Is it degenerate to date a woman for a year...

Is it degenerate to date a woman for a year, impregnate her and then dump her in search for a younger woman and continue the cycle?

Science tells me I need to spread my seed with as many women as possible.

Just become a sperm donor. $50 a pop.

It's degenerate because that's not how society has worked for a few thousand years you nigger. Civilization only flourishes when stable marriages can take place and social norms are enforced.
Goodnight Sup Forums you retards.

no thats normal niggery and beanbag behavior

You're creating single moms, which is the possibly the worst thing you could do.

your kids will be criminals and kill eachother off after one generation

Don't we all aspire to be The Chad and not beta providers?

Conquering armies rape the women and spread their winning genes.

Women's rights were a mistake.

Media brainwashing is all that is. Stable marriage between man and women always wins and benefits society the most. Why do you think it's attacked so much these days? It's the easiest way to collapse a society.

FUCKING THIS
Niggers
>ooga booga gonna fuck em and leave an
>single mom raises niglet
>niglet becomes shithead
>cycle begins a new
>black community in America or Africa stagnates and dosent advance
Whites and Asians
>marry woman
>have as many kids as possible with same woman
>try to father and raise the kids
>some die but that's life for most of history
>build for family and provide
>offspring learn this
>improve on ideas of the father and become better for next generation
>2 races have the largest and greatest empire's in history
And then there's Mexico.....
>Spaniards follow white path
>mixes with natives
>Mexico keeps up with this tradition
>cartels take over Mexico
>all is lost
>man has fuck tons of kids
>leaves woman and kids in Mexico to work for nothing in America
>bangs sluts there
>brings family here
>spends money on stupid bullshit like booze and hookers
>sons learn same
>spic community stagnates into complacency with degenerate behavior

Raise your kids faggot

Do you want to be a nigger?

There is already too many spics on earth so please don't do that

dont

dna tests exist and you will be on the hook for it.

If you can afford to raise all of your children and care for all of their mothers without government support, go for it.

Most sperm banks are very picky about those who donate. Women only want donor sperm from healthy, handsome, wealthy men with big dicks, so why would they pay the average Sup Forums user $50 for sperm that will sit in the fridge forever?

Now to be absolutely honest, when we wuz kangs that was perfectly apt, but our development is guided by the context of where we want to go as people, what traits we favor, and how we want those to develop.

Spreading seed haphazardly is just as degenerate as a category 5 cuckout. You are creating uncontrolled variables, being a progenitor of unguided filth that is born of single-parenthood. If you want us to revert to animalistic tribalism in such a way, feel free, the Middle-East being a shining example of how animalism can be degenerate when applied to complex social constructs such as society.

Having a spine and accepting responsibility in one's own life is the only way to build, to create and to thrive. Choosing to give in to the animalistic impulses and rule with blood and terror only spreads chaos and instability, and in such fosters an environment where the worst traits are spread arbitrarily. Anyone can kill, anyone can rape, and seeing as humans are capable of abstract thought, this precedent would become the undoing of us all when perverted in such a manner, to justify one's shortcomings through brute force, like an ape, like an animal.

>category 5 cuckout

Explain

a rich chinese men just paid woman for this he has like 23 children each one raised by a different woman. i really suggest you become a sperm donor if you want to give your descendance with not direct repercutions to yourself

Children need a father to be present in their lives.

By the term "category 5 cuckout", I was referring to the current climate of bleeding-heart cuckoldry held in today's world.

Relinquishing your cultural values in favor of signalling your own purity, appealing to the narcisistic postmodern ideal of being "open and tolerant", of rescinding responsibility for one's own environment. The thought process behind this is misguided, not sustainable, and easily manipulated.

All joking aside, it's a sad state of affairs to have easily manipulated emotion as our guiding principle. That instability, what can be done with it, and how it can be abused has been proven time and time again with history.

An individual assassinates a prominent political figure over emotion, not accounting for the consequences? Chaos.

A movement is spawned and rallies the people around a banner, appealing to their emotion and overthrowing government for ideals that feel good in principle, but fail in practice? Chaos.

The unstable biochemical reactions in our brain and the context that controls their dispersal can be shaped, molded, and manipulated in a pretty brazen way. When applied to a large social dynamic such as civilization, the human factor is removed, the emotions become distanced from reality, and it perverts itself.

When those values held precedent over anything else, we have reached what can be defined as a category 5 cuckout.

>with big dicks

I don't believe you

>Civilization only flourishes when stable marriages can take place

Wow, brainwashed much? Monogamy is so extremely recent compared to how long we've been around that it isn't even funny.
The whole single mom thing, is actually pretty natural. Let me explain:

The females of many other mammals go into heat where they'll have sex with anyone who is interested, including beta males. The only reason alpha males breed more is because they chase away the beta males with violence. Once the children are born, the violent alpha males will often attempt to kill the children in order to make the female go into heat again, so that they can have more sex. Note that the males are interested in the sex, not in the reproduction itself, they just happen to coincide (by evolutionary design of course, the individual only cares about the sex, but evolution cares about the reproduction).

