Explain this Americans!

Why is the Bible Belt the largest consumer of gay pornography?

Other urls found in this thread:

huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/19/black-gays-lgbt-community_n_1989859.html
archive.is/Bq5gK
archive.is/nZcyS
supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
archive.is/fxLHV
archive.is/BoWCE
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Is it because die hard Christ cucks are typically self hating faggots? I'm thinking that seems like the most likely explanation.

Niggerfaggots.

Did you respond to your own post because of how shitty it was?

Shitposting doesn't make making a post that no one even notices, it's about trolling. You do your flag a disservice

>gays can't be openly gay because of where they in the bible belt
>fire up pron and crank out a few at home away from polite society

As long as its in their browser history and off rainbow floats on main street, im good m8.

Poor slide attempt

Bible belt types are weird. Kind of like how Utah Mormons are the worst porn consumers.

I liken it to Islam. If you hold people to burdensomely strict rules then they will break them for fun.

miami, new orleans - have you ever been to either of these cities? obviously not

Possibility 1: fags binge on fag porn to cope with a more moral environment that stunts their potential faggotry

Possibility 2: people (males) in those areas can't tolerate looking at other dicks, so they watch primarily lesbian stuff (idk if that counts towards gay porn)

I would like to suggest to you that people with certain kinds of sexual preferences don't think of lesbo porn and cocks as fungible from a porn perspective.

Probably some of them do when they're messed up enough to become unable to get their marbles off.

...

It looks like California and the South are the biggest consumers. My state is safe. Fuck off.

Fags love warm weather. Its pretty obvious. Look at Brazil.

Actually in the 90s Atlanta was a gay Mecca. Many large corporations had their HQ their and would allow for gays to claim their partners on insurance and such long before fag marriage was an idea.

Niggers are statistically the race most likely to be homosexual. Southern states also have huge Nigger populations.

>chart actually suggest a correlation in largely black communities
lol

Niggas love gay porn. Can't explain it.

Back before the Jews pushed race relations too hard and it was becoming normal for blacks and whites to get along, there was this one black dude on a mainly white forum and he was all like

>oh yeah
>i guess you wouldn't know
>they call it keeping on the "d/l"
>it's really big
>lots of normal married hetero black guys fuck dudes on the side

It's almost like colored people like to smoke cock.

This. The bible belt has the highest population of blacks, and black boys are the more likely than any other race in America to be gay (whites are least likely, btw).

On a scale of 1 to 10 how much of a faggot is OP?

Please correlate nigger distribution and then you'll notice that blacks are the gayest race
ever wondered why people talk so much about prison rape
prison population: mostly black

>THE DENSER POPULATED AREAS HAVE MORE PPL!!!!!!
Moron.
Kys.

>Australian critical thinking
Gays have a uniform distribution across the country until they are financially able to move to a coastal hub. Since more conservative states are less culturally accepting of open gayness, gays seek an online outlet for their sexuality. When there aren't many gay bars in Mississippi you go online.

Stop worrying about a fixed % of our population and just keep your country from being overrun by 3rd world vermin.

I know people hate blacks and all but is this true? Seems to me Hispanics are far more likely to be fags.

According to the a large study, blacks are most likely to be gay, then asians, then hispanics, then whites.

Gallup Poll Finds People Of Color More Likely To Identify As LGBT
>huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/19/black-gays-lgbt-community_n_1989859.html

You forgot to archive that
archive.is/Bq5gK

Or until they start overrunning the place. It's one thing when there's that one backroad with the gay bars that I only know about because my gay friend brought some of us down there. Not my thing but it wasn't all disgusting so we could all have fun and make the best of a slightly awkward situation.

It's when the Jews came in and ramped the place up to where now there are rutting cocksucking numales crawling all around that makes me want to avoid that part of town now.

This. I don't give a fuck what the degenerates fap to so long as I don't have to see it.

Isn't gay marriage legal everywhere in the US?

It varies by state. Each state is technically its own sovereign nation, so it's a little bit like how different countries in the EU have their own laws and still Mama Merkel tries to force her rancid vagina on everybody.

>heathen states: everyone watches porn that appeals to them.
>Bible belt: significant portion of the population refuses to watch porn because they know it will get them sent to Hell. This means the leftover population of porn viewers is disproportionately degenerate faggots.

