Why not fund the welfare state with a 100% inheritance tax?

> Cultural norms teach us that the inheritance of private property is the default and any expropriation of this wealth must be justified. It should be the other way round.
> There’s some value in respecting the wishes of the dead, yes, but why is that more important than social housing, healthcare or any number of other possible uses for the money?

archive.is/tjDll

People have always worked hard to improve their children's situation in life more so than their own. Why are women the most vocal proponents of every stupid shit that would ruin everything good and decent about civilized society? Was Universal Suffrage mistake?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/MRpEV2tmYz4
youtube.com/watch?v=FEvkbhKVBU4
youtube.com/watch?v=km9OCw3f5w4
youtube.com/watch?v=qw4pZfwsGls
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because niggers will take advantage of the system at the expense of white people. The best solution to the welfare system is to purge the niggers.

>Yes, people work hard so their children can have a better future. But wouldn't the house you worked for be better off going to Mohamed instead?

>everything that you ever worked for should go the the state after you die
>you should inherit NOTHING, PERIOD.

How do we meme this into the Leftist political agenda?

>Was Universal Suffrage mistake?

Yes

>Was Universal Suffrage mistake?
Yes.

It's already part of the Leftist agenda.

There's just one catch. I don't give a rat's ass about people beyond my immediate family
>greater good
I'm not letting my accumulated wealth go towards subsidising the welfare state because of some crackpot socialism scheme

>There’s some value in respecting the wishes of the dead, yes, but why is that more important than social housing, healthcare or any number of other possible uses for the money?
I want every communist dead.

I'm talking centerpiece.
Something that their representatives should be mentioning on national television as if it is a good thing.

man you guys aren't going to stop until you've turned pol into a full on runninng social commentary on twitter posts, news articles and celebrity blurbs. fuck off back to huffpo or wherever the hell you came from

>work like an ant your entire life thinking your wealth will go to your children
>government takes everything and gives it to lazy bums because some woman said it would be more fair

people would just give their money away before they die, or buy a bunch of gold and give it to someone to hold onto, then to give to their children. third party transactions. I can think of a bunch of ways to get around it, and if I can, so can anybody.

Social incentives are the bedrock of a strong society.

We want to incentivize parents to work hard to give the children every chance possible for success. We want to encourage people to be independent and not dependent to the gov't or charity. This would do the opposite of both.

Wouldn't that be beautiful, let Hilary run another time with Symone Sanders in 2020 on a "YOU DON'T GET SHIT, CRACKA" platform.

> It’s natural to want to protect and care for your family, but what about people who don’t stand to inherit a penny? Is there any reason their needs should matter less?
> We have to fund our state somehow – what makes inheritance tax more objectionable than income tax or VAT charged on essential consumer goods?
> A 100% estate tax (perhaps with a small allowance for objects of sentimental value) isn’t a policy we can expect to see in a party manifesto any time soon. It’s well outside the current spectrum of mainstream political opinion.
> Questioning the status quo is always going to be a somewhat uncomfortable process, though, and all kinds of major social changes seemed impossible until suddenly they weren’t.

So what if a parent dies with young children? Inheritance money in that case should be there to raise children, not going to the state.

Sup Forums is nothing if not a running commentary in it's least function.
It's a memetic creature, a hive-gestahlt of many posters continually digesting news and word from around the net.

You sound like a sleepy-poster.

>Retarded bitch still spewing retarded shit.
Quickly someone post her pics.

At least its politics, would you rather more traps and blackedposting?

All this would do is encourage old people to spend lavishly in their last few years, that or just transfer their funds to different accounts before they die so their children get it anyway. In fact there are so many ways around this it's embarrassing to know she didn't put in any time to think about it.

As someone who advocates high potential taxes(but low effective) to promote the velocity of capital I think this is more retarded than a flat tax.

Wow a complete denial of human nature.
You know how people's behavior would change if you had a 100% inheritance tax? There wouldn't be any tax collected by it! Everyone would spend all their wealth before they die!

FPBP

First off, fuck this. I've been taxed on my earnings ever since my first job. The government has been taking it's share out of my paycheck and will continue to do so until the day I die (or retire). The idea that they should be able to tax the sum of my life's earnings (which they have already taxed as I was earning it) is fucking absurd and blatant double dipping.

As for the "greater good," just replace that with "more gib me dats for niggers" and you've found the agenda here. As for this woman, she's merely the product of a liberal arts degree and thinks you can solve the world's problems by typing up a cute, one sentence sentiment that seeks to fuck over people that actually work for a living and reward those who sit on their ass collecting welfare waiting for the new Jordan's to come out. Fuck this cunt.

I fuck some sense in the little slapper

Pointless effort. The state already takes everything from the poor when the enter rest homes, and rich people put their assets into trusts and LLCs to avoid inheritance tax anyways. If it becomes a mandate, corporations will spring up to form trusts for middle class individuals so the government can't take their houses.

