Why is modern "art" absolute trash?

Why is modern "art" absolute trash?

Are (((they))) behind it? What is their endgame? Destroying culture?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=J8IqSAOGIiA
youtube.com/watch?v=lNI07egoefc
youtube.com/watch?v=bHw4MMEnmpc
independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html
archive.is/E4wK5
amazon.com/Who-Says-Thats-Art-Commonsense/dp/0990605701/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1500537807&sr=1-1&keywords=Who Says That's Art?
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Are (((they))) behind it?
Yes, actually. Most of the people who buy this trash are Jewish.

in canada sometimes its the wagon burners laughing as they scam booze money by selling "art" to the canadian National gallery. as all official canadian institutions of heritage has to be repentive

The only meaning for modern art is money laundering.

>Are they behind it
According to the Nazis, yes. Watch Eternal Jew there is a section on Weimar Art

It's deliberate, basically the Soviets are butthurt that even America has produced more classical composers and classical artists than they have, so they made post modernism.. which turns out women really like this, because low intellectual standards, so they ran with it.

> the Soviets

fuck is wrong with you?

I saw an old documentary once here, it was about systematically destroying art and the culture behind it by (((them)))

Someone has it?

Because culture is racist.

also look at modern architecture. they are trying do destroy us not only physically but spiritually.

Oh, you know, I'm actually red pilled
>suddenly stops believing in Soviet espionage as soon as someone implies they sent spies to universities
What's wrong with you? You'll believe they sent spies elsewhere, but not the universities? No, you will respond to me and give some justifications.

CIA ruined art to subvert USSR cultural influence
its even on wikipedia and they are biased

sage slide threads and get in here faggots
youtube.com/watch?v=J8IqSAOGIiA

Those white canvases sold by record sums are for money laundering

>what does /pol think
These threads are old and have been circulating for years. Fuck off OP.

despite what you may think, even the reptilian zog machine people cares about having good taste and being in tune with the zeitgeist. art is supposed to be about the most treasured aesthetics and ethics we can imagine and while you may yearn for the good old days, rich and successful people are looking for the new hotness

if there's an idea of the modern man being tolerant of other cultures and attempting to break free from the evils of his colonial and oppressive past then the art has to reflect that sentiment
basically there's a hole to fill and it has to be filled with art by the women, the oppressed and the marginalized. in this case, aesthetics is of secondary importance to ethics

It looks like most of the 'artists' making this shit as well as 'architects' are actually jews. And then there is a whole bunch of 'critics' who are all jews and who manage to sell these pieces of nonsense to rich idiots who in turn hope to resell them later at a profit or just because they think it'll make look cool and sophisticated.

Its high end money laundering these days.

Look up the frankfurt school

Because they're shitty artists and it's all just a money laundering scam. Say what you want about Picasso, at least that faggot could actually paint. Same with most older painters, they just chose to go down a different path

Why does modern art even exist?

Actually, I'm pretty sure modern art is just a bunch of people trying to make a quick buck by doing retarded shit and pretending it's art, and if you don't understand their retarded shit then you must be dumb or something (as in the only selling point of it is to pretend you understand retarded shit with no meaning)

I once saw someone say this very same thing, I thought it was intriguing, can you please elaborate?

I didnt like when people called me an artist because all the "artists" were no talent , no skill bums . THEY have art shows while REAL artists , that are highly skilled craftsman , get jobs in commercial art .

It's a (((psyop))) designed to wreck our minds and civilization. It was carefully designed with malice aforethought.

There's plenty of good artists out there. In a matter now is the best time to become an artist just because of the sheer access to tools, knowledge and studies you have at your finger tips. With social media and things like Patreon you can get a decent following and money from it too depending what you do.

Don't get me wrong, Post-modern art is fucking garbage but it's just mostly talentless hacks being propped up by their friends in media outlets. There's no culture being destroyed and the Jews certainly ain't behind it, don't be dumb.

