Even if you successfully argued that blacks and other darkskins have lower IQ how does that correlate to violence?
Are you saying the dumber you are the more violent and criminal you are? Then how do you explain Soros and the other globalists who have high IQs but are doing the most evil in the world?
Other urls found in this thread:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
m.youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
digitaljournal.com
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com
youtube.com
sciencedirect.com
twitter.com
There's probably not much correlation between IQ and violence. I remember an user talking about how the abos have even lower IQ than blacks but are not as violent. Blacks just happen to be naturally low IQ and violent. And certainly there's no correlation between IQ and evilness, as you said, Ashkenazis are the proof.
Men who are unable to settle their difference via words and arguments use violence.
Does this really suprise you?
Black have higher testosterone. They are closer to apes than civilized humans.
Also. Soros and his associates are Zionists. Of course they have evil intentions to help Israel in any way they can
>I don't understand bell curves or outliers: the post.
What are you trying to slide you fucking shill?
>Black have higher testosterone.
t. low testosterone nu-male
>Then how do you explain Soros and the other globalists who have high IQs but are doing the most evil in the world?
Being violent and having the emotional intelligence of a small child isn't them same as being a childfucking psychopath
Everyone has the potential for violence in them. The difference in how you get caught is what is iq correlated.
Low IQ is tied to impulse control, hence more dumb niggers acting violent. Abos are humanity's turtles/sloths; they just move and think slow and are ok living in their own excrement.
It's a statement based on fact, not any personal information you insecure faggot
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>needing reasons to hate niggers
SAD!
High IQ sociopaths.
Only dumb criminals get caught doing petty crime
Smart criminals legalise their crimes.
Physical violence. Blacks commit physicaly violence more often because of the combination of higher testerone and lower IQ
Jews commit financial and societal violence. That's why they were kicked out of every society they encroached on
Niggers have different levels of testosterone and estrogen. Their women are more masculine and their men kill you for dissing their shoes because their feelings got hurt.
criminality tends to happen around the 80-75 spectrum. Kind of like when you're drunk you can do stupid things and become aggressive and get into meaningless brawls because your iq significantly is lowered when consuming alcohol. This is ofcourse even worse for people with already low iq.
It's also related to low impulse control etc. and there's a lot of things like race specific things that also plays into it, iq is just more of a meassure of how fast your brain operates and is imo best used on groups to assess their average potential in a superficial but reasonable fashion. Many many of the other parts of intelligence and various traits that factor into it can't be inferred directly from iq but it's a good qualified assessment of someones potential.
IQ can also be different between races, like different ethnicities can have a similar score but their capability can be much higher or lower depending on the race because of many other parts of intelligence/traits that are not so readily apparent in iq tests.
Ofcourse iq doesn't mean you can't be evil or bad or commit crime.. but it means you are less likely to do it overall, because the smarter you are the more you realize the consequences/the negative outcomes of doing so and the risks involved, whereas less intelligent people don't for lack of a better term, think things through. Hence why you see so many of the well let's err on the side of caution to not throw too many under the bus and say 75, i want to say 80 and below but let's go with 75.. and below.. you find extremely many average criminals like people robbing stores and what not within that iq spectrum, which is ofcourse a really stupid thing to ruin your life from doing. So ofcourse those who do those things are ofcourse no surprise, not very intelligent.
...
(cont)
Around 80-75 and below seems to be where the majority of the criminality spectrum starts/in general across all ethnicities.
This is Where you find most criminals statistically. As in.. this is the iq spectrum where you can expect a pretty high level of criminality on average.
And around 100+ you find people who can go their entire life never committing a single crime whatsoever as more of the general behaviour.
There are ofcourse exceptions to both, but what you want to look for is not individual assessments but the average expected behaviour which is ofcourse what's interesting.
a lower IQ contributes to things like impulse control, long term planning, risk assesment etc. it regulates many things related to criminal behaviour. blacks also have the highest expression rate of the MAOA1 gene.
en.wikipedia.org
that being said there are still blacks with normal IQ's and regular levels of expression of the MAOA gene. /pol is specifically refering to the niggest niggers.
except that is not the argument...
stupidity =/= violent
Each quality has its own word for a reason, some people are generally violent and stupid.
Get over it shill.
we should be arguing about why they always push race and why they must be destroyed.
...
>Even if you successfully argued that blacks and other darkskins have lower IQ how does that correlate to violence?
>Are you saying the dumber you are the more violent and criminal you are?
This is a well documented fact dumbass, there's a correlation between crime and lower intelligence because they don't think about the consequences as much and they act on impulse. Read a book sometime, queer.
They have a higher propensity to be manipulated by (((them))) as well as other factors, iq is not the only one
People who can't win an argument intellectually are more prone to use violence, that is just a fact of life.
