Romans where whi...
Romans where whi
Can I get a source on the image?
...
Nobody said they were ,they just weren't black probably looked like modern day Arabs
Why would people in Italy look like Arabs?
...
thats not a roman. thats a dick washer who was in service to the romans
dude, what?
Romans were white.
>what is image search
fuck off
WE
>where
pavement apes confirmed to be incompetent animals
WE WUZ SPQR AND SHIT JULIUS CEASAR WAS BLACK
DEM WHITE FOOLS FIGHT FOR US IN ARENAS N SHEEEIT
Stop posting Egyptians you moron.
You're getting those pictures from the Fayum Mummy collection
Lol it shows up as the painting is from Egypt literally Africa.
DAMN This roman dark as shit.
WUZ
we wuz zuckbergs an shieet
>tfw Romans weren't white
...
nothing better than a white Germanic sex slave
Because they had trading routes literally up to china and the darkest parts of Africa.
It was a lot more multicultural than Sup Forums would ever admit
True they were.
...
Only plebs were mixed. Former slaves etc. Though most 'brown romans' are likely depictions of romans in africa
...
Those are egyptians and romans according to civic nationalism.
They are not italic however.
...
Romans = Modern Italians
Well obviously.
KANGS, etc...
/thread
A lot of southern europeans are interchangeable with some north africans, they're all meds afterall
btfoing the nordcucks pre-emptively
The Gothic Wars would like a word..
WE WUZ
Swarthier ones are probably south italians
Countless marbles busts and statues of true Romans, a few shitty old color pencil drawings and mixed slaves.
Hmm, I wonder which is more believable.
Wars don't leave anywhere near as much genetic impact as people on Sup Forums think.
all your of your skins doesn't matter since we all share the same color of cum
thats a jew
well if you do it right.it does
They looked like Stallone
You don't need a source, idiot.
We all know it was like that. Even Caracalla was half negro.
Romans imported blacks as slaves. But, in Rome, slavery had a time limit. After 20 years you got free.
The problem is the aristocrats were so cucked they allowed slaves to take care of State matters. This meant slaves were already powerful when they became free men after a bright career.
ALL of this applies to the late Empire 117 AD onwards. It wasn't like that back in the days of the Republic.
>tfw I took the Subject of "History in the High Middle Ages"
>tfw I got taught the fall of the Roman Empire wasn't due to "barbarians", but rather poor fiscal reforms, loss of expansive momentum, and the extension of citizenship to all Roman subjects all over Europe, which watered down the idea itself of citizenship
SEEZARZ N SHIIIIIIIIEEEEEEETTT
...te
read Plutarch's Lives. it has all the most famous Romans. they are almost described with blonde, brown or red hair. after the roman republic spanned the world, yes, paintings of blacks/ arabs sprung up, because they had been conquered and assimilated via taxation. I know that your profs give you an A for being a nigger, so I'm not expecting you to actually read Plutarch.
Svastika on the left?
>lybian = negro
He was Egyptian, not Roman (Latin).
>Even Caracalla was half negro.
Nice proxy kike.
We wuz kangs of Rome an shiet. Bu sumhow Tom Whitey came outta his cave and uh enslaved us.