Germanics are the people that most of Sup Forums and the general white supremacist community considers to be "white"...

Germanics are the people that most of Sup Forums and the general white supremacist community considers to be "white", right?

Why is it then that most of Western Civilization was developed in Rome and Athens, two places with swarthy dark haired people barely indistinguishable from Arabs? The Germanics, the whitest(and hence most superior) of all races were literally just like niggers until they were Christianized. Why? Why were people who were essentially half-nigger more superior in every regard to the white master race? It makes no sense. Even in the Middle East, even darker and more African blooded peoples had civilizations comparable to those in Europe before Islam destroyed them. How can that be the case if whites(see, Germanics) are the only master race capable of developing civilization?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/details/TheTrueAndTheFalseHeroesOfTheWhiteRace
youtube.com/watch?v=xfbnnP6bdck
youtube.com/watch?v=MLLMfWmiC0E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

> Rome and Athens
> barely indistinguishable from Arabs

Next time at least try.

Hellenics are blonde and have blue eyes.

WE

Germanics founded roman and greek civilizations.

/thread

WUZ

WE WUZ ROMANZ!

Founders of civilization.
Northern Germanics = stayed in the cold were survival was the main concern.

Italics (Southern Germanics) = came over the alps to the south were it was warm and survival much easier, so they started assembling and building civilization (since they had the ressources), later together with the etruscans. Also lower races like Africans were in the proximity which were fit for enslavement.

Germanics aren't the whitest people. They tend to be "swarthy" too,its just not olive skin, more of golden leathery colour. The whitest people in terms of appearance are anglo-celtic and slavs.
Most southern europeans aren't even swarthy. They're actually pretty pasty when they don't have a tan, yes even greeks. In comparison germanic people tend to have colour year round, especially germans and scandinavians.

Also, germanic people weren't like niggers before they were civilised. More like native americans. And italians and greeks aren't barely distinguishable from arabs. The problem is most people outside of europe really have no idea what most greeks, italians and spaniard actually look like. Most look far closer to other europeans then stereotypes would have it. nd if you mean ACTUAL arabs ie saudis, yemenis etc, and not fake wannabe arabs like lebanese an syrians, then southern europeans certainly are not barely indistinguishable from them. There's some resemblance between levantine "arabs" and southern europeans, because they're both mediterranean, but they're still very distinct from one another

dude just stop! you're embarrassing us snow niggers. we had culture embrace your own heritage don't steal someone else's like one of those afro centrist niggers.

WE WUZ ITALIANS AND SHIT

You think Italians were Southern Germanic? Have you ever looked at a genetic map?

I think youre talking about Nordicism. Most of pol have a pan european outlook.

(((Christianised)))

Give me a white tribe over a white 'civilisation' any fucking day.

what? Germans swarthy? the British from what i've seen are the swarthy ones although Bavarians are pretty dark probably from the Roman-Italian colonists.

Only the party of Dylan Roof cares that much about race.

Theres plenty of tribes in your no go zones, allah piss be on the queen

GREEKZ WERE GERMANIGZ AND SHIEEET
ROMANZ WERE GERMANIGZ AND SHIEET

Even Germanic barbarians knew the mercy of a painless death.
Niggers on the other hand will torture and piss and shit all over their victims.

>Why is it then that most of Western Civilization was developed in Rome and Athens, two places with swarthy dark haired people barely indistinguishable from Arabs?

Liberal revisionism must be stopped.

It s actually true.Not everything you dont agree with is liberal propaganda man

Read this one.
archive.org/details/TheTrueAndTheFalseHeroesOfTheWhiteRace

Greeks wuz white, they bowed to the German barbarians and let them fuck their wives in order to create a better civilization

Study the indo European expansion.
Roman culture hit northern Europe and northern Europeans exploded with science.
We are all pagan brothers.
The best Catholic cathedrals were built by northern European people.

>Vargtard detected

youtube.com/watch?v=xfbnnP6bdck

Never questioned that they were hwhite

God the music is lit senpai

Anglos are germanic you tool.

