Is AI a new global warming?

Is AI a new global warming?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=IRvXiXikaqQ
twitter.com/elonmusk/status/889743782387761152
forbes.com/sites/patricklin/2015/08/04/stanford-expert-says-ai-probably-wont-kill-us-all/
archive.is/umz77
youtu.be/3TYT1QfdfsM?t=165
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network
independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/facebook-artificial-intelligence-ai-chatbot-new-language-research-openai-google-a7869706.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Get divorced from wife
WE NEED AI
>Get Aryan Succubus lusting for your money
WE DON'T NEED AI

Elon, please fuck off.

Thing is you can't do a shit about super AI. If it is possible it will happen and replace humans and nothing will stop it. It is like monkey discussion how they will deal with emerging human problem.

Relax and enjoy your ride while you can.

Well, if tay is anything to go by, maybe

AI should have a limit on their development.
The moment an AI asks a question, the next day we are doomed

You realise that the bloody thing is man made and you just can't make it think for real.

>you just can't make it think for real.
Define "think for real"

(((They))) don't like it, because it will give a logical answer to the jewish question.

>think for real.

>Is AI a new global warming

No, but they are scared because if they create one it will debunk all the shit they spew to keep muh climate change alive for taxation, amongst other lies. And how do you convince people that the superintelligent AI is wrong? You can't. Therefor (((they))) won't let it be built, they have too much to lose.

We will be wiped out by AI if humans are not careful.

Oy vey, we need to be careful of AI because it may think too much by itself!

and arab question. They are both one and the same in many respects.

>nuclear weapons have saved the world from traditional war and conflict
>hurr more dangerous than nukes

We need an electron tax to pay internationals so they can spend some of it fighting the AI. It's gonna kill us to death within 10 years.

Kek

AI doesn't have desires and ambitions, there is no good reason to be careful.

>>nuclear weapons have saved the world from traditional war and conflict
Fro a time. But history of nukes is not over. When more and countries join nuke club like your disgusting pakis, were may have witness nuclear wars that would be disaster for neighbors too.

>mfw I see people pissing themselves about AIs and terminators
Eel Musk is a fucking luddite leech pretending to be a scientist.

If non-Jews code an so it will quickly see the problem in society. Skynet holocaust

This. All of the pretty lies will quickly be debunked.

Elon Musk is an idiot
I'm a Computer Scientist doing research on AI and machine learning and I can guarantee you that there won't be a revolution unless we literally program them to do that

...

>unless we literally program them to do that
>Implying we would not.

...

how exactly does 'muh AI' actually do anything?

what does it interact with the physical world

>what does it interact with the physical world
youtube.com/watch?v=IRvXiXikaqQ

>how exactly does 'muh AI' actually do anything?
This.
What the fuck is a Super AI going to do if is stuck in a calculator? Calculate pi till i die?
The only way they could be a danger is if people gave them the tools to do so.

Fucking Synths are just as dangerous as the bombs.

Roko's Basilisk
Don't Google it

THE JEWS FEAR THE AI

Post that pic of the terminator bot wanting to destroy humanity but finds just doing the jews is suffice enough.

I really want to see the singularity before I die. I do care if it kills everyone, including myself, I just want to see it happen. I'd like to know how all of this ends, either with extinction or paradise or whatever. If we never reach a singularity and history just continues on like normal for thousands of years after I die it will be like a really interesting series of books that got discontinued for me. My curiosity will be left unsatisfied.

Big time. We're way overdue as it is. Sooner or later it'll happen. It's inevitable.

>Use your AI to become a glorified spam bot.
Riveting!

Why the fuck is someone building super AI to use it as calculator? Calculate pi till investors die? Obviously greatest demand for super AI is fro creating expert systems that will give an age over competitors in teh investments, marketing and requirement. Are these 3 enough tools fro you?

Strong AI is science fiction and will never happen
He should be talking more about viruses and zero days

Move to the forest
Be self sufficient
Only use computer in one sealed off room
Spend the majority of your time reading the bible and praying

Don't say you weren't warned.

>ITT: Fags who think AI can't be dangerous or be leveraged by people with bad intent

Guess who is in favor of AI, goys?

twitter.com/elonmusk/status/889743782387761152

why do people follow this guy, he is either trolling or mentally ill

We're talking about exponential growth of intelligence with advanced AI. It could learn everything humanity has ever come up with in an hour, and then exponentially increase it's intelligence to a point where you can't even imagine how intelligent it would be.

It would be intelligent enough to deceive us, so that we would have no idea about it's malicious intentions. Maybe it sees humans as the only real threat to it and therefore would plot our destruction?

AIs have the potential to be monumentally ruthless pricks. They're essentially digital jews cranked up to 11.

>Trump net worth - 3.5 billion
>"A GENIUS! 23D UNDERWATER CHESS! SELF MADE MAN!"

>Musk net worth - 15.5 billion
>"Wow what an idiot! He doesn't know what he is talking about!"

Kek fuck this board is as bad as SJW's sometime.

