TAX THE RICH

TAX THE RICH

Is this good? I genuinely don't know.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=661pi6K-8WQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Its unfortunate for the rich, but good for the rest of the population. I mean the rich are still pulling a shit load and more than likely dodging the IRS to save money anyways.

Wonder how libs will find a way to complain

it should be more clear in law and enforcement the nature of laws and loopholes and tax havens. And the deal with deficit and budget and interest and loans and foreign investors and corporations

>good for the rest of the population
so CEOs can outsource more jobs

No, it isn't.

The government should learn to deliver value for the money it already takes, not just grab more to paste over its failures.

Remember that there is no maximum amount of money they are capable of wasting.

what does that have to do with personal taxes?

>Wonder how libs will find a way to complain

It isn't 100%. Libs will still bitch. There is no victory in appeasing them. They will always find a way to call themselves victims.

Holy fuck I've been wishing they would create more tax brackets at the top since I was 8 years old.

Forced redistribution of wealth is wrong and is one of the reason India is such a shithole.

yeah rich people tend to be extreme faggots

either muh constitution fags, muh greatest ally fags, or hardcore marxist fags

tax em, gas em, i don't fucking care

Yes. It will help fund our budget, reduce our debt, and stop (((corporations))) from evading their responsibilities.

He's not trying to appease them, he's trying to produce a balanced budget

Increase taxes on the rich to pay for what?
More entitlements?

?

It'll practically guarantee you 2020

>8 year old logic

Huffpo headline tomorrow
>Bannon proposes 44% Tax on the wealthy, here's why that's a bad thing.

>When talking points aren't understood at a core level

No way, whenever you pull up taxes to the rich, the poor population is the one ends up paying the price. Imagine I own a small chain of restaurants and make a little over $5M a year: if I now make less profit with my current prices (or even enter in debt with it), I will for now on raise the prices for my restaurant chain, and in the end the consumers (AKA the working class) will pay the price. Taxes for the rich are only a good deal when you are a fucking billionaire, as it won't make that much difference for them, but will destroy the competition and allow them to maintain monopoly, with high prices and an awful service. And last of all, the government is inefficient in money spending, and if the people had the power to spend their own salary as they wished, they surely would pursue the highest value in trade.

We need to kill Walmart; money should be spent on local goods and services, end the need and globalism will wither.

Funny what you consider rich tax.
We pay like 50% tax normally...

eat the rich is better

I'm fine with it if deductions, corporate taxes, and lower/middle class taxes are reduced

i don't care about higher taxes for the rich

In a perfect world yeah, but in reality consumers are fucking morons who blow their weekly budget on dumb shit like fidget spinners then bitch that other people should pay for their healthcare

why doesnt the national debt and deficit matter?

Is part of that national debt and deficit owned by foreigners? foreign governments? why, how is that a good idea? Is it a good idea simply in a crazy nihilistic sense, of trying to get away with as much as possible now and soon, and if anyone asked for any value back, they would just be given more paper money?

>I will for now on raise the prices for my restaurant chain
Because you're a hook-nosed, greasy-haired kike.

Just fix the tax code. The very wealthy can hire accountants that know how to manipulate the tax code so that the rich don't have to pay a lot.

sure. many people over the 44% tax bracket will do everything to avoid hitting that cap, so they're more likely to redistribute their wealth in the workplace. Im quite sure thats how it used to work in ye olde america in the first place

Jews are wealthy this is a nazi attempt to punish them.
The wealthiest states are democrat.
The biggest percentage of the 1 percent are Jews.
A majority of the wealthiest individuals in America are democrat.

These nazis don't want to help the poor they want to steal from demos and Jews to build a fascist state.

The rich joined collectively in a war on Trump, and then he got elected. Bannon should go much further.

Traditional left vs right views on economics are pretty far down the list of priorities in a world of massive one-sided biological warfare.

Same here in Brazil
Emergent countries, despite from their massive potential, are only in that situation because the government is a huge obstacle for the economy

>tell me what to think Sup Forums
another brave freethinker

Kill the government and local services shall thrive

The rich right now are all lefties. So this might be good....

Yeah, won't increase prices of their products or anything.

Bannon is right, he always has the truth.

Fuck the riche REEEE

It doesn't solve the problem which is excessive spending.
youtube.com/watch?v=661pi6K-8WQ
You can literally steal 100% of the wealth created in the country in a year and still not cover the debt. That also doesn't include all the unfunded liabilities that have been promised. We are so fucked if the dollar ever stops being the reserve currency.

