POLL: DO YOU SUPPORT A STRIKE ON NORTH KOREA?

If North Korea follows through and sends missiles at or near Guam, would you support an American retaliation on them in the form of a missile strike?

strawpoll.me/13677533

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=G8Gk2yZcDNM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

yes, i've been craving some korean BBQ

What if the death and suffering horrifies me but I'd sure love to read the habbening thread on Sup Forums?

>do you want a hebbenin
of course

No.

100% yes, and not just because I have a morbid sense of entertainment but it's a situation that really needs to get sorted out once and for all

HERE WE GO

SHADILAY

Checked
We want habbeingz

Only because the habbening threads will be epic

fuck you op I'm gonna fudge your results

that's a big set of repeats

AND HERE

WE

GO

Norks are redpilled and pretty natsoc. No.

Deus vult

>quints get
ROASTED COMMIES AND CHINKS NAO

Of course.

Better now than 10 years from now.

fuck yeah I want to see some american pig and degenerate chink die. BEST WAR EVER

no, millions of innocent ppl getting blasted does not get my support.

whos the faggot that said no

do we even need to wait for them to strike first? why cant we strike first?

I truly believe it's a sign of the times we live in; this need of important events in our lifetime. it's not like any of us here actually want anybody to die. I sure don't.

Kim is controlled opposition like all the others. He studied in Switzerland. Like Lenin did before he moved to Russia to start the Revolution.

>2027
>North Korea now has MIRV technology and multiple SLBM subs around the world
>People bitch and blame blompf for not stopping them while he was in office

kys cancer

I like how your digits repeat themselves

No I don't want to see retaliation on NK but unfortunately it will have to be necessary to end the conflict

no. all this posturing is about globalism. nk dont want no jew shit in their country, and they want a means of punishing nations who attempt to do that. now they supposedly have it. they will posture and posture until someone attacks, giving them a reason to retaliate.

Pretty much.

SK and others will start arming up with their own nuclear weapons. NK will start making more and more to a point that they're a credible threat to any power.

It's going to be, stop NK now, or nukes for everyone.

I don't want Muslim countries to be all armed.

The North Gooks will retaliate by bombing the South Gooks and we will have far less Gooks to worry about.

This is it, nukes will fly!

It would be a great happening but memes aside we'd need to understand the consequences that would come from it. An unprovoked attack threatening the lives of US citizens is enough to warrant war, but the real question is if it needs to be nuclear. Just think of the lefty outcry from yuropoors about "muh diplomacy." If we were to bomb best korea it should be on millitary bases and energy plants because bombing civilians will undoubtedly anger our allies.

Heilige Scheiße!

I support an insurgency , that the leaders would be taken as in arrested to be charged in the Hauge , or killed. Meanwhile other teams infiltrate the top brass position and at least cut communications to cause confusion. The third team would neutralize the nukes , and all missiles capable of biological and nuclear arms , as well as the mortar nests. Then when the forces have ben diminished in a flash war , loads and load of trucks filled with goods from all over the world could be immediately shipped into the country , to let all the people there have the same benefits of cooperation that we enjoy immediately when there is no fascist who is deluding the ignorant and arrogant among the masses who are next to scheme for power. That the people would immediately then be basically left alone if they wish , all forces immediately pulled back , with kim and all his henchmen and generals dead or jailed. If they wish us to remain the UN could aid the North Koreans with rebuilding and support while they reemerge and become part of the world at large. Trade would increase worldwide and goods and services would create new jobs and fields of research. New medicines and new advances through cooperation could emerge. When the people are free to their own minds instead of bread to follow the mind of a sociopath they can't be easily dominated. The world would increase in production and health. Life expectancies would rise and we would make discoveries undreamt of by our ancestors....too bad most can't see that , we are still dragging knuckles...

No, I think we should just let them keep nuking us.

YES! Please nuke us so I don't have to put up with this shit anymore!!!

Yes. Ill be looking from a far

whites having kids just fine nigger pill whore and mind you we only need a 4th and even less to kill every last one of you ,,,why your so adamant crying about it ..How about those you try to destroy rise up and say no and in turn use power you cannot possess and destroy your masters first that crippled you into thinking a fallacy was possible lol you wasted your shitskin life

1776+1984=1488

Fuck yeah

No and here is why.

North Korea isn't a threat, they're a growing sovereign country going through growing pains.

The world is placing pressure on them to see if there mature enough to hold the power they now possess, to see if they can exercise restraint.

They're being tested. If they fuck up, they'll be obliterated.

If Kim can exercise restraint, eventually they will be recognized and shown respect. The sanctions will come down, and maybe we'll even have diplomatic relations with them.

It's all up to Kim. He can fuck up, or choose to be a great leader of his country and hold back on his aggressions.