>Why is it then that most of Western Civilization was developed in Rome and Athens
stopped reading there

socrates kinda look like a finn or something. it's kinda sad that southern europe is mostly mixed rape babies but it's been a clusterfuck for 12 000 years. ethnicity is worth shit. how do you measure genetic worthiness without memeing.

...

Because you know,britain and france were even better before the romans.if romans never went there we would be 1000 years more advanced

>Rome and Athens
Ask yourself, where is the Rome and the Athens of the modern day? The cultural, scientific, financial powerhouses and world capitals of today?

"...swarthy dark haired people barely indistinguishable from Arabs?"
Seriously, have you fucking looked at any Roman statues?
BTW, you meant "distinguishable".

>civilization
>To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, they call empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace

because, the roman and greek empires had access to the Mediterranean sea. Which allowed extremely cheap shipping, travel and trade.

Furthermore, it's a mistake to suppose that the ancient germans and scandanavians were nothing more than barbarians. Much of this is roman history clouding the historical record, depicting them as savages. Actually they had pretty good little societies

Utter shit

Imperial scum!

>Why is it then that most of Western Civilization was developed in Rome and Athens, two places with swarthy dark haired people barely indistinguishable from Arabs?

>The Germanics, the whitest(and hence most superior) of all races were literally just like niggers until they were Christianized. Why?

>Checks flag

>Uneducated retard

What a surprise.

Britain was doing quite well before the Romans came.

Actually Aristotle describes Celts and druids in particular as philosophers. He and quite a few others held them in regard for their Platonic understanding of the human soul and reincarnation.

They imported and bred with blacks in the 1500s. Well documented and it changed the gene pool.

He looks like a modern day Greek you dumb cunt

just like the modern day Italians look like the ancient Italian peoples.

Just a reminder than Italians got a lot darker in the 1500s. Voluntary intermixing among nobility of Africa and the citizens.

Never happened.
nice cuck fetish you got there

>germanics
>white

Correct. Most of the records made of the "barbarians" are of wars with them.

If the roles were reversed and all that was writen about Rome was all the fucked up brutal shit they did (which they did often) you would hold a shitty opinion of them too.

Germanic tribes were an architectural, mathematical, etc backwater compared to Rome

But they weren't stupid. Which is why they were fine craftsmen, and could outwit Rome in a battle or two.

I didn't say they weren't. Fucking cunt.

Idiot.

>Some say that the study of philosophy originated with the barbarians. In that among the Persians there existed the Magi, and among the Babylonians or Assyrians the Chaldaei, among the Indians the Gymnosophistae, and among the Celts and Gauls men who were called druids and semnothei, as Aristotle relates in his book on magic, and Sotion in the twenty-third book of his Succession of Philosophers.

—Diogenes Laertius, Vitae, Introduction, Section 1[56]


There's actually tons of references by multiple historians on this.


Wanna try again?

>we wuz kangz

You mud hut dwelling savages are nigger tier.

>KANGZ of Scandinavia
WE

And what have the Romans/Greeks and their successors done in the past 2,000 years? Nothing.

The modern world of the past 500 years was built by northern and western Europeans.

LOL when pol has become nothing but shills/kikes larping as nazis and the retarded leftists who think they are real....

No one actually cares if you are white or not...
White people just want to be able to love their own people, culture, and way of life same as every one else.

WE

>who was leonardo da vinci
>machiaveli
>medici
>columbus
ur a feg

E=mc^2 was from an Italian. Also an Italian discovered nerve growth factor. Also the telephone was discovered and patented by an Italian before bell.

It started in those cities you dumb fat american fuck. He is talking about 200 AD and you are throwing facts like after-middle ages.

I swear all these fucking Americans have like 60 IQ.

Oh and I think the telegram as well...

So? The first civilizations were in Iraq, China, Pakistan, and Egypt. For hundreds of years they had technological superiority over whites and were more civilized.

That's how things go. civilizations peak then slow down and decline then other ones take their place on the top. Right now America and Germany are on top, and declining sharply soon China will take your place on top and in a hundred years you will be the equivalent to South Europe in regards to economy, and progress.

This picture is from some stormfronter, it's not in any scientific journals. It's literally just made up non peer reviewed trash some guy put up on his blog.