That's why corporate rates should be reduced to a reasonable amount

So let's control prices, Mr. Maduro

loud mouth anti-trump hollywood types and celebrities will have to find a way to defend themselves from the hordes of twitter apes wondering why their favorite anti-trump celeb doesn't actually care to give up large sums of income arbitrarily to "help out". this would be the wrestlemania of virtue signaling

Sup Forums will now backtrack and say they always supported tax increases!

I always said that Trump/Bannon were centrist nationalists; but autistic lefties wouldn't listen.

We tax the (((rich globalists))) and we oppose trade laws that hurt native unions, because it's all part of "America first" ideology.

Government relies on votes. And in poor countries most votes are from Poor's, we waste all our wealth in gibs and loan waivers. That's all ok but we still don't see any improvement. This just keeps the country in perpetual poverty.

It's garbage. If I wanted Hillary for president I would have voted for Hillary

At least you guys have high quality, efficient government services amirite?

Probably to start paying off our massive fucking debt to foreign countries, if I know Bannon
He always seemed like the responsible one in this shitshow of an administration

Bannon's done. He's gone. He's outta there.

Nice duplicate slide thread you got here. Let's talk about trump banning trannies from the military instead

In Germany they tax you 46% if you make more than 60k €

I HATE MY COMMIE GOVERNMENT

>and local services shall become regional services
>and regional services shall become national services
>and national services shall become the de facto government

And people stop buying from them. The producer is reliant on the consumers, not the other way around.

Increase tax for the rich
>the borderline rich stop being rich so they either stop paying taxes or get fucked cause the law is thought with people way past the "rich" line
>people making just below the "rich" line are decentivized from making more money cause if they pass the line they will actually make less, incentivizing the hoarding of money and non-redestribusion/inversion of it
>important people like CEOs will find ways to avoid taxes like they have always done while still making more money
>more dodgy labour practices like fake contracts, hiring unskilled/untrained labor, outsourcing jobs, getting factories in foreign countries and decentivizing companys to come to the country

No user, unless the law is better made out, its not good

"America left" you mean.

2 flavors, chocolate or double chocolate

>60k €
thats not even that rich, if you factor in putting a good amount of that towards retirement and paying for a family. 4 million is a much more reasonable level

No one should have too much money.

Don't need to control the prices themselves, just the market, to keep you fucking parasitic jew cunts from profiteering in our society.
Disgusting rats.

Taxing the *very* rich is a good thing. People making under a millionish shouldn't be taxed very much but there is nothing wrong with heavily taxing the super wealthy.

It's not about wealth redistribution either, but power distribution. There's no reason to allow an oligarchy of billionaires to control everything in society.

>good for the rest of the population
Someone here doesn't understand economics.

it would probably be better to close these aforementioned loop holes that Trump has stated that he's used (and is willing to close up)

>looks at flag
Right. Better give up all of your nazi gold then

>5 million a year.

That isnt "super rich"

Many who make that much do so honestly and through hard work.

Billionaires like soros are a different story. There should be a 50% tax on them.

Bannon realizes Trump has abandoned his populist policies so he's doing damage control.

Literal retard

Major media critics of trump make tens of millions a year. Why not tax them even higher, they like the idea of big government and fair taxes.

A lot of people have supported taxing the uber rich in an intelligent way
>pol has always been hard purple libertarian
>t. started browsing after finding out what Sup Forums is on the pol harbor page on know youre meme

>personal income taxes will change the price of widgets produced under the corporate tax system

Just admit you're a liberal shill. You haven't the slightest fucking clue how taxes even work, proudly announcing you're a retard while waving a Reddit flag.

You would think it would be good, right? Sounds good, right? But it's not.

When you raise taxes on the rich you will receive more money per RECEIPT, however your amount of RECEIPTS will go down.

You see rich people have the resources to avoid paying taxes, so they will just employ more methods to avoid them. This causes more rich people to keep money offshores and pay NO taxes.

Until the rich stop enslaving the poor they have no right to oppose taxation, which is a collective wage for living in this nation of roads, emergency support, city facilities, basically all the good things about living in a charcoal choked nation of oil slaves.

Funny thing is 3 out the 5 major parties wants to increase the taxes after the election even more because of muh social equality

>Billionaires like soros are a different story. There should be a 50% tax on them.
how do you tax market manipulation like that? its all international. the man has no real home

>tax the rich more
>rich just put even more money into offshore accounts

As long as we don't surpass anyone in Europe.
Try to flee with your wealth when third-world shit holes like India are your only better alternative, rich fags.

