why is male virginity looked upon on Sup Forums?
you do realize that virgins of Sup Forums postponed the downfall of Western civ by 8 years despite all odds and billions of Clinton?
Also, any sex outside of marriage is degeneracy materialized - its pretty simple to understand why and since it takes 2 to tango men who participate in it are just as guilty as female roasties.
Yet even (((redpilledTM))) people look at male fornication as a proof of masculinity...why is that?
Other urls found in this thread:
tandfonline.com
twitter.com
Daily reminder pornography is the electric Jew that is causing people to doubt God.
Prior Chad here. Id take my notches off this belt if I could.
its quite telling how the image of masculinity of the altright is a fornication brawler (its not officially that, but it cant become) insted of a Godly family man.
so many people internalized the JerseyShore-girls-dictate-how-masculine-I-am as a prerequisite of masculinity.
did you knew that Tebow was literally dumbed by some slut for not wanting to have sex before marriage?
hide that image now, Ill have to report the post othwerwise.
It shows more strength showing restraint than giving in
Deeply ingrained biological imperative in men to hose anything human and female down with cum in the hopes of propagating our progeny. Male virgins will always be mocked and derided because, unlike women where men view their chastity and self-restraint as a virtue and an indication of good moral character, men who can't attract females are seen as low worth, genetic dead ends. I'm not saying I agree with it or that it's right but it's our primeval instinct.
A large part, maybe even most of the world's biggest contributors to humanity were virgins, but they channelled their virginal rage into becoming godlike in their field of expertise instead of posting on Sup Forums all day. I don't look at male virgins with contempt at all, but society at large will and most other people who post here probably do.
Are we seriously looping back around to the point where virgins are Chads and non-virgins are robots?
For a man, claiming to be a "virgin" generally means you're a homosexual.
>I don't look at male virgins with contempt at all, but society at large will and most other people who post here probably do.
I didnt speak about lifelong virgins only - those always existed, but mostly about men who choose not to participate in sexual degeneracy, people like Tebow for instance, they are horrendously mocked by other men for choosing not to sleep with loose women, waitresses etc.
and the people who usually peer pressure other man into that behaviour are not cucks, but pretty manly, but manly in a wrong way.
The problem is far deeper than just SJWs and roasties.
>For a man, claiming to be a "virgin" generally means you're a homosexual.
technically yes, men dont have virginity.
>and the people who usually peer pressure other man into that behaviour are not cucks, but pretty manly, but manly in a wrong way.
its a 90s MTV vision of masculinity, or what feminists reffer to as "destructive masculinity" - its not family and responsobility oriented maculinity but its a pretty niggerized value system people on the right accepted partially.
Yes user, good will always triumph in the end.
>I have to restrain myself from having sex with women
Yeah ok.
He's so gay, he calls himself a virgin Christian just to avoid being chastised.
Tim Tebow is virgin Chad. And is the ultimate white nationalist
>He's so gay, he calls himself a virgin Christian just to avoid being chastised.
you are a racist gay
you just call yourself a neckbeard neet and post on 4chin to seem like you are a ironic racist and ironic faggot
>chastised
that word only exists because you couldnt keep it together until marriage
>8 years
Trump won't even make it to 4 years before he's impeached for obstruction of justice. Then the dems can literally run a ham sandwich and win.
Trump has done more damage to the Republican brand than even that bumbling buffoon GWB did
Shareblue faggot
relationships are not symmetrical, female virtues are not male virtues and have never been through history in any tradition
> and since it takes 2 to tango men who participate in it are just as guilty as female roasties.
Not really, no.
Men and women are very different, and men crave sex to a much greater degree than women.
Back in the day, it was common for men to fuck any moderately attractive women who were willing to go to bed with him (just like today, I guess), and that worked fine, because not all women were skanks back then. Let's say 25% of the women were skanks, and the men took turns fucking these women (one night stands or short relationships purely for sex). Then they'd settle down and get married to a good woman who wasn't a skank. The skanks would eventually settle down with some working class loser or a beta, and shit out another generation of skanks.
The problem today is that almost all women are skanks, so there aren't many good women for men to settle down with when they're done partying and fucking skanks.
>Back in the day, it was common for men to fuck any moderately attractive women who were willing to go to bed with him
Roosh wont tell you that...once the critical population rises to current level, you say 25%, I say it takes less, then you put the described behaviour under magnifing glass and see that there is nothing morally worthy about men fornicating.
every basic bitch altrightist knows that sexual value is not simetrical, but in more moral times, male fornication wasnt glorified as it is with PUA...and men who wanted moral family life werent shamed by other man into fornication.
to not realize that it TAKES 2 TO TANGO is utter nonsense despite that parts of the tango are very different. Lack of male sexual morals coused the Sexual Utopia in Power not the other way around.
You have really bizarre views of both the past and the present. It's like you have no experience from modern life, and look at the past as if your only source are movies from that era.
to put it more concise, women havent become skans by themselves.
Male morals dictates the ammount of skanks of society.
2 2 TANGO
>You have really bizarre views of both the past and the present.
offcourse I do, I guess 50% divorce rates and STD rates we have today were common in 19th/early 20th century?
Are you completely retarded? I never said they were the same. In fact, I wrote a long post that spelled out the differences.
Slick Willy was impeached for lieing about his BJ from a fat chick. You have at least three and a half more years you dumb motherfucker.