Why is the left so obsessed with Russia?
Why is the left so obsessed with Russia?
Other urls found in this thread:
washingtonpost.com
politifact.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
theguardian.com
time.com
reuters.com
kyivpost.com
theguardian
archive.is
time
archive.is
twitter.com
They have to have a boogeyman.
why is the right so dismissive of russia?
"Divert your eyes": the country
Why is the right so obsessed with brown people?
They are still sore they lost and have to blame it something.
Don't want another cold war, pretty simple. Anyone who isn't a neocon would like to see us work with them in Syria and in general. What do you have to fear from Russia at this very moment? Also post proof that they were responsible for the DNC hack.
>let's just LET putin consolidate his dictatorship and annex/conquer as he pleases! nothing bad has ever come from appeasing totalitarian states!
They keep spewing all this nonsense, is there any proof that I've somehow missed? How was our Democracy attacked by Russia? Is there any proof of this?
because if they accuse other people of the stuff they do, nobody will accuse them.
Becuase they're literally destroying civilization.
>4 years ago Romney says Russia is the #1 geopolitical threat to America
>liberals scoff and mock him for being stuck in the Cold War era
>Trump gets elected
>suddenly Russians are everywhere and we need to go to war with Putin
Doesn't need proof, doesn't even need to be true. Nothing say does. They learned to argue from their commie professors.
>
The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
I had one job.
Nobody gives a shit if Montenigger and Georgia get assraped by Russia. They've been fucking around in buttfuckistan since the dawn of time. Why should the US risk pissing off a major geopolitical force to help some slav third world shitholes?
Becouse they were actually making huge efford to pay up all debts(they actually had less debts than Poland just before Syrian war if you count their both debt in same currency) and is strongly opposing globalization. Also don't increase their sphere of influence recently. Gives up their previous spheres of influences just to don't provoke the unnessecery conflict, supports Assad, Pretty much does a lot last couple of years to be a grown up around here.
You have no idea how cringy that replacement of "R" with "Я" (sounds like "ya"), and "N" with "И" (literally "i")
>CIA destabilize Ukraine because they didn't want to join NATO
I have told a Democrat this and they literally argued that its ok to get rid of a democratically elected leader because they were """""""corrupt""""""
>don't appease totalitarian states
>only thing obama did his entire presidency
I don't get where these claims are coming from.
politifact.com
>This doesn’t mean the remaining 13 intelligence organizations disagree with the January assessment, nor does it mean the report was insufficient, according to multiple national security experts. The 17 organizations differ on their missions and scope, so they wouldn’t all be expected to contribute to every intelligence assessment, including one of this import.
>nazi and polack cannot remember the historical context of the term "appeasement"
>b-but obama did it too!
Obama destabilized Ukraine
If he didn't do that we wouldn't be in this situation you
Unless you protested the at least 3 times Obama overthrew a democratically elected government you have no right to complain that someone "messed with" any part of our election
can we lynch all blacks. They cant admit they corrupt freaks and got shit on by anthony's wiener
>i-if you didn't go out and protest when obongo did it then you can't call out lil' don!
>moving the goalposts THIS hard
Because they don't control it.
This is completely partisan bullshit
The CIA has been destabilizing countries everywhere and 99% of the people bitching about this never gave a single fuck until it "happened" to them
You don't need to have protested or did anything then but you have to state it was unequivocally wrong to do it now for the argument to even be valid
Because they can't bare to accept hillary was a shit canidate and bernie would have been better. Fugging corprate democrats.
Great Quote. Is it from you?
They were told to by their (((overlords))) via the (((MSM)))
The cold war never ended. We will cleanse the earth of communism and fascism, no matter the cost. If it takes a rigged election here and there or even a dictator WE ARE THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY!
They pushed the Russia thing so hard it's like racist now and means nothing
they believe what their masters tell them to believe
most people avoid thinking for themselves at all costs
>amerithrash trying to be the victim when it comes to democracy being destroyed
Even if Ivan did the deed I'd say that the yanks got what they deserved.
>nazi and polack cannot remember the historical context of the term "appeasement"
But why would (you) need all this war burger? Why Russia has to be a smart one here?
I unironically support this.
My Emporer
And who does your thinking?
Misdirection, the real collusion is Ukraine and Clinton. But the left and media are keeping eyes on Trump. Same shit they always do.
>because they were corrupt
Why they keep going for that point? US is not much less corrupt. The fact that it's called "donations", "lobbying" and it's all "transparent" and shit doesn't change much.
Dont answer a question with a question.
You need a boogyman for your narrative.
Why is the right so obsessed with gay sex and trannies?
>Also don't increase their sphere of influence recently.
Fuck off Kremlin shill. They literally invaded Ukraine three years ago.