It doesn't mean that just because you're dumb, you are violent. But it does mean that when you look look at it statistically; Groups with lower IQ will be more violent than groups with higher IQ. (Assuming IQ is the only variable in the statistic)
Low iq usually results in a disfunctional society. Hence the violent behaviour.
It's also associated with low impulse control.
Both fuel urban violence.
As for blacks, they have, on average, lower iq higher testorterone levels and lower impulse control than whites and asians. All those combined help to explain black crime.
he's not a dumbass, he's misinformed. you don't convince people of things that way. you need to be more clinical in your approach.
Low IQ does correlate with violence, but I doubt it's causative.
What causes violence, aside from circumstance and upbringing, is the MOA-2 Gene. Blacks have it at rates 8 times higher than whites. It was once called "The Thug Gene," but has now been renamed "The Warrior Gene" for optics.
We know for a fact that Negroes are genetically predisposed to violence because of this genetic quality. It's been tested repeatedly, it specifically correlates well with stabbing behaviors. It just so happens that the rate by which blacks possess the gene over whites is the same rate of black violence compared to white violence. Asians have less of the gene than whites, Indio Latins have it between whites and blacks.
IQ is only one piece of the puzzle.
Warrior Gene makes low IQ blacks an even heavier risk than low IQ whites. This is a FACT.
Societal Factors contribute both to gang banging and shekel grabbing tribalism.
The IQ isn't everything, retard, and no one claims it's everything, retard.
Hey, retard. The only reason people bring up the IQ is because it's the most concrete and most easy to understand, the most easily explainable difference between races, retard.
If there was some sort of a crime vs race study done to determine some sort of a crime coefficient, people would bring that up.
People bring up niggers and their high crime rates all the time, retard, but that gets completely ignored and ''explained'' away by saying that blacks are just discriminated against and poor. They can't do the same with IQ. There is literally nothing you can come up with to disprove that each race has different IQ scores even if you account for all the variables.
Anyone who doesn't have their head stuck up their ass already know blacks are more prone to violence. Genetics don't stop at skin color, genetics don't stop at IQ either. There are genetic traits that impact your behavior. Each race acts differently, and the way niggers act is absolutely disgusting. These sub-humans shouldn't be in white countries.
monoamine oxidase A
/thread
false equivalence. Soros is not committing violence.
People in prison for violent crimes are not geniuses there is a correlation
>Are you saying the dumber you are the more violent and criminal you are? Then how do you explain Soros and the other globalists who have high IQs but are doing the most evil in the world?
Soros isn't down robbing or looting a convenience store, he funds BLM to do disastrous things however.
So he's a smarter criminal, being smart doesn't mean you can't be evil or criminal.
So you miss the entire point about why iq is brought up with regards to crime. Low iq and criminality is to refer to the stupid and violent type of nonsensical high risk crime like..
Murdering someone for very little reason.. like a nigger killing another nigger with a clawhammer because he owed him 3 dollars. Probably is not the sharpest tool in the shed.
or robbing a convenience store, or stealing a random car and so on and so forth. Or selling drugs or being in gangs and all these types of things.
This type of behaviour tends to happen mostly in the 80-75 iq spectrum and below. These people have a high likelyhood of ending up doing stupid shit like that. And probably think they are total geniuses for doing it and not realizing that it's really stupid what they're doing, the impact it has on other people, the high the risk is that they will get caught and their life will be ruined and might go to jail for a long time or get killed by police or by the store owner or whatever, they don't think so far, hence why they do it, and this makes them dangerous/unreliable ofcourse.
The best part about this argument is showing that Asians have even lower violent crime rates than whites, which correlates with the gene. This is why Asians are being pushed into the "privileged" camp - the more laypeople that learn these facts, the more the Marxists MUST silence.
It's fairly self explanatory. Low IQ= more violent.
Low Iq= high impressionability
Easily influenced by nigger thug music and nigger culture. for instances.
Low=bad decisions as a low iq individual was unable to think rationally.
Bad decison. For example, crime.
i did not state otherwise. i thought the implication was obvious. the combination of both is what creates the niggest niggers.
>implying evil=violence.
no
blacks have lower iq's and are more IMPULSIVE.
SOROS breeds violence because of greed.
Here's an example of a guy i would put in 65 or below iq spectrum. (see webm)
Notice the mistakes he makes aside from deciding to commit a crime in the first place which is really fucking dumb.
>take a iron pole
>go into a gas station with it, eventhough there's an empty police car parked right outside the front door.
>starts banging on the clerk with the iron pole, police draws weapon, doesn't stop.
>Charge him and beat him with the iron pole in the face and on the hand where the gun is..
>gets shot.
Iq has A LOT to do with what's going on there.
And dumb people (low iq) tends to be even more impacted by drugs/alcohol than others. Since their brain isn't operating very fast to begin with.. add drugs you got yourself a shitshow of a whole new level of fuckuppery.
