Is incest the next thing the left is going to lobby for?
They were already able to make homosexuality accepted and some of them are already working to make pedophile the next big thing and in order to finnally in order to destroy the family unity completely they would push for incest to become accepted as well.
PIC somewhat related
Other urls found in this thread:
It would increase family unity by fucking family, right?
>Is incest the next thing the left is going to lobby for?
nope, paedo is
We need to do something order for them to not even have a chance to rally behind such vile practice.
I meant after paedo the craddle robbers might be the ones in the Spotlight now but I belive they will start to normalise incest after that If se are not successful.
no the slippery slope next bump is pedo, then animals
Aren't they already on animals?
Isn't easier to make society accept dogfuckers rather than to let perverts touch their children?
After pedos are accepted...hmm. Necrozoophilia I guess? there's not much that can go beyond pedos. Accepted incest is not as fucked up as accepted pedos...
No It would certainly not.
>there's not much that can go beyond pedos.
wew lad
humans have always been attracted to little girls
it's nothing recent
I would say that incest is even more damaging because It fuck up genes for generations.
>then animals
meme
infact, they're outright banning it where it's been already legal
I want my loli daughter just for me
True, you got a point. Imagine this, water fluoridation + mixed races + ocasional incest between generations ...They are slowly turning us into vegetables.
Nah we've basically achieved equality under the law now. Next step is to get back to some level of courtesy and decentness in how people approach each other in society.
First us liberal rebelled against courtesy because it seemed like a hypocritical fraud when half the population was openly discriminated against and kept down. Then conservatards rebelled against it because they were angry that half the population wasnt discriminated against and kept down anymore.
Needless to say it's a huge loss.
We cant have civilized society if everyone throws pottymouthed little insults around all the time. That's the next step in the liberal plan. All the tits and ass and dicks on tv will also have to go. Society has been debased far enough.
Also, something needs to be done about the fourchan internet sect that turns our sons and daughters into devious little nihilists who think real life should follow the same rules as internet larping. It's really gone too far and needs to stop.
Oi post more of that.
>Seriously reply
Given that the vast percentage of Muslim marriages in the UK are to first or second cousins and I watched a pro cousin marriage programme on the BBC a couple of week ago.
Yes they are pushing for incest.
Homosexuality is not widely accepted: it's widely enforced. There's a difference between natural social progression and outright coercion.
>wtf i hate incest now
And the next step is polygamy.
OH SHIT WHAT ARE YOU DOING!
"Brave New World"
All answers in this book
THIS is the actual plan. Developed by the (((Frankfurt))) University, perfected by the KGB.
THIS is how they plan to topple the west. Pay close attention, not only to the how but the WHY. The family is the most basic cohesive unit in a society. Destroy that and the society is destroyed.
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. Start breeding crackers.
polygamy is ok for us whites if we can have 2 girls for 1 man
No because if they do they would have to stop using muh inbred rednecks as an insult for the common right winger american.
My guess is that either zoophilia or pedophilia will be next in the next decade if things don't change soon.
I REALLY can't do that user.
It'll go like:
Homosexuality -> Transgenderism -> Polygamy -> Incest -> Pedophilia -> Bestiality
...
The hundreds of "incest" videos that popped up on your local, friendly porn sites in the last 5 years is just a coincidence.
Here it's actually legal if I recall correctly but no one does it because it's shunned by people and the offspring has high chance of being retarded. I like it this way, people decide for themselves and have made the proper decision of not participating in incest. The only idiots who still do it are muzzies.
Seconding this
Yeah that is strange as fuck.
The more recent trend I'm seeing is BMAF interracial videos. It's like they saw that white men were moving to Asians and so they had to push niggers into that market just like they did with white women.
Which is weird by the way since I pretty much never see nigger men lusting after Asians. They're never "thicc" enough; too petite and the asses aren't big except for very rare cases.
Go ask for It on /aco/.
Now in relation to the topic, is the legality of It like here? You won't go to jail for sleeping with your sister but the state won't formalize the union.
Surrogate pregnancies.
Then they are probably going for polygamy.
Lastly children.
Yup, same situation as you guys.
love is love is loving...we love either others private parts leave us alone
What's wrong with homosexuality?
Why should some random politician have a right to police your bedroom?
Sis and her bro wants to fuck, it's their business, deal with it.