Because they were told to be.
why should anyone allow you to speak, you worthless, turbo-nigger weeb cocksucker?
...
Kill yourself.
...
Because Russia and Trump get two scoops while everyone else gets one
They're fair game ever since they dropped support for them in the 60's and switched to muh European socialism
Also they know because Russiastan is so pants on head retarded that nobody will believe their refutation of the accusations brought against them
They're the perfect punching bag, like Yeb!
>Nobody gives a shit if Montenigger and Georgia get assraped by Russia
That's where you're wrong memeflag
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
many links in the references section of these articles
They live in a world where the Russians unquestionably stole an election.
Which in the end may be a good thing. I've read some recent polling data that suggests the left's useless idiots have bought the narrative so hard that 2018 turnout maybe significantly lower with dem voters.
What's the point of voting if the "Ruskies" are just gonna steal the election?
Kek
Because democrat politicians get foreign bribes from places like Saudi Arabia. There's one angle. Russia backs the Syrian gov, Saudi backs the rebels.
Russia is fairly right wing and conservative, domestically. Dems, are not right wing and are progressive.
Russia is at odds with Nato and the cultures and politics of western european countries.
Dems, are supporters of Nato countries and the political ends they tend to support.
It's only natural they want to make Russia into their boogeyman.
Shilling against Russia means that ever nation or group against Russia, becomes a potential source of income. I mean... the Clinton foundation's taken Saudi money, like a thirsty cow drinks water. It serves their pocket. It serves their ideological ends for supposed "peaceniks" and "progressives" to want to start a war with Russia.
...
Which is why the left was in such an uproar when the incursion into Georgia happened...?
These fucking retards wouldn't be able to point to Russia on a map, but because MSNBC sold them a narrative they believe in confronting a nuclear power with military force.
Comrade Burger Crimea been part of Russia longer than america has existed it self.
An entire generation of brainwashed manlets.
See, it can happen anywhere, even in the land of the hard cowboys. Not so hard are we now haha
>
en.wikipedia.org
I can tooo play link game with wiki.
bingo
fpbp
>what's the point of voting when we know Hillary will win
>what's the point of voting when we the voting sample is so big
>what's the point of voting when Russia will steal it anyway
It's like they're stoners or something.
Why is the left so obsessed with russia? Slavic women are more beautiful.
Why is the right so obsessed with brown people? Blacks have bigger cocks.
Heh heh, top kek. Conspiratards always shoot themselves in the foot with defeatism.
>that creeping 50 dinars
Nice copypasta. Only because it's 100% true.
to condition the masses into fearing (((their))) next target
>Crimea
yeah, invided with soldiers stationed here for decades, without anybody fighting back.
>E. Ukr
theguardian.com
>they say involved regular units of the Russian army
>Samchuk, like many Ukrainian fighters, said
>He told us
>Nato claims
>regional newspaper has published a long transcript of what it alleges to be
>appears to be fighting in Ukraine
>etc.
time.com
>on Friday two British journalists witnessed
witnessed, but the camera charge was too low to record it?
>Polish TV correspondent Wojciech Bojanowski reported
>NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen warned on August 11 that there was a high probability of further Russian intervention in Ukraine
"probability" top kek
>Reuters reports that retreating rebels are fighting to maintain control of the city, aided by a supply of men and weapons from over the border in Russia
a proof within a proof? neat
lets see
reuters.com
>Ukrainian officials said
>Kiev and Western governments watching nervously to see if Russia will intervene
hahaha holy fuck!
>Russian servicemen are seen through a car window as they drive a military vehicle along a road outside Kamensk-Shakhtinsky near the border with Ukraine, Rostov Region, August 17, 2014.
Russian soldiers are in Russia, horibru
>allegations from Kiev and its Western allies that it is providing material support to separatist fighters
kyivpost.com
this one doesn't even quote anyone, let alone showing videos or photos
it's just:
>a special project covering Russia’s war against Ukraine
I've run out of the character limit
can you point to specific proof, wikipedia links all kinds of bullshit
Archived
>theguardian com/world/2014/sep/03/ukraine-soldier-youre-better-clueless-because-truth-horrible-moscow-ilovaysk
archive.is
>time com/3142580/ukrain-russia-luhansk-donetsk-rebels-reinforcements
archive.is
jews still hate Russia for being purged and losing control of it.
Sorry, based bot. Didn't mean to trigger you.
Hello? I'm not shitposting. I genuenly want proofs so i can turn my back on Putin.
because we actually care that a foreign country hacked the US election process unlike drumptard traitors
The left needs someone to blame so they can defend Hillary's honor and continue to defend her.
Meanwhile just ask one of the dumb cunts to tell you exactly how Russia helped Trump and they can't tell you.
Show us exactly how they hacked the election