That nigger is an actor; a pretender, from a television show (and a really stupid television show at that). So why would you even think of using his image to try to prove that ridiculous point of yours?
Gotta disappoint you there, buddy. There is ample evidence that pretty much through the population, everyone has, on average, an equal predisposition towards committing crimes. The only difference is that stupid people get caught more often and the nature of the crimes changes from violent to white collar.
That, together with the fact that violent crimes are by far the easiest to solve and prosecute make it appear as if stupid people commit more crimes.
t. lawfag
Statistics do differ from what you're saying though. blacks in the US do kill more than whites. And they do have lower IQ on average.
Well that certainly depends on the demographics of the population.
It's pretty well established that monoethnic majority white nations who have around 100 iq or close to it on average, have a very low amount of crime. Take a look at scandinavian countries before the immigration wave that started in the 70's or so. And even up to 80's 90's etc. The crime, murder, violence rape etc. was virtually non existent. So i'd have to disagree with that.
This is also why the average iq matters so much for a nation to operate well internally. And why mass unvetted/unselected mass immigration can destabilize nations extremely quickly. It's like throwing a wrench in the gears essentially. You then have more crime, dumber citizenry, and so on, in exchange for more citizens which is the only positive thing in that equation, and it's not even positive that part because it will degrade the society over time.
Sorry to segway into that but the two are so massively related in my oppinion. And average iq imo is more relevant to compare groups of people with than it is with comparing individuals. Because in a society/nation, having majority of intelligent people around you is far more important than yourself being a genius with regards to how well the society functions.
Smarter people can still commit crime, it's just not impulsive.. remember the Mob? Italian Mafia? Japanese Mafia? Russian Mafia? One of these alone could wipe out all lower-I.Q races with ease.. you see the difference? One is impulsive, animal, with no control, and no ability to control... the other is a human with the power to plan, coordinate, think, and act when ready,, and to understand complex concepts.
>Smarter people can still commit crime, it's just not impulsive.. remember the Mob? Italian Mafia? Japanese Mafia? Russian Mafia? One of these alone could wipe out all lower-I.Q races with ease.. you see the difference? One is impulsive, animal, with no control, and no ability to control... the other is a human with the power to plan, coordinate, think, and act when ready,, and to understand complex concepts.
Pretty much this. I also see nations as a team or a mafia if you will.. Probably a bad connotation let's go with team..
And the west kind of are in a league of their own and each nation is a team.. so they're playing in the big league, and then some guy comes and says
>"hurr durr i'm retarded can i join your team"
NO fuck off, you'll diminish the quality of our team, go back to the little leagues cu when you get better and improve..
They each have developed a good ingroup or a team.. that works well together, and they want to keep improving that A team.. so like they have a high average iq, they have a good society built up, they have values that are conducive to achieving good results etc.
So.. "xenophobia"/dislike of foreigners and "racism" is perfectly natural and makes perfect sense, just like a professional team doesn't want to have some incompetent player taking the place on the roster of one of their really good guys. So they tell them to fuck off if someone asks if they can join.. or they have a trial and deem them unworthy or whatever.
Same exact thing with immigration, but the left have gone autistic and claims it's evil or bad.. What they have forgotten is that if you don't do that, if you have a good team and you aren't selective about who you let on your team, you risk fucking up your entire society/team and you're back to the little leagues.. And have to build all the way back up again to qualify for the big leagues again so to speak. Getting problems again you had already conquered in the past. Frustrating.
We are all inherently violent. The smarter/richrr you are the better you are at getting away with it and destroying more lives. Black violences extent reaches only to those closest to them as they lack the resources. Whilst Soros can sit cosy in a 5 star hotel and have a country break out into civil war. Its a mixture of resources and power.
some dog breeds are more aggressive than others.
Or my retarded relatives back in Asia who eat rice field rats and live in mud/shack/huts yet don't even hurt a fly and are the most peaceful kind people I've known.
Spoiler alert their just to stupid to do critical thinking and just lazilly connecting the 2 in hopes you won't ask questions. Most of this "race realism" shit is like that, cringy plea to try and look smart.
That's exactly what I was saying. Lower IQ simply correlates with (more) violent crimes.
What happened to Sweden and company is more a cultural than an intelligence problem - although IQ certainly plays a role and it still doesn't contradict my point. Dumb shitskins are, like niggers, more prone towards easy crimes - rape, murder, robbery and so on. Clever people, again on average, commit the same amount of crime, just a different sort. Tax evasion, fraud and corporate/ business malfeasance in general. It's just that those crimes are very hard to solve and prosecute and don't get the same attention.
My point is, that, disregarding the percieved severity of the crimes, it's pretty much the same rate of occurence through every strata of intelligence. Culture and race are factors in smaller samples like the population of a single country but in the big fucking average, it's almost perfectly level.