And the groups that lived in Iran and Egypt then migrated and became Europeans. Modern day inhabitants of those cities are nothing like they were that long ago.

gr8 b8 or shitty american education, can't tell the difference anymore.

>civilization is good for the planet and humanity

WE

Not according to genetics.

Humans have been bad for the environment since we evolved. If you don't like it, kill yourself. Civilization is the one shot we have as acquiring enough information to stop these effects. Going back to the stoneage won't change our impact.


If you doubt this, look up the historical rates of extinction of freshwater muscles in the old and new world.

>Why is it then that most of Western Civilization was developed in Rome and Athens, two places with swarthy dark haired people barely indistinguishable from Arabs?
You are being stupid, Greece wasn't nearly as brown as it is now, neither was Italy. They accepted Christianity and allowed poor refugees like Jesus inside, also their slaves. Arab philosophers looked much different in style than Greek philosophers if you going to imply their statues were once painted with brown. They had different clothing, hair style, no headcap, different bone structure..

Are you daft? The max.planck institute as well as other studies have confirmed Egypt. Iran was named after the Aryans that lived there. Derp.

I should have gone a a step further and pointed out that India only develop civilization after it was conquered by the same Aryans.

Aqueduct?

youtube.com/watch?v=MLLMfWmiC0E

Fucking faggot Europeans and leafs. I'm glad you're all getting raped. You don't deserve your heritage. Good night/day.

civilization doesn't always equal technological superiority. the British Celt's were living in African looking round houses and they developed the must advanced machines in the world at the time. these chariots had suspension which was previously thought to have been invented in the 1900s.

Keep reading Roman accounts and literally nothing else, I'm sure the Romans didn't have a vested interest in making the Germanic people look as bad as possible.

t. purebreed descendant of the people who kicked your laughable civilization to shit

The first civilization with with hydraulic santiation was in the Indus valley. Literally thousands of years before Europeans. The modern day decendants of those people now live in pakistan and India.

OP here, I'm going to throw in my two cents.

Development of a civilization as more to do with the conditions it's exposed to and it's trade routes/capabilities than it has to do with anything else.

Take Sub-Saharan Africa for example, it's the breadbasket of resources and life and it's isolated on all sides, three by ocean, and one by the world's largest desert. As a result they never had any reason to socioeconomically evolve beyond hunter gatherer societies.

Meanwhile Europe was primarily born from travel in the Mediterranean, Mediterranean trade empires laid the first seeds of real European civilization because it was an adverse and complicated way of living that allowed distinct cultures, languages, and practices to develop. Hence the growth of the ancient Hellenic civilizations which later influenced the Romans who created the foundation of western civilization that other countries built on.

Adversity and trade are fundamental to a society being able to develop into a complicated civilization. The Americas and Africa for example were bountiful and isolated for different cultures, hence there was no cultural or social growth for millennia. Meanwhile places like India, China, the Middle East, and Europe were in constant Eurasian trade with each other allowing adversity and complex economics which later created their civilizations.

Circumstance > Race

no he doesnt look like a finn,he has alpinid phenotype.
But he could be a finn since the alpinid is maybe the most common sub-race in Europe

Farming is much easier in the Mediterranean compared to the cold northern forests. Easy access to food make it much easier to develop culturally and field large armies. Even so, Germanics and celts were doing OK for themselves in terms of metalworking and shit

Literally what the fuck are you talking about? Now you are claiming that North Africans were whites? What is your sources some blog made by a random stormfronter? You're a fucking idiot m8.

> barely indistinguishable from Arabs
I hope you are joking?
Do you realize that all European have a common ancestor?
Also the modern German learned from us and they are civilized so who give a fuck?
for all people that think >lenonwhite
Italy is still there
Also it exclude pre 1400 invention and italy is still one of the best
>american education

>Snowniggers
>Human
Here's the answer

Once rome started to fall apart, germanics were successful at making use of and later improving existing roman bureaucratic and scientific technology.

People often describe the dark ages as a total fall into barbarism.

However, the reality was more of a decentralization of power. Rome fragmented into kingdoms that were still in many ways civil albeit often at war (as was rome).

Romans also thought of and portrayed themselves as white in the european sense.

