apparently.

no it isn't. 2000 was one of the closest ever, depending on how you measure. Bush won 271-266 and he "won" Florida by 500 votes but the GOP Supreme Court stopped a recount handing it to Bush.

Bush won by less than 500 votes in Florida.

Jeb was the governor and rigged it for W.

Not to mention 100,000 retarded Green voters that went for Ralph Nader instead of Al Gore. But that's a different story.

Wait. The president doesn't actually make the budget. Congress does. There was a republican Congress under Bill Clinton.
That's the definition of what Congress does, they pass Bills. The reason they are called Bills are because they have to do with paying for stuff.

Do you have any evidence that Jeb rigged it?

Kitty history

The jews rigged the election since they needed an useful idiot for their Iraq war. They didn't rigged the 2016 election properly since they were gaslighted by their own ((((polls)))) and genuinely believed Hillary would landslide Trump, no need to cheat so (((they)))) only deployed a few rigged voting machines in Michigan. But it don't matter, (((((they)))) still won at the end.

...

South Park > Family Guy

I have no idea what that means.

Yeah, but it's actually kind of funny.

See, Gore sued because of voting irregularity in a few counties, specifically counties he thought supported him more, and thus if he could get a recount in those counties, he would win.

The Supreme court decided that it was unconstitutional to only do a recount in a few counties, and put a stop to it, thus making Bush win.

Here's where it gets funny:

Unofficial recounts were funded and conducted by private citizens who were upset at the result and found out that if the recount was conducted the way Gore wanted, he still would have lost by a few hundred votes. BUT, had every county in the state been recounted, instead of just those couple, Gore would have won.

So basically, yes, it was rigged, but the Supreme Court tilted it. Had they decided "You can't only recount some counties, therefore you have to recount them all" Gore would have won. They went with "You can't only recount some counties, therefore you can't recount any."

>BUT, had every county in the state been recounted, instead of just those couple, Gore would have won.
Citation needed. People perpetuate this lie just as much as they exaggerate Perot's influence in the '92 election.

Had Al Gore become President would he have been good?

take your pills leaf.

both South Park and Family Guy were actually great and Watchable only during their first 3 seasons. after that, both shows turned into SHIT.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_United_States_presidential_election_recount_in_Florida#Post-election_studies

All the data is there. Dozens of sources, university studies, the works.

Bush wins Gore's recount, but loses a statewide recount.

youtube.com/watch?v=0-Lvv1f5Qu4

That's not what happened. Holy shit you're completely wrong. The Florida State Supreme Court ordered a full statewide recount. The Republicans went to the US Supreme Court to stop them. So much for state rights eh? They won 5-4 to stop the Florida recount which was total bullshit. Then America burned for 8 years under a Republican retard president.

>The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

You do know that the Florida State Supreme Court ordered a full statewide recount right?

Supreme Court´s Decision to Halt the Florida Recount
nytimes.com/2000/12/10/politics/supreme-courtacutes-decision-to-halt-the-florida-recount.html

archive.is/YIYBZ

Yeah he would have paid off the US national debt. No 9/11, no Iraq War, no 2008 Great Republican Recession

>was 6 during the election
>school had a mock election for it
>Ask who Bush is
>Teacher says voting is private and she can't help me

Bitch I'm 6, I thought Bush was a fucking plant.

remember when family guy was good?

...

who cares? do you think gore would have been better? he's clearly a self absorbed retard out to make money off of hopeless "muh scientific consensus" fedoras.

>two pieces of dog shit lay in front of you on the sidewalk
which one do you step in Sup Forums? that was the decision to be made.

Someone gets it.

>I thought Bush was a fucking plant.

He was.

>When will they fucking learn?
When ideology comes before facts, it becomes impossible to discern the truth. They don't learn because their ideology prevents them from acknowledging reality, which dictates facts. The fact is, reality conflicts with their ideology. This is why they must delude themselves deliberately in order to maintain their ideology. The reason that they're so determined to maintain their world view is that they're emotionally attached to it, which, in and of itself, is a highly unscientific mindset and irrational.

TL;DR: they will never learn.

The american and canadian west is all on fire and you still deny anthropogenic climate change?
There's a special place in hell for a scientifically illiterate retard like yourself

i never said i didn't believe in climate change, i only made the point that scientific consensus is a shit argument. appeal to authority is one of the least logical fallacies. scientists get BTFO on a weekly basis these days, their consensus means nothing.