They are pushing to add a P, to LGBT...so anything is possible. Fun fact, Putin has repeatedly called law makers out in Europe for pushing this.
JUST
FUCK
MY
GENES
UP!
Ever heard of contraception, favelafriend?
>breeding with sis or daughter
>stay pure genes
Nope it worse pedos
WHY? give good reason or be cursed to the end of times.
Because I don't want to be banned is a good enough reason for you?
Search for legoman on gelbooru if you want it so much.
The purest
it's avatar's own firecest - you are looking at Azula's belly right now
i fapped to it many times
Have you ever heard about marrying outside the family tovarish?
>humans have always been attracted to little girls
Not adult ones
You have to fucking keep this awful thread alive, didn't you.
I hope so. Ive been in love with my cousin ever since i can remember.
incest+pedo=love
this is a fact.
Of course a kiwi would be the one to freak out about anti bestiality discussion
>Is incest the next thing the left is going to lobby for?
Weimar NOW!
We have our differences Alan, but do I look like a fucking leaf?
might vastly depend on how atractive and functioning they are itfp
Nah your good mate
Nigga, we have been doing incest for decades, so it is nothing new.
Thanks Mitch.
>sibling incest will be legal in your lifetime
BEST TIMELINE
All the Catholic priests who fucked kids were conservative and a guy who says it's good for preteen boys to get fucked by old men is a Sup Forums hero.
How is pedophilia not a 100% republican thing?
"Incest" is too personal. Shit like faggotry can be portrayed as nice and squeaky exactly because people are so distanced from it. When parents take their kids to a pride parade they don't think about the bleeding anuses these people will cause each other later, they're thinking about fabolous men acting like cute little boys. Twisted enough but at least you can uphold that illusion.
Just think about siblings being told that having sex with each other is a good thing. I think there's a guttural disgust that you can't supress as easily, its too personal.
Plus incest doesn't really help their plan, its actually counterproductive because people would then procreate within their own race. Plus, afaik, despite all the "Cletus McCousinfucker" memes, whites are the least prone to incest so it wouldn't really change the landscape in their favor either. Its just nonsensical if you run the scenarion.
Racemixing is good because it means less white people and less social cohesion. Homosexuality and transsexuality is good because its a form of self-sterilization which allows the import of more 3rd-world migrants. What would Incest achieve?
The left is working for a world where the white TFR's below 1.0 which means literally the end of the white race.
Its tools are very diverse: race mixing, trans genderism, feminist movement, gay propaganda, anti-religion, anti-family agenda, porn, other degenerate things which make weaker and weaker the white men.
>All the Catholic priests who fucked kids were conservative
You got data for that grandiose assumption?
>every single development is steered, controlled and precisely planned by some shadowy single entity
that's easy to process
Bad Dragon dildos exist and /gif/ regularly has threads on them. Bestiality is already kinda accepted even if no one can profit off of the actual act.
How new?
You don't think an agenda exists? You think everything thats currently wrong in the world is just a coincidence? We don't really believe in "coincidences" here
i think you have a noodle + shit fetish because everytime your mom took the noodles out of the cabin you sitting in the kitchen her crusty ass was sticking into your face, after prolonged repition you linked all those sensations together, and now you want shit and noodles because you love your mom
i think that's harder to process than a god like entity you just have to puke at
...
Yeah they were also Catholics i.e. the most raw deal a Christian priest can have. There's either something wrong with you in the first place for accepting that role or you develop something from the environment you surround yourself in. Also, only reddit ever liked that virtue signalling, showpony faggot Milo.
i don't think social developments are engineered in the easy to process way you portrayed but instead believe that the most promising approach lies in science and analyzing technically and focused on the issue
of course such an analysis could be misinterpreted as an agenda, some ind of blueprint when in fact it might just mirror reality
of course one can also take agendas into account, though here as well one might want to assume multiple factors and all kinds of possible agendas, from personal to collective ones, religiously, economically, racially and other motivators
but as you see it doesn't feel as comfortable as ''blaming'' some kind of group for the situation, though it might be more effective and bear more sustainable results for your and other life
but, is that even something your interested in?
is that your primary motivation?
or do you rather want to play with your intellect a bit, making crazy theories about some kind of omnipotent social group
>but as you see it doesn't feel as comfortable as ''blaming'' some kind of group for the situation
I never got why people say this when this kinda stuff carries social stigma so big it can cost you friendships or even your damn job. If I wanted to take the "easy route" I'd convince myself that everything is a coincidence and that I'm evil for even questioning the endgame of globalism and progressivism, kinda like you seem to be doing. Get the fuck out of here.