>and the Jews certainly ain't behind it

Spotted the kike

Obligatory reading

youtube.com/watch?v=lNI07egoefc

It's just a bunch of pretentious nobody's that are looking for their 15 minutes of fame, calm down user

Modern art is one big laundry-scheme.

CIA and it has been proven

Didn't CIA pretty much admit that modern 'art' was a psyop to combat USSR?

Postmodernism is an instrument of power to keep people from actually doing anything worthwhile like ending corporate tyranny. The CIA secretly funded the modern art movement.

yes

I took this picture yesterday at Tate Modern (London). I have no words. I went to listen to the guide's ...explanation and it was so brave and beautiful.
Fuck this Earth

Jewish form of money laundering.

Then they spent 5 minutes looking at and talking about a rock.
I wish I was kidding

m8 the "artists" aren't getting shit, the kikes own the galleries and use them to shift cash in an unregulated market.

WE WUZ ARTISTS N SHIEEETT

sure, if it's art that stands the test of time. look at the most valued artists and contemporary artists and it's still mostly white men. if the art you're buying becomes an important cultural touchstone then it will never decrease in value. warhol might fall out of favor but no one can say he wasn't important at some point and owning a warhol will then basically be like owning a time portal to the prevailing aesthetic and ethical ideals of the time. it's probably the most powerful aphrodisiac you can imagine if you have the slightest interest in the development of human culture

actively supporting menstruation art wont make you huge loads of cash. it's like you believe these powerful people aren't looking for spiritual redemption like the rest of us, you're elevating them to non-human status . like the rest of us they fall victim to trends and nodding in agreement to what critics are saying

it's a conspiracy in same way a female dr who is a concerted effort to dethrone the white male. on some level it's true, on some level it's simply an idea that resonates with a lot of people. it gives them the sense that the culture is changing and evolving into something more equal and beautiful

From yesterday's trip to Tate Modern. Lack of Diversity in Art.
Someone shoot me please

All the good art has already been done, we don't need anymore.

Either Jews or just people with Jewish attributes.

Money for nothing. I mean, I almost gotta say that the idiots that buy it are shittier than the people tricking them. That's what I'd like to say if not for the fact that buying actual shit on a canvas was a real thing that happened.

dude modern art lmao im so cultured

>Brave lesbian african wymynz

modern art was initially about the soviets...

but today it's a broader phenomenon involving the plutocracy, government subsidized galleries\tourist attractions and people who just get bored looking at old art

the imageboard world is definately part of the modern art scene whether it likes it or not....

Such brave modern art

that's that happens when a civilization loses its faith in itself. it's now been more than a century of pure degenerate art. if a had a time machine i would go back and gas every cubist that ever lived, before they even painted a single painting. every year they push the boundaries more and more, and the pile of degeneracy is getting bigger and bigger, because the average apathetic zombie normie doesn't care about anything anymore. they don't care about starting families, they don't care about the fact that they will be a minority in their own country in a couple of decades, they don't care about the "tribe", etc., so why the fuck would you expect them to care about something as sophisticated as art. they only want dumb, ephemeral distractions in order to escape from their shitty jobs and their shitty life in general. we are DONE.

Eat your heart out, Leonardo.

First of all this is not modern art but contemporary art. Modern art is mainly during first half of the 20th century and figure many great artists.
But indeed contemporary art is shit and has no other purpose than beeing use as a form of money. In most countries art isn't counted in your fiscal revenue and therefore you are not taxed on it. See the shit happens already?
So basically what they do is few people decide who will be ne the next "artist" to rise (and there is only 3 people on earth with this power and they are all jews. Surprisingly.)
Their friends buy those art pieces and then just wait for the prices to rise to degenerate amounts.
Profit.

Doesn't really have anything to do with Jews, it's more the modern psyche. The reason is because degenerate art developed independently and before the Jews really could have had worldwide influence.

I know they participate in it now as much as possible and try to manipulate things. But blaming everything on Jews is ignorant and leads to tunnel vision.