Scientific consensus =/= opinion consensus

>leaf
please LEAF this board now

uhhhh seth isnt a hardcore libcuck, just alot of people thought he would lose due to them in the media. let that sink in.

no

fuck off with your hair-splitting. how many ppm worth of CO2 can the planet currently process in a 24 hour period? do you even know? are you sure 390 ppm is going to result in warming or has the greening effect which has accelerated over the last 80 years offset emissions and then some?

while the earth certainly is experiencing relatively dramatic shifts in climatic norms, CO2 is a meme and you look like an idiot fedora posting bullshit from NASA of all liars.

Other major studies showed Bush would have won:
archive.is/PZE2N

But for some reason (((Wikipedia))) only shows the one study funded by the likes of (((CNN))), (((New York Times)))), and other (((MSM))) outlets.

Pic related from the article discussion.

btw if that's Speaker Hastert on the right, that's literally a Republican pedophile.

When the episode was being made, probably some time in 98, Newt Gingrich was speaker. That doesn't look like him, and they probably didn't bother looking it up, so they probably just made some rando white guy.

>I know more than nasa, look at all these peer reviewed papers I've published!
I worked with a 'know-it-all' jackass like you just recently.
Said that vaccines are bad for you and cause autism, that gmo's are bad and thinks evolution isn't real.
Literally no one liked him, and he would sometimes just spit out bullshit answers to questions no one was really asking, just to seem smart.
He was a prick, and so are you.
The science of global warming is more than established, and to go against the grain just makes you a contrarian fucktard on the same level as moon landing truthers and flat earthers.

The co2 in our atmospher has risen over 35% in the last century and a half, from 320 to 410 ppm, all because of us. Plants may absorb some co2, but without the necessary equal amounts nitrogen and water to complete the growth they will not be able to absorb the co2.

hm actually nvm, Ithough this was from the first season, but I guess not. idk, it doesn't look like that pedo.

correct your flag

chances are you arent going to see this, but since your are just such a fucking faggot I need to point this out. The original quote from that scene is that Christianity never existed, and that since it never existed it, medieval times didnt either, so now there was no halts on technological advances.

...

Learn English you fucking leaf. I bet you're a frenchy fag.

>leaf

Maple nigger

I was 20. Guac man and Florida.....

>I know more than nasa, look at all these peer reviewed papers I've published!
appeal to authority, didn't we just talk about how stupid this is?
>Said that vaccines are bad for you and cause autism, that gmo's are bad and thinks evolution isn't real.
i disagree with all three. what's your point or do you even have one here?
>The science of global warming is more than established
no it's really not. something that changes on a yearly basis isn't established, you're just appealing to authority again. you should really try not to do that, it makes you seem slow.
>to go against the grain just makes you a contrarian fucktard on the same level as moon landing truthers and flat earthers.
and the wright brothers, tesla, anyone who did anything important, etc. what a stupid thing to say.
>without the necessary equal amounts nitrogen and water
are they not getting necessary amounts then? how much CO2 do you think is produced by man anyway? you keep talking as if humans are making all of it.

i'm going to take a wild guess and say your solution to all of this is socialism, isn't it.
>boohoo, government needs to save the planet by taxing evil greedy corporations to pay for my environmental science degree.

I thought Family guy started airing after that election

>American political party
>"Right-wing"

please.

...

Still a maple nigger no matter how hard you try

Amerishart@(((You)))

ps im american
canada is better

being a cuck is sexy

This was probably more clever in your head.

You have no idea how that fallacy works.
Appeal to authority fallacy is like saying you should drink my all natural vitalizing juice because kobe bryant and oprah endorse it, THAT'S an appeal to authority.

Utilizing data from authorities on certain subjects is not an appeal to authority, you stupid fuck. And I literally just said in my last post how much co2 mankind has emitted, learn to read.

>Tesla
Hahahahahahaha

And there's nothing changing on a yearly basis with climate change science, pull your head out of your fucking ass.

She wasn't trying to catch no case

found it

youtube.com/watch?v=TNEZsruEBqE

also

youtube.com/watch?v=COebForDa8s

no, it sounded retarded

>Plants may absorb some co2, but without the necessary equal amounts nitrogen and water to complete the growth they will not be able to absorb the co2.
So water them more faggot.

this planet is fucked and it's because right wing retards are allowed to exist

>China
>Right Wing
?????

