White genocide is self-inflicted

Allow me to explain.

The tax that the average worker pays over the course of their lifetime towards welfare schemes is not enough to cover the amount of money that one person will withdraw over their lifetime from said welfare schemes.
Historically speaking, these schemes were supported mostly by the positive native population growth rate.
It follows that welfare schemes, including your fucking state pension are pyramid schemes.
Pyramid schemes, by design, stop working when they stop getting enough people in them.
The native birth rate in white countries has dropped dramatically.
This gave the politicians no choice. It'd be Hell on Earth if they make radical changes to the welfare system, so all they could do was open the floodgates to people who would breed more workers than the natives, but the only people who wanted to come into our countries were from the third world, which lead to white genocide.

tl;dr wake up faggots, the whites caused their own genocide.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Caesar#Dictatorship
youtube.com/watch?v=3rWU_VDa1Js
youtube.com/watch?v=taoHk_enqWA
youtube.com/watch?v=FOMI0ORGH44
visual.ons.gov.uk/welfare-spending/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_of_Japan
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

stupid fucking old ppl

i dont even belive in pensions

>White genocide is self-inflicted
>This gave the politicians no choice
So is it whites or the politicians you dumb faggot?

You can't even remain logically consistent for a single paragraph.

It doesn't matter how many times you point this out, Sup Forums will never accept the truth. They will continue to chase the Jewish boogeyman.

We shouldn't even use the term "white genocide".

"Suicide" is far more accurate.

The politicians are white you imbecile.

The race of the politicians doesn't even matter, they had no choice.

>The race of the politicians doesn't even matter
holy fuck how did you manage to miss my point this hard, you sure you're not a muzzie? this is some serious sub 80 IQ shit

>The politicians are white you imbecile.
>Politicians embody the destiny of the white race
thanks for the insight

White ppl be so fukin' rasis mang. Da deserf ta be genocidaled! Fukin white devils. Day so fukin' rasis ta us honest niggas.

I hope the white race disappears, and I hope every other race subsequently disappears. There is no meaning to existence. Humans are just pieces of trash. Made up of the same atoms in shit and garbage.

>BLM flag
Seems legit.

You sound like an honest and true Rick and Morty fan. How skinny is your neck?

What taxes are, to in your explanation, is simply a scale down from the larger issue: public debt.

The real truth is that there is far more debt owed in existence than wealth, and it will never, ever be paid back.

The real problem is that this mathematical fiction, odious from inception and born of sinful usury, has been consciously used to enslave the world. This did not happen by accident.

It just so happens that those who control this leverage are engineering the phenomena we see happening, as a temporary stopgap to losing their power, for various reasons.

The west is reluctant to take on more debt, to live as slaves. This is why populatuons are declining. The jig is up when the holders of leverage lose purchase.

The petri dish doesn't have to fill up, we're going to implode like calhoun's mice. Those who have rode the wave of productivity of the masses are very likely to be exposed, and fall.

Everything you wrote is true. I would just point out that the biggest obstacle for getting any reforms done is women.

When you look at the replies in this thread you get to understand why many great men in history considered common people for mere monkeys meant to be used and nothing else. The common man never looks to himself and ponders, gee golly, everyone is allowed to vote, but it is those pesky elite! that is the real problem, not the persons voting in the elite. Today the power rests in the hands of everyone who manages to turn 18, everyone is to blame.

>no choice

no they chose to reduce population OP

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Caesar#Dictatorship
"After the triumph, Caesar set out to pass an ambitious legislative agenda.[85] He ordered a census be taken, which forced a reduction in the grain dole, and decreed that jurors could only come from the Senate or the equestrian ranks. He passed a sumptuary law that restricted the purchase of certain luxuries. After this, he passed a law that rewarded families for having many children, to speed up the repopulation of Italy. Then, he outlawed professional guilds, except those of ancient foundation, since many of these were subversive political clubs. He then passed a term-limit law applicable to governors. He passed a debt-restructuring law, which ultimately eliminated about a fourth of all debts owed."
>After this, he passed a law that rewarded families for having many children, to speed up the repopulation of Italy

This is just how civilizations go. It has nothing to do with some grand scheme.

