When will Sup Forums stop blaming the jews for everything and realise capitalism is the real problem?
Jews look like they are pulling the strings but in reality that's because jews are the best at exploiting others through capitalism, which requires usury to function.
If we get rid of capitalism, we get rid of the jew. You can't claim to be politically incorrect whilst shilling for the status quo of capitalism and neoliberalism.
so true
And all top commies are also Jews.
If only there was some 3rd way
*revs up helicopter*
Care for a free ride, communist filth?
Anyone who believes "Cultural Marxism" is real is a fucking moron.
No thanks, jew.
>economic mastery
kek
someone post the original
Shut up and read The Culture of Critique, and then become redpilled.
...
Please go read the definition of "usury".
Marxists and socialists of all types have always been against usury.
>lolbergtardian
>defending usurers
Why am I not surprised?
>cultural marxism isn't real
>that's totes why nobody cares about my ideology anymore
Dude, maxists evolved. You're stuck in the past with ideology unappealing to 21st century workers. You may not call it "cultural marxism" but the bottom line is that they marxists of the past based on their own mistakes figured out what has appeal, and you didn't.
I agree fuck capitalism but it's better than communism. Third position or economic centrism is optimal.
Defacing Garrison
Unoriginal
Sad
Communism is a system for concentrating wealth into the hands of the Jews, not distributing it to the hands of the working class.
Ethnic nationalism combined with the best parts of both Fascism and Capitalism is what kills the jew.
Marx believed in absolute truth, which we should strive to determine through dialectics.
"Cultural marxists" believe the opposite, they believe everything is a social construct.
Remind me how they are marxists.
>self identifying sjw thinks his own ideology isn't real
Or
>educate yourself
>i did, who is herbert marcuse
>CONSPIRACY THEORY
You just get triggered by that word which is part of the reason people use it. Typical commie who has to control language to make an argument
jewish usury is the real pryoutube.com
What you're angry at is postmodernism, not the Franks.
...
>who has to control language to make an argument
Except that's exactly what you're doing by inventing the strawman of "cultural marxism".
Fuck off.
>reeeeeeeeeee
>Remind me how they are marxists.
They were marxists, they saw communism has no appeal in the west, then they constructed new school of thought.
You can say that they stopped being marxists if you want, I'll just call them "cultural marxists" and remember the distinction.
...
>giving my money to blacks and spics so they can support their twenty kids
Yeah, no thanks. Get back to me after you clean out the ghetto
>new school of thought.
>new school of thought
>new school of thought
Not real marxism then
Liquidate the bourgeoisie onii-chan
Not defending the USSR, but in their defence being unemployed was illegal so Jamal and Shaniqua would be sent to the gulag.
Never said it was "da real marxism". That's why we use the qualifier.
How exactly does it concentrate wealth into the hands of the Jews? That's capitalism you fucking moron
leftcantmeme.jpg
Most capitalists aren't even Jews. There are probably more WASPs on Wall St. than Jewish people.
>Communism is a system for concentrating wealth into the hands of the Jews
Funny that, because that's exactly what capitalism does
You fucking retards weren't alive when capitalism took a hold. Most of you cunts should die with your welfare monkey counterparts. Expect others to feed your family, what a fucking dogshit society. I hope cum guzzling lil Kim starts ww3 so you cunts realize how good capitalism was in true form. Cannibals and death. I want the population to decrease 90%. Famine and rivers of blood. You asked for this.
>he read Animal Farm and misinterpreted the pigs as capitalists instead of commies
Looks like little Johnny just finished his first Nietzsche
commies will burn you faggots
>Orwell was anti-communist
Babby's first reading comprehension pitfall. Funnily enough I'm actually related to Orwell.
Pics of birth certificate or it didnt happen
Good goyim! Communists are the real enemies!
Obviously my surname isn't Orwell you mong.
When we all become mentally retarded
>implying poor people deserve the same happiness as the rich
Capitalism is fine the problem is that we lump land into capital even though it has unique and distinct characteristics.
Real problem we face in this world is unearned income and the rentier class.