Catholic Priests I heard.

...

But archive.is/nZcyS

God bless you

>lesbian porn
>gay

Yes.

>Each state is technically its own sovereign nation
>what is incorporation

That's like when the federal government says weed is illegal but states still pass their own laws saying it's legal.

It's an important part of the design of the US. We call it a balance of powers.

They spread it those specific areas to try to breed out Christianity in the biggest area possible. Why else is there pride events everywhere in the belt? I live by the belt and usually pass through it so I've seen how it works. They put the fagotry around the belt and it creeps its way inside of it.

...

how do we verify the integrity of this data?

>what is incorporation
A charter issued by the state.

I don't think you really want to try to unwind that one. That's how faggots hellbent on swinging their dicks and bleeding vaginas around get themselves on par with
>AM I UNDER ARREST
>AM I BEING DETAINED
>AM I UNDER ARREST
>AM I BEING DETAINED

Wait, so Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, and the Dakotas aren't just the whitest, they're the straightest?

I am soooo raising children there

this desu

in the bible belt faggots and shunned and fap to gay porn in secret.
on the coast the faggots go to faggot parties and fuck each other in the ass all night.

Because the jews spend a lot of time shoveling fag propaganda to them in the schools and in the media. They turn the kids into faggots because they recognize that the Bible Belt, made up of white nationalists with a firm sense of morality, is contrary to their goals. So they have to destroy their youth. They are succeeding.

This is why their are openly-gay pastors and shit now. It started with the jews pumping "modern, relevant" Churchianity, you know, the whole rock band on stage, flashy lights, pop-culture mixed with Jesus thing. That was the start of it, bait disguised as an effort to appear more friendly to nonbelievers so they could be converted easier. Progressively it got worse, as Christian music on the radio became indistinguishable from regular pop music like Katy Perry or whatever, and the lyrics started lacking any spiritual substance and instead were full of mushy superficial "I love you, you love me, we're a happy family" garbage. Now this "pop-culture" jewery has completely destroyed Protestantism. You have a bunch of Christians running around with SJW haircuts and skinny jeans, the men completely emasculated, shaming their parents and grandparents, supporting fag marriage and other worldly movements of degeneracy.

Fags are everywhere now. My friends got married a few years ago, and the preacher who married them was best friends with the groom. No one knew that the preacher was gay until he got caught cheating on his wife with a man, last year. Also, we're pretty sure that the bride's brother is also a fag, from the way he talks, acts, and has never had a girlfriend, but is always around girls. Coincidentally, he too is trying to become a preacher.

God help us all. May He redeem His church.

Repression

Yyyyup blacks are way gayer than we give them credit for. Also if "gay" includes lesbian obviously there will be a shitload of black female interest. Sheboons are not attractive and there are as many of them left behind as there are black men into mudsharks and putas de negros. They tend to settle for each other & tell themselves it's empowering & become turbo "woke."

>That's like when the federal government says weed is illegal but states still pass their own laws saying it's legal.
No it isn't. Fag marriage is legal in all states and territories of the US. Granted, weed is illegal in the same, but it's a lot easier for the feds to police enforcement of an "unconstitutional" law than for them to coerce rebellious states into enforcing federal law.

Federalism is fairly normal in the world; it's nonsensical to say the American states are "sovereign nations."

because it has the largest black population, and blacks have the highest rates of homosexuality.

It's OK that you wantonly misunderstand our country because you're more interested in getting a gold star for sucking cock, but that doesn't mean you're correct.

To defeat the heretic, you must understand the heretic

Plus a lot of straight men watch lesbian porn. So if lesbian porn is included in the stats, then the gay porn consumed by actual gays is probably off in every state.

Sorry, I should have been more specific. Reverse incorporation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment is why Obergefell v. Hodges legalized fag marriage everywhere at once.

Isn't he correct though? That 2013 shit from King Nigger made being a fag legal everywhere right? You're talking about individual state laws, but I'm pretty sure Nigger man made it a federal law to let people suck dick.

As is typical of the deficient kind of gay that needs above all else to feel validated by BIG DADDY rather than caring about marriage.