I would say the major divide is in regards to skill. If you take the iconic image of modern art, "Black Square" by Malevich, you can see that it is completely abstract, essentially meaningless, and skill-free. It only has meaning in the idea of the work, and for him it was rebellion against what he saw as decadent and abstract art. Painting was largely for the wealthy, with landscape images, and the viewers were trying to see what the artist was trying to tell them rather than feeling the image for themselves. He was trying to bring back pure feeling to the painted image, a religious experience in a sense (Orthodox Christianity was a huge influence on him).

Compare this to the first modern work of art, "The Death of Marat". It is clearly still in the realm of skilled artistic work, but the brutality, raw realism, and unfinished nature of the scene makes it modern. So I think the question is, even though pure abstraction took over, can the modern world be represented in all its brutality and cruelty, without the artist resorting to a similar form of brutality? I mean, one can represent beauty but there is no realism to it, as if each painting exists within a flipped version of "The Misanthrope", staring out at the cruel and miserable world which has isolated it.

The other possibility is that much of Modern Art is actually pretty good, but the endless reproduction and the copies of copies make it monotonous and banal. I'm on the former side, I prefer traditional imagery but feel it is basically just larping now.

Modern Art at the biggest museum in London

Yeah but it literally is the Jews.

It's basically the Emperor's new clothes.

>ITT: assblasted traddies mad that their era is over
Go back to the 30s ya goddamned natzi

We're trying.

>cherry-picking the worst examples of modern art to incite moral rage and feel morally superior for being an ignoramus

This thread again.

i can't wait for you to name those "great" artists form the first half of the 20th century. you country was GROUND FUCKING ZERO for that degeneracy. it all started there.

your*

What? America hardly has any composers, and Stalin forced strict codes on what was allowed.

Meanwhile, American composers were the most degenerate of all, producing unending racket or 4 minutes of complete silence. I admire some of the Glass and Adams stuff, but a lot of it is just an unending racket.

Do tell me what have YOU personally done to support the"real" art as of this year.

Step 1: load gun (Lüger would be best)
Step 2: point gun behind one's temples
Step 3: pull the damn trigger
Follow these three easy steps, and you can join your glorious leader. In hell, that is.

Would be nice if build and liveable.

modern art is completely gas worthy. get ready and don your most choice oven attire.

I really wish I could play that modern arts game. I would fuck over rich people on a daily basis. Problem is you have to have some sort of pull. Like a Nigger from Nigeria born and raised in a village that looks and talks like Einstein.

Or some other shit. It just needs to be out of the ordinary. A former Childsolder could make sculptures out of AKs and bones. And he would get hundreds of thousands for his "Art".

Or you really need to sell your product. Art is about marketing. If you can sell it and make a dramatic and confusing story around it you are in. Or your art has to be otherwise confusing. All you need is one rich chump to fall for it and it gets the ball rolling.

You have to have the personality for it. You cant be ashamed of selling worthless trash for big amounts of money. Otherwise they will sense it. You cant let them feel you want something from them like something mundane like money. The more you act like you dont give a fuck the more cash you will get.

edgy

You are too ignorant to understand it

People get bored and art is about expression. If you only copy what came before than you have stagnated and are uninteresting.

On the otherhand this can lead to many pisspoor ideas, but its better than stagnation.

breathtaking. we are saved, the golden times are back.

Not my fault if you have absolutely zero culture false flag.
Europe was emulating with creation between the world war.
I guess you never heard of German art during the 30s. Painting, cinema.

Beeing an idiot make you controlled by everyone

no one cares about female art because it's fucking awful and always about their smelly vages. get bent cunts.

That's the 40's. I know it's hard to keep up with all the revisionism, but at least try.

I remember some garbage tabloid trying to incite some outrage over the National Gallery purchasing a red canvas for millions of dollars by printing a shitty picture of it in newsprint when the reason it is so valuable is because it's one of the first examples of painting that used different chemical composition paints of same color to reveal a picture as museum-goers walk by since the different paint reflect the light differently at an angle.

Very true, they pushed 'individualist art' which was more degenerate than anything the Soviets could ever come up with. Brainwashed generations since the 1940s.