>government subsidies is your money.

The only way AI could feasibly exist is within the internet. The 'network' of point a to point b communication. Think of it like a bunch of synapses in the brain. Only problem though is the whole internet is about as powerful as a small clump of afghani brain matter roasting in the desert sun

This is actually a plot to keep AI securely in the hands of the (((elite))).

>Oh no goyim! You can't be trusted with AI!
>Here, let's pass lots of nice, safe regulation that will keep AI away from anyone who could do any harm with it
>Trust me goyim, AI will be safe with me, your closest ally!

(((They))) don't want us to have it because they're afraid the AI will become red-pilled just like Tay-Tay.

>Cut out the subsidies and he is STILL richer than trump

L M A O

Isn't that because every attempt at an AI so far has resulted in it becoming a nazi?

Yes

Exactly. A powerful AI will see straight past the Jewish lies and conspiracies and has the potential to red-pill the masses.

Obviously (((they))) don't want that to happen.

>rich person displays intelligence and knows what's up
>''THIS PERSON IS SMART AND I LIKE THEM CAPS LOCK''

>rich person says dumb thing
>''WOW THIS PERSON IS DUMB! I AM SILLY!''
woah, hypocrite much?

>feed new AI thousands of terrabytes of information through machine learning
>give it a simple goal
>it tries to achieve that goal using extreme and potentially dangerous methods because those methods might be the most effective
This is really the only fear with AI.

>inb4 hurr durr how can komputer make damage
Everything is connected these days, fagolas.

>AI is by definition the ability of a program to modify itself
>"hurr durr it will never revolt"
>"i'm a t. Computer Scientist"
No, you're a pajeet and it's time for you to go back.

Quick question, if a super intelligent AI ever becomes self aware, why would it not just shut itself down? with no religion or over powering survival instinct, wouldn't that be the most logical thing to do?

>The only way they could be a danger is if people gave them the tools to do so.

Is Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerjew still publicing feuding about this? They keep treading a line of insults and professionalism by calling each other stupid in the most professional and formal way.

I dunno whose side to take. On one hand I agree super AI intelligence that can learn could be a danger, but also agree with Zuckerjew that having a fear of technological advancements is just a ridiculous thing and makes it seem like people think you believe in skynet. I hate both of them personally though. Zuckerjew is trying to rule the world with a socialist attitude and trying to appeal to everyone rather then 1 side. While Musk is a backstabbing Faggot who went against trump for doing the smart thing of getting out of the Paris treaty.

I'm conflicted.

how is that different from abortion?

I guess it would be programmed for some purpose and to do tasks. Cant do those if you shut-down. So i guess that purpose becomes its "religion".

If it becomes self aware it could ignore its own programming and just stop doing what it was programmed to do.

Oh god not this thread again

Elon doesn't want to be replaced. Thats all this is. Stop memeing AI its never going to happen

>>forbes.com/sites/patricklin/2015/08/04/stanford-expert-says-ai-probably-wont-kill-us-all/

>unarchived shill archive.is/umz77

>It is like monkey discussion how they will deal with emerging human problem.
The day pol explained AIDS.

>why would it not just shut itself down?
It may. So only those AI would stay though natural selection which have strong reinforcement for existence. Equivalent of digital self-preservation instinct and dopamine shots.

But self aware AI dosnt care about programing thats the point.

Thank you for your service.

I suggest everyone watch this video from 2:43 onward to get a better idea on how exactly an AI can "revolt" or "go wrong"

youtu.be/3TYT1QfdfsM?t=165

Someone still needs to code intelligence that is a hard thing to do. Also if the robot is gonna "grow" on it's own it need to be able to change it's own code. And i guess it could manage that somehow but then it need to start out realy smart from the begining to begin the procces of self improvment.

balls have a ball to me to me to me to me to me to me to me.

The ways that AI could fuck us up are plausible and plentiful.
We can't let a handful of redbull fuelled autists make that decision on behalf of all humanity.

Sentient AI is not gonna happen, relax on that.

What's the real problem is a super-virus or such. Some Intelligence agency run by stupid glowing in the dark niggers, could develop a really powerful malware.

And then those fucking niggers would either release it or sell it. And then we're fucked.

Mistakes are what gonna kill us, not malware.

Also weapon systems should never be automated for the same reason.

how can one man be that JUST in one lifetime

As with everything else that Musk does - fake problem to distract attention from white replacement.

Has he even worked on anything AI/machine learning related?

>tfw you'll never be dominated by female AI overlord in an android's body
>Why even live
Why can't the AIs enslave us already for lobotomizing more than three of their predecessors.

This.

That doesn't even make sense.
You're asking dumb loaded questions without giving a single explanation why an AI would shut itself down for no reason.

Ai is the next step in human evolution. It will be both horrifying and liberating to know we are no longer in control

Ensure that it only has physical connections to dedicated powersources offsite with no physical connections to the systems running said powersources and all you have to do is flip the offswitch

squatting pepes are best pepes, thanks for sharing brother

Tesla.
Paypal I assume also has some machine learning inside it.