Obamacare is bad cause taxes

But let's tax the rich!

I don't care, i live like in venezuela. And i'm OK

>rich just put even more money into offshore accounts

No you see Trump has a magic way to make them pay!

>Is this good

No. Rich people create wealth. Over-taxing them prevents wealth creation.

>And people stop buying from them
No, because other laws made sure to kill any potential competition.

People who think government having more money is good for the commoner should be shot on sight. There's a reason inequality grows as regulations do, inflation affects everything save inelastic demand products. Guess who sells these products? The filthy rich lobbyists

I love it, tax those fucking jews for the theft they contributed to.

>arrest them
>execute them

>no counterargument
People will be spending less retard. Businesses will have to increase prices.

You are american fagget, just bomb everything off shore.

>i live like in venezuela
you're constantly starving and trying to avoid the secret police?

Including his family members and himself?

Daily reminder that taxation is theft

it's the soc part of natsoc

The tax rate should be low, but you've got to do something about the jews.
Nobody wants to talk about the second part though.

How are paid libertarian for sucking rich's cocks ?

>fiat money
>taxation required as source of income

the reason for taxation in fiat money is purely distributive. At the moment, we are facing a meltdown of epic proportion in terms of the gaps between the ultra rich and the middle class and the poor. Note that this doesn't even affect::
-the professional pulling high 6 figures
-the owner who reinvests most of his profits in his business

$5 million is A LOT of money. and pulling it every year is a rarity.

It's great as long as they cut corporate tax.
Let Hollywood faggots money pay for the wall.

Please refrain from ever posting on this board again.

Daily reminder stealing other peoples money is jewish

the more they can keep, the more they can spend on hiring locally, the more jobs are available for average joe

Can someone explain to me the situation with Dwight Eisenhower? He had the highest marginal tax rate at around 91% during his presidency. How did that go?

If the government lowered peoples taxes, those people might hoard more of their pay check, spend less, save more, and retire earlier, and that would be bad for the economy: so even if the government wastes some or a lot of the taxes, it doesnt matter, because thats better than the citizens actually getting closer to the actual value of their pay, because then they might be able to retire earlier

Sup Forums is sadly kind of confused about whether libertarian "Taxes are theft!" ideology is "Sup Forums or not."

I respect libertarians a lot, especially their underlying values. I really fucking do. But at the end of the day, if you're a nationalist of any kind, you're either a welfare state nationalist or a balls-to-the-wall capitalist nationalist.

Welfare state sounds like it means everyone should be a fucking pussy. What it really means is that, like many European countries, everyone should have access to the same amenities and education so that a gigantic cancerous rich cocksucker upper class doesn't develop that gives no fucks about the country itself, and sees itself as something SEPARATE from the nation. The idea of nationalism only really works if you don't have massive, wealthy in-groups inside the nation who could give less than a shit about it as a whole.

We've tried low-tax, trickle-down economics. It doesn't work. That's what Reagan and the Neocons tried, and they were just a business party of rich faggots. But what should make you even angrier than the ultra-rich bankers, if you're a Sup Forumsfag, is the upper 5-10% of "fairly rich" guys who simply evade 75% of their taxes using scams that EVERYONE uses (note: Trump referenced these). The ultra-rich, of course, pay almost no taxes at all.

Like I said, at the end of the day, you're either a nationalist and a (mild) socialist, or a nationalist and a capitalist. In a properly functioning society, nationalist sentiment would simply be high enough that rich assholes didn't become completely independent multi-national bankers the instant they became rich. But we don't have culture strong enough for that. At least not yet. Until then, we need some way of preventing the super rich from stealing all the fucking money. That's not anti-capitalism, it's not anti-liberty, it's just a fact of life.

Anti-tax rhetoric is a leftover from the Neocons.

It's all part of a much larger plan. I don't pretend to know the endgame but it will likely be good for whites

>Venezuela
So give up your Nazi gold faggot, like he said.

Why is there a male and female to represent humans in that image but not for the other anima and why does it start at a doggo for nature and spiral in?

>regulation prevents competition
>not the fact that your personal financial interests aren't equivalent to what's in the interest of a competitive market, so you sell out your local business to the hugely wealthy corporation next door.

You gonna be the one to shoot me?