>Great leader who led his nation into prosperity >Militarist and great wartime leader >Very quickly strengthened industry >Led to an economic miracle >A proud patriot and nationalist of his nation >Supported a strong police force >Purged degeneracy from society >Anti-globalist, sent such globalists and shills to death camps >Reunited and strengthened the family after social progressives supported things such as feminism >Through his strengthening of the family, he eliminated single parents, orphans, unmarried adults, etc. >Loved by his people; had very strong national support >Possible one of the best world leaders to exist
Pic unrelated, I'm talking about a man none other than Joseph Stalin of course.
Kevin Moore
...
Jonathan Gonzalez
>economic miracle
Kek Stalin?
Jayden Butler
Yeah, Russia was quite backwards in the early 20th century. After the revolution and especially during Stalin's reign, the soviet economy rapidly grew and the nation industrialized very quickly.
Nathan Green
>great wartime leader
He was horrendous, literally just threw millions upon millions into a meat grinder for no reason other than to stay in power.
Jayden Mitchell
very slowly and shit compared to a nuked and firebombed japan. +a shit ton of slavs lives
Jaxson Turner
>millions into a meat grinder
Like how you guys tortured millions over some cotton which could have been produced more efficiently in factories?
Dylan Green
...
Brandon Nelson
1. Slavery was commonplace all over the world at that point 2. Niggers aren't human 3. Niggers being brought to American soil is the best thing that ever happened to them
There's no reason for me or anyone else to feel bad about any of it
Robert Price
>slowly becoming industrialized after every other major country had already been is a miracle
LOL!
Xavier Hill
It's more about how quickly they industrialized from a more backwards and poor society.
The Tsarist regime was terrible for Russia and they couldn't industrialize Russia like the Communists were able to.
Alexander Fisher
do you have any clue what the actual scope of slavery was in the united states? for example, how many citizens held slaves? or in what years did states start outlawing the practice?
its a little different from your government systematically slaughtering entire groups. nice good goy talking point though. try to grow up. your dont have to be a faggot your entire life
Jose Adams
>how many citizens held slaves Not many, because all the slave owners were southern bourgeoise that looted the southern working class too, those that didn't have slaves.
>what years did states start outlawing the practice Whenever they were, clearly those were only the northern states.
Easton Murphy
>slaughtering entire groups Whoever it was, they deserved it. Besides, the actual numbers of how many people were slaughtered are inflated and exaggerated by western Capitalist propaganda artists.
Caleb Lee
Yes they totally stopped being a backwards and poor society after Communism took over! LOL
Angel Diaz
yeah that's what happened... problem? The soviet economy had fucking double digit GDP growth for a period of time.
Grayson Gomez
Holodomor killed a fucking lot of Ukrainians... are you saying around 10 million Ukrainians deserved to die for Communism?
Wyatt Ramirez
don't forget the 11 million kraut
Carson Baker
Wow I'm guessing that means that millions didn't starve to death and their economic system didn't fail completely! HAHAHA delusional commies are the funniest.
Leo Taylor
then don't forget the six gorillion you commie :)
Kayden Martinez
You're fucking retarded and don't understand Russian culture or what life was like during that time.
>family unit The state became the family, see Pavlik. >police Secret police who would take you in the night for expressing any form of dissent because your neighbor happened to be an informant. Gulag Archipelago, read it. >economy Retard
Simply by being here you hold viewpoints which are contrarian enough to get you killed.
Ryder Ortiz
Millions starved to death not by the fault of the government or Stalin. That was because the kulaks burned their whole fucking farms because they were too lazy to give half of their produce to the government so they could feed their population.
And their economic system didn't fail either, the Soviet economy grew very well.
Logan Mitchell
Stalinism, and the cult of personality around him enabled the seizing of land en-masse, resulting in its poor management, resulting, directly, in the horrible starvation, torture and death of MILLIONS of Russians, to a degree as to make Hitlers ordered executions and internments less fearsome by comparison.
Hitler might have been naughty. Stalinism was a true monster, he just didn't piss DA JEWS off as much.
Jaxon Thompson
The leaf strikes again!
>oh the state trying to transition society to the next stage of humanity was so bad because they killed a few people that were supporting bourgoise oppression!
Ayden Ward
Don't you mean all their equipment was seized so they could hardly produce anymore? And you're talking about when the Soviets burned and ran right?
>their economic system didn't fail
HAHA! It must be nice living in fairy tale land. Yes their GDP went up great it was amazing having most of your population die or be in work camps does wonders per capita.