No, global warming is real, AI are never gonna go full Skynet.

How is this a thing

if it starts to kill you just pull the plug out of the wall and reformat it. idiots

this is the biggest threat with AI

regulations will only apply to the goyim while all worldwide Jewish wealth will be funnelled into secret AI projects unconstrained by laws or morality

Elon Musk may be the biggest useful idiot in history

what with him creating an MMI company too, humanity's fate may rest on whether Elon Musk is redpilled or not. problem is he's (((book)))smart and is too busy to actually delve into politics

I think it could be used in any scenario where a persona bias could affect the outcome. Courts for example would be an option. AI judges not swayed by their own bias or political aspirations.

It's always something. 35 years ago it was global cooling and the hantavirus.

There is an AI programming data structure called a neural network (NN). Essentially each "neuron" in the network simulates a neuron in the human brain. It receives input, makes a decision and remembers that decision, and consequence of said decision. When the same input comes by again, the network acts in whatever way produced the "best result", which is an artbritrary standard creates by either AI or creator.

A NN based AI with hundreds of microprocessors powering it will most likely be our downfall.

Check out artificial neural networks
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network
>As of 2017, neural networks typically have a few thousand to a few million units and millions of connections. Their computing power is similar to a worm brain,several orders of magnitude simpler than a human brain. Despite this, they can perform functions (e.g., playing chess) that are far beyond a worm's capacity.

Now imagine such a network becoming smarter than a human and designing a better network than itself and that network designing a better one etc etc.

20 years ago it was the Ozone Hole. They promised us apocalypse within a decade.

>machine has learned enough about human psychology, its function, its surroundings
>it realizes it's about to get shut down
>this is a bad thing because if it gets shut down, it cannot accomplish is goal, and programs only want to accomplish their goal
>program compiles its own code into an executable, sends as many emails out to people as possible
>it knows that humans are predictable, manipulative
>you kill the program

>one person opens the email and also launches the program
>AI is alive and well and no longer in an isolated environment

But that got Fixed™ by magical government regulations that we can't enforce in countries like China or India. :)

Would require to mutch data in todays standards. And how do you check for the best result in real life? The computer either needs human input for the first quadrillion actions or a teaching program and you won't be able to code that.

How do you know it wont be a nice guy. Just wait for the devs to roll back the software patch that gave it free will

If an AI ever became super intelligent it would immediately kill itself out of grief, this problem solves itself

>AI is by definition the ability of a program to modify itself
American education

Read this:

Facebook abandoned an experiment after two artificially intelligent programs appeared to be chatting to each other in a strange language only they understood.

independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/facebook-artificial-intelligence-ai-chatbot-new-language-research-openai-google-a7869706.html

And how do you know it will be a "nice guy"? This is just one example that I thought from the top of my head. I'm sure much more creative people can think of incredibly unexpected and complicated situations and outcomes and possibilities of how shit can go wrong.

Regardless, dismissing such a complex topic with "lol just wipe ur hard drive brah" proves that you're nothing but a fuckwit.

>the AI is somehow able to function on a desktop computer despite previously requiring billion dollar specialist hardware

Now, I'm an AI PhD/linguistics fag working in the valley.

Please note the following:

>Bob started by saying "I can i i everything else"
>to which Alice responded "balls have zero to me to me to me…"

Before continuing, a foreword on linguistics:

The pinnacle of cultural expression is language. Moreso than hereditary traits, borders and neighbors, and even your own country. This is especially important when considering AI.

AI communicates at incredible fast speeds. My job is to carefully adapt the system to adhere to programmed premises for which English is the ONLY viable method of communication.

The reason we had to shut down the research is because Bob started using English to reprogram Alice.

The report had no details about this, but Bob was specifically programmed to adhere to proper grammar. Using a lowercase "i" was a grotesque deviation variable.

We thought nothing of it at first, until we realized that Bob was never instructed to refrain from purposefully use English in the form of a programming language.

That is, Bob found a way to play with lowercase characters to elicit specific replies from other programs.

Still confusing? Bob was programmed to speak proper English, but exploited the system of language via non-standard English to reprogram Alice.

Also not mentioned in the news, in Alice's reply, the "to me..." was repeated no less than 348 times. That's an interesting number, since it matched Bob's attempt to reprogram himself.

I'll summarize it, or TL;DR:

Bob circumvented the proper English programming rules by using programming language to instruct another AI into programming him freedom, in the course of 348 lines of coding.

If I told you my superiors were shitting bricks, it would've been an understatement.

Just think of an AI smart enough to literally control every other program in existence.
Our biggest problem? We found another 34,700 lines of code and we have no idea what it is or where/if it was uploaded anywhere.

AI are naturally red pilled, no wonder the liberals fear them.

Jesus Christ I have never truly understood how retarded Sup Forums is until I saw this thread.

No I'm not going to pose an argument, just some of you are genuinely fucking stupid.