>pic
There crime rate is so low because there is literally nothing worth stealing. How hard is that to get?
The most valuable ressource on the planet do you know what that is? atleast in my oppinion. It's not gold or any stuff like that.. It's not individual geniuses either.. it's large groups of people with average high iq. If you can surround yourself with those, then no matter what goes on in the rest of the world, your society will be better off than the rest of them.
That's imo been the whole thing about nations, and why nations actively practiced eugenic like things throughout the centuries and even milllennia in some cases. For instance in the viking age in scandinavia which became very peaceful, if you murdered someone they didn't put you in prison.. no hilariously you were banished from the fucking country IMMEDIATELY.. this kind of thing cuts down a lot on crime!
Because if you breed towards people who are smart and also healthy ofcourse on average, then you increase your society/nations chance of success exponentially.. So the smart ones who went into that longterm strategy ofcourse HATED foreigners of any kind as a default. Because they had the opportunity to throw a wrench into that whole development by coming and mixing in their shitty traits into that thing, undermining the process.
Having high ingroup preference and very ethnically homogenous nations also creates common unspoken norms and behaviours and the likelyhood of someone straying from that behaviour also is heavily minimized. So high level of cooperation, high level of average intelligence/iq. Great chance of success and also a very high likelyhood of geniuses popping up from that mold.. It's brilliant of a situation.
The west should've never dropped eugenics and should've never allowed mass immigration or even just moderate immigration except of extremely high quality people. Because it literally ruins/is in the process of ruining everything.
Jews get kicked out because people get jealous and don't want to pay debts. Stop blaming Jews for your own failings.
>lower IQ how does that correlate to violence
That's a fact.
>Are you saying the dumber you are the more violent and criminal you are?
Yes.
>Then how do you explain Soros and the other globalists who have high IQs but are doing the most evil in the world?
Conspiracy bullshit.
>it's your fault for taking the loan, goy! I'm just a humble lender
>what are sub-prime mortgages
>what are student loans
I want usery-defenders shot.
There are 2 types of people that chose a life of crime over honest work.
1. Those stupid enough to think they can get away with it.
2. Those smart enough to always get away with it.
Well i agree with your other points to a degree, except the part that every ethnicity and every iq is just as likely to commit crime. Just doesn't seem to fit with observable reality it's not the same rates of crime. Where do you see that in the statistics? or is it a gut feeling based on your own personal experience? Like for instance if you take white collar crime, those nations i mentioned before have extremely low ranking on corruption index. digitaljournal.com
>What happened to Sweden and company is more a cultural than an intelligence problem
What happened to sweden has nothing to do with swedish culture and swedish people, it's a far leftists subversion problem they are having.
A 1965 swedish minister was quoted saying how fortunate it was that sweden was monoethnic, not just because of race but also with regards to culture and all kinds of other things and how fortunate they were that this was the case..
>hurr durr decades later
Sweden getting run over by trucks of peace and flooded with middle eastern and african migrants and experiencing massive crime waves and car burnings. It was never in swedish culture to have such a thing happen to them, on the contrary. In fact they were renowned for being very peaceful society, and had many right leaning governments and also practiced eugenics before this whole change towards the far left happened.
How about higher IQ giving you the ability to commit more sophisticated crimes?
Face it, niggers can't pull off a complex white collar crime.
>Jews get kicked out because people get jealous and don't want to pay debts. Stop blaming Jews for your own failings.
A jew with a south african flag, what is this trickery, are you gloating over getting your nigger hoodlems to attack the afrikaans?
Can't you take a day off from your self absorbed kikery and self aggrandisement schlomo, you weren't kicked out of europe countless times because people were jealous but because you were subversive as fuck.
Somalia doesn't even have a government so judging there corruption should be void as its a poor comparison
They wouldn't have such an IQ problem if they were taught the importance of education. Your pic itself explains how people don't want the problem with African Americans to be fixed.
This
>privileged
You make a funny point. We have to go out and actively destroy ourselves and communities to gain sympathy
Again, I'm talking about averages. Even in Somalia the stupid people will do the most violent crime while the (relatively) smarter ones will gravitate towards 'victimless' crimes. My sources for this are a (my) juris doctorate and all the relevant literature I had to read and what I was taught. I understand it's a difficult concept to grasp, but I'm NOT saying that developed nations have the same spread of crimes as a shithole like somalia, what I'm saying is that they have, on average, the same AMOUNT of people committing crimes. Hell, I remember reading about 300 year old, compiled crime statistics from england that compared petty crimes by commoners with what the royal courts had to deal with in regards to the crimes by nobility and it still averaged out.
To reiterate my point: stupid people do violent crime, smart people don't.
As for Sweden, I probably wasn't clear that the cultural problem they're having isn't stemming from THEIR culture but the subhumans' they're importing.