I am not talking about coincidences, just trying to open up a to you new way of processing reality... allowing you to take back some of your self responsibility.
You can blame anything for anything, though you want to be interested in solving your particular issue, repeating some kind of easy to process and agree on formula won't help much, especially as compared to the alternative approach of formulating own criteria and then working on their realization.
I think your approach is way more at the level of coincidental, you just replaced the word coincidence with agenda.
t. Mahmud Al-Jihadi
Incest is a fundamental element of right wing conservative thought. I don't even say that as banter, you will believe it soon enough: Nearly all Sup Forums racists wouldn't hesitate to bang their own sisters given the chance. They have no difficulty admitting this if you conceal your natural disgust.
>I am not talking about coincidences, just trying to open up a to you new way of processing reality... allowing you to take back some of your self responsibility.
Are you on drugs or something? You're trying to frame me as if I'm somehow blaming something else for my own issues (woooow never heard that one before, advanced ad-hominem), even though I'm talking about societal trends that have nothing to do with me. What exactly does the prevalence of homo and transsexuality have to do with my own shortcomings?
>What exactly does the prevalence of homo and transsexuality have to do with my own shortcomings?
Soros should be asking you.
>You're trying to frame me as if I'm somehow blaming something else for my own issues (woooow never heard that one before, advanced ad-hominem), even though I'm talking about societal trends that have nothing to do with me.
''you'' as in German: ''man''
>Are you on drugs or something?
Yes.
In your thinking you replaced God with some kind of social group. God's agenda is what we call coincidence.
So there's that omnipotent social group and they have an agenda you were born in.
Do you see now why you might want to overthink your approach?
>>Are you on drugs or something?
>Yes.
Should have said that from the get-go. Have a good one.
>bible-thumping christian conservatives would love to do something that is absolutely forbidden by the scripture they love so much
>blaming of ad hominems where there are none
>going for a big one yourself
It might feel a bit uncomfortable in the stomach but reality is super complex, get comfy in your tiny world.
Great analysis! Much insight. If we model the world as if certain influences were already present, we can make projections based upon what those hypothetical influences would desire.
>legoman
Ha! I knew I saw it already. Thanks
Dont get angry.
Its all critical theory.
We need to make intellectual debates popular again. Or this is the future we deserve.
>when the berlin wall got torn down it just radicalised the marxsists.
Its like they planned for it all along.
Dude, I said have a good one. I don't care if you take drugs, but it explains why you're making such little sense. Its not worth unraveling
>Is incest the next thing the left is going to lobby for?
god, I hope so
I stopped a girl from race mixing but then she started fucking her cuisun.
What is incest anyway?
Daily reminder there is NOTHING wrong with that.
>we can make projections based upon what those hypothetical influences would desire.
Yes, all of it clearly goes back to pic related. Not the guy or the quote itself, necessarily, but the mindset.
>In every aspect of life there are people who want to change a thing so it is beneficial for them
>Rich people like Soros give money to organisation with certain goals
>No agendas exist whatsoever in social order and culture because that would go against my beliefs
Polygamy is already prepped and ready.
Tv series; Sister Wives, BigLove, My Five Wives, Polyamory, etc.
Plus it gets Muslims and Mormons into LGBTQP
>implying this isn't what wh*tes want
>sitting before class
>see cute girl
>cutie girl turns and looks at me.
>I smile
>cutie girl walks up to me
>I say hello cutie
>she say "what is incest?"
>I ask why?
>"it's in the book I'm reading"
Fucking a family member.
...
>the left
>lobbying for the benefit of the american south
yeah i don't think so
>accuses of ad hominem
>no ad hominem
>makes an ad hominem
>says have a good one
>still keeping the conversation up
just accept th fact that your bogey man primarily exists in your imagination, nothing wrong with that just in your particular model I see little benefit for anyone
all you do is blame a group with imaginary traits, it's not rooted in reality, the group might exist in some form, but you seeking the ''cause'' in them at such a scale is not only a bit concerning but totally enslaves you to your imagined masters... you seem to enjoy your social strings though