A man named Henry George came up with a solution to this miss nearly 100 years ago. Georges ideas were so earth shatteringly radical that (((THEY))) had to come up with new economics and subvert the language to put him down. Anyone really interested in solving the problem of inequity should read Progress and Poverty.
Tax land not man
National Socialism is not capitalism you retard
...
But jews use capitalism to their advantage
It's called intersectional feminism idiot. I don't give a shit what you call it, but stop saying shit like critical race theory is made up
Georgism is the answer; ill be dropping Georgepills itt until someone can refute. Good luck ancaps/commies
>Georgeism reconciles common land rights with private tenure, free markets and modern capitalism.
>Those who got the upper hand by securing land tenures would support public services, so wages and commerce and capital formation could go untaxed.
>To pay the taxes, landowners would have to use the land by hiring workers (or selling to owner-operators and owner-residents). This would raise demand for labor; labor, through consumption, would raise demand for final products.
>To pay the workers, landowners would have to produce and sell goods, hereby raising supply and precluding inflation. Needed capital would come to their aid by virtue of its being untaxed. Thus, George would cut the Gordian knot of modern dilemma-bound economics by raising demand, raising supply, raising incentives, improving equity, freeing up the market, supporting government, fostering capital formation, and paying public debts, all in one simple stroke.
>George's proposal enables us to lower taxes on labor without raising taxes on capital. Indeed, it lets us lower taxes on both labor and capital at once, and without reducing public revenues.
> Georgist tax policy reconciles equity and efficiency. Taxing land is progressive because the ownership of land is so highly concentrated among the most wealthy,'8 and because the tax may not be shifted. It is efficient because it is neutral among rival land-use options: the tax is fixed, regardless of land use. This is one favourable point on which many modern economists actually agree, although they keep struggling against it
Communism was made by (((them))), for (((them))), and with blessings from (((them)))
> Georgist tax policy contains urban sprawl, and its heavy associated costs, without overriding market decisions or consumer preferences, simply by making the market work better. land values are the product of demand for location; they are marked by continuity in space. That shows quite simply that people demand compact settlement and centrality. A well-oiled land market will give it to them.
> Georgist tax policy creates jobs without inflation, and without deficits. "Fiscal stimulus," in the shallow modern usage, is a euphemism for running deficits, often with funny money. George's proposed land tax might be called, rather, "true fiscal stimulus". It stimulates demand for labor by promoting employment; it precludes inflation as the labor produces goods to match the new demand. It precludes deficits because it raises revenue. That is its peculiar reconciliatory genius: it stimulates private work and investment in the very process of raising revenue. It is the only tax of any serious revenue potential that does not bear down on and suppress production and exchange. As I have noted, George's fiscal policy takes two problems and composes them into one solution.
> George's land tax lets a polity attract people and capital en masse, without diluting its resource base. This is by virtue of synergy, the ultimate rationale for Chamber-of-Commerce boosterism. Urban economists like William Alonso have illustrated the power of such synergy by showing that bigger cities have more land value per head than smaller ones. (Land value is the resource base of a city.) Urbanists like Jane Jacobs and Holly Whyte have written on the intimate details of how this works on the streets. Julian Simon (The Ultimate Resource) philosophizes on the power of creative thought generated when people associate freely and closely in large numbers. Henry George made the same points in 1879
I respect Georgists for being free thinkers, unfortunately with skyscrapers your theory has been outmoded.
>what is state capitalism
are you baiting or just retarded
>Georgist policies encourage the conservation of ecology and environment while also making jobs, by abating sprawl. It is a matter of focusing human activity on the good lands, thus meeting demands there and relieving the pressure to invade lands that are now wild and marginal for human needs. Sprawl in the urban environment is the kind most publicized, but there is analogous sprawl in agriculture, forestry, mining, recreation and other land uses and industries.
