So why did Hitler let the British off that beach?

So why did Hitler let the British off that beach?
He could have ended the war right then and there.

Go read Mein Kampf. He never wanted war with the UK he considered them his Germanic brothers. All Germanics were considered equal in his eyes.

>not our natural enemy he said
>Brits will defend Europe against communism he said
>Brits are sensible people he said

well, history is history

cause he was too busy killing six trillion jews

*Gorillion you anti-Semite

So Hitler was retarded.

because he thought that letting them go will teach the brits that he doesnt want war, he also thought that Mosley would win the elections

*Gorillion you fucking nazi

Duncuck is a shit movie for shit people. Don't waste your money.

This and the Panzers and Luftwaffe had taken massive losses and needed to be conserved. They needed those 3 days to move the planes up to new airfields.

Hitler was a blind fanatic that didn't realize short term gain (muh anglo-saxon bruddahs) would fuck him over in the long term (western front will be formed in '44 using britain as a spring board). If he invaded those pussified cucks on their island stalin might've just surrendered when barbarossa started.

hitler was very retard
pol worships

Anglos outsmarted and outmaneuvered the Hun once again.

He couldn't invade even if he wanted to. An invasion of Britain was predicated on air and naval superiority, neither of which Hitler could achieve. The Royal Navy was far more powerful than the Kriegsmarine and the RAF had dealt powerful blows against the Luftwaffe. It would take a naval buildup of years to secure the number of ships needed to fend of the Royal Navy while troops were being transported across the channel and then be able to constantly supply them from France. It was basically an impossible feat in 1940.

He was literally drumpf

OORAH STOP PRETENDING TO BE A GOOK DEVIL DOG

HITLER DIDN'T LET THE BRITISH ESCAPE YOU FUCKING RETARDS, IF HE DID GIVE AN ORDER WHY DID THE LUFTWAFFE CONTINUE FUCKING BOMBING RED CROSS AND CIVILIAN BOATS, ETC.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

His panzer divisions did their memekrieg shite and overextended their supplies and infantry support, as per usual, and needed to regroup before they could close the pocket.

Because Hitler wasn't a monster as (((history))) describes him. He thought (foolishly), that Britons are humans and he could negotiate with them and if he shows them mercy, Churchill wouldn't start the war. But he was wrong, Churchill was a psychopath and no matter how much Hitler pleaded, he was going to have the war.

>muh naval, air superiority
That argument has been debunked as revisionist, it has always been his personal love affair with some fair blond english girls that he knew earlier in life. This cuckified adolf so that he would be unable to cause destruction and death to british people. He invaded france without air superiority, and ussr, but for these countries he was willing to kill millions of their people to win out.

>WHY DID THE LUFTWAFFE CONTINUE FUCKING BOMBING RED CROSS AND CIVILIAN BOATS, ETC.
They really didn't. That's a myth/Brit propaganda put out to make Hitler look evil and themselves "more heroic." You'll see that in movies and PR, but not actually true.

U boats compain on its own could have whittled down the Royal Navy, it was literal pot shotting british battleships. He could have invaded, anything else you hear is just nazis saving face.

He didn't realise the British were retreating.

>his personal love affair with some fair blond english girls that he knew earlier in life
Mosley's wife and her sister? Not sure I believe that either. As with all things WW 2, your best source is David Irving.
As for IRVING, NOT FOR HISTORY FAGS-- ONCE HE DIES, THE JEWS ARE GOING TO DO ALL THEY CAN TO DESTROY HIS BOOKS AND HIS DAUGHTERS WILL GLADLY SELL OUT THE RIGHTS TO THE JEWS. HIS SHIT IS ALREADY EXPENSIVE, BUT GET WHAT YOU WANT NOW BECAUSE HE'S CLOSE TO DEATH.

LAST OF HIS ASSISTANTS I KNEW (J.) SAID HE HADN'T PLANNED ADEQUATELY AND THE DAUGHTERS WERE CIRCLING LIKE LEECHES, LOOKING FOR A PAYDAY.

*campaign

do u advice me to go watch this movie anons?

>He could have invaded,
Dumb motherfucker. Napoleon conquered all of Europe, Egypt, all the way up to Palestine and couldn't cross the channel.

You're assuming they even wanted to. The blitz and the destruction of London didn't even begin until he realized what a savage animal in the pay of the Jews Churchill was.

People here (the retards who never read anything) should read Irving's Churchill books, or at least listen to him lecture on it. He first made his money by forging paintings. when that ran out, he took a huge bribe from the British Jews in 1936 and suddenly became vehemently anti-German when he had despised Jews and seen them for what they were only 13 years prior.

>calls last post revisionist
>posts the most revisionist bullshit about daddy Hitler being able to wipe Britain off the map with one order but not doing so because he fucked a couple slags from that island

You're an idiot my dude. If Hitler could've taken Britain he would've

>go watch this movie
If you're actually in egypt, just fucking buy the DVD or DL it. Not like the Jews can send their goons there to arrest you for "intellectual property." It supposedly has almost no dialogue and is mostly a 'visual experience."

