isn't acknowledging that there are different races the first step of racism?
Isn't acknowledging that there are different races the first step of racism?
Other urls found in this thread:
researchgate.net
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
tau.ac.il
nature.com
rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
digitalcommons.unl.edu
journals.plos.org
jstor.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
sociology.as.nyu.edu
collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
bio.miami.edu
pnas.org
science.sciencemag.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
mbe.oxfordjournals.org
researchgate.net
uff.br
eebweb.arizona.edu
jstor.org
bearproject.info
eebweb.arizona.edu
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
researchgate.net
researchgate.net
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
mbe.library.arizona.edu
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
research.amnh.org
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedirect.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
people.virginia.edu
isites.harvard.edu
webspace.pugetsound.edu
atavisionary.com
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
nature.com
telegraph.co.uk
archive.4plebs.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
@scienmag
There is only one race.
The human race.
>isn't acknowledging that there are different races the first step of racism?
yes, this is called race realism and is often referred to as "hate facts"
There's a reason why they aren't showing skeletons or likelyhood of inheriting certain genetic diseases. We learned how to figure out the race and gender of a person just through the dimensions of their bones in fucking highschool, lmao.
'Race is skin deep' my ass.
Hey dawg, you left your "shit-posting flag" on.
ah yeah shit, ahh much better
Don't blacks have smaller brains?
...
ooo hate fact, ive never heard that tasty term
Define racism, without using the term white, European, or inferior.
This will win you an argument with most leftist.
>white, black, yellow we're all the same XDDD
>All lives matter is a racist organization!
pick 1
asians study (see: cheat) for their IQ tests making their results redundant
...
Denying differences in race just leads to more problems not less. Look up the prevalence of sickle cell anemia in African descent.
>detects reoccurring theme
...
There is only one leaf. A fucking leaf.
this is a hate fact
>Im a well educated liberal, I love Science™ and investigative journalism™
>thats why I listen to Samantha Bee and watch Bill Nye
>evolution is real ok STUPID Christians, except it doesn't affect humans, we are all exactly the same and selective adaptations don't exist sometimes because I find them upsetting
Imagine looking at this picture and having to convince yourself there is no significant genetic divergence going on here
saying these two women are genetically different in any way is a hate fact. race is a social construct, there/'s no difference between these two. stop being racist, read a sociology book instead of a biology book for once stupid maybe you'll learn something
brain size has very little to do with iq and such
>be misanthropic
i consider this human because i consider all humans to be dumb animals
Woah, woah, woah. They're NOT very genetically different. It's just that THE DIFFERENCES MATTER.
no whites ever cheat either.
btw dumb fuck if cheating is so easy why don't you do it? instead you're a loser who says other cheat. there's only winning and losing in life and you're a loser
...
in all three pictures they're taking a spics blood, so?
What are you talking about, you racist fuck? Race doesn't exist. All I see is complete blackness, although I am clinically blind.
that is true
some people have shorten pathways that augment speed but show up in an mri as a visually smaller part of the organ
i don't cheat on my IQ test because i want to know what my real intelligence quotient is. yeah i'll cheat on my IQ test and be a "winner". i think you got a few things backwards mate
most mixed race people cant even donate organs
It's a parody of this picture.
thanks for admitting to teaching on standardized tests, gook. What have Asians contributed to society? What inventions or marvels of engineering?
>Everyone is dumb but me xD
world war two
They all look like different organs, are people retarded?
wrong.
there's only one species, the human species.
there are multiple races.
Why does the black heart look like it has spent a lifetime struggling to pump a blood/crisco mixture?
>there are multiple races.
i substitute "race" with the word "subspecies" all the time now and it makes people think
Races are subspecies
...
>tfw no redpilled anthropologist gf
The black heart does look different.
Don't african brains have less folds?
...
Maybe they all are luddites, I dunno, nature is cruel and having 2 madman races might hurt the Noosphere.
...
>never been never will
>nihilist
rousseau is right we should be in nature because hobbes was right about our violence
>no one isnt a trash animal
Asians are smarter, but they do cheat on everything, tho
why inferior?
"Racism is thinking your race is superior to another"
Damn, Abos are so gross. They're like toad people.
Are Jews racist then when the call themselves "Gods Chosen"?
there is only one race
the dog race .
OH WAIT no das rite there are many types of dogs
Dude, there's racial realism and racial denialism. Racial prejudice may or may not exist in both types.
...
Sure
They are some of the most racist people ever
religious superiority based on genes is racist
>What have Asians contributed to society? What inventions or marvels of engineering?
Tentacle porn
Waifus
(1997) Barbujani et. al., find a human genetic distance of ,155. There are no recognized subspecies.