Stupid. You fund the welfare state with Soylent Green. Case closed.

Milton put it best ya commie

youtu.be/MRpEV2tmYz4

I'd burn the fucking house down after my folks died if that were the case. Fuck them if they think they can just take my shit. Enjoy your smouldering ruins cunts.

>100% inheritance tax invoked
>everyone with any significant amount of money moves their money out of the country before they die for their children
>nobody paying taxes anymore
>everybody starves

I think the Democrat party is in just enough disarray, and their voter based just radicalized enough to make it a serious platform item for the Democrats.

They want Socialism, may as well radicalize them further, well beyond what the powers that be intended. Best that the true threat to Democracy out itself before it can gather enough strength and influence to actually do it ten or twenty years down the line.

Goad them, prod them, in any way we can. I want the Left to go down trying to swing.

>Implying you always know when you're going to die.

I lost my Dad on Monday. Being the oldest of 2 children I haven't heard about terms such as probate or intestate wills until very recently. Having to step up and handle this duty, all I know is that if this article was taken seriously, it wouldn't be long until my brother had no roof over his head worked for by a man who worked tirelessly to give a better future for us all.

The imposition of a 100% inheritance tax would clearly define a cause worth dying for. No amount of security would protect the tyrants from being used to water the tree of liberty.

>can't leave wealth to children
>get old or sick
>blow fortune on hookers and gambling
>"fuck you poors"
good plan abi

Almost everyone in the UK can't stand Abi Wilkinson, so much so that she has to beg for money on Patreon as no newspaper will touch her with a barge pole for a staff position.

Just ignore her, and stop giving her the oxygen of publicity.

>Was Universal Suffrage mistake?
You already know the answer to this. We all do.

A corpse has more right to the property they held while living than parasite who believes he is entitled to said property.

There's no niggers in America.

Only Americans you collectivist scum.

The idea of the welfare state should be to have as least people on it as possible. Allowing inheritance means people can take care of their own. What would these people do with an elderly widow? Would they argue the house had to be taken by the state?

>I deserve things because somebody else worked hard
sounds pretty commie to me

Why not enslave Abi Wilkinson???

The difference is that the commie forcibly takes things from others with the power of the state.

An inheritance is willingly gifted by the one who originally owned it.

we already btfo this jewess last thread

>100% inheritance tax
bet that'll surely make every rich folk flee the country faster than a jew could catch a dime falling from his own purse

>another welfare state thread
>ancap flag

Anyway, the solution is not an inheritance tax, but an income tax reform that turns the static piles of cash in plutocrats' accounts into a positive good for everyone in the country without diminishing the incentive to work hard to earn the money in the first place.

It sounds like this woman, if she has kids, is unlikely to leave them much of anything when she dies. Welfare state advocates love to offload morality and virtue onto the state because they fail to express it in their own lives.

It can't be 100% you stupid cunt. Everybody would hide it in their mattress, or launder it.

You could argue for a high one, sure, but you want a parent's hard work to be for nothing? Hell, they'd gift it to their kid on their death bed.
Dumb journalists need to hang

...

She kinda looks like a crypto-kike, is she really one?

>freelance journalist

She's living on welfare (since freelance work is unreliable) so she can only see the direct benefit it. This is a really stupid opinion though. First wave migrants came here and worked hard to ensure that their children had a good life. This is what natives have done here for generations.

I know this is bait, but it's one of the worst instances of false dilemma fallacy argumentation in circulation today, so I feel compelled to point it out on that basis alone.

She is amazingly retarded, this is as well thought out as a 3am Tumblr post.

> Where’s the evidence that people without children are less productive, on average? And those who are motivated by a desire to help their family will presumably still want to do so while they’re alive.
> Honestly, if people did decide to retire earlier and enjoy their later years, instead of slaving away for as long as possible, would that be such a bad thing? And given that youth unemployment is such an issue, it may well be socially beneficial to free up those jobs.

Reading that angered and disgusted me.
What the fuck is wrong with people?

This is classic leftist, though.
At the core of a leftist, what do you have? A fucking loser wanting gibs. An innate fucking loser. Likely from an innately inferior family, and thus why they won't likely get shit for inheritance.
So when averaged out, why do they care, gib me more useful people's noms. Their shit, garbage children, need better people's noms.
Leftists are innate peasants among the rank of peasants. Pigs. Livestock for the king, that do as they're damn well told, spread their legs to get fucked when ruling class very well wants to breed, and squirt out more subjects for the lord to reign over. It's how they've been selectively bred to be.
When it isn't this way and they get power, they eventually destroy themselves and all of society. Because it's not how they are designed to be.
They drag those not of their kind down, as a means to try and stay about water, when they inherent can't without being ruled over.

who is this semen demon? i can feel my sperm count going up

the way to solve the inheritance problem is to bring back Carnegiean public endowments
give 50% of your estate to near-objective public goods that the government usually neglects; like libraries or parks (while naming them after yourself), then give the rest to whoever the fuck you want

society benefits, your kids benefit, and you get a legacy you can be proud of

I don't know, but I bet her first name is Abi something. Just a feeling.