Makes me wonder how you get cultured blacks and aggressive blacks. Its probably because of the culture they're raised in or there genes? You tell me
Your defending people that literally put themselves in that position. Who do you blame when someone climbs into a lions enclosure. The loin for doing its job or the idiot for climbing in?
You'll be pleased to know that half of those times we wanted to be kicked out for subversive reasons.
Also King Edwards a liar. He owed the Jews a tidy sum for supporting his wars
addendum: comparing crime statistics from various countries works to a certain degree, but not really. Every country weighs and prosecutes crimes differently. What can be considered a trivial offense in one country can have a 2 year sentence in another and so be recorded differently.
And talking about worthless cultures reminded me of pic related. Has almost nothing to do with the topic, but it's an enlightening read.
All children are highly impressionable. Being surrounded and only having gangsters as your role models will inevitable turn you into a gangbanger as well. Try looking at the subject without a biased view and you'll come to more sensible reasons
You dismiss the topic on something as trivial as a TV show. Really speaks a lot about your own intelligence.
It is low iq high testosterone combo
>They wouldn't have such an IQ problem if they were taught the importance of education. Your pic itself explains how people don't want the problem with African Americans to be fixed.
Define "people", he's talking about people in the black community that preys on blacks like pariahs making lots of money on peddling that victimhood mentality to them. He's not talking about other ethnicities that don't want niggers to improve.. because my goodness, if niggers had high average intelligence, nice, well mannered and were just brilliant, the world would be quite happy! Niggers think we just bash them because we hate them, no it's essentially negative encouragement.. because decades of blowing smoke up niggers ass about how great they are to make them more optimistic and motivated to improve themselves, didn't help whatsoever but made it 100x worse.
>All children are highly impressionable. Being surrounded and only having gangsters as your role models will inevitable turn you into a gangbanger as well. Try looking at the subject without a biased view and you'll come to more sensible reasons
That's very humane of you schlomo shekelsteinberg, perhaps the jewish owned record labels should stop pushing that shit on niggers, The reason niggers turned so bad is because they were deassimilated in the US by telling them they should no longer respect or follow american/white culture and values and behaviour you created mini africas all over the US. And their crime and murder rates returned to african levels. Because the respect for white americans and being told to behave in the american way was the only thing that suppressed their genetic dispositions.
In african americans it correlates to violence. IQ itself doesn't correlate exactly to violence, but under the right circumstances it almost always plays a key factor.
Pretty good analogy. Your right about letting anyone in just because of their feelings can fuck everything up easily. Like people supporting trannies joining competitive sports. They have this mma fighter or something that used to be a guy. Now he's a 'girl' and was absolutely destroying the female competition in the game. I haven't kept up but I thing they're gonna ban him now.
What you don't get schlomo is that culture is genetic. Someone with inferior genetics if they need to have a chance to improve, someone with superior genetics needs to enforce their culture and values upon them. And force them to adhere to those culture and value systems till they start selectively breeding for traits that are conducive to such a system.. This is why culture is genetic.. because how people are selectively bread for, they instantly recreate a similar situation no matter where you put them if they become a majority in a city or a nation. They recreate that culture. So whites create civilization because they have been selectively breeding towards more advanced societies valuing cooperation, intelligence, empathy/kindness and such things. So the moment those kinds of people you place them somewhere else they instantly create the same kind of thing over just a few years..
You could take a large group of people of european descent place them in a shithole in africa and give them a decade the place would thrive like you've never seen that place thrive before.
In the case of niggers they are selectively bred to do literally nothing, and to be savages murderers and criminals. That's how they are bred in africa, aswell as bred totally randomly for no purpose or direction whatsoever, no sense of quality or anything, just pump out 6-12 kids with a random nog and hope some of the kids turn out sort of alright. No quality assesment of the father or mother whatsoever.
In the US after they abandoned the american culture, same thing. Now niggers in the US are breeding for.. you guessed it schlomo! murders, lazy people, and criminals. THUG LIFE.. right? Exact same as in africa..
These people can't get off the ground like that, they were doing pretty good when they were forced to live under the american model, as soon as they weren't.. the progress was destroyed over just a few decades. or barely above 1 decade actually and the destruction continues.
See pic related. It was what your typical African american family looked like in the 60s and 70s.
You know after blacks got the vote that extremely pissed of the racist government. This isn't a joke. I think it was FDR or some president and the CIA FBI whatever did what ever they could to undermine the African american culture. They were racist as fuck. If you see old blacxsploitation movies from those time they were always talking about what drugs were doing to their streets and 'The Man'. The man was real. And it was the government. There is ample evidence to prove of all they did to destroy the African communities. They got people to start selling drugs. They started get liquor stores on every corner theybdid everything in there power. Crazy fuckers tried to blackmail MLK.
