Why aren't you a social anarchist?

youtube.com/watch?v=WIvn8qjyrzk

>Freedom and equality are good
>Freedom and equality can only co-exist; they are not mutually exclusive
>Capitalism means lack of freedom and equality
>The state means lack of freedom and equality

There is literally no other solution.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pKWoKxC-tQk
youtu.be/DB9oUqIcX-c
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Freedom and equality can only co-exist; they are not mutually exclusive
>Capitalism means lack of freedom and equality
>The state means lack of freedom and equality
Total bullshit, along with equality.
youtube.com/watch?v=pKWoKxC-tQk

capitalism is comfy and fuck you got mine
why would i subscribe to an ideology that cant give me the same level of wealth i have now

Because you misunderstand what constitutes a good life. Not wealth. I know I sound like a hippie libtard, but wealth will not bring you any satisfaction in the long run.

Care to explain?

Equality is a false god. No one is equal, weather it be in intellect, strength or beauty. Heirarchy is a natural human behavior that without which soceity wouldn't function. Imagine if those who peform the duties to keep soceity running decided fuck it, no one is the boss of them and didn't do their jobs. They will be replaced by those who will.

You know what else is an inherent human behavior? Our natural rise of complexity. Our species shall transcend, and once it inevitably does, capitalism and government will become obsolete. Mark my words.

>our species shall transcend
No it won't not until the false god of equality and diversity is smashed and scattered unto the wind. Society requires cohesion and cooperation voluntarily, not imposed by some fag who doesn't understand that cramming a whole bunch of people who hate each other and will never cooperate with one another because it's biologically programmed for them not to and no matter if you brainwash them for a hundred years without being enforced militarily its doomed to failure.

individuality and equality are mutually exclusive states of being.
your idea is retarded

I agree that society must function by voluntary action. I think humanity is on an inevitable rise to enlightenment, and at some point we will be able to create such a civilization that also has equality as a defining characteristic. It can come naturally, as long as the human mind evolves as it is supposed to.

In a truly free society, equality could not exist.

This guy was exposed with having aspergers and high anxiety. Kinda fits in with most socialist/commies.

Also, if this is you Libertarian Socialist, stop shilling on Sup Forums for views and get a job.

So you think evolution can be guided? that's fairly National Socialist position to have for a marxist such as yourself to admit.

What if I like the slave and master relationship?

If there's no equality, then the society isn't truly free.

Pic related

First of all, not a Marxist. Secondly, I think we should just change our education system to let students' studies focus more on history and the human condition. They should be able to examine it and make their own judgements. My approach to the evolution of the human mind is really just Socratic desu desu famalam.

get help, you mentally ill faggots. Your commie socialist ideology was made to use your emotions and turn you into useful idiots.

Is that supposed to be an argument

You people are not meant to exist. Mother nature is fascist. Your equality bullshit has failed numerous times.

If you believe in evolution, you're either a national socialist(even fascist), certainly not an anarchist.

Anarchists are meat shields for kikes, such as Lenin in 1917 with "muh workers rights"

The only argument you have is autistic screeching for not getting free shit, equal rights for races that want you dead just for being white and beating trashcans.

>If you believe in evolution, you're either a national socialist(even fascist), certainly not an anarchist.

Fucking bullshit. That argument doesn't make any sense.

equality is bullshit so fuck that

equal opportunity NOT equal outcome, git gud or get lost

I hope you're just shitposting on this thread. Otherwise your entire existence on this board is just a massive logical fallacy pleb

>If there's no equality, then the society isn't truly free.
Explain.

Great but we don't get to that posthuman wonderland without a lot of technological advances, which mean capitalism all the way. Go read Nick Land and hop on the accelerationist train.

>Capitalism means lack of freedom and equality
No, the Federal Reserve means lack of freedom and equality, in Capitalism, Dave and Buster's should be able to print their own money that is just as valuable as any other piece of capital to anybody willing to trade for it.

Well said.

You are prioritizing values of "equality" and "freedom" over survival. It may be possible for humanity to transcend hierarchy, but its only really reasonable if its survivable.

We don't even need to argue the merits of your ideas to see that their flawed. Reality is the testing ground for ideology. So where has a perfectly egalitarian society ever worked in history? And if there was one that I can't think of, why isn't it around today if its so advantageous?

Okay. Maybe things have changed. What makes society ripe for absolute equality today? What's so radically different? So far, neither you or the video have explained.

>wealth will not bring you any satisfaction in the long run.
In the long run you are just a corpse, incapable of satisfaction.

We know that nature is unequal. We promote competition and the continuity of the natural order. Improving our own race.

Leftists, marxists, commies and anarchists believe that gender and race don't matter, they just wanna mix everything up. Let the woman act like a man, and force other races into white territory thinking they will adopt white culture.

Man is an animal like every other animal, he must obey the laws of nature. Your degenerate trannie movements, pedo acceptance, fag propaganda and race mixing will destroy societies.