What?

Wait a minute, why didn't we just subsidise the native birth rate instead of opening the floodgates?

the west is under population control mechanisms, this was the goal of the progressive and socialist movement in the 1930's with it taking total control in the 1960's

just womens sufferage and birth control would have put us at a 2.1 rate, add in free love and jewish mind control "tv" and you get where we are today.

Oh! Gracious we should protest this horrible genocide with a day without the white man. See what happens to the world if all white men simply don't come to work one day.

white countries were never given a democratic vote on it.

...

>the west is reluctant to take on more debt
That's where you lost me bro.

>pic
That has some sort of story behind it, doesn't it? If memory serves they were just brainstorming about how to solve the overpopulation problem that was on the mind of academics back then.

Pretty close to reality.

Pyramid scams always need a fresh influx of Stooges at the bottom to stay alive.

This is why ((They)) keep telling you "Immigration" of third-world Stooges is a necessity.

They are the only ones left who are stupid enough to fall-for ((Their)) schemes.

Although their are many Stupid American that still ((Drink-The-Kool-Aid)) there are not enough White American Brain-Washed Stooges to keep the scheme a-float.

Therefore - Third World Stooges.

Smells like tin foil.

>their
shitskin detected

Then why didn't you get more kids ? Maybe YOU are the problem.

Who cares. It's over. We're done.

Hail Satan.

All the quotes are real, its all the elite talk about is overpopulation, its the core issue underlying everything else.

youtube.com/watch?v=3rWU_VDa1Js

youtube.com/watch?v=taoHk_enqWA

Way to just roll over. You sound sleepy. Come to think of it, I'm a little sleepy. We should both have a nap.

Because that wont work for ((Them)).

>implying breaking a pyramid scheme would be the death of the west
>implying old people being part time employees would be a doomsday scenario even though we bought them out of the workforce to make room for keynesian youth jobs
>implying we need manual labour with digitization
>implying a shrinking populace is deleterious at all year of our lord 2017
>implying Japan will die out and not just be slightly less overcrowded

This is just another "we need to force feed welfare capitalists with stolen overtaxed money from the middle classes by pretending we need migrants because otherwise let's pretend the economy won't like it even though digitalization is happening the current year".

A bunch of jews goof'd ya into believing you need to make shitloads of brown welfare babies so they could hike the housing prices and suck welfare bucks. We do not need immigration for fiscal reasons. This argument barely made sense when all jobs were manual like in the 70's.

I see no genocide only happy praying peoples

We rolled over 45 years ago

No matter which way I look at it, you are right.

I think at this point a collapse is needed. The system has been built year after year on failing systems and it is now almost impossible to 'fix'.

So basically it's because of (((capitalism))), (((capitalism))) is the pyramid scam.
The amount people pay in tax more than covers the welfare system, the problem is too few consumers.
Sure, they can bring a new TV out every year, but unless you're a goy or your old one is fucked you won't buy a new one. So who needs a new TV? The poor (((immigrants))) who are just setting up their new lives in their new country who have nothing. But why stop at a TV? A new house needs all new appliances and a new car. You've just successfully shown your GDP has risen and all it cost you were 200,000 (((immigrants))).
However that's now 200,000 new people looking for jobs, which floods the employee market which drives down wages because the supply outweighs the demand. Not only that, but you need 200,000 new houses to put them all in.
But where will the money come from for that? Well you just need to let in 200,000 more (((immigrants))) and it'll work because, do you know who needs a new TV?
So with all of that in mind, who's to blame? Well, whoever controls (((capitalism))).

He is not implying that at all you fucking idiot. He is explaining that the common people WON'T vote for it! You fucking idiot. Every single time politicians suggests making serious cuts in the welfare system they get called evil and gets no votes.
True or false?!
It is true.
You can stop immigration, but not without cutting welfare, and people won't do that. And the middle class is at least in Denmark the biggest parasites of them all.
youtube.com/watch?v=FOMI0ORGH44
From 2.00

You fucking swedes are the worst, you fucking did it to yourself. Try and take a look in the mirror. You want a welfare state? You want immigration. That fucking simple.
But you are most likely to dumb to even start to fathom that, since you can't even understand OP's post.