>Georgist policies strengthen public revenues while in the same process promoting economy in government. Anti-governmentalists often identify any tax policy with public extravagance. Georgist tax policy, on the contrary, saves public funds in many ways. By facilitating the creation of jobs it lowers welfare costs, unemployment compensation, doles, aid to families with dependent children and all that. It lowers jail and police costs, and all the enormous private expenditures, precautions, and deprivations now taken to guard against theft and other crime. Idle hands are not just wasted, they steal and destroy
They literally just took the phrase critical theory and inserted the word race into it. But oh no this has nothing to do with critical theory, that's just a made up lie by "neoliberals"
Dishonest lying piece of shit
The "Global Elite Bankers" are all Jewish bilderberg members, and we have been trying to tell you this for years. Capitalism isn't the problem, oligopolies and monopolies are...
Wtf i love critical theory and Gramsci nao
...
i dont follow my friend. Under a Georgist paradigm building skyscrapers would be encouraged as the value of your land itself would be taxed regardless of improvements
>no this has nothing to do with critical theory, that's just a made up lie by "neoliberals"
Correct
>Not real marxism then
Hah it never is, is it ?
Not an argument.
>SAGE
>HIDE
>REPORT
“Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of blooksuckers, a single gluttonnous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild.
This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which. speculates on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail ....” Mikhail Bakunin
Never forget this quote Sup Forums burn it into your memory even if you forget every other redpill remember this one
...
>le dank helicopter may may
What is this 2015 ?
>Someone disagrees with me! Report them!
Did I violate your safespace?
>commie "economics"
>BASIC LABOR AGREEMENTS ARE SLAVERY EVEN IF YOU ARE GETTING THE FULL VALUE OF YOUR LABOR!
>ROBOTS CAN'T PRODUCE SURPLUS VALUE!
>muh LTV
>THERE'S A HUGE PORKY CONSPIRACY THAT'S WHY I'm NOT RICH
it's called socialism
...
Says the retard employing the no true scotsman fallacy
Haha its just another retarded commie comes to Sup Forums gets BTFO and leaves episode you get used to it
...
Ad hominem, fallacy fallacy
also fun to note that the sock puppets on Sup Forums left and right have no idea how to respond to Georgism
from "Debunking Economics: The Naked Emporer Dethroned"
you committed a fallacy first
>t. George
>claims backed up by a single study from the Koch-funded heritage foundation
Really makes me think.
anarchist were redpilled, but those antifa kids today should kill themselves
Gramsci wasn't Critical Theory.
Can you supply evidence for your claim that usury is required for capitalism?
who taught you that?
>if the Heritage Foundation says something it's automatically wrong
>even if I can't explain why
kek. You don't even know what an inflation deflator is do you? You just blindly follow the "data" that agrees with you.
communism is a jewish invention too.
the true way is the third.
...
no shit retard but he greatly helped the praxis i put the and in there to distinguish between the two
>we're all equal user
>except for those evil porkies that are oppressing you and me!
>Capitalism isn't the problem, oligopolies and monopolies are...
The inevitable transition from small scale commodity production (little shops) to large industry requires capital to be raised though borrowing and investment.
Simple my man
>What follows is a tutorial on how to end poverty, slash housing prices and generally end all human misery with a few keyboard strokes
>Any government that is too lazy to delve into the economics can simply replace their land titles as follows.
>Here's what modern land titles normally look like. Government, pay attention: These are the ones you DON'T want to use.
>we'd all be richer under communism!
>if only we would abolish wage slavery (being able to choose your job) and basic finance!
The jews are capitalist. and communist.
The jews ARE the capitalists, you morons
Old school anarchists where very redpilled Proudhon was also an antisemite and believed anarchism could only work with europeans and Mahko was the foundation of national anarchism. Reading old school anarchists was my first redpill
>137003106
>Here's the correct kind. Replace your existing land titles with this template. Drink before reading; otherwise it'll make too much sense.
>If the red makes you think, "But whaddabout the rental value of the building? Shouldn't we leave that to the landowner? No. Legitimate improvement expenses will simply lower the rent bidders will bid for the land title. They'll keep it from the start.
>Tax Land Not Man
>generally end all human misery
pay rent or not, you still can't have a GF
Anyway I'm not against higher taxes for rent-seekers. You should look up the Coase theorem.