That's why you fail.

>freedom

haaaahahahah

having the state control you if you fall out of line isn't freedom

Can i rape white women and lolis? If so im in.

Because people will naturally acquire wealth and seek allies to become stronger, and you'll have government all over again. What we call "government" wasn't simply willed into place, it is a natural progression within human kind. Force your way back to anarchy, government will only re-emerge again.

I'm not 16 or a manchild

only inferior beings desire equality

Equality is by definition a restriction, which is and antithesis to freedom, since each equal individual is restricted to the abilities of the individual before them.

I lack a fedora so no thank you.

Not technological advances. Intellectual advances. Free and more developed education all the way.

If there is inequality, than one person is more able to do more things than another person. That means one person is less free.

Just as my replies to other posts in this thread, state, I believe that the human mind must evolve in a way before such a radically advanced ideology can take place and allow survival, freedom, and equality.

Alright. Then keep up with your hedonistic lifestyle.

I believe the laws of nature are different. What are you gonna do about it?

Please be b8. Do you fucking know what anarchism is.

This human "nature" you describe is all because of the current state of society, and it will change over time.

Unless equality is practiced voluntarily.

...

>If there is inequality, than one person is more able to do more things than another person. That means one person is less free.
You are confusing the definition of privilege with freedom. You are confusing the defintion of similarity with equality.
>than

I am an anarchist myself,but i advocate for Mad Max like society

Cause i am not stupid.
Sorry for your mental handicap btw.

Easy for you lot who didnt have any responsibility while i go to work 9-5 supporting my family, pay taxes and all other white supremacist things

>If there is inequality, than one person is more able to do more things than another person. That means one person is less free.
Are you trying to say that natural differences like intelligence and strength do not exist between people? Is everyone exactly the same?

Have fun waiting. It might be a while.

Nature isn't compatible with degeneracy. Your local trannie will never be a woman, same for your faggot friend that can't reproduce.

Blacks and arabs are very tribal(nothing wrong with tribalism) they just fail to see it. Currently whites aren't allowed due to white guilt, but tribalism is natural and exists in every race.

Africa for africans, asia for asians, Europe and North America for whites.

I've listened to your vids, now how about you get back to me once you see this, it's 12 minutes, i'm sure you have a good attention span.

youtu.be/DB9oUqIcX-c

Disagree. And sorry to offend you with that typo, I'm typing replies pretty quickly

capitalism is good

>create anarchist society
>people who don't like anarchist society bad together
>acquire land, resources, arms
>establish hierarchy and laws
>organize state is born
>organized state is more powerful, coordinated and richer than the average anarchist
>organized state starts expanding
>eventually other states form to stop the original state's expansion
poof. Anarchy is dead

>Unless equality is practiced voluntarily.
What does that even mean?
Are you proposing some sort of egalitarian religion?
Voluntary equality isn't something you can do at a state level and a self imposed restriction is still a restriction and you are still dependent on those around you to determine how to be most equal which is subjecting yourself to foreign control.

>intellectual advances

What are you even talking about? Society is cyclical, go read some Spengler. Nothing is new under the sun, all of this has happened before and will likely happen again. Technological growth is what's linear, not "intellectual growth". If you want to change the human mind, you'll need technological growth to do it.

...

Equality isn't real and imposing it as a Utopian ideal is unrealistic and in fact bad for society. Your version of freedom means the freedom to make the wrong choices. That isn't freedom but rather slavery to your desires.

Freedom and equality can't coexist. I'm more intelligent than you, making us unequal. Because you're so stupid, your bliss allows you to be more free than me.

This

The people wanting a communist state, don't understand they will havr to give up a lot of belongings to people who are much poorer, and you can do that already, it's called donation

because I am not 16

I either have freedom to discriminite or I don't have freedom.
Your argument is contradictory.

>eventually other states form to stop the original state's expansion
You don't need another other states to stop the expansion, the interests of that state just have to cause enough conflict with other interests to overwhelm it.

You can disagree but you are still incorrect.
In your example, the both people are free do to what they want. Freedom doesn't come in degrees. Either you are free or you are not. The person who is able to do more is because they have privilege.

>burger education

Capitalism was a big step toward equality back in the day of feudalism, and it was despised by aristocracy precisely because it put plebs on the same level playing field as them.

individual entities, no matter how bothered and affected they might be by the state's actions, are far too disorganized and lack the resources to compete with sovereign states. Yes, there might be scenarios where expansion is halted simply because the state became too big or its forces stretched too thin, but that would only happen after a pretty long expansion period

54th post best post

sorry, can't hear you

The expansion would scale with population, entropy doesn't need to be organized and a large loss is a lot easier to apply than large infrastructure gains. If a state couldn't provide for individuals, they couldn't retain individuals and the amount of resources by the opposition depends on how much external individuals could gain from the state's loss which means opposition resources scale directly with the state's resources.

>(((freedom)))
>((((((((((((((((((((equality))))))))))))))))))