>being that dumb
The problem is the welfare state and people not having enough children. The system in the 60's were set up such that you need at the very least a birthrate to sustain the currrent population back then, probably even more.
You know all those old people now? They never paid for their government pensions when they were young. They were paying for old peoples government pensions when they were young. Now, when you have a babyboom it is no problem. You have lots of young people paying for a few old people. Today it is the opposite, lots of old people and few young people, hence, immigration.

I'm not implying most of those things.

>You can stop immigration, but not without cutting welfare
The only welfare you'd have to cut it retirement. Temporarily. Until digitalization replaces the costs anyway. And it is about as sustainable regardless because migration has ceased to generate jobs since most of the migration now is to post-industrial countries, not industrial ones.

Saying we have to choose between welfare+migration or no welfare+no migration is a bad meme and a hoax made up by the small globalist clique that makes big bucks on states over-spending to integrate migrants (housing market and corps receiving benefits from migrants like subsidized employees). It's a coup. A heist. They've managed to convince you people we can't have the cookie and eat it when there's no fucking cookie to begin with.

>ancap
>(((capitalism)))
What?

>Saying we have to choose between welfare+migration or no welfare+no migration is a bad meme a
Ok I agree that was shit sentence from my part.
The danish governments latest number on what immigration from non-western countries is costing is 33 billion kr per year and that is a conservative number, it is at least 40 billion if the government gets it to 33. And it is taking into account asian countries to...
Stopping immigration from the third world should happen regardsless of any cuts in the welfare system. But that is OP's point. When you keep taking in people, even if they get on welfare, they are consumers and keep the ponzi scheme going, the government just creates more debt for the country and the welfare state can continue in the short run. So we are on the same page.
However, you need extra hands in the current system. To provide the extra hands that is needed to provide all the benefits for the lazy ethnic people. You are going to have to make some cuts, that can't be made in the current democracy if you want to stop creating debt.

>hence, immigration.
Which just gives more people who need to be supported on the work of the few young people.
But as you probably know, even though you are in denial, is that the later part of the boomer generation is no longer eligible for pension. They need to be well into their seventies before pension becomes an option.


So by and large, the taxes goes to pay for eternal NEETs who gets disability pension because of their crippling social anxiety or just because, can't work because of muh-what-ever-diagnose-drug-addiction-included. And the endless supply of able bodied muzzies who somehow can't be expected to work either

its not capitalism, its the banks

they are vampires

so the immigration laws just changed themselves, in dozens of White countries?

or did (((someone))) change them?

Tfw Dad married a Mexican woman, Sister is a coal burner burner and you (white af )are are with multiple Asian women. My life is a meme.

>even though you are in denial,
About what?

>They need to be well into their seventies before pension becomes an option.
Last time I checked, that's not true anywhere.

>So by and large, the taxes goes to pay for eternal NEETs who gets disability pension because of their crippling social anxiety or just because, can't work because of muh-what-ever-diagnose-drug-addiction-included. And the endless supply of able bodied muzzies who somehow can't be expected to work either
If you believe that then you simply haven't looked at the numbers.
visual.ons.gov.uk/welfare-spending/

The jews push it, but no one is forcing anyone at the voting booth in Denmark. I have no problem expelling jews, but the problem is the same in Japan. Now, they choose another route and just say no to immigration, good for them, however.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_of_Japan
Japan had the world's highest debt per GDP in 2014.[4][5]

It's 65 in Denmark and then it rises compared to when you were born. All the way up to 68 years, so yeah, it is not true.

Japan has negative interest rates, it's fucked.

We should be trading with them instead of China.

So does a lot of Scandinavia. Really tickles the pickle.

China has several hundred million people living in abject poverty, i.e. slave labour.