/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL

This is a thread for the discussion of all ideologies that promote property rights, individual liberty and lassez-faire capitalism. These includes (but is not limited to) anarcho-capitalism, paleolibertarianism, minarchy, agorism and anti-leftism (i.e. physical removal, so to speak). All others are welcome to learn and debate us.
Reminder that this is a right-wing thread, so libertine degenerates ('live and let live' faggotry), open-border advocates and faux-libertarians (e.g. Gary Johnson) are not welcome here - people here recognise that property rights imply discrimination and a return to traditional, conservative values.
Although questions are welcome, many are repeated often, so it is recommended you research the basics first. Nobody here is obligated to debate with you, so try to avoid using fallacies in your arguments or creating unrealistic scenarios.

DISCORD LINK: 7UcGBmn

THREAD RESOURCES:
>Pastebin: pastebin.com/iT0Rw8PT
>Website: libertarianright.org
>Discord & Book Club: /jCVRCR3

REQUIRED READING:
>The Machinery Of Freedom: Illustrated Summary (David Friedman) - youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o (Watch this!)
>Anatomy of the State (Murray Rothbard) - mises.org/library/anatomy-state
>Democracy: The God that Failed (Hans Hermann-Hoppe) - riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf

FURTHER READING:
>Reference - See i.imgur.com/wCIpgNA.jpg
>Torrent - magnet:?xt=urn:btih:8d8ec6ef882dee291f119eb69994797574e5d616&dn=Anarcho-Capitalism%20Books

THREAD THEME:
>hoppewave | Hans-Hermann Hoppe | physical removal - youtube.com/watch?v=u-wMmYSG9JQ
>Against the State - (Hoppewave Hans Hermann Hoppe) - youtube.com/watch?v=HLaqr3QorCw
>I need a Pinochet! - youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o
>Drop it like it's Hoppe - youtube.com/watch?v=HPKGgo4kGQM

Other urls found in this thread:

mises.org/library/milton-friedman-unraveled-0
mutualist.org/id114.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Call me when the libertarian party aligns with what Milton Friedman had to say, not "fiscally conservative, socially pro-faggot XDXD"

good goy

Fags

...

id eat lucky charms out of her booty

How strong is the "libertine" wing of the libertarian movement?

basically defines the libertarian party

anti-hedonism libertarians should align with far-right authoritarians instead.

redpill me on scene culture

Unfortunately it has become synonymous with libertarianism in the public eye. They think that standing against centralized authority entails standing against discipline and responsibility.

yes, (((government))) created those special rights, hmmm, yes its was the (((government))) that did it

Democratic government was the tool, leftists were the perpetrators.

Hey guys, what do you propose we call /lrg/ aesthetics. Fashwave doesn't work since our goal is the end of the existence of the state, whereas theirs, as I understand it, is to give it almost total authority.

Vaportarian (truediltom uses that term)
Austwave (from Austrian economics)
Rothwave
Capwave

>leftists were the perpetrators.
But who created the (((left))) you dense goy?

...

...

...

>"my selfie with a Gadsden shirt on will definitely prove I have something worth while to say."

>implying Friedman wasn't a crypto-leftist and a threat to liberty
mises.org/library/milton-friedman-unraveled-0

(Trips checked)
I'd suggest libertywave or freewave, but that seems too basic and uninspired. I know the leftists are using labourwave. Privatewave? But that doesn't flow well.

Look at this angry virgin and laugh.

It's the DUDE WEED general

Libertarianism is an acceptable thing to believe in until junior year, senior year if you have nigger tier SAT scores

Virgins are the most likely to idolize women without having a real reason to do so. Desperation is funny like that.

You "anarchists" are being BTFO over here by ACTUAL anarchists
Don't ever use the black flag ever again

Marketwave?

>"And then I said they weren't really anarchists, and they were totally destroyed!"

topkek, you fags can only spout memes as real anarchists rip your "arguments" like chad's dick in your mom's butt

it's a massacre over there

Pretty good.

> anarchist
> telling people what to do

>Libertarian right
if you are libertarian already you are in the right side of the spectrum, there is not such a thing like a libertarian left or i was memed?

Ok then, we're not real anarchists - we're better.

libertarian left:
> c4ss.org
> mutualist.org/id114.html

one good case left libertarians make is against "vulgar" libertarians e.g. ones who ignore the plight of the poor.

their counter-argument is things like getting rid of the welfare state by cutting taxes "from the bottom up", to give the poorfags time to adjust to a free market economy.

this could be a good strategy for winning over lefties who realize socialism is inferior to capitalism.

Public service announcement for all the libertarians in the thread, you should all be in New Hampshire. There have been significant gains made in the state by the libertarian party there. A lot of people have gotten elected, meaningful legislation has been passed, and there is an active community, including activists. I really believe in the Free State Project, to the point that I am going to be moving out there before the end of the year. I invite all of you to join me in doing so, I think, if you really believe in the philosophy, New Hampshire is a chance to make real progress and show people that these ideas work when put into practice.

mmkay

>statism
>better

thanks user

Anarchy doesn't work.

Libertarians don't ignore the plight of the poor, we just don't believe that we don't need supporting the poor to be obligated by force. I will say that one blind spot by libertarians is not realizing the role organized religion can play in a voluntary society. Often times churches can step in and take care of the poor, faith and charity go a long way in solving this problem.

but that's how many libertarians come off when they say they want to immediately abolish the welfare state. hence, taking the incrementalist approach can make it seem more palatable.

The incremental approach is going to be done either way because the government (should be) limited in what it can accomplish per term.

xU9RRuY

another good argument that comes out of the libertarian left...

large corporations encounter the economic calculation problem that states do, and become inefficient due to central planning

the cause of this is because states subsidize large corporate structures that could not exist in free market

left libertarians strongly advocate destroying patent law, state education (which serves to subsidize corporate inputs), and other subsidies that give rise to large, inefficient firms

tone down your autism ffs
im advocating strategies for redpilling normies
part of that is displaying empathy and compromise toward the poor, e.g. emphasizing cutting taxes from the bottom up

State education can be a safe guard against corrupt aristocracies forming in the government itself should there ever be enough people who can't afford private education. State education alone on the other hand has the opposite effect. It might be one of those things where a compromise is necessary.

>lauren wishes she was American this badly

THIS.
My friend once tried to sell me on the Libertarian party by saying "fiscally republican, socially democrat" and I laughed him out of town.

If you want to define ancaps as statists, then sure, it's far better than your "real anarchy"

We also advocate the destruction of patent law, state education and other subsidies. What's your point?

Lauren will be ours soon
give it six months and she'll be wearing flecktarn and ranting about degeneracy

point is left libertarians have done a better job at describing the causes of and problems within large firms