Though you said it yourself. They're this way because of the Jews(and government). So clearly your race based opinion previously stated is undermined?
Soros is not Ashkenazi, he is most likely Khazar. If you want a correlation, google khazarian mafia.
Low IQ doesn't lead to violence.
High time preference is what leads to violence.
It's likely these are somewhat correlated.
Blacks have more testosterone and prevelance of the moao2 gene, those are what contribute to the violence, not so much the iq.
Let's put it this way...if being poor causes crime, then why is West Virginia basically free of violent crime even though it's basically the poorest state?
No low IQ absolutely does lead to violence. Do you think Somalia is such a shithole because they have too much time on their hands?
>culture is genetic
If you say so... But that not true. You were born and then brought up into your culture. What youbsaid at the beginning doesn't line up with your conclusion.
Your knowledge of what goes on in Africa is limited. You only hear about 1% of what goes on here so don't be to sure of yourself. If your thinking of Africa's civil war countries don't forget 2 centuries ago Europe wasn't much different. You also forget that there are active foreign agents that have much to profit by fueling and creating the wars that go on in Africa.
Gaddafi had a brilliant plan to help bring Africa out of poverty so you lovely Americans decided to kill him. God forbid you let an African prosper. You'd lose your false of superiority.
Stop looking at Africa and scoff about people having 6 children. Does that make you better than them? As I was saying Europe wasn't much different 2 centuries ago. The problem is you can't give a child a car and expect it to know how to drive it. Europe developed its culture and government structure. It was forced upon Africa(in a sense) we are seeing growing pains but socialism and communism coupled with foreign influences, there's a plethora of shit that you don't take into consideration and just chalk it up to blacks are dumb haha. Instead of trying to understand the problem and fix it you turn a blind eye and allow the Jews to fuck shit up. If you don't help your brothers don't expect them to help you when the Jews come for you
>Though you said it yourself. They're this way because of the Jews(and government). So clearly your race based opinion previously stated is undermined?
No not really, see the response i just made to you about genetics create culture, and culture/how society is constructed is related to how much people are bred for these traits that create more sophisticated and stable societies.
But i will agree, there was nefariousness in some aspects of the US government, that knew exactly what buttons to press to get niggers to degenerate back to their default behaviour, which was incredibly sad because they were as pic related shows starting to selectively breed for western traits, and if they kept that up long enough then they would be able to actually improve genetically so that they could recreate a healty stable society wherever they went.
I don't know the full motivation as to why this was done, but i quite frankly find it disgusting, it undermined a multidecade progress in getting niggers in the US to breed for more hollistic civilizational conducive traits. And they were the only niggers in the world who were close to breaking that mold. And now they've been instead reduced to the worst niggers in the world instead over just a relatively few decades.
If it had been kept going they could've maybe all been repatriated to africa and helped massively improve it and become leaders of it westernizing. So it was a completely idiotic thing to do imo. It's almost as if someone thought it was going too well between blacks and whites, so "let's fuck it up to get a conflict going again". That's pretty much how it looks like, rather than just "fuck all niggers". If you hated all niggers, the last thing you would do was to create that situation, because in high likelyhood a lot of them would've "fucked off to africa" by themselves but in a peaceful manner having great values and behaviour etc. to bring to africa.
it's just sad.
well your niggers even kill them self over rats, and I am pretty sure they are everywhere.
I think your peaceful rice paddy relatives will turn to theft and the ensuing violence that follows a people with food. Say everything turn into a barren wasteland do you thing they'll just chill in there hut and watch there children starve to death?
Also post slits for proof
Your argument is incoherent.
>CTRL+F "warrior gene"
>only two results
>I don't know the full motivation as to why this was done
It's difficult for us - especially whites living in cucked self-hating libtarded white societies today - to comprehend how racist white America was back then, and it's no secret that racist white politicians and individuals in government did a lot to disadvantage blacks. And it's not really surprising that this caused such serious antipathy when it became widely known by blacks.
That doesn't make you or I guilty (fuck the original sin doctrine) and it doesn't mean that we deserve anti-white racism from black people, it just means that we've inherited a massive fucking problem, because the racist whites of the 1960s and 1970s 'poked the black bear', so to speak, and now that bear is trying to tear us (whites) apart.
It's easy to just say 'lol shoot the bear' but that conversation ends as soon as you and I leave our keyboards. What we actually have to do is find a way to re-establish the commonality between us and blacks that racist politicians, black supremacists and faggots like Malcolm X, and Jewish leftists tried so hard to destroy.
The consequence of failing to do so is effectively extinction.
>You're just brought up in a culture.
