LIBERTARIANS DON'T EXIST

Freedom is a meme.

nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/new-study-shows-what-really-happened-in-the-2016-election.html
archive.is/HcuVM

Other urls found in this thread:

huffingtonpost.com/pierre-omidyar/the-democracy-fund_b_2489430.html
unvis.it/huffingtonpost.com/pierre-omidyar/the-democracy-fund_b_2489430.html
youtube.com/watch?v=JVDArGTo2fY
nymag.com/author/Jonathan Chait/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Who was in the wrong here?

So according to them, Trump voters are literally fascists and Clinton voters are hippie-tier. One can only hope.

Shitty metric.

I personally would call myself more "socially conservative" or at least moderate

Difference is I don't believe I should impose those principles on others

Needs a third "-1: my way or the highway / +1: FUCK OFF" dimension

This comes from an organization that was founded by a guy who wrote for Huffingglue.

huffingtonpost.com/pierre-omidyar/the-democracy-fund_b_2489430.html

It's time to stop. She lost. It's over.

Archive
unvis.it/huffingtonpost.com/pierre-omidyar/the-democracy-fund_b_2489430.html

That's okay m8. I'm a monarcharist in the current year which will go nowhere either.

>Yellow dots show literally no pattern whatsoever

Libertarians are also fucking retards across the board.

Holy shit you guys are complete fucking hippies. It's pathetic

>Libertarians are also fucking retards across the board.

How so?

It's not that libertarians don't exist dipshit.
It's that libertarians don't vote.
Because libertarians have no faith in a process that itself is utterly insane.

Yellow is OTHER not necessarily Libertarian

the 4th quandrant has more blue than red

who the fuck is going to pilot our helicoptors now! fuck gold salesmen fags

As much as I hate to say it, the ancom is right.

I'm not an an com.
I'm a voluntarist. I don't care what you do as long as you fuck off.

Well you do have the ancom flag so I just kind of assumed.

I like how there's exactly 1 perfectly aligned libertarian and 1 perfectly aligned liberal anarchist but no perfectly corner aligned authoritarians from either side

It's an anarchist flag. It's not ancom.

Just speaking in terms of politically, and Americans mostly (which graph represents), but because there is no "libertarian core" like there is for Republicans/"conservatives", or Democrats/"liberals" (non party names used loosely)
I mean I can attest to just on this site and Facebook alone that a considerable amount of libertarians didn't even support Gary Johnson. How can there be a core when people can't even get behind their party's leader? This leads to people always having "their" definition of libertarianism. Some are AnCaps, some are AnComs, some are AnMutualist (AnMu?), some are relics from the Tea Party days that just want slightly less government intervention and more personal freedom to own guns, refuse service to faggots or anyone, etc.

Yeah this also applies to Jill Stein supporters too though, which although might call themselves libertarian. That's what I always figured anyway.
Those are the two largest and most significant "others" anyway.
Oh and McMuffin aye?

If you can find a meaning for red other than communism, then good for you.

Because the hardcore libertarians don't want anything to do with mainstream politics, they're more interested in getting people to see the pointlessness of the whole thing rather than trying to pick the least painful option.

Libertarians don't generally have faith in a political process they themselves think is illegitimate, and thus don't tend to engage in that illegitimate process.
Being principled isn't being retarded.

I use it because "anarchist" has no connotations other than "anarchist". If you're adding them in your own head that's your problem.

These people voted though.

Good for them.

The article is conflating a small number of libertarians voting as being indicative that there are a very small number of libertarians period.
Which is absurd given it ought to be intuitively obvious to anyone who knows anything about libertarianism that of all ideologies they'd be the very least likely to try to use an election process to try to achieve a given goal.

Doesn't this prove that Conservatives are more middle of the road?

The red blob is almost straddling the y axis.

The blue blob is way off in the fucking corner in commie land.

