Well?
Well?
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.is
m.youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Because I'd just give it all to my children before I died and the state would get zero.
why should welfare fags acquire parents wealth instead of their own family?
She has no children of her own.
>100% inheritance tax
You'll be seeing a whole hell of a lot of boating accidents and building fires. You can't tax something that doesn't officially exist.
What retard put this in an image?
since OP is a faggot: archive.is
also
>That’s money that no living being has a moral claim to, according to standard justifications of wealth inequality and private property.
is literally the most vapid argument I have ever seen. Perhaps I should go into "journalism". Seems like an easy paycheck.
Because all the rich people will just move all their assets to places that don't have such a retarded laws.
>Soviet Union pledges to redistribute the wealth
>also all the rich people left
>so we're taking it from the middle class now
>Nazi Germany pledges to take all the money from the Jews
>all the rich Jews left years ago
>take it from the poor Jews and business owners
You can't tax the rich if the rich don't want to be taxed. The benefits of being there must outweigh the costs, or they'll just find somewhere else to set up shop, because they have the capital and assets to just go wherever the hell they want.
Why don't we put a bullet in her head and put an end to one useless person? I'm not having my assets distributed to shitskins when I die.
Because the welfare state is immoral