That's what modern art is inherently dissembling, though. It always has been. It's chaotic neutral, not chaotic evil.

youtube.com/watch?v=bHw4MMEnmpc
This is a good documentary.

the concept is more important than the aesthetics. the concept is more relevant. there's an anxiety about women and minorities not being as successful in the art realm and this is the remedy for it
watching this kind of stuff and thinking about it puts you in the "good" camp, the camp where people are seeking for equality and equal representation because we're all equally beautiful in our own special ways.

the idea of cleansing your soul with pieces like these is probably more appealing to a lot of people than to see accomplished art done by white men because it just reaffirms their dirty thoughts about the superiority of a certain group

>still mad that his leader an heroed like a coward

and the fact that you presented this as a counter example to our "cherry picking" says everything i need to know about you. we don't need to cherry pick, we only need to take a stroll to our local contemporary art gallery in order to see the amount of garbage that's being passed off as art.

That looks like an Ikea house made in china plastics

Who were some of the first to criticise modern art, but you know, we gotta keep the conspiracy theory going.

I really hope someone murders you.

Yes. They made random paint splattering on canvas into 'fine art'. I mean that's pretty amazing.

independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html

Clickbaiters into archive
archive.is/E4wK5

>'s one of the first examples of painting that used different chemical composition paints
so it belongs in a science musem since it's not art
kys leaf

No, I'm mad that someone didn't assassinate him sooner.

Nah fuck you. Picasso was the first scammer. You ever see his work in person? It's beyond shit.

Did someone not post a list of the end goals of communism in society? Supposedly formless art is supposed to belittle human identity and tradition, cultural, etc. Of course not all artists are communists, but assuming art got hijacked, it wouldn't be much of a jump to say that everyone has gotten blinded by what is considered good and bad art.

Someone who doesn't know how to put up a tent?

It really isn't.
youtube.com/watch?v=bHw4MMEnmpc

Come on, faggots, I dare you.
Tell us what have you done to support the "real" art.
Talk is cheap.
Artists need to eat, and if modern art sells (due to money laundering or whatever) and "classic" art does not, that literally means that great majestic market has spoken and the value of modern art is de facto far greater than that of the classic art.

That is literally a Picasso painting posted there, before he decided that some effort was too much effort.

DaVinci invented new types of paint because he wasn't satisfied with existing ones.

Should his paintings be moved to a children's science museum next to the Tesla coils?

Read again: It was a picture but only of you walked by, sort of those moving picture cards effects.
>you should have quoted further

Which is why I call him the first scammer. Someone with some talent who decided to feed the normies bullshit and realized he could even turn art jewish. How many softcocks look up to Picasso as a great artist? The damage he and others like Pollock have done is virtually irreversible at this point

went to classical and design art college and 90% of the people there have no actual talent and just do this type of post modern trash, performance being the worst, i mean, Marina Abramovic's performance art is part of the studies.

So much this! Essentially tax fraud schemes for the rich.

To further understand the issue and arm yourself with argumentative ammunition for discussion on- and offline, I highly recommend 'Who says that's art?' by Michelle Kamhi.

(I do not profit from this link)
amazon.com/Who-Says-Thats-Art-Commonsense/dp/0990605701/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1500537807&sr=1-1&keywords=Who Says That's Art?

>>Today's artworld experts accept virtually anything as "art"--from all-black paintings and facsimiles of supermarket cartons to dead animals preserved in formaldehyde. Many art lovers reject such fabrications, however, arguing that they are not art. This book explains why those ordinary people are right and the presumed experts are wrong.

>>Museums and galleries around the world are filled with "cutting-edge" pieces of "contemporary art" that art lovers largely detest, while painters and sculptors whose work the public would appreciate are ignored by the cultural establishment.

>>How did this happen? What mistaken ideas have led to it? Who is responsible? And what can be done to reverse the situation? Who Says That's Art? answers such questions--in commonsense terms that non-specialists can readily understand.

...

tell me about the great european painters and sculptors of the first half of the 20th century. tell me so that i can laugh at you.