Tomorrow at 8pm???

What did kek mean by this?

Yes because I know Kim is hiding his power level and (((Trump))) is going to get cucked.

There = they're

No, I'd rather Cali or Guam get hit than see one dead North Korean. One North Korean life is worth ten America lives

...

>KILLARY WILL START WW3 FUCK THAT BITCH
>trump starting ww3 is fine

Hypocrital cunts

Korea isn't the world
Russia doesn't care
China doesn't care

How is this ww3

So If I live next door to you , and yeah maybe you are an egotistical fuck , but I start pointing a rifle at you and your family , you just gonna say "oh well , he has every right to do that , he's just got mental issues and growing , after all remember what he went through before he was born 50 years ago" ...dude....wheres' your balls. There is actual evil in the world , and evil wins only when good men do nothing.

The United States and many other nations from around the world have tirelessly tried to solve issues with North Korea diplomatically and they have all fallen short. North Korea is a rogue nuclear power that routinely attacks its neighbors in the south and threatens periodic nuclear annihilation to countries like Japan, South Korea, Guam, and others near the Chinese peninsula. Idea Id like for Trump to put China into a position where their forced to respond and make regime change which is why I think he's flexing and pushing North Korea to look more radical. But in either case something needs to be done because North Korea is only going to increase its nuclear capabilities and black male the world with nuclear annihilation to achieve it's geopolitical goals. The era of strategic patience with North Korea over

Yes. Unlike Syria, it's clear who the enemy here is. I would also be a conventional war unless North Koreans decide to drag it like Vietnam. It'd be a fun happening.

>korea isn't at the nexus of a shit load of other states
>russia doesn't care about America using nukes
>china doesn't care about nukes on its doorstep and on it's ally

How is it not

You understand OP is asking if you support a missile strike on NK if NK does a missile strike on Guam first right?

DEUS VULT!!!

how does a missile strike kill millions of people?

You can't argue with American education, it's flawless.

If you point a rifle at me from your own property, without firing, that's your right. I can address the community and try to put pressure on you to stop. Soon as you for a shot, we could all attack and push you out.

We're waiting for them to make the first move, an attack on or around guam might be all we need

I think you mean Sup Forums

You put a nuclear warhead on it?

Then yes I do. If they strike Guam, or any of our allies, they should be obliterated

>international law works like how i live on my porch

...

Dude bullshit - it is against the actual law to do that it is called a terroristic threat. Your rights end when you threaten mine.

Top kek

that makes sense I guess...
So OP is talking about a nuculear attack? It's not quite clear.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

As a matter of fact if your past history exhibits a record of like behavior , a pattern over time they will lock you away for longer.

What is Kek trying to say?

...

If you pointed a rifle at me on my property I'd shoot your dumbass. And I would be well within the law to do so.

Also this

Of course, there hasn't been a good old entertaining massive loss of life in years, we're well overdue for a war.

Fried gooks

Was getting quints a part of your plan?

shiggy diggy

HOLY SHIT, SOUTH KOREA BEING EVACED, PUT ON CNN! THEY'RE BEING EVACED OUT!

1.Launch ICBMs at California.
2.Blame Korea
3.Nuke Korea

Win win

I'm for nuking enemies.

that means china and North korea

Fuck off war monger

>Do you support the kikes overthrowing one of the last independent nations on the planet?

Glass nork. And china while were at it.

>If you pointed a rifle at me on my property I'd shoot your dumbass.

don't we have nukes pointed at NK?

Hell yeah, fuck NK

Kek wills it

Im all in for a strike but not nuclear. US, Japan, and SK should have a while back. Now we are in a position where nuclear war could very well happen.

> 80% yes
I remember when Sup Forums believed "AMERICA FIRST" and that Hillary was going to start WWIII.

Odd how that changes when it's Trump in office.

No, too many innocents will die

>I remember when Sup Forums believed "AMERICA FIRST" and that Hillary was going to start WWIII.
>Odd how that changes when it's Trump in office.

>these two scenarios are exactly the same

...

maybe not a missile strike, because we got to show a little more control than North Korea

nukes in 30 seconds

That dumb bitch wanted to start ww3 with russia.

Of course, I support retaliation.

I'd be surprised if NK strikes first. The Kim regime cares first and foremost about staying in power. They want a seat at the table without fear of US meddling.

...

youtube.com/watch?v=G8Gk2yZcDNM

maybe in secret he is more based, than we might think

Keep telling yourself that user as you support more ZOG wars.

Probably even more now since we could get into a nuclear war. Should have attacked when casualties would have been at a minimum.

But what do I know about war. Im just a faggot pol poster.

right, so isn't NK defending our threat justified? we threatened them first

...

Shit, maybe the Norks have been the good guys all along.