Have you ever even used our legal system yourself? I have. That's not how it works. Under which jurisdiction would you even have standing to argue that one? You are the scourge who makes normal people have ill will toward faggotry.

King Nigger can issue whatever edicts he wants. Aside from what force and effect they have, the main issue is an understanding of the fundamental structure of our country.

The violation of this offends me much more than how some guys here and there like to violate each other's assholes for good-humored adult fun.

>montana is less gay than idaho

bullshit

more black people

Everyone in the south already has the AIDS, so they make the most of it.

There is no state or territory of the US where fag marriage is illegal. The states are quite clearly administrative divisions, not sovereign in any sense. If the Civil War isn't an obvious enough result, consider the incorporation of the Bill of Rights. States suffer the same legislative and executive restrictions as the federal government, plus inferior courts and the Constitutional prohibition on negotiating with foreign states or between each other. What do you mean by "sovereign?"

The logic that if you hate gays then you secretly want to be one is not sound. Why does it only apply to gays?

Again, you completely misunderstand the situation. But if you would like to continue acting like a Jew to justify your perversion, then by all means parade it on display for all to see why we don't like your kind.

You've already resorted to using the Civil War as legal precedent, which is about the most shaky thing you could have done short of arguing that maybe the Crown still owns the land. Give it up. Nobody really cares if you like to dump sperm in some guys butt or the other way around. We care when you make a nonsense fuss about it -- this is the entire basis of our legal system.

I'd have to plot that on a chart but it's looking like "no correlation" to me

Shadow repression. It's enantiodromia at work.

t. Carl Jung

The ruling in Obergefell established a "right to marry," dummy. The states are not allowed to ban fag marriage and any bans still on the books are unenforceable.

It's pretty obvious. You have there a group of people can't work out for themselves that it's a good idea to not to butt-fuck or suck dick but are so mentally pathetic that they need gods/scripture to proscribe those things under severe penalties.

There's no such thing as a "right to marry" and therefore no need to ban it or enforce anything.

This is one of my favorite trolling topics because invariably the completely mentally unstable people go in to full autism 360 degrees around from anything to do with what marriage is or why they want it. It almost makes me want to advocate for ECT.

>>AM I UNDER ARREST
>>AM I BEING DETAINED
>>AM I UNDER ARREST
>>AM I BEING DETAINED
these are perfectly reasonable questions to ask a cop. if you are not detained you are free to go, if you are then he must say exactly what reasonable suspicion he has

this comes from lawyers

as for the driving/traveling thing, doubt anyone gets away with that, even though the law does differentiate between driving and traveling. driving is acting in commerce, bus driver, truck driver etc. travelling in your own conveyence as never supposed to be licensed, they pulled a trick

go look it up in blacks law

It is completely reasonable, but it does not represent an effective understanding of the force structure. Are you about ready to stop paying income taxes?

Are you about to explain that you don't just have custodial title to your vehicle?

Are you about ready to explain that the SWAT team just violated the NAP and it's time for a time-out and a sit-down talk?

And what does any of this have to do with getting fags upset about fucking each other in the ass when most normal people don't want to know and don't care? Are we having a trigger situation?

oh, this is the fag hate thread? I see

anyway, the other faggot was slagging perfectly reasonable questions, if done in a none belligerant manner, probably a glow in the dark jidf nigger

I'm telling you what the real, de facto and de jure situation is. The Civil War is not exactly legal precedent, but no state has tried to secede since it happened. De facto, states do not have a right to secede from the Union. According to the Constitution, states are barred from making agreements or treaties with foreign states and the federal government makes the rules for interstate commerce. The 14th Amendment has, for about a hundred years, been interpreted to imply that the same restrictions imposed on the federal government by the Bill of Rights apply to the states. It's nice to fantasize about a world where the states are sovereign and Congress has to ask the states to levy troops for war, but you shouldn't pretend that's what we have to deal with.

Nigs

checking your numbers

If you review my ID, I think you'd find that I'm quite compassionate toward fags if anything. But if your delicate emotional configuration can't deal with anything short of the state reassuring you that you're OK too, then I feel bad for you.

All of which has nothing to do with shacking up with what I hope is your spiritual partner.