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
(2001) Kim et. al., find an Asian dog genetic distance of ,154. There are eleven recognized subspecies.
tau.ac.il
(1994) Roy et. al., find a North American coyote genetic distance of ,107. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.
nature.com
(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic distance of ,033. There are three recognized subspecies.
rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org
(2014) Jackson et. al., find a humpback whale genetic distance of ,12. There are three recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2008) Lorenzen, Arctander & Siegismund find a plains zebra genetic distance of ,11. There are five recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2003) Pierpaoli et. al., find a European wildcat genetic distance of ,11. There are three recognized subspecies and five biogeographic groups according to (Mattucci et. al., 2016).
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
(2007) Lorenzen et. al., find a Kob antelope genetic distance of ,11. There are two to three recognized subspecies.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
(2003) Jordana et. al., find a south European beef cattle genetic distance of ,068. There are eighteen recognized subspecies.
digitalcommons.unl.edu
(2004) Williams et. al., find a red winged blackbird genetic distance of ,01. There are twenty-two recognized subspecies.
journals.plos.org
jstor.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
sociology.as.nyu.edu
collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
forgot to say this dude on tumblr says "isaralites" are not jews & that "blacks, hispanics and antive americans are jews" his actual words
science.sciencemag.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
digitalcommons.unl.edu
tau.ac.il
(1997) Wise et. al., show that the genetic variability within humans is 0,776. There are zero recognized human subspecies.
mbe.oxfordjournals.org
(1997) Wise et. al., find a chimpanzee genetic variability of ,63. There are four recognized subspecies.
(2001) Uphyrkina et. al., find a leopard genetic variability of ,58. There are thirteen recognized subspecies.
(2001) Eizirik et. al., find a jaguar genetic variability of ,739. There are nine recognized subspecies.
eebweb.arizona.edu
fair enough
*relatively significant
(2000) Culver et. al., find a puma genetic variability of ,52. There are six recognized subspecies.
nature.com
(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic variability of ,66. There are three recognized subspecies.
jstor.org
(1998) Paetkau et. al., find a North American brown bear genetic variability of ,5275. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.
bearproject.info
(2000) Waits et. al., find a Scandinavian brown bear genetic variability of ,687. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.
eebweb.arizona.edu
(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a coyote genetic variability of ,629. There are nineteen recognized subspecies. They further find a Gray wolf genetic variability of ,574. There are thirty-seven recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2001) Girman et. al., find an African wild dog genetic variability of ,643. There are five recognized subspecies.
(2001) Kyle & Strobeck find a North American wolverine genetic variability of ,55. There are two to three recognized subspecies.
(2001) Walker et. al., find a Scandinavian wolverine genetic variability of ,325. There are three recognized subspecies.
(2000) Polziehn et. al., find an elk genetic variability of ,395. There are seven to eight recognized subspecies.
mbe.library.arizona.edu
(1995) Forbes et. al., find a bighorn sheep genetic variability of ,6235. There are three recognized subspecies.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
(2000) Reinartz et. al., find a bonobo genetic variability of ,535. There is one subspecies.
research.amnh.org
(1999) Paetkau et. al., find a polar bear genetic variability of ,68. There is one subspecies.
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
(1999) Wilton, Steward & Zafiris find an Australian dingo genetic variability of ,445. There is one recognized subspecies.
eebweb.arizona.edu
(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a domesticated dog genetic variability of ,5085. There is one recognized subspecies, and there are many breeds.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedirect.com
...
people.virginia.edu
(2000) Turkheimer presents his Three Laws of Behavioral Genetics and explains their meaning.
Turkheimer begins by stating, "The nature-nurture debate is over. The bottom line is that everything is heritable, an outcome that has taken all sides of the naturenurture debate by surprise. Irving Gottesman and I have suggested that the universal influence of genes on behavior be enshrined as the first law of behavior genetics (Turkheimer & Gottesman, 1991), and at the risk of naming laws that I can take no credit for discovering, it is worth stating the nearly unanimous results of behavior genetics in a more formal manner."
The Three Laws are as follows:
? First Law. All human behavioral traits are heritable.
? Second Law. The effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of genes.
? Third Law. A substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioral traits is not accounted for by the effects of genes or families.
In short: no one is born tabula rasa.
isites.harvard.edu
(2005) Philippe Rushton and Arthur Jensen (author of, "The g Factor") conclude that IQ is the greatest indicator of future success in Western societies when inter-generational income dependence is accounted for.
They also found that IQ is at least 50% heritable and likely nearer to 80% heritable. To draw comparison, height is 70-90% heritable.
During their analysis they concluded that Whites have a minimum of 75% IQ heritability.
webspace.pugetsound.edu
(2004) Plomin & Spinath discuss intelligence in the wider context of genetics, genes, and genomics.
sciencedirect.com
(2009) Rushton & Jensen refute erroneous claims made about the nature of the Flynn Effect and its relationship with the Black-White IQ gap.