Pic related - gaius julius caesar (statesman and general) doesnt look like an arab imo

Surviving bust of same caesar.

>there are people on Sup Forums that unironically believe that there were ancient whites ruling classes that inhabited China and the Americas
>there are people on Sup Forums that unironically believe in the lost city of Atlantis being the origin of the white race
>there are people on Sup Forums that unironically believe that whites are one of the lost tribes of israel, and that jesus was a red haired white man
>there are people on Sup Forums that unironically believe all of these things and then laugh at Hoteps
this is why Sup Forums gets laughed at on /his/ and other boards.

Shitpost detected, i have yet to find a single one of these people you describe.

Germans were barbarians but became civilized and surpassed the Latins over time.

Black have been at the shame state since they've been discovered.

The climate has to be an even bigger factor than access to the Mediterranean sea. Its not only colder the only light source at the time was often daylight. Go to Norrland (provice in Sweden) and you will find very little of that during winter.

According to the anthropologist Buxton, Leonard Halford Dudley ,ancient Greeks had mediterranean and alpine phenotypes.

Carleton S. Coon agrees with Buxton ,that ancient greeks had those phenotypes in majority ,but also believes that ancient greeks had also few people who had nordid phenotype.

You forgot that Ghengis Khan may have had red hair and green eyes.

>i have yet to find a single one of these people you describe.
then you need to lurk more, newfaggot, or fuck off back to the plebbit shithole from whence you came:
WE WUZ KHANZ YALL

>Rome and Athens, two places with swarthy dark haired people barely indistinguishable from Arabs
you know things change over thousands of years, right?

>WE WUZ KHANZ YALL
more likely that there used to be asians with red hair and green eyes that got bred out. there's no doubt that many steppe tribes had blonde/red haired and blue/green eyed people in them, Ghengis Khan being a ginger is mostly speculation but it's plausible.

the first person to exist with blue eyes was far eastern europe, somewhere near the black sea. it's not unreasonable to think the trait spread east as well as west.

shhh Germanic tribes where even before Romans advanced into their territory already hundreds of years ahead even of the most "advanved" nigger tribes but niggers like you cant even see the obvious differences unless humans explain them to you.

shhh there is this thing called craddle of humanity, humans didn't just get suddenly spawned as whitey in North Europe along with the rest of humanity at different places

shhh the upper caste of Romans where the whites of their race, its like you are imply America is the most powerfull nation on earth and thats proof tacos and negros are superior to the mostly German and Bong ethnic whiteys building it up and still keeping it running till today.

shhh genetics arent physically tied to civilizations, they will just limit what you can do and its most unlikely a nigger like you will actually create one on its own

these question you niggers keep smuggly asking to imply you subhumans are not worthless compared to Germans/Whites have been answered and long documented by science in favour of whitey

shhh there was never such a dichotomy of "only", its just how reality played out

actually to this day there are plenty of Mongolians with red hair. horse culture originated in the Caucasus region and spread out across Europe and Asia with the Indo Aryans , red hair may have originated there.

>barely indistinguishable from Arabs
>Terrible bait, worst I've seen so far

well there you go

All Julio-Claudian emperors were described as having fair hair and blue or green eyes. Modern Mediterranean people are mongrelized and not the same phenotype they used to be.

the only account of ghengis ever having red hair was written decades after his death by a jewish man who never even met him
Ghengis' own people depict him as an asian with dark hair. All of ghengis' sons are depicted as asians with dark hair
it's not speculation m8, it's just bullshit. WE wuz not khans

Romans, Greeks, and Germans were all white. Each had their own achievements in history. After the fall of Rome, Europe obsessed with achieving Roman greatness again, especially the Germanics. After they sacked Roman territories they realized they were dumb forest niggers by comparison so they spent centuries bettering themselves. Which led to many achievements that surpassed Rome.

That helmet isn't really much better or worse than an early pre-marian Roman helmet. Actually the engraving on that helmet indicates it was not a helmet for a regular soldier and it also indicates skilled craftsmenship considering whoever made it was doing it with basic tools in some shit twig shack.

southern europeans are mongrelized but that happened much earlier, 9000 years ago with the arrival of Anatolian farmers after the last ice age.