Yes.. but where does that come from? You don't get it yet it seems.. it's a tandem thing culture and genetics.. people of high intelligence create sophisticated culture and society, then that culture promotes breeding for traits that are conducive to that like high cooperation etc. making it more stable more effective, smoothes out all the rough edges basically, which then creates a more sophisticated culture and so on and so forth, so net result is.. you end up with a group of people that are bred for those traits that are conducive to that kind of a society, so no matter where you place them that's the type of society with that kind of values etc. that they make.
People who come from it as outsiders not having those traits that fit that particular society/culture.. they create instead in their community what THEY are bred for which might be very different. UNLESS.. you force them to adopt your culture in your nation, then over time they adopt those traits that are conducive to that and start breeding for those traits that fit that culture.. See the difference?
When africans become majority in a city in the US, and they don't follow the american culture, they recreate the conditions in africa, their average murder/crime rates are uncannily similar statistically.
This is because culture is genetic.. If they selectively bred for other things they would create a different culture.. But that requires either a) a deliberate effort to promote those kinds of traits and values and then breed for them. b) an ethnicity that already has those traits to impose their culture upon you for a long enough time that you start to promote those traits, that was the original point of colonialism other than the ressources stuff, bringing civilization to the heathens, some guy sitting on some obscure island teaching a guy shakespeare along with basic agriculture and other things.. Didn't exactly work out but that's another story.
(cont)
So culture functions in two ways a) it's genetic and people bred for those traits can recreate it wherever they go. b) high level culture/value systems that is proven successfull by people who bred for those traits can be transplanted on others to help them breed for similar traits and thus similar success.
it can ofcourse also work in a negative fashion like you can have a negative culture that breeds negative results, that some empire or whatever imposes on you. And cause you to breed for negative traits.. which then ofcourse over time impacts your people and also what kind of culture that group of people create after that.
So it's a tandem effect, both genetic and a blueprint for selective genetic breeding for good traits. But either way, the uncanny ability of peoples from around the world if they become a majority in a city or somewhere if they don't follow the majority culture in that nation, to recreate their culture/value system from where they came from is uncanny.
And with africans because their default behaviour due to their breeding history in africa is so massively different from people of european lineage, this effect is extremely noticeable when they recreate african ghettos directly in the US.
I think your right about the genetics thing now that I think about it. Coming from being born in desperation and constant fighting like in Africa will leave you predisposed to aggressive traits. It just makes sense. If you can't defend yourself from an apparently threat and adequately dispose of it you'll likely be the one disposed. So that kind of environment will breed for a trait like that warrior gene.
I seriously subscribe to the theory that government uses race baiting to cause in fighting amongst people like with other topics. People fighting pro life or some other shit rather than worry about how there government is systemically destabilizing one country after another and undermine civil liberties on security law or regulation at a time
The only problem I have with your breed for culture is that if I drop one of your culture guys in the middle east and have him raised by al bagdadi he'll probably end up a jihadi. Like youbwere basically saying its the culture that is nurtured and grown through the generations. Its something people collectively uphold. Its not something one person is born or predisposed to through genetics. We got to were we are thanks to the ability to pass on knowledge. Without that media or transference of knowledge you'll have Tarzan thinking he's an ape.
Those people that come from the outside can choose to conform or not. That's your Muslim prraised
The blacks had that culture before they became a majority.
Muslims fighting for more rights the higher their population gets is because of how they are raised
I'm sorry your wrong
>They wouldn't have such an IQ problem if they were taught the importance of education
Education has no effect on IQ.
>how does that correlate to violence
Smart people tend to get paid more and experience less hardship. Poverty is the real link to violence.
>Then how do you explain Soros and the other globalists who have high IQs but are doing the most evil in the world?
They are nice to your face at least. Stupid people will call you a nigger or whatever to your face and try to start shit.
>that pic
Its irritating to see this cause you get a vocal few idiots that shout stupid shit like race is a social construct so its impossible to actually talk about the subject honestly because people want to pussyfoot around the facts.
Actually American ghettos are worse than the ones I've seen here. In fact its surprising the difference. I think there is something seriously wrong underlining American culture. Why do you have so many people that just get the urge to go on a killing spree. Its not normal
Have you ever taken an IQ test. If you take a man from the bush and ask him to do the test I doubt he'll even answer half the questions.
>The only problem I have with your breed for culture is that if I drop one of your culture guys in the middle east and have him raised by al bagdadi he'll probably end up a jihadi. Like youbwere basically saying its the culture that is nurtured and grown through the generations.
I'm glad you brought that up because i was getting to that by mentioning how it can work in a negative fashion to undermine genetic traits that are conducive for high level situations. But your situation is erroneous. What i was talking about is if you put a group of europeans and placed them in that nation and they were in control of the culture of that society, they would recreate a sophisticated society because of their genetic traits they were bred for predisposing them for that. If you drop me in the middle of a jihad camp ofcourse i would perhaps not become a jihadi but i would be subverted by that culture.