In their conclusions they state, "We conclude that predictions about the Black–White IQ gap narrowing as a result of the secular rise are unsupported. The (mostly heritable) cause of the one is not the (mostly environmental) cause of the other. The Flynn Effect (the secular rise in IQ) is not a Jensen Effect (because it does not occur on g)."
sciencedirect.com
(2001) Rushton & Rushton show evidence for racial-group differences in the form of brain size and structure, IQ, and musculoskeletal trait variation.
Their analysis shows significant variation in both the structure and sizes of the brains of Negroids, Caucasoids, and East-Asians. In addition to this, they have found differences in the skull shapes and structures of the races, alongside differences in average height and weight and all parts of the bone and muscle structures from the neck to the feet.
sciencedirect.com
(2007) Shatz analyzes the relationship between IQ and fertility.
They find that IQ is negatively associated with total fertility rate, birth rate, and population growth rate. This means that higher IQ populations are less fertile than lower IQ populations.
Holy shit, is that true?
That is just pathetic..., do these people actually believe that?
sciencedirect.com
(2013) Michael Woodley, Jan Nijenhuis, and Raegan Murphy conclude that Western IQs have declined by an average of 1,6 points per decade since the Victorian Era.
Higher IQ people are more productive, healthier, and are more creative. The reduction in IQs across the West has been met with a marked decrease in average productivity and general health despite vast increases in average wealth, nutrition and access to healthcare.
The cumulative reduction in IQ is between 12,45 and 13,35 points or roughly one standard deviation on a normal IQ bell curve. This represents an eight-fold reduction in the number of geniuses and a counter to the Flynn Effect.
The resultant decrease in IQ is attributed to dysgenics in the form of outbreeding and negative mate selection within populations. The importation of migrants of different races and ethnicities preempts the outbreeding and subsequent loss in IQ. This effect has sped up as migration has increased.
nature.com
>Egypt, located on the isthmus of Africa, is an ideal region to study historical population dynamics due to its geographic location and documented interactions with ancient civilizations in Africa, Asia and Europe. Particularly, in the first millennium BCE Egypt endured foreign domination leading to growing numbers of foreigners living within its borders possibly contributing genetically to the local population. Here we present 90 mitochondrial genomes as well as genome-wide data sets from three individuals obtained from Egyptian mummies. The samples recovered from Middle Egypt span around 1,300 years of ancient Egyptian history from the New Kingdom to the Roman Period. Our analyses reveal that ancient Egyptians shared more ancestry with Near Easterners than present-day Egyptians, who received additional sub-Saharan admixture in more recent times. This analysis establishes ancient Egyptian mummies as a genetic source to study ancient human history and offers the perspective of deciphering Egypt’s past at a genome-wide level.
>be God's chosen people
>screw up majorly, to the point where Jesus calls Jewish pharisees a "brood of vipers"
They haven't changed from back then. Radical Judaism, where they followed the motions and stoned blasphemers without actually believing in God and prioritizing themselves, mirror's today's radical left.
Stop the denial. East Asians have heavier brains than whites. It's a fucking fact.
No. It's even older than that. (((They))) have been playing this game for longer than we realize...
Ugh, ignorant!
What you didn't understand about Google's illustration is that one of the guys is a transgender, trans-african american woman, another is a trans-african american, yet another is a trans-asian, and lastly the second to the right is a transgender blonde woman.
How funny is it when your Stephen Hawking computer reads the shitposts aloud?
...
...
sauce pls?
...
I hate hate facts!
Info dump
This is true. Convolutions in the brain are more important than size and Negros tend to have less convolutions in brain surface than Caucasians.
Not the biggest fan of straw-men but this is basically them.
I said this once when I was 14
God damn
...
Earth was a Joint Colonization with each Race picking a Continent(Whites = Europe, Blacks = Africa, Asians= Asia).
[Did threads on this: archive.4plebs.org
Each Race had a Planet(s) they were from. To figure out who had what, look at the Adaptation/Design of each Race in relation to the Environments on each Planet.
This Norwegian documentary is probably on of the best ways to counter this pseudo-science, it's also normie friendly.
if this image is true then racists have a clear disability. their own rules usually give the disabled immunity to criticism.
there is only one human race - white.
Try putting that Chinaman's heart into a German and see how well he fares if race doesn't exist.
It's the only step of racism. If you accept that there are differences between people, you accept that some people are inherently better at some things than others because of those differences.
It's the only step of racism. If you believe in race, you are a racist.
Race is pure pseudoscience.
Shoes on the couch is completely unacceptable
I don't know why I even reply to these pathetic kike threads but let me just say one thing to rat faggot OP and his pathetic bait thread;
on the black market, which is probably ordained by kikes, people who are kidnapped and butchered for their kidneys are...
wait for it OP kike faggot
PREDOMINATELY WHITE.
I guess it has nothing to do with genetics and quality, it's just, like everything else, a coincidence. I'm sure some decrepit kike would like a nigger from sahara kidney.
That's scientific racism you Nazi