Libertarian

>libertarian
>calls himself "pro white"

If you support open borders and civic nationalism, you can't be pro white. Period. Libertarianism can work in the future possibly, but right now it is not feasible and will not help fix this country. We need NatSoc or we will lose our country in our lifetime.

>b...b...but muh Cawnstuh tooo shun

The main concern behind libertarianism is free market enterprise, grounded in proven economics. Not a racial distinctive.

Socialism via natsoc is opposed to free market enterprise, a clear failure in execution

>implying you'll ever get national socialism
Keep dreaming. And not all of us are pro open borders or even anarchists.

im a libertarian for whites

>create ethno state with strong border protection by volunteer white militias
>BTFO shitskins trying to come in

inb4
>what if there are no volunteers
pic related

National Socialism is the same as Communism - a bunch of parasitic bureaucrats are given free reign to loot and kill whoever they want.

Collectivism itself is anti-white, as it deprives whites of the intellectual and economic freedom they need to thrive. Fascism is nothing more than the subordination and enslavement of the white race to the State.

thats why German engineering and technology was the most advanced and we snatched as many Kraut scientist as possible after the war?

Talented krauts had nothing to do with the government. Actually, the government was holding them back.

sauce? never heard this? I know from Hitlers expermiental weapons but is there an actual source on it?

>collectivism is anti-white
Jesus Christ Shlomo...are you really trying to imply that having a national socialist revolution here would somehow be WORSE for whites than our current system to keep replacing them??

How stupid do you think we are?

Feels like the perfect time to drop this image

What if you want to legalize weed and abortions and have gun rights and close the borders to keep the shit skins out and GTKRWN. What's that called?

>screencapping your own tl;dr post
>s-surely someone in the next thread will appreciate my grandstanding...

It's from two years ago

>brown people would never be able to compete in a free market!
>abolishes the minimum wage and makes brown people even more competitive since they already work for less

I love """Libertarians""" & """"""anarchists"""""" who are pro white, and pro state, and anti liberty.

Hitler had an old fashioned view on a lot of things, he had development on guns like stg44 (first assault rifle) impeded
But for the most part Hitler was pro-science and pro-exploration

>civic NATIONALISM
>open borders

Sweetie, you are dumb as a brick. Civic nationalism would put up so many demands on immigration, do you really think that more than a handful of non whites would meet the criteria? Civic nationalism in practice would boil down to white nationalism.

But the main focus of CIVIC nationalism, is civic rights. It prevents shit like NatSoc etc to take the rights of men. I was, my entire life a proponent of singe party fascist rule, but, single parry governments are so feebly corrupt and idiotic that I feel rather ashamed.

Civic nationalism is about not viewing the citizen as a cog in a machine, but an individual. Further more, civic nationalism is the antithesis of ethnic nationalism, and ethnic nationalism is no better than what open border maniacs preach.
No immigration is no better than open borders.
NatSoc is no better than Communism.

All extremists are the same, the same feeble disgusting vermin as their peers on rhe other side.

Besides
>lose your country
This is why nationalism sucks: your country is irrelevant. The survival of the European people and the western civilization is more important that your country.

>implying that minimum wage jobs will even exist in 20-30 years

>"Socialism via natsoc is opposed to free market enterprise, a clear failure in execution"

>National Socialism eliminates all poverty and unemployment in 6 years while turning a war torn and debt stricken country into an economic powerhouse leading in innovations that gave light to the technologies we use today.

Single party rule isn't inherently inefficient.

You may be right, but being a sweetie poster negates any point you're making

> The survival of the European people and the western civilization is more important that your country.
Last time I checked, ensuring the preservation of the European people didn't mean being over run by rape-crazed somalis and Arabs.

>No Immigration is no better than open borders
Those are two totally different things

>ethnic nationalism is no better than what open border maniacs preach
"demographically extinquishing your race = preserving your race by remaining demographically pure". lol ok.

>NatSoc is no better than communism
lol How? One is the absolute antithesis of the other. Tfw the word "Privatization" was created to describe your economic system but it's still the same as communism

That Jewish semen collecting in your large intestine can't be doing well for your mental health

>civic nationalism, in practice, is effectively white nationalism
>ethnic nationalists are extremist vermin
You're just a fence sitting pussy dude. You just admitted you want implicit white nationalism, but won't state it outright.

>American't thinks white is an ethnicity

Want another?

...

Powerful post.

>For Americans, it is.

Britbong education for you.

this is what civic nationalism boils down to. there is no such thing as a non-white american.

>muh freedumb muh rights
shove your hyper individualism up your ass nigger lover. you're the reason why we are where we are in the first place. civic nationalism is multiculturalism, period.

pic related you liberal faggot.

Today's poster children for libertarians might be for open borders, but being libertarian does not automatically mean you have to be pro open border. Early libertarians were very much against open borders/mass immigration because it would hurt the country.

...

...

Libertarianism doesn't necessarily mean open borders. I know that's a Sup Forums meme, but it just isn't true.

Libcaps do not support open borders, ancaps do

Corporations benefit from the cheap labor, but it lowers the gdp per capita

We respect freedom of movement not open borders see

Libertarians are too pussy and bluepilled on the connection between race, culture, and ideology to formulate a real, practical set of beliefs. They're liberals in right wing clothing and their passivity or disinterest in politics leads to them finding themselves under the boot of shitskins and their more extreme leftie friends rather than finding themselves wearing the boot alongside their brothers. You can't fucking opt out of being a human being. We are social animals and we will ALWAYS organize and use violence if it appears to benefit us more than our alternatives. You cannot outsmart human nature and convince every single person to be an emotionless ultrarational radical individual. They may pretend, but anyone backed into a corner will get violent. It's kill or be killed, there is no third option.

Nice meme kid.

Economic conservatism is impossible without first having social conservatism... You pretend like political science is still alive when it's dead, dead, dead. Ethnic interests are what's in play.

Not an argument, niggerlover

The libertardian must be destroyed in every situation for the national good. His entire philosophy revolves around _not_investing_ in the community in which he finds himself.

Everyone check this guy out. He thinks that every reply to his ignorant shitpost has to be in the format of something like a debate. Read a book slugger.

I would say the same about you, you fucking degenerate commie

*tips fedora without posting an argument*

...

...

But all capitalism is inherently globalist, it is for internationalist free trade, and no state borders just accelerates white demographic replacement. They are as anti-white as it comes.

I'd totally be for explicit white nationalism if ridding the country of every single nonwhite wouldn't require an MSM-tier bloodbath. I'll settle for implicit for the time being.

t. Bernie Sanders

I hate to tell you this, America.
National Socialism will NEVER take root in your nation.
You can still be ethnonationalists, but National Socialism is not in your future, not now, not ever.

You don't have a Nation, first of all. You'd have throw away the constitution and revert to the Article of Confederation. (HAHAHA)
and treat each State as it's own autonomous Nation-State within the American Empire.
Those states would have to choose National Socialism and each state would vary from geographic location to geographic location.

Plus, you aren't (now and never will be again) self sufficient.
You can't even farm the majority of your own food.

National Socialism is not for you.

>80 years later people are still falling for the socialist red herring
Hitler really was one of the smartest men who ever lived. Trump dreams of playing chess at this level.

That's because America was built on the rotten core of (((Democracy))) and every-man being equal in rights. It was only a matter of time until the Republic killed itself

Open borders and Civic nationalism are incompatible with libertarianism.

We're not liberal Democrats.