time.com
Men that attack women online are scientifically proven to be losers.
The truth hurts doesn't it. You alt right faggots going on about how women don't deserve rights or respect just do it because you're losers and strong women are a threat to your fragile ego.
Other urls found in this thread:
Archived archive.is
>time magazine
why are you reading trash?
>reaching this hard from a few games of Halo
Into the trash it goes
I respect women online and attack them physically in person.
>low-status men with low dominance have more to lose and are therefore more hostile to women who threaten their status in the social hierarchy
Just more white male shaming from the media. White men have given women more rights than any other society and time and time again women have proven that they will throw their men under the bus with the rights we gave them. Arabs, Asians and Indians dont have problems with their women because they know that letting women have rights will undermine their society.
This.
Women who attack men are literally fat feminazis. Literally the same quality of of statement.
>time magazine
at some point you just start treating these shitrags like a random blog posts by retards, because they are
^this
It's to lure them in
Most "women" online are men with HRT pills and neon colored hair.
most women who attack men are feminists
only in the video game and weeb communities
we have nothing to lose, so we might as well tell the truth about these lunatic overly medicated bitches.
The study's (((leading researchers))) are literally Eastern European Jews.
(((time)))
Maya Rhodan
Jul 21, 2015
>A new study purports to show what we all could have guessed: Men who attack women online are actual losers.
>A pair of researchers examined interactions between players during 163 games of Halo 3 to determine when men were most likely to exhibit sexist, anti-social behavior toward their female peers.
>According to the study, which was recently published in the journal PLOS One, men who were worse players than their peers tended to hurl more nastiness at female gamers. On the other hand, men who knew their way around the console were nicer to male and female players.
>The researchers say the findings support an “evolutionary argument” that low-status men with low dominance have more to lose and are therefore more hostile to women who threaten their status in the social hierarchy.
>“As men often rely on aggression to maintain their dominant social status, the increase in hostility towards a woman by lower-status males may be an attempt to disregard a female’s performance and suppress her disturbance on the hierarchy to retain their social rank,” researchers write.
>The findings also support the growing body of anecdotal and research-based evidence that women face harsh blowback when they enter into and thrive in male-dominated corners of the Internet.
>As the Washington Post points out, however, the study does not offer any solutions on how to solve the issue.
>implying a study establishes fact
kek
Alpha Chads attack women IRL.
so, attacking a woman in person makes them winners then?
With there dicks though
This is the state of the modern press. So confused about who their enemies are, so threatened by any little thing, that they are actually attacking kids play CoD who rage after getting killed.
End sexism. Fuck a loser.
>time
>2015
>study looked at 143 games if Halo 3 and looked at when men would attack women
>people losing would attack women more than people winning, therefore all men that attack women are beta losers
Really makes you think
Third time this is posted in two days. Avoid shill threads.
>The researchers say the findings support an “evolutionary argument” that low-status men with low dominance have more to lose and are therefore more hostile to women who threaten their status in the social hierarchy.
what
also lol at evopsych being suddenly okay when it's used against men. stay consistent shitlibs
thanks norbro. good dubbles
this seems to indicate that the losers are the ones who are nicer to women, i.e. the people who are better at video games (the ones who sit at home playing them more and have more practice)
What a stupid article
>played a few rounds of halo with pre-selected losers
>some losers were bigger losers than others
>scientific proof
fuck this im going to bed