Because in WWI the German army turned away from Paris to encircle the French army under the assumption that it would end the war. It didn't.

Hitler was trying to correct the WWI mistake by making Paris the focus.

>irving

lel

Op probably praises Hitler like most on pol, knows nothing about him or the war. How surprising...

No, just misguided

Churchill was an imperialist cuck that saw Hitler as a growing threat to the cracking empire that would fall apart by the 1950s. It has nothing to do with being in cahoots with muh jews, if fricken israel threatened british hegemony in the world he would become an anti-semite.

Napoleon has nothing to do with Hitler and the logistical constraints he faced, so not an argument.

What a stupid argument. U-boats alone could not have secured the channel and their were too few in 1940 to accomplish such a task anyway. The Royal Navy was still the strongest in the world in 1940, the Kriegsmarine couldn't even begin to compete. The Kriegsmarine had suffered crippling losses in the Norwegian campaign and was mostly made up of what few destroyers they had left and a couple of pocket battleships. The bigger battleships like Bismarck were not yet operational in 1940. The Royal Navy still had dozens of vessels at its disposal including two aircraft carriers so stop acting like you know what you're talking about. He did not invade France without air superiority. The Luftwaffe was crucial for the German success in Western Europe, the allies had the numerical advantage but the Germans much like their army had superior tactics, favoring a close air support doctrine rather than a strategic bombing one like the allies expected. And finally, what kind of bullshit is this so called 'English romance'. First everyone claims he loved a Jewish girl who dumped and that's why he hates Jews and now she's English? I'll need more than your opinion to prove that conspiracy theory true.

we dont care about "intellectual property." here, I can just download it torrent if it isnt worth cinema screen experience

He let them go, in my opinion, because America would have gotten involved if he hadn't. Whether through an early lend lease or by sending the army to britain. This was not the goal of Hitler. To get bogged down fighting an America backed UK whilst Stalin eats him from behind. Nobody ever mentions America when they speculate about Dunkirk.

It's an amazing piece of cinema you prole, total anathema to the Hollywood Jewry.

Also worth pointing out that most of germ surface fleet was sunk at the start of the war. Invading the isles would be a nightmare.

Capturing the expeditionary force at dunkirk could have crippled brit publuc opinion enough into surrender.

Losing that many troops in one go is fairly bad. You could argue germany was fucked after stalingrad for good on that note.

They were over extended and feared an attack on their flanks by the french if they didn't regroup after fighting continously for about a month. Additionally, the luftwaffe anticipated an evacuation from the beach and not the port, so they foolishly attacked ships instead of the better defended port.

>Churchill was an imperialist cuck
Not only are you wrong, it's the exact opposite of the truth. All Hitler wanted was a piece of traditionally German land taken from them in WW 1 and given to Poland.

ww 2 turned the UK from a world empire into the fucking lapdog of the US. Churchill was a lapdog of the Jews. You can find it all in the archives. Cornell's archives and Stanford are good re: Churchill. Princeton has a major collection they still haven't opened.

Hitler having only sychophants on military matters didnt help. Hitler was asleep and none dared to wake him. You need people to make on the spot decisions in any organization.

>>irving
>lel
Please Hymie, do expound on what's wrong with Irving's work? Even Dr. Michael Scheuer defended him in his article this week. Tell us, since I'm sure, scholar that you are, you've red his work and know all the sources.

Where is Irving wrong that you'd say Hilberg is right? you of course know who Hilbetg is, correct? Tell us. I'm happy to discuss it with you, including Lipschitz (I was a UG at Emory, but refused to take any of the bitch's courses..I think he was only teaching 1 UG course over the course of 2 years, but anyway).

Tell me. I know my material. Let's see if you do.

holy fuck the only red pilled answer. he was sure the angols would dig in- and there is documents in the french archives that you wont find in the british archive of orders directed only at the british to "advance" on the beaches of dunkirk, not to the belgium and french mistakenly fighting on. shit i'm pretty sure the british indian corp had no idea of the retreat either or were sent to the front line anyway.

another massive idiotic thing people dont realize is that the whole regrouping mistake was from hitler getting his panties in a bunch about the army command reassigning hardware and troops to actually go attack dunkirk as that is all the panzer divisions wanted, and a little over 3 days of getting their head out of their ass

Can we make this a Gallico's Snowgoose General instead so we can talk about Dunkirk outside the veneer of Hollywood?

The Germans' advance through Belgium, the Netherlands, and France was actually one of absolute terror on the part of the Germans. They were afraid, every step of the way, that they were gonna fuck it up and the much larger, better-equipped armies of England and France would swarm into Germany and destroy them again. The invasion had literally gone so well that the Germans thought for SURE they were walking into a trap. By the time the tanks reached Dunkirk, they had been out pummeling Allied positions for days without resupply. They had little ammo, their flanks were exposed, and they really didn't have THAT many quality tanks. Basically, going all in at Dunkirk didn't look like a good idea, because obviously Hitler couldn't have had the Command and Control presence (especially back in those days) to know that, even though his troops at Dunkirk were exhausted and undersupplied, he could have pushed to the coast and won.