I voted trump. fall in the lower right and am registered republican. deal with it.

as a libertarian this doesnt shock me. most people are retarded, of course we are the extreme minority

I ended up somewhere blue on that chart, voted Trump, they can't say that the blue voted for Clinton. My whole family wanted Bernie, crazy libs, all but two voted Trump. My father voted for Bernie anyways because he's a bit of a defeatist cuck

AHAHAHAHA
>b-b-b-b-but muh lolberg utopia is so rational and it corresponds with human nature! it's a real political school of thought!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

...

>socially conservative, economically liberal
National Socialist takeover when?

Fuck yes.

phew.... looks like our roads are safe for another day

>Years ago, a central banker killed my partner.

>Don't exist
>Are vastly outnumbered by disgusting normies and Nazis
Two different things.

Also: popularity is not an argument.

>popularity is not an argument.
I agree that it shouldn't be. As long as we have elections though it will be.

With "Libertarians" like Gary Johnson leading the charge, I'm not surprised

Well I guess I should have specified that the retarded libertarians I was referring to are the ones that chose to vote and recognize the system of government still in place, because for now and until any revolution happens in the West which is virtually impossible now they're the only ones that matter.
I stand by my retarded across the board statement.

At this point, we don't really give a shit about federal politics, and why anyone would be I don't understand. Secession is a much better strategy than fucking voting.

Libertarians who vote are misguided, yes.
>I stand by my retarded across the board statement.
Drown in maple syrup canuck fuck

>As long as we have elections
>we

I think libertarians that vote shoot themselves in the foot in terms of credibility, but there's a way of looking at it as a gesture that I can see some credence in.

youtube.com/watch?v=JVDArGTo2fY

I call bullshit.
1) The plot uses some some VERY poorly defined axis. This is not, I repeat, this is NOT the "usual" political compass axis. Without seeing their questionnaire and methodology this shit is worthless and can mean whatever the fact they want.
2) Polls don't show adequate picture (as we've seen with 2016 elections polling).

>right wing social views
>big government impact on the economy

sounds kinda like socialism, but on a national level

Fucking idiots who did not understand the election trying to explain ''what happened'' during it.
What the fuck is wrong with these faggots? They made libertarians non-existent.
In 2015 I was a libertarian. In 2015 at least half of Sup Forums was libertarian or libertarian leaning.
The election, all the crazy shit that the left did made people abandon libertarianism and become either Republican or fascist.
They made it happen, and now they're going ''hurr hurr check this out, the voters are either hardcore left SJW sub-humans or they're fascists!''

WTF, how far to the left are the blue dots? How can Democrats complain about being called commies after this?

The conclusion was literally drawn based on a bad data display. IQ of whoever did this is literally too low to even interpret data. Look at the points cluttering on the left. Are you saying that all liberals are literally fanatic communists who don't believe in an ounce of individual freedom? This data is merely not properly displayed.

nymag.com/author/Jonathan Chait/
>poltical shill journalist who can only write about how leftists are good and drumpf and republicans are hitler
>interprets data in an absurdly retarded way to claim "see, republicans also want leftism" when they actually don't.
Emagine mui shok

This.
You don't have to be a degenerate to believe in the right to be a degenerate

It's not even that, it's that you can oppose degeneracy without wanting to imprison degenerates on the public dollar.

libtertarians don't vote.

Killing or deporting them is cheaper.

that's called being retarded (not shown on the graph)

clinton is libertarian left? who the fuck made htis compass? shes center left at best and more realistically center right

We punch above our weight because you know we're actually right.
We talk to your moral concern for caring for your fellow man. We talk to it in the long-term.
We say it is not enough to show caring right now. You must care ten years from now. Twenty years from now. Sixty years from now. A century from now. Not just in public, in the ways everyone respects, but privately and thoroughly, in the ways you know will work.
Whosoever cares for people in THAT way on THAT timespan will also be a capitalist.

the free market will fix it

the conclusion sentence of your pic is that national socialists are underrepresented in politics