Humans are a little bit different than other mammals. We have a more societal way of handling children. Our females don't show obvious signs of whether or not they are currently in the fertile part of the cycle, which makes it harder for us to know who impregnated her, and when. They are also pickier than other mammals and will not have sex indiscriminately, instead opting to only have sex with alphas, in order to get as good genes as possible. When it comes to raising the child, it doesn't matter much whether the biological father does it or not, and the child will more often be raised by one or several beta males that might think they were the ones that impregnated her, but actually weren't. Sometimes they are also raised by society as a whole. Think single moms being supported by the government. Think the saying "It takes a village to raise a child".

Where does this leave you? Well, you have a choice. Either you can be the alpha providing the seed, or you can be the beta raising the child. Rarely will you be both, because faithfulness is not part of human nature.
>So you're saying I should impregnate girls and then leave?
Well...that used to be a good idea, but these days we have laws and paternity tests and shit that will probably bust you eventually if you go around impregnating dozens of girls. Luckily, as you read earlier, males do not care much for their children and do not really want children, they want sex. In other words, your best bet is to get a vasectomy, or if you understandably feel iffy about that, wait until a better birth control method for males is invented. I must admit, it feels fucking great blowing a fertile load into a girl, there's something primal about it. But you should only do it if you're absolutely sure that you can get away with it. Don't risk your personal economy and life just for that.

The fact that you believe that is why your race is inferior and Mexican people will never amount to anything except a bunch of indians stabbing each other in the jungle.

This right here carnal.

is this even real? this swede thinks that being a cuck is embedded in our genes. it's over for them. hey man, maybe read the post you're replying to again before you start babbling about how cuckoldry is the greatest state of humanity.

Betas are meant to be cucks, yes. If you don't want to be a cuck, work on yourself. Become a person so desirable that you can genuinely say to the girl you're with "I'm fine with you leaving, I can get a new one in a matter of hours". Most men are scared shitless of their girls leaving because for them it is a matter of months, not hours. Either you control your woman or she controls you, equality in relationships is a myth. You choose which one you want to be.

Also, my opinion is nowhere near in line with the general opinion in Sweden. People here will take any girl they can get, spoil and coddle here to no end, marry her, listen to her feelings, inevitably get cheated on, forgive her, get cheated on again, forgive her again, decide to have an open marriage, never have sex with their wives, get addicted to porn, cry themselves to sleep.

That's what you're in for if you think marriage is a good idea. I'm telling you, you can either be the person who she has sex with or the person who takes care of her. It is very rare that the same man ends up being both.

>impregnate then dump
Good good goyim.

Perfectly normal, if you're nothing more than a mindless animal.

But perfectly ok if you subscribe to the mindless bullshit that is modern feminism and equality and the whole Wimminz don't need no man thing.

Also, if you wonder why society is going to shit, it's not the single moms, it's the female teachers. Intended human maturation goes like this:
>Be born
>Be protected and spoiled by mom for a few years (women don't know how to be harsh, set rules, or challenge you)
>Leave home, go to school
>Teacher is male role model, teaches you about real life, how not to be a pussy, how to fix your problems yourself instead of blaming nonsense and crying for mommy

So what happens if you replace that male teacher with a female teacher who talks about toxic masculinity and is completely incapable of giving anyone an F, or setting a non-biased grade for that matter? Shit society, that is what happens.

t. proud afrikan-american KANG

men like you are the problem

kys

So if you then set them up with betas, is the problem solved?

>impregnate woman
>orchestrate her falling in love with Dexter McNerd

Surely there are enough lonely men out there who would also somehow make excellent fathers.

No. Being a beta male means lacking the valuable male characteristics (stoicism, confidence, persistence when facing challenges etc.). A person like that can't be a good father. A would-be single mom and a cuck dad is a lot like two women raising a child together, all female values and no male values. The result is a cuck son.

However, as I mentioned here school has the opportunity to provide a male role model when the family environment fails to. The problem is that 1. Children "leave the nest" extremely late these days, and 2. Male role models are not allowed in public society because "masculinity is toxic". So child with cuck upbringing goes to school, gets taught all about how women are oppressed and masculinity is toxic, goes back home, sits in front of his computer and does nothing and cries about life's problems until his thirties, instead of growing up and moving out.

>No. Being a beta male means lacking the valuable male characteristics (stoicism, confidence, persistence when facing challenges etc.). A person like that can't be a good father. A would-be single mom and a cuck dad is a lot like two women raising a child together, all female values and no male values. The result is a cuck son.
That is sad.