He wanted all of it. Stopping at the cezch annexation would have prevented the war at least for a decade.. Hitlers personality would suggest more land grabs anyway.

Read his autistic drivel mein kampf and he clearly states to compensate germany's inability to play colonialism germany should settle eastern europe with the locals being servile.

>So why did Hitler let the British off that beach?
He didn't.
His army was stopped by heavy fights around the pocket.

If you're so learned, and you say it was physically impossible for Hitler to defeat the uk in the 40-42 timeframe, explain how exactly he could have won out in these european wars that played out at the time? Defeating the uk would free up both troops and reduce the opposing forces against germany in 1941 to only the soviet union.

Yeah, fuck the British and their shitty oral genetics.

> invasion of the U.K. Would close off that front
>when a country gets invaded they stay invaded

is this movie good?

Fantastic movie, made me proud to be a bong

He wasn't merciless, he falsely saw Anglos as his brothers and not the vicious blood-sucking criminals they are.
In war it's most compassionate to show mercilessness. The crueller war is, the shorter it is.

Retarded means slow is he slow?

lul you suggesting britcucks would start a national liberation army and guerrilla their way out of occupation should the nazis have some military reversals on the eastern front? England is extremely urbanized and dense, they would get slaughtered. Their only hope would be a rump government in exile using their overseas colonies but that is pathetic.

Right, because the implausible suggestion here is that occupying the UK wouldn have been a huge headache.

Being a huge headache and overthrowing Nazi rule are kind of two different things entirely.

They sure are. At least you softened your stance a little after being corrected, hosefriend.

I haven't softened anything. You can always try to give them a headache, it is not impossible that you would be stupid to try to, but the casualties would be devastating, maybe 3/5 of all rebels in the cities would be massacres like dogs. So no implausibility.

>In war it's most compassionate to show mercilessness. The crueller war is, the shorter it is.

Agrees, and is still hated for saving ton of lives by taking many quickly & harshly to end the hellish war...

I think that guy misread your statement of "Irving's Churchill" as "Irving Churchill's" and thought you got Winston Churchill's name wrong.

It's a far cry from closing off the entire theater like your post implied. It's okay, I can tell you're a bit of a history hobbyist, so I don't expect you to take being corrected particularly graciously.

Why did a country that supposedly had the strongest navy in the world force their civilians to rescue their men with their tiny little fishing boats?

>He wasn't merciless, he falsely saw Anglos as his brothers and not the vicious blood-sucking criminals they are.
>In war it's most compassionate to show mercilessness. The crueller war is, the shorter it is.

Hitler was merciless with conquered Slavs and it cost him in the end

>go to see the movie yesterday
>FUK GLRUGMPF FUK WHITE PEEPULL MUH GLOBABL WARMNING ad plays during the previews

GRUMPF IS LITERALLY KILLING PEOPLE BY NOT TAKING GLOBAL WARMING SERIOUSLY

There are 2 reasons, and none of them is political.
1. Stopping tank movements was a common maneuver back then. The tanks were waiting for the infantry. Furthermore, they could rest their men for the battle of France. And they were unaware that the Brits had no more tanks left. They expected to get raided by enemy tanks. Such a raid would have destroyed the German army.
2. Back then, the military was obsessed with air superiority. They were way too convinced by the power of the Luftwaffe. They thought that they could simply bomb everybody to death, but it did not quite work. For examples, the bombs dont detonate that nice in the soft sand.

Because like said. He never wanted to go to war with them, and frequently sent peace offers throughout the war that were refused because churchill was a warmonger.

Hitler offered to leave western europe if they didn't help Russia when he went to war with them. Europe was never his enemy. His enemy was Russia from the very beginning, but he couldn't go to war with Russia without preperations and then UK and France jumped in, he couldn't fight a full power west while fighting Russia.

WW2 was ENTIRELY avoidable and had multiple outs for most the allies.

During the Battle of France in 1940, the 4th Armoured Division (Major-General Charles de Gaulle) and elements of the 1st Army Tank Brigade (British Expeditionary Force) made probing attacks on the German flank, pushing into the rear of the advancing armoured columns at times. This may have been a reason for Hitler to call a halt to the German advance. Those attacks combined with Maxime Weygand's Hedgehog tactic would become the major basis for responding to blitzkrieg attacks in the future: deployment in depth, permitting enemy or "shoulders" of a penetration was essential to channelling the enemy attack, and artillery, properly employed at the shoulders, could take a heavy toll of attackers. While Allied forces in 1940 lacked the experience to successfully develop these strategies, resulting in France's capitulation with heavy losses, they characterised later Allied operations.
That's why, Hitler saw blitzkrieg could be countered. He wanted to try for a surrender or deal. With the army trapped he had a advantage.

now youre getting it

Search what Goring and his lutfwaffe did to allied.