>No one tell him why or you suck.

...

Fuck that shit. I'd blow my fortune on killing all the niggers I see.

this shit is the reason people loose their family farm.
fucking kill these kikes

why, of course goy, you wouldn't white privilege to perpetuate itself now, wouldn't you?
youtube.com/watch?v=FEvkbhKVBU4

>Im broke af and I'd benefit from this....

Think this kike should look up a man named Nero and see how that worked out for him.

are there good pics of her?

monopoly tax is better

youtube.com/watch?v=km9OCw3f5w4

A 100% inheritance tax effectively exists already for a large portion of the US. The poor are forced to pay into social security instead of saving and investing their money themselves. Then if they die before getting out what they put it, the government keeps the extra. Had that money been in a privately owned 401k it would have been inherited by the children of that poor person, but because their retirement money, their assets, their net worth is already in the government's hands it just keeps it. So yeah, there is a 100% inheritance tax, it's just only on the wealth of poor people.

She's rather plain but I'd hit it and never call her
youtube.com/watch?v=qw4pZfwsGls

>Was Universal Suffrage mistake?


YES

yes

SI

YES

YWEA

agreed. I just got the impression from that post that there are nudes of her or something floating around

100% this, much as we all bitch about the plethora of e-celeb posts (myself included), social commentary on mass media publications has always been a huge part of how the board keeps us informed on world issues and (somewhat) unified in focus

Let's put this into perspective, you are taxed on earnings, you are taxed on the products you buy, you are taxed on savings and you are taxed on utilities gas, electric, petrol, water. And now this silly bitch wants to tax you when your dead at the expense of your beloved ones. BASICALLY she has been cut out of her parents will, and she's bitter. The super rich avoid inheritance tax anyway.

This is 100% communism. Absolute filth

>be rich
>transfer money before i die
>change the name on every fucking thing i own to somebody else before i die
>die
>state gets nothing

meanwhile
>average joe dies
>state takes everything

are you retarded? that is literally their argument already.

the idea is to stop the accumulation of generational wealth so you will forever be a dumb, broke, good goy with no social mobility what so ever. with that in place, they can impliment their 'basic income' scheme and then train your children that all money comes from the state.

>put monies in trust for kids
>die
>no monies for gubernent

100% death tax is as unattainable in reality as idiots believing single payer healthcare is equal to everyone and not just screwing the middle class.

But that's exactly what they want, leftists have been owned by the banker elite class since their induction into western society.

>implying people won't give away their entire estate before death

It's like leftists are retarded.

we already have inheritance tax for fucks sake -- my grandfather died in '02 and my dad and uncle just got approved last month to receive 84% of what he left behind. How is this not robbery? FUCK the government, I know damn well that money's going towards EBT for niggers

>government profiting off of the death of its people

What could go wrong?

Before Abi advises on tax policy, she should probably understand that high net worth individuals don't just have all their wealth in the Scrooge McDuck vault. And would those funds even begin to fill the insatiable financial deficits of the welfare state? Poor research, but typical of utopian dreamers who's biggest launch into commerce is maybe high-end food service. I found one quantitative value in the entire article and Abi's moral derision and class divisiveness is representative of a utopian crybaby.

Before Abi advises on tax policy, she should probably understand that high net worth individuals don't just have all their wealth in the Scrooge McDuck vault. And would those funds even begin to fill the insatiable financial deficits of the welfare state? Poor research, but typical of utopian dreamers who's biggest launch into commerce is maybe high-end food service. I found one quantitative value in the entire article, and Abi's moral derision and class divisiveness is representative of a utopian crybaby.

Does the author seriously not realize that such laws would just heavily incentive people to transform their assets into some untaxable form?

Also why is the left always against Prudence? Saving is a good thing. Passing something on to the next generation is a good thing. Left Wong economics are always based on envy, it's so transparent.

Sorry about your dad, Britbro.

> Left Wong economics

My phone does this shit on purpose I swear.

WOO LETS FUCK OVER POOR PEOPLE MORE. Fucking privileged ass bitch probably hasn't had to worry about a single god damn thing in her life. Of course she doesn't see how important inheritance is to the lower class. It allows the poor to eventually break the shackles of their circumstances and rise above in class.

Your picture sums up the number one issue I run into when talking to college liberals: They think fairness and requires of opportunity should be determined on the level of individuals, not the level of families. This is wrong. Good people (or at least society-preserving people) work for their families success, not just for their own. To demand each individual has equal opportunities at birth precludes good people's ability to work for their children. This is not only evil, but society destroying.

*Requires of opportunity = equality of opportunity

Sorry for your loss. Stay strong in this difficult time.

would the gov't come and take my parent's house too? what about their precious heirlooms? does the state get to "re-appropriate" all of their valuables?

fucking liberals are literally not human