How do you justify this /pol?

how do you justify this /pol?

That we had control over our niggers and saw them as lesser class. The EU sees them as all that is good in the world

brits generally make places nicer when they colonize.
pakis and other shitksins generally fuck them up.

>Brits united India, poos/pakis couldnt manage this since ancient times.

God raises the debts of the father upon their sons
upon their grandsons upon their great-grand-sons.

But men are not God, and therefor should not punish a man for the crimes of his ancestors.
....
Unless the sick twisted freak offers to.

>libs say colonization is bad
>WHY CANT WE COLONIZE BRITAIN!!!???

This is apples to oranges. You are comparing two things that are nothing alike

How retarded do you have to be to not understand the differences?

sweden didnt have an empire and they got migrants
is not conected
also they no longer had the empire when britain got the migrants

Who said anything about not wanting immigrants? The difference is not having unrestricted immigrants.

If shit skins brought technology 1000 years more advanced than we have and kitted out the UK with this future technology out the UK at their expense to them I wouldn't be complaining.

>Provide civilization and benefits to natives giving rise to the growth of said groups

>Reap vinegar and salt

Poor wages for good work

this
/thread

Exploring the world, building an Empire while seeking the best the world has to offer is the same as letting in the worst the world has to offer in your own country to shit all over it

>wants to win

>doesn't want to lose

What's the deal with wh*ites?

>what are kebab and curry shops
checkmate

because we gave them infrastructure and the basics of democracy giving birth to some of the better nations on earth (usa, Canada ,Australia, new Zealand etc.) and then human filth from countries we DIDNT colonise out breed the local rabbits and play the victim when they run us over.

It's similar to how the United States creates fake wars for profit all over the globe for centuries
But shits itself at the thought of enemy boots on it's own turf

>le 17th century argument
And then the Brits went home
When are the Pakis going back?

Hypocrisy

>God raises the debts of the father upon their sons
Wich is why you will always be hunted, Christ killers.

its all a cycle of victimhood

Fuck niggers

and this ^ is the truest post likely to be posted in this thread
which is why, when Britain grants independence, the natives all flock to Britain
They want to be near their masters
they want to be British
and enjoy the benefits Britain brought to their heathen lives prior to independence
but which the natives were incapable of continuing when left to their own devices

Conquerors are not to be conflated with immigrants.

Conceptually wrong. Colonizers are not immigrants.

Are you this fucking stupid? Get over it. Empires existed all around the world. Empires grow or die. un ironically believing Brits didn't improve the lands they conquered.

bbaaasssed

...

How do you equate 'colonizing the world' with 'liking immigrants'.

This is why we left EU, you bunch of total retards.

Civilization in North America wouldn't exist without colonialism, so I don't see how anyone who lives here can say it's a bad thing unless they have their bags packed and are about to catch a one-way flight to their ancestral backwater.

They know first hand what an invasion will do to the native population

>It's your turn to be colonised by foreign invaders
>It's only fair
>White guilt

Yeah, nah, fuck off cunt