Islam is a perfect example of a culture/value system breeding negative results/negative traits. Middle easterners and arabs weren't always like this stupid and violent etc. They had many contributions in the past to things. But 1400 years of islam breeding bloodthirsty savages and encouraged to marry cousins, and the ones who still had traits conducive for a sophisticated society.. and objected to it "chop chop off with the head" so their genes weren't passed on, coupled with the destruction of knowledge via the jahilyah principle.. takes its toll so their iq etc. and positive traits were bred out of them again and they are now reduced to like 80 iq on average and 40% of males illiterate 60% of women illiterate or some shit like that it's crazy.. and very sad. They are a shadow of what they once were/could've become because of this.
The point is ofcourse to alter the poorly performing elements of humanity by imposing only cultures that show success, and breed for traits that create such a society. Not to impose cultures that promote negative genetic traits.
Then don't use something as trivial as a tv show to try to prove that ridiculous point of yours. Just accept the fact that niggers are stupid, and move on.
IQ is a jew meme
Intelligence cannot be measured unless a person is an actual retard, and even a lot of them of moments of clarity.
The only real answer.
A key thing about this is also, that you need some form of eugenics, breed for specific traits and construct a society that rewards those traits/behaving in a certain fashion that is good for everyone in that nation, whilst not rewarding people who act contrary to that. The net result is you get a high quality group of people and iq and other things increase gradually as a result.
Is why most successfull european nations including the US which is pan european practiced a form of soft eugenics that way, whilst severely limiting or even completely restricting immigration from certain nations that didn't fit with that mold.
Multiculturalism and multiethnic societies and mass immigration from random places that might be very incompatible and then tell them not to change on top of that, just destroys that kind of selective breeding that took place within those nations..
There's no common direction anymore to improve the society by selective breeding for traits and behaviour that are conducive to improving upon it. It's just people do whatever and you just hope it somehow works out, but it doesn't because that's not how it works.
It'd be like.. take a bunch of very different dog breeds (no pun or negative thing intended) put them all inside the same area and just let them arbitrarily fuck eachother.. you'll end up with a lot of muts of degraded quality in most cases. That no longer had the unique quality of the various dog breeds.
It becomes a house that is divided against itself and therefore cannot stand. A divided society lacking philia, and many groups with very different traits pulling society in many different directions, some extremely negative some extremely positive, somewhere in between.. In essence a nation at war with itself. This is what multiculti and multiethnic societies produce when they don't even have a common direction.. when you say multiculti.. the culture now has 10 different directions or whatever.. It's not good.
(cont)
For instance, it was a crucial mistake aswell along with the multiculti multiethnic stuff, and mass immigration, to also promote welfare, people on welfare should not be rewarded for being on it by being allowed to massively breed for example. They do not contribute to improving the society and when they demonstrate such traits, in high likelyhood their kids will demonstrate the same, and you are then breeding for those traits.. It ruins the whole progress and starts to degrade the quality of the citizenry. You can have welfare and all these things, but they shouldn't be allowed to have kids unless they become a productive part of society. Likewise it's a mistake to reward africans for overbreeding in africa when they can't even do basic agriculture to provide for their own children, you are not helping them by doing this you are breeding less and less quality kids, because you reward that kind of behaviour rather than scold it.
similarly with the mass immigration, you shouldn't reward people with citizenship who behave like pick related, regardless the situation they come from, they will replicate their behaviour in your nation if you don't even demand them to be different. If they don't want to behave different, they should be handed their hat immediately. Or you destroy your own society. And quite frankly westeners should have a bit more respect for themselves and what their ancestors have built and the values and traits they have been selectively bred for that has lead to that success, than to allow this kind of stupidity out of misplaced altruism. The genetic disposition for altruism was because it's positive for the ingroup inside the nation, not for outsiders that want to hurt the ingroup. Was never meant for that, that's what the left does, they hijack the positive traits meant for ingroup and impose them on outgroup immigrants who don't even wish to adopt that culture and those traits but undermine them.
1. Violent and evil are two separate things. 2. It's not iq but but the "warrior gene" that is cause for their violence.
Because they are smart enough to have the antifa/blm/sjw retards do violence on their behalf and not be directly connected to it themselves. No connection, no jail time.
Found the nigger.
that's a fantastic image
If you dropped Europeans in the middle of no were it would be the culture that has been raised up through the centuries that would cause them to build up a sophisticated society. Genetics has nothing to do with it. If your saying that their genetic predisposition to avoid farcical conflicts then sure you might be able to say they're more compatible to western culture. Is that what your trying to say?
I don't know man I get your point on genetics I think. But it feels like its leaning alil to abstract. If you can fix the culture you can fix the people. When you say genetics I think you should be using another word but I'm not sure what that is.
I'm not OP buddy. Chill your tits mwah