>because kobe bryant and oprah endorse it, THAT'S an appeal to authority.
are you trolling? what the actual fuck is wrong with you?
>Utilizing data from authorities on certain subjects is not an appeal to authority
no it's not, but stating that it's settled and "going against the grain just makes you a contrarian fucktard" is. how do you not get this? it's not really an abstract idea at all.
>And there's nothing changing on a yearly basis with climate change science, pull your head out of your fucking ass.
then you haven't actually been keeping up with it have you? you're either a troll, a fedora, or a 14 year old edgelord. nothing you have said so far has been pointed.
>And I literally just said in my last post how much co2 mankind has emitted, learn to read.
no you didn't, brainlet. you said how much it has risen. the majority of CO2 in the atmosphere is not from humans. maybe you should do a little research into where all the CO2 is actually coming from, it seems important to the discussion doesn't it?

as i said before, i don't deny climate change, but the political bullshit you've bought into is clearly bullshit to anyone with a brain. there are much larger problems than CO2, which is a retarded theory to begin with.

americans have it hardwired into their culture to support the underdog,their nation is built upon a tiny weak force taking on a more powerful one and somehow winning

its easy to manipulate a yank...set a underdog story and bombard them with patriotism imagary and they will do what you want

an eagle..a guitar solo and a pic of washington and bobs your uncle you could get pee wee herman elected president

Why so triggered leaf? It's not difficult to water your garden.

extremely disrespectful dude

>t. yank

...

>George W. Bush
>Underdog
So this is British education?

who doesn't like a good underdog story? make the guitar solo a bombastic orchestra and it might work on me.

it's true, all americans are hundreds of years old. we personally kicked the confederate's asses and the nazi's, too. generational divides don't exist in canada or something?

why apologize to a leafcuck for winning?

finders keepers we can do what we want with those flags now

kek, it would be awesome if that was an international law, if the losing nation in a war had to surrender their flag to the victor to do with as he pleases. i would wrap little mexican women in the spanish flag and take them to pound town.

Dude the article is 17 years old

It's a bot.

I know

But the science IS settled, and it all points to mankind causing the +30% spike in atmospheric co2, which is already causing huge problems and will cause bigger problens in the future.

^ bot talking to itself

What YOU are not understanding is what you called 'splitting hairs'. The scientific consensus isn't determined by polling all the scientists who worked on climate change research and asked them a simplr 'yes' or 'no', it's perusing all the papers themselves and seeing what their data says. And SEVEN different consensus studies have shown the same consensus between climate change research

*Blocks your Path*

Says country where it is legal to fuck your own dogs.

*balances the budget*

>1000% OF ALL SCIENTISTS AGREE
>FUCK THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, WE CONSENSUS NOW

>1994
>republicans retake the House for the first time since 1952
>Newt Gingrich's Contract With America
>Grover Norquist demands that the budget be balanced and taxes be reformed
>Slick Willy Clinthole decides to hire Dick Morris (a republican) to figure out how not to be a 1 term president
>Morris comes up with the idea of "triangulation"
>it means whatever the hell the republicans want to do, Clinthole does it first and pretends it was his idea
>shockingly, republican policies are fucking amazing for the country
>budget balanced by republicans
>demorat takes credit for it
This is stone cold evidence that liberals are evil.

Nice alternative history fanfic but it was Based Bill Clinton's tax hikes on the rich that led to the balanced budget.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Budget_Reconciliation_Act_of_1993

Previously the top individual tax rate of 31% applied to all income over $51,900. The Act created a new bracket of 36% for income above $115,000, and 39.6% for income above $250,000.[2]
Previously, corporate income above $335,000 was taxed at 34%. The Act created new brackets of 35% for income from $10 million to $15 million, 38% for income from $15 million to $18.33 million, and 35% for income above $18.33 million.[3]
The 2.9% Medicare tax had previously been capped to apply to only the first $135,000 of income. The cap was removed.
Transportation fuels taxes were raised by 4.3 cents per gallon.
The portion of Social Security benefits subject to income taxes was raised from 50% to 85%.[4]
The phaseout of the personal exemption and the limit on itemized deductions were permanently extended.
The AMT tax rate was increased from 24% to tiered rates of 26% and 28%.[5]
Part IV Section 14131: Expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit and added inflation adjustments.

If Republicans are so fiscally responsible...

BASED BILL CLINTON handed right wing retard hero and leading conservative thinker George Dubya Bush and a GOP Congress a $230 BILLION SURPLUS.

What happened to it?

Merkel has been running consecutive surpluses and paying down goymany's debt yet nobody talks good about german fisccal responsibility.
The conservative movement is done - fiscally irresponsible, race mixing, pro mass migration, anti church, warmongering retards.