So Sup Forums, I was indulging in the hobby of the white man (Allele cataloging and amatuer genome-design) and I discovered something odd;
Blacks have the highest frequency of an allele that impairs the production of sperm volume;
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22735779/ >It was found that the rs13395648 TC genotype was associated with a significantly lower semen volume compared with the TT genotype (P=0.016
This image displays the frequency of the C allele as orange - YRI is African, CEU is European, and CHB and JPT are Asian. As you can see, C has it's highest frequency in Africa, and CC (A double dose) only exists in the African and Japanese samples.
Now this is real science. Thanks for sharing your discovery.
Joseph Wood
do you have any interesting info on RH negative allele data?
Gavin Watson
What could this mean? The Japanese population tends to stay small, despite having access to excess food, while the nigger population exploded like herpes in a brothel
Gabriel Davis
Why would impairing the production of sperm volume help them breed like the rats that they are?
Oliver Ross
Neanderthal males had antigens that killed their own sons (Not daughters) when they impregnated H. sapiens sapiens women. The paper is behind a Jewish paywall;
I think they were RH-, and they're hiding the fact behind this paywall. Jewish plausible deniablity.
It means that Japanese have an ancestor in common with Africans that Europeans and Mainland Asians don't. Probably from the Ainu.
Also - Africa still has the lowest population density on Earth. This allele might have evolved to keep them from breeding beyond carrying capacity - a large population which subsequently starved to death might produce an anti-fertility phenotype.
The Japanese might be the advanced branch from this population, and the Africans might be the degenerated branch. Also there was admixture into Africans 35,000 years ago.
Camden Robinson
>Neanderthal genetics Is that why RH neg mothers only birth RH neg offspring ? (without the modern antigen) tfw RH neg and 4% Neanderthal
Jonathan Collins
If Africans came from a population that was at one time large, there would be an adaptiveness to having poor sperm quality - you'd be less likely to reproduce the problem.
But Africans interbred with a hominid only 35,000 years ago;
>m.pnas.org/content/108/37/15123.full >Extensive simulation results reject the null model of no admixture and allow us to infer that contemporary African populations contain a small proportion of genetic material (≈2%) that introgressed ≈35 kya from an archaic population that split from the ancestors of anatomically modern humans ≈700 ky