Other user is correct. Opinions by SCOTUS are the law of the land. Obergefell is often attacked by legal scholars because it was the first time in the nation's history that a "positive right" was created. "Rights" ate often confused by people without any legal background. However, the rights granted by parts of the bull of rights have been applied to the states through the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th.

Obergefell provides that all people have a right to marry, and it is the supreme law of the land. I'm not 100 percent sure if the supremecy clause comes into play here, but gay marriage is legal in all 50 states, even if the actual state statute provides otherwise. If you went to get a marriage license, and you're refused on the basis of being a homosexual, you can seek a writ of mandamus to compel the state to grant you the license.

>There's no such thing as a "right to marry"
Just as there is no such as a right to eat in a restaurant. Rights being general principles, the broad category encompassing both is the right to contract.

Also incorrect. They are interpretations of the law of the land, which in most cases has no application anyway because the entire system has been perverted.

And saying this or that ruling or precedent is final demonstrates a very badly failed understanding of case law.

Contract law is another thing entirely, although a valid thought exercise.

But I'll tell you what. The only contract I want to sign in the course of getting married is a prenup to limit my liability should it all go so wrong. The rest of it is an eternal vow before God.

I'm not really seeing a pattern.

>There's no such thing as a "right to marry"
Obergefell, page 11.
supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf

Are you fag married yet?

>I'm quite compassionate toward fags
I'm more compassionate to society

they are extremely promiscuous, and spread insane amounts of STDs

aids patient 0 was a fag, imagine if there was no aids in america

they are also hedonists who do far too much drugs, and have no link to the pas or the future. a bunch of selfish assholes who revel in perversion and mens poop

I don't think allowing them to be legally recognized as being married or not is going to stop them from fornicating and spreading diseases and taking drugs.

Although SCOTUS is supposed to interpret the law, anyone who's read Marbury v. Madison knows that they stole the ability to essentially create law and powers. The jurisprudence of the Equal Protection Clause is another example of how they've "interpreted" new ideas and powers. Another one, that's since been overruled, was the trimester framework in Row v. Wade.

I wouldn't say it's the final law because that's disingenuous to the idea that the laws never change, but like I said, anywhere in the states has to issue you a marriage license if you pass all of the other hoops each state requires. My law degree begs to differ with your interpretation of the judiciary' place in America.

I'm not defending it, retard. I don't think the law should be followed, but it is what it is.

And it has nothing to do with why you're arguing for or against homos.

Nice!

so how do we do that?

and how do we stop them molesting boys?

I live in a shall-issue state as far as CCW goes. You don't think the sheriff could just decide to give me an FU until I want to try to take on the all-powerful government?

Your law degree must have been a waste of taxpayer dollars (and you probably think taxpayer dollars fund anything in the first place.)

Firstly we have to gas the kikes, since their entire religion is centered around molesting boys.

really?

I knew they hated the goyim and drank infant blood from feshly mutilated baby penises

Given the legal situation in the West the best we can do against gay marriage is to distinguish it socially from marriage.

Thor and Freya: married
Thor and Olof: gay-"married"

Yes, really. If they want to flood in Muslims who practice even more barbaric and clearly illegal things, then that's how we hit them back twice as hard.

They both belong in the desert if they don't want to adapt to modern civilization.

The operative phrase here is "identify as".
When pollsters ask about behavior it evens out.
Lots of men who identify as straight prefer gay sex.
During the early part of the AIDS epidemic health workers noticed this trend and coined MSM (men who have sex with men).

Pic related is a book about the phenomenon.
There's a pretty funny article takedown on this book "that's not how dicks work"
archive.is/fxLHV

Right, but this doesn't change anything. Gay blacks boys are much less likely to identify as such, since their entire culture is built around hypermasculinity, pretending to be macho, etc etc... They even invented a whole culture around the idea of pretending to be straight - "on the down low."

Gay white men, conversely, are much more likely to be open about their homosexuality.

Dont teach him he must stay a retard in order to survive

easy answer is that they must use porn where they cannot thrive in relationships and mass orgies?

That's my guess desu.

Maybe I'm misuderstanding you but that's not what the poll shows.
Black men are more likely than white men to identify as lgbt.
And hispanic and asians even more so.

here's the gallup page